Wednesday Jun 04, 2008
Posted by Gil Troy
Morris Talansky's tearful testimony about how "foolish" he felt when he realized that Ehud Olmert had exploited his "love" - yes, Talansky used those words - exposes the Israel-Diaspora relationship at its worst. It represents the Zionist dream perverted, conjuring a comic book universe where swaggering Israeli sharpies acting like superheroes manipulate the Zionist guilt, Galut (exilebased) insecurity, and Jewish idealism of Diaspora saps. If the mafia supposedly demands omerta, silence, reducing innocent citizens to cowed sheep, the Israeli political Mafiosi now lives by Olmerta - "magiya li [I deserve it] - bullying normally tough Jewish businessmen into becoming easily-conned pushovers.
Tuesday Jan 22, 2008
Posted by Gil Troy
Despite yielding no agreement yet, the latest round of peace processing has triggered a struggle regarding Diaspora Jews' role in shaping Jerusalem's future. The World Jewish Congress president, Ronald Lauder, recently told Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that no "changes in the status of our Holy City" should be implemented "without giving the Jewish people, as a whole, a voice in the decision." The political scientist Shlomo Avineri objected to world Jewry meddling in Israel's decision-making, as did the head of the World Jewish Congress's Israel branch, Shai Hermesh. Natan Sharanky then countered with a powerful plea in Sunday's Jerusalem Post headlined "Israel Must Not Decide Alone." Yet much as I venerate Natan Sharansky, and much as I believe in the Jewish people's spiritual and political unity, ultimately, the headline is wrong: Israelis must decide Jerusalem's fate.
In some ways, the gap between the combatants is exaggerated. Lauder only requested a "voice in the decision." Sharansky endorsed some kind of consultative process which would build a constructive consensus on such a key issue as the future of the Jewish people's eternal capital. But underlying this argument is the question whether membership in the Jewish people is sufficient to vote on life and death matters for Israel, or is Israeli citizenship required?
|
 |
About this blog
Center Field
McGill history professor Gil Troy - a passionate moderate - looks at the American presidency, American history, Zionism, Judaism and Israel today.
|
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs
Recent Comments
JD (Colorado, United States): You hit the nail on the head with this comment: "People frequently swing rights as clubs, claiming their right to free speech without extending that freedom to others who disagree with them." This is the epitome of a liberal, secular progressive philosophy. I am saddened to see that Israel is affected by this just as my country is (the United States). You're in a difficult spot as a professor with principles, and I feel your pain! (USAF Veteran, Grad Student, Gainfully Employed, etc).
www.offeringcommonsense.blogspot.com
Berg in VA -USA: Sounds like a good idea. But that's all. The polarization going on in Israel and the US is ramping up into a form of religous civil war. Call it Humanism vs. Biblical theism. On a vast ice floe splitting in 2, staying somewhere in between is a non-option. Humanists make up their rules as they go along, basing them ultimately and only on expedience. Theists adopt their rules from their Bible which they must assume to be authoritative. MUST assume? Yes, since to do otherwise would be to play G-d, leading in turn to "I AM GOD". Theists recoil from that idea, Humanists, like Eve, ask "why not?"
roland Jerusalem: proffesor, 1) let's put aside that the Sternhell incident in all likely wil turn out to have been a provocation and not an attack. 2) His ideas are not simply unpopular but justifiable and worthy of debate. He has all too often incited against Zionism and judiasm and all but called arabs to murder Jews and Israelis from segments of the population whith whom he disagrees. IN other countries he would long ago have been brought to trail. I think it wise not to compare you free expresion with his incitement. We censure holocaust deniers and fomentors of andtisemitism and other forms of h
|
|