Zionism perverted

Morris Talansky's tearful testimony about how "foolish" he felt when he realized that Ehud Olmert had exploited his "love" - yes, Talansky used those words - exposes the Israel-Diaspora relationship at its worst. It represents the Zionist dream perverted, conjuring a comic book universe where swaggering Israeli sharpies acting like superheroes manipulate the Zionist guilt, Galut (exilebased) insecurity, and Jewish idealism of Diaspora saps. If the mafia supposedly demands omerta, silence, reducing innocent citizens to cowed sheep, the Israeli political Mafiosi now lives by Olmerta - "magiya li [I deserve it] - bullying normally tough Jewish businessmen into becoming easily-conned pushovers.

Where Left and Right can meet

George W. Bush came to Israel bearing great gifts. With the Zionist narrative of Israel's founding being assailed worldwide, with magazines like The Atlantic Monthly asking "Is Israel Finished?," the President of the United States gave Israel an emphatic bear hug. The embrace was sincere; Bush has no more elections to run. He spoke for posterity not for Jewish votes.

Bush visited Masada, and viewed the Israel Museum's 2,000-year-old scroll of the Book of Isaiah. Both stressed the Jews' historic connection with the land of Israel, along with the biblical values Israelis and Americans share. Bush’s speeches celebrated Israel's past, present and future, recounting how an oppressed people found redemption and achieved greatness by rebuilding their old-new land.

Sometimes, Israel's dreams and realities converge

In Israel, Yerushalayim shel malah and Yerushalayim shel matah clash continuously, the ethereal, heavenly Jerusalem confronts the corporeal, earthly Jerusalem. Considering Zionism's magnificent dreams, and many of Israel's ugly problems, the collision between Israeli dreams and reality is often jarring. But what keeps Israel going are those other moments, when the modern miracle of Israel fulfills the Jewish people's highest aspirations and most compelling ideals. Those are the moments that make it all worthwhile, that sustain Israel's citizens and supporters through the many daunting challenges.

Why I am a moderate

I am a moderate. I embrace my centrism proudly, assertively, passionately, unapologetically - but not violently, intolerantly, or fanatically, of course.  I dislike extremism, zealotry, orthodoxy, and partisanship. I abhor all or nothing, take it or leave it, approaches. I believe life is more complicated than the black-white, red-blue, Ebert & Roeper film critics' thumbs-up-or-thumbs-down approach so prevalent today. I seek balance, temperance, alternative viewpoints, middle paths, syntheses, synergies, unlikely alliances, even paradoxes, creative tensions and shotgun marriages, especially in politics. 

"What’s a moderate to do," I often wonder as I read shrill blogs and increasingly angry books from the left and the right, as I watch the maneuvering in Congress and the screaming in the Knesset. Those of us who define ourselves as moderate or nonpartisan get hit from both sides. Too many people need to imprison everyone in neat little partisan boxes, and resent those who see complexity, acknowledging flaws and strengths on both sides. Today, for too many people, too many of the differences line up all too neatly, toxically - politically, religiously, sociologically, culturally - dangerously reinforcing each other. In America the "reds" tend to be more conservative, religious, moralistic and angry. The "blues" tend to be more liberal, secular and libertine - yet still angry. Similarly in Israel, the differences pile up dangerously with the "orange" camp, as the more conservative, religious and moralistic types facing off against the liberal, secular, libertine "blues." The mirror-image mutual contempt is palpable, unproductive, toxic.

About this blog

Center Field McGill history professor Gil Troy - a passionate moderate - looks at the American presidency, American history, Zionism, Judaism and Israel today.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

JD (Colorado, United States): You hit the nail on the head with this comment: "People frequently swing rights as clubs, claiming their right to free speech without extending that freedom to others who disagree with them." This is the epitome of a liberal, secular progressive philosophy. I am saddened to see that Israel is affected by this just as my country is (the United States). You're in a difficult spot as a professor with principles, and I feel your pain! (USAF Veteran, Grad Student, Gainfully Employed, etc). www.offeringcommonsense.blogspot.com
Berg in VA -USA: Sounds like a good idea. But that's all. The polarization going on in Israel and the US is ramping up into a form of religous civil war. Call it Humanism vs. Biblical theism. On a vast ice floe splitting in 2, staying somewhere in between is a non-option. Humanists make up their rules as they go along, basing them ultimately and only on expedience. Theists adopt their rules from their Bible which they must assume to be authoritative. MUST assume? Yes, since to do otherwise would be to play G-d, leading in turn to "I AM GOD". Theists recoil from that idea, Humanists, like Eve, ask "why not?"
roland Jerusalem: proffesor, 1) let's put aside that the Sternhell incident in all likely wil turn out to have been a provocation and not an attack. 2) His ideas are not simply unpopular but justifiable and worthy of debate. He has all too often incited against Zionism and judiasm and all but called arabs to murder Jews and Israelis from segments of the population whith whom he disagrees. IN other countries he would long ago have been brought to trail. I think it wise not to compare you free expresion with his incitement. We censure holocaust deniers and fomentors of andtisemitism and other forms of h