Sunday Apr 19, 2009

Center Field: The Anti-Racism Conference As It Should Have Been

Posted by Gil Troy
Comments: 8
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

DURBAN DIARY

Gil Troy is Professor of History at McGill University and the author of Why I Am A Zionist: Israel Jewish Identity and the Challenges of Today. He is attending the Durban Review conference as an observer.

Geneva is awash in the light green of early spring, nestled amid snowcapped mountains. Arriving from Israel, I found the city's tranquility surprising, until I remembered this was Sunday morning, not Monday. Still, the quiet set the tone for this first day, on the eve of what promises to be a tumultuous United Nations Review Conference on Racism, Discrimination, Xenophobia and

Intolerance beginning Monday (the UN shifted from Durban to Geneva hoping to avoid the riotous anti-Semitic atmosphere of Durban, 2001).

Related

Entering the city, I passed the Intercontinental Hotel, where Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is staying before addressing the conference Monday. Many Swiss citizens are urging their president not to shake Ahmadinejad's hand. "But," my taxi driver shrugged, "protocols must be followed."

What a perfect welcome to Europe - and to the UN's moral myopia. By cherishing protocols more than human rights, the world enables dictators. Despite advocating Israel's and America's destruction, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will be welcomed like a head of state, rather than the genocide-seeking rogue he is.

Fortunately, twenty human rights NGOs hosted a "Geneva Summit for Human Rights, Tolerance and Democracy," or what I call the "Anti-Racism Conference as It Should Have Been."

Offering a mirror image of the Durban Review conference leadership, many of the speakers suffered repression thanks to the leaders of today's UN Human Rights Council. The 22 speakers from Iran, Cuba, Libya, Iran, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, and elsewhere, along with the hundreds of attendees, rejected the toxic combination of European politesse and dictatorial manipulation perpetuating what one speaker called the "coalition of autocrats around the world."

That speaker, Dr. Saad Eddin Ibrahim, imprisoned in Egypt for three years, said that having Libya lead the human rights council made a mockery of human rights. He also denounced "the indifference of the democrats," regretting Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's vow that human rights issues would not sour American relations with the Chinese. "When people no longer denounce injustice ... we are giving an oxygen boost to dictators so they can continue to trample on people's rights," Jose Gabriel Ramon Castillo, a Cuban activist warned.

In the emotional opening session, victims of the Darfur and Rwanda genocides moved delegates to tears, by describing the evil they endured. Dominique Sopo, the President of SOS Racisme, condemned the Durban Review conference's "negationism," ignoring real the human rights crimes. "It is unbelievable that Darfur is not on the agenda," Sopo insisted. "What is the point of having a conference against racism if this is ignored?" Contrasting the UN's passivity with the opening panelists' activist idealism, Canadian MP Irwin Cotler thanked the dissidents for "inspiring us to act and do that which needs to be done."

Celebrating sixty years of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Genocide Convention, sessions examined the declaration's various articles. This afternoon's session examined Article 5, the "right to be free from torture and cruel or inhuman treatment." Parvez Sharma described "Jihad for Love," his film describing the discrimination endured by Islamic homosexuals. Ahmed Batebi, a dissident imprisoned in Iran for nine years, recounted how he was thrown in solitary confinement on flimsy legal grounds. He recalled: threats, mock executions, brutalization of friends, and how "they tied my hands to a chair and kept me awake until I lost consciousness, then cut me and poured salt in my wounds to wake me up." This cruelty, he explained, "is an attempt to crush the spirits" of anyone who criticizes Iran's regime.

Finally, Dr. Ashraf El Hagog, a Palestinian doctor, and Kristina Valcheva, a Bulgarian nurse, described how Libya falsely accused them of spreading HIV, then tortured them with beatings, electrical currents, and sexual sadism. "It's disgusting" that Libya is chairing the UN human rights council, Dr. El Hahog shouted, "SHAME ON YOU LIBYA." Noting that a Jew was one of the first people to help him get out of prison, Dr. El Hagog admitted that he had been imprisoned in his own ideology, and now regretted his bigotry.

"Please use your liberty to promote ours," Soe Aung, a Burmese dissident begged. Once, that slogan was the UN's watchword. Today, the sentiment challenges UN protocols.

We owe it to these democratic heroes to do what we can to use our liberty to promote theirs - while pushing the UN to fulfill its historic mission. Meanwhile, we buckle our seatbelts for the farce that Ahmadinejad and his fellow dictators will launch tomorrow.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Laura, Sunday Apr 19, 2009
1) When will Arab racists & Islamic bigots let go of the UN and stop hijacking it with it's lobbies? Why is Arab terror singling out Jews not racist? 2) Why is the essence of the entire "conflict'" not a form of bigotry by Arab Muslims who can't "accept" the non Arab non Muslim pluralistic democratic Israel. 3) Are Jews living or allowed to live in racist "Palestinian" controlled territories? 4) When will lefty radical Meretz/B'Tzelem talk about preferencial treatments to Arabs OVER jews, like in Hebron and in other cases? 5) Why is (Arab Palestinian or Hezbollah) use if its own kids as cannon fodders considered "innocent victims"? 6) Is Israel battling just terrorism or an ARAB MUSLIM CAMPAIGN OF GENOCIDE since the 1920's?
2  |   Rafael, France/US, Monday Apr 20, 2009
It's not surprising that the governments of Muslim countries participate in this slander against Israel. They have to fan the flames of anti-Israelism so that their people won't rebel against their miserable condition. The Romans had bread and circuses to keep the natives from becoming restless; the Mullahs and secular autocrats have Israel and Jews. The other participants in Turban II are reverse racists. They give the real perpetrators of human rights abuses a pass because non-whites are inferiors who cannot be held responsible for their actions.
3  |   Andrew, Geneva, Monday Apr 20, 2009
It's more than protocol that the Swiss government is following when it welcomes Ahmadinejad with open arms, it is a history of hypocrisy. Switzerland, despite its international image as a democratic and modern state, should always be remembered for granting women the right to vote in 1971 (or even as late as 1990, in some Swiss cantons). Like you said, this "protocol" simply enables the totalitarian regimes of the world to continue business as usual.
4  |   Steven L, Monday Apr 20, 2009
Why did Switzerland accept to be the siege of this infamous anti-human conference?
5  |   Donna USA, Monday Apr 20, 2009
It's too bad the Summit for Human Rights not hosted by the UN with the appropriate speakers will not get the press that I expect the official conference on racism to get. Good would come from that. The fact of the UN sponsoring a conference with so many speakers with innocent blood on their hands indicates that the world would be a better place without the UN. I urge those of your reading this comment to write your elected officials and ask them to re-evaluate your membership and funding of the UN. I don't want my tax dollars going there to sponsor racism!
6  |   Donna USA, Monday Apr 20, 2009
It's too bad the Summit for Human Rights not hosted by the UN with the appropriate speakers will not get the press that I expect the official conference on racism to get. Good would come from that. The fact of the UN sponsoring a conference with so many speakers with innocent blood on their hands indicates that the world would be a better place without the UN. I urge those of your reading this comment to write your elected officials and ask them to re-evaluate your membership and funding of the UN. I don't want my tax dollars going there to sponsor racism!
7  |   Samuel P., Tuesday Apr 21, 2009
Shame for a country call Switzerlnd!
8  |   Marina, Amsterdam, Switzerland, Thursday Apr 23, 2009
What a world:: Racist Arabs & Islamic bigots call the victims of their racism - "racists" Forget the fact that Israel is multi-racial for all colors from the whitest of white to the darkest of black, whereas Arab countries (including "Palestinian" authorities") asides from oppressing all non-Arab minorities, are almost entirely "judenrein", but in democratic Israel, an Arab can get the highest office! But the brazenness of Arab racism not only fails to admit of it's racist war on Jews/Israel since the 1920's, but it brands Israel's defense FROM it as "racist". .
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Center Field McGill history professor Gil Troy - a passionate moderate - looks at the American presidency, American history, Zionism, Judaism and Israel today.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Time to be put out to pasture?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David A. Harris
    Sunday Nov 01, 2009
  2. Hillary's Middle East saga
    Posted in A Point of View by Abraham Foxman
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  3. The end of anti-Semitism?
    Posted in Guest Blog by David Turner
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  4. 'The Jewish Terrorist'
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  5. The downfall of a cynic
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Lande
    Tuesday Nov 03, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Duncan Tucson AZ: Whether liberal or conservative, the majority of educated Americans aren't remotely anti-semitic in the course of their lives. Yet a growing vocal fringe on the Left has found it to be a very small step to go from legitimate criticism of Israeli actions to bigoted slurs. The source of the problem lies with a moral equivalency between nihilist murderous rampages against civilians and an organized civilian controlled military which goes to great lengths (most of the time) to avoid civilian harm. Evangelicals have a weird alliance with Israel at the moment, but secular liberals are endangered.
Donna Diorio: Podhoretz is a great thinker and the number one factor of great thinkers is the ability to pull oneself back for an honest look at both sides of a story. I think he nailed it about the liberalism of American Jews that "today's less committed Jews frequently place their liberalism ahead of their people's self-interest." Also, it is profoundly true that "the Left is so insanely Left, and the Right so insanely Right". That is true not only of Jews, but clearly the case across the political spectrum in the U.S. It is a sickening thing to those who love the truth.
PZ: Participatory civility is hard, Gil, which should push us to be careful/precise -- EVEN with respect to (or, perhaps, ESP. with respect to) failures of civility. And this goes for you, too! Totally agree that ChazanÂ’s use of the word "innuendo" contained veiled charge of McCarthyism that was both uncivil and unfair. But, even assuming she can be coherently read as having intended to "equate" Oren w/ Teitel (I don't think she can), is it really an "obscenity" that "profanes" Rabin's death? Delegitimizative words are always uncivil and usually unfair -- we all must do better.