|
Sunday Dec 14, 2008
The Warped Mirror: Human rights at 60 Posted by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
Comments: 5
As many of the commentaries written to mark the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on December 10th have highlighted, the document was drafted at a time when the horrors of the Holocaust and World War II were still a fresh trauma. Back then, it was perhaps hard to imagine that human rights would once be cynically employed to play politics. But six decades on, it's even fashionable in some political circles to downplay the most deadly conflict since World War II and argue that, instead of wasting time and effort to address the humanitarian crisis in Congo - where war and violence have claimed more than 5 million lives since 1988 and as many as 45,000 people still die every month of war-related causes - the international community should rather focus on the suffering that Israel is supposedly imposing on Gaza. Indeed, when it comes to human rights in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, nothing is too preposterous in the year in which the UN proudly marks the 60th anniversary of its Declaration of Human Rights. Earlier this year, the UN's Human Rights Council (UNHRC) saw it fit to appoint a man who thinks Israel should be accused of committing a "holocaust" against the Palestinians as a "special investigator" on Israeli actions in the Palestinian territories. Of course, it is not only the UNHRC and its "special investigator" that constantly worry about the Palestinians, since there is also a UN agency dedicated solely to the needs of Palestinians: UNRWA, which is currently gearing up to mark its 60th anniversary next December and which happens to be the largest UN agency in terms of the number of staff employed - between 25,000 and 30,000, of which 99 percent are Palestinians. Yet another example of the lack of any sense of restraint in using the issue of human rights for political pandering was provided when the President of the UN General Assembly, Miguel d'Escoto Brockmann, tried to prevent Israel's ambassador, Professor Gabriela Shalev, from speaking at a special commemorative plenary session marking the 60th anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights. Obviously, the idea of listening to a speech by Israel's UN ambassador couldn't appeal much to a man who, back in September, had a warm embrace for the Iranian President after he heard him deliver his version of the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" to the UN General Assembly. Unfortunately for the General Assembly President, European representatives rejected his attempt to prevent the Israeli UN ambassador from delivering her address, but Brockmann wouldn't give up so easily and announced that he insisted to then also invite a representative of the Arab bloc to give a speech. It's safe to assume that Brockmann's move was not motivated by any desire to learn about the state of human rights in the Arab world - but as it happens, a new report about this subject has just been published by the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS). The institutes main conclusion is "that the status of human rights in the Arab region in 2008 has increasingly worsened." With regard to the Palestinian territories, the CIHRS report decries "the continuing criminal practices of the Israeli Occupational Forces", but, unusually, the report also points to "the bloody internal conflict between Hamas and Fatah", noting "that for the first time, the number of Palestinians killed as a result of internal fighting has exceeded the number killed as a result of Israeli attacks. Fatah and Hamas have outdone one another in their maltreatment of prisoners from the other side, engaging in the worst types of abusive practices." Perhaps even more unusual than this open criticism of Palestinian human rights abuses is the report's claim that Arab states are not only becoming more repressive at home, but that the increased internal repression "has been accompanied by earnest attempts to export increasing domestic repression outside the Arab region through the international mechanisms of the UN and the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership Initiative." That these efforts to "export" repression are considerably more successful than one would hope on the 60th anniversary of the Declaration of Human Rights is vividly illustrated by a report about "Islam's Challenges To 'Universal Human Rights'" on the Radio Free Europe website. But the sorry state of the discourse about human rights is perhaps most dramatically illustrated by a bit of googling, because this arguably shows where people think they should worry about human rights abuse - here are the results I got:
1 |
Petra, Bat Yam,
Sunday Dec 14, 2008
WRT the Google results I should note that somebody contacted me to let me know that she got a very different, i.e. much lower, result on Israel. I've tried it again, and indeed also got a return of "just" around 4.5 million hits. However, since I copied the result line straight from the Google page when I did the experiment for this article here, I am absolutely sure that last week, I did get the 30million plus number as a result but apparently, the same search can yield vastly different numbers of "hits" at different times, i.e. it doesn't mean much. Sorry about not realizing this earlier!
2 |
akus md USA,
Sunday Dec 14, 2008
Thanks for drawing attention to the CIHRS report. A second article examining its findings in detail would be useful as it is buried towards the end of this article. I wrote in response to Brittain: Of all the shameful, shameless articles that have appeared on CIF regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, this is by far the worst.It is callous and wicked.To compare the ongoing slaughter, rape, starvation and pillaging of millions in Congo and Rwanda to the UNRWA supported Palestinians in Gaza is so totally despicable that one can hardly believe that Brittain was able to get it published.
3 |
Francis Pretzelberg,
Sunday Dec 14, 2008
What you fail to address, Petra, is why the figure for Iran re. googling human rights abuse is almost five times that for Congo ...
Plus you fail to provide any opinion on why there is so much coverage - not simply criticism - of the I/P conflict. When there's a suicide bombing in Israel, it's a top story in the Western media. Likewise when the IDF goes into Gaza. And also when Israeli and Palestinian representatives meet for negotations.
The issue is one of great interest to people in the Western world - and you know why.
p.s. the Hamas rally today with the mock Schalit figure - disgusting
4 |
peterthehungarian,
Monday Dec 15, 2008
Francis, Congo has no nuclear ambitions, and is not led by religious fanatics. The ongoing tragedy in Central-Africa has much less influence on the future of world peace than the regime in Iran. Naturally the world should do much more to stop this, not only googling but actively intervening. The solution of the I/P conflict (or lack of it) could cause huge changes in world politics so the interest in it understandable. (BTW I think that some minimal objectivity in covering the conflict by the mainstream media would help. (see Israeli police shoot bulldozer driver in Jerusalem - Guardian)
5 |
Bob Claus, Illinois, USA,
Tuesday Dec 30, 2008
I am an American and I agree with the fight with Hamas. I know it is wrong with the air power straggle of waging the fight in Gaza. I spent time in the US Marine Corps and we were always taught the only way to win was to put foot troops on the ground and destroy the enemy. Did your government not learn any thing from Lebanon. I wish their was a military who would learn from history. I pray for the peace of Jerusalem.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |