Diaspora-Israel relations as bad date

The results of the third annual Survey of Contemporary Israeli Attitudes toward World Jewry commissioned by the B'nai B'rith World Center in Jerusalem are in, and once again we can proclaim: Israel-Diaspora relations remain less fraternal than we like to believe - and more like a bad date than we really acknowledge. Just as North American Jews are convinced that Israelis need us more than we need them, Israelis believe we need them more than they need us. In this survey, focusing on the Israeli side of the equation, most Israeli Jews - 76 percent - believed it is safer to live as a Jew in Israel than in the Diaspora, while 43 percent believed the State of Israel rather than the local Jewish community was more responsible for fighting anti-Semitic outbreaks in the Diaspora.

Where Left and Right can meet

George W. Bush came to Israel bearing great gifts. With the Zionist narrative of Israel's founding being assailed worldwide, with magazines like The Atlantic Monthly asking "Is Israel Finished?," the President of the United States gave Israel an emphatic bear hug. The embrace was sincere; Bush has no more elections to run. He spoke for posterity not for Jewish votes.

Bush visited Masada, and viewed the Israel Museum's 2,000-year-old scroll of the Book of Isaiah. Both stressed the Jews' historic connection with the land of Israel, along with the biblical values Israelis and Americans share. BushÂ’s speeches celebrated Israel's past, present and future, recounting how an oppressed people found redemption and achieved greatness by rebuilding their old-new land.

Obama at his worst - and his best

On Tuesday, Senator Barack Obama's speech on race in America tried to quell the controversy over his America-bashing, race-baiting, Israel-hating pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright. For days, video clips of Wright spewing his poison threatened to neutralize Obama's populist magic. Until Tuesday, the controversy showed Obama at his worst. His response to his pastor's demagoguery was mealy-mouthed and disingenuous. It was impossible to believe Obama's Clintonesque claim of ignorance, that he never "sat in the pews" during one of Wright's wrongheaded riffs. And Obama's failure over a twenty-year relationship to criticize his mentor's venom stirred doubts about Obama's judgment, patriotism, and commitment to the unity he celebrates. Yet once again, Illinois' rookie Senator hit a grand slam with two strikes against him. Obama's speech was thoughtful, thought-provoking, rich, complex, effective, poetic, and inspiring.

About this blog

Center Field McGill history professor Gil Troy - a passionate moderate - looks at the American presidency, American history, Zionism, Judaism and Israel today.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

JD (Colorado, United States): You hit the nail on the head with this comment: "People frequently swing rights as clubs, claiming their right to free speech without extending that freedom to others who disagree with them." This is the epitome of a liberal, secular progressive philosophy. I am saddened to see that Israel is affected by this just as my country is (the United States). You're in a difficult spot as a professor with principles, and I feel your pain! (USAF Veteran, Grad Student, Gainfully Employed, etc). www.offeringcommonsense.blogspot.com
Berg in VA -USA: Sounds like a good idea. But that's all. The polarization going on in Israel and the US is ramping up into a form of religous civil war. Call it Humanism vs. Biblical theism. On a vast ice floe splitting in 2, staying somewhere in between is a non-option. Humanists make up their rules as they go along, basing them ultimately and only on expedience. Theists adopt their rules from their Bible which they must assume to be authoritative. MUST assume? Yes, since to do otherwise would be to play G-d, leading in turn to "I AM GOD". Theists recoil from that idea, Humanists, like Eve, ask "why not?"
roland Jerusalem: proffesor, 1) let's put aside that the Sternhell incident in all likely wil turn out to have been a provocation and not an attack. 2) His ideas are not simply unpopular but justifiable and worthy of debate. He has all too often incited against Zionism and judiasm and all but called arabs to murder Jews and Israelis from segments of the population whith whom he disagrees. IN other countries he would long ago have been brought to trail. I think it wise not to compare you free expresion with his incitement. We censure holocaust deniers and fomentors of andtisemitism and other forms of h