Walk in the footsteps of JFK

Clarifying Barack Obama's stance on Israel is secondary to figuring out how he understands the world. As the Obama Phenomenama grows, many who are not completely starry-eyed fear his foreign policy may be too starry-eyed. The 46-year-old senator's foreign policy can best be summarized in two words: "Leave Iraq."

Echoing the 1960s' get-out-of-Vietnam movement, this approach risks perpetuating the delusions of the Clinton 1990s he usually rejects, ignoring the ugly realities facing post-9/11 America.

As a former community organizer, Obama cares most about domestic issues. His experience overseas is limited - beyond his oft-distorted Indonesian sojourn when young. Like most Ivy League-educated idealistic Americans, he assumes compromises can be found for every foreign conflict, while viewing "evil" as a right-wing Republican spectre not a force in today's world. And considering how high he has soared with his charisma and eloquence, he naturally assumes he can handle any world leader, one on one.

Want the best president for Israel?

'Super-Duper" Tuesday is looming February 5. Americans will vote in 22 states, including New York, New Jersey and California, all with major Jewish populations. As Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama fight fiercely for the Democratic nomination, many pro-Israel voters are asking, "who is best for Israel"?

Truth is, despite the murmurings about the "Jewish vote" and the "Israel lobby," few American Jews today are such narrow one-issue voters. Amid American Jews' lamentable but growing disinterest in Israel, most American Jews are more multi-dimensional, and frankly, more passionate about other stances such as being pro-choice and anti-Bush. With American support for Israel so widespread and "apple pie," most mainstream candidates make enough pro-Israel noises to satisfy the casually pro-Israel American Jew.

About this blog

Center Field McGill history professor Gil Troy - a passionate moderate - looks at the American presidency, American history, Zionism, Judaism and Israel today.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Recent Comments

Philip Gretzky: they are exactly the places where there is a push to have more "representation" of groups in proportion to their percent in the American population. They are the places where certain groups demand their own housing arrangements. Mr. Troy is totally wrong about America being a place where there is "a strong sense of cohesion and a rich internal identity, not simply about group posturing." Perhaps Mr. Troy has never heard of the phrase "the Balkanization of America." It's easy--and intellectuallly dishonest--to dismiss counterexamples by calling them "trivial."
Philip Gretzky: stand on Israel's defence. Hard to believe, but true. There are women I saw interviewed on TV who preferred Hilary Clinton because they wanted a woman as President. And candidate's are aware of what is called "the Hispanic vote," and on that basis have to consider the matter of illegal immigration from South America and Mexico. And there are American citizens who are agains making English the official language. All this means is that there are millions of American citizens who, contrary to Mr. Troy's assertions, do NOT with to "transcend identity." As far as uniiversities are concerned,
Philip Gretsky: This is exactly how the anti-Israel Noam Chomsky deals with his critics: their arguments are trivial, or "it's merely an empirical matter," or the issues raised are marginal and irrelevant. As a matter of fact, anyone who keeps up with the news in the U.S. knows that political candidates make their pitches with the affiliations and interests of racial, ethnic, religious, and gender groups being addressed. There is a widespread belief, for example, that most blacks prefer Barack Obama. Hard to belive but true. There is a widespread belief that religous Jews are sensitive to a candidate's