Sunday Oct 12, 2008

Center Field: Israel's 'Wild West' tendencies

Posted by Gil Troy
Comments: 7
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Last month, a de-magnetized identity card prevented me from entering the building housing my office on the McGill University campus at 10:30 one night. I asked a woman passerby who looked like a faculty member for help. "My ID card isn't working," I said. "I teach here."

"I know who you are," the woman spit out contemptuously. "You're that awful right-wing conservative professor."

Startled, I was about to launch into my standard defense when I face that accusation, saying how I consider myself a centrist, just wrote a book championing moderation and besides, if all she knows about me is that I'm pro-Israel and anti-terror and that makes me conservative, liberalism is in worse shape than I thought. Instead, I wisely stayed silent. I just looked at her quizzically. Backpedaling from this ugly descent into politics when a simple, civil exchange was required, my colleague said she lacked the correct card and left.

This admittedly minor but nevertheless outrageous incident highlights why those of us in the broader Zionist community should be particularly horrified by the pipe bomb attack against Prof. Ze'ev Sternhell ostensibly in the name of Zionism. Those of us who have defended Israel on campus know what it is like to take unpopular stands. We understand that independence of thought is the lifeblood of freedom, that democratic communities and especially intellectual communities wither in environments that smother dissent.

The attacks and ostracism pro-Israel professors experience worldwide reveal that the intolerance underlying the assault against Sternhell is not unique to Israel. But it is rare, and particularly horrible, to see this increasingly common small-mindedness degenerate into violence. The violence reflects the acute shortage of two key ingredients democracy demands: mutuality and civility.

IT IS the most compelling lesson from George W. Bush's simplistic approach to democracy: Democracy entails much more than choosing your leader. The chaos of Iraq, the brutality of Gaza's Hamas-Fatah civil war, teach that without mutual respect votes are worthless tools and rights are shams. Citizenship in a democracy requires a commitment to sharing rights, to granting the same liberties to others that we demand and enjoy.

People frequently swing rights as clubs, claiming their right to free speech without extending that freedom to others who disagree with them. Without that grace, people are not enjoying free speech but demanding personal prerogative. Mutuality requires thinking about others, accepting differences within the same community, and limiting some of our excesses for the common good. Mutuality tempers the individualism so essential to freedom, avoiding the descent into selfishness. Civility is the logical and necessary result.

Alas, modern Israel often lacks both mutuality and civility. The litter strewn about too many sidewalks, the aggressiveness harming so many on the roads, the harshness of so many public interactions and the corruption tainting so many leaders, all reflect the elevating of individual whims over communal norms. The palpable, toxic, mutual contempt between left and right, secular and religious, reveals an arrogant presumption of personal infallibility that demeans the freedom of others to draw opposite conclusions reasonably.

And the particular pathology of the settler community, characterized by illegal outposts, bursts of rioting and a growing disrespect for the police and the army is a ticking time bomb that must be defused. Last month, when 40 thuggish settlers attacked an IDF post near Horesh Iron every parent of an IDF recruit or reservist should have denounced this outrage. These soldiers are our sons, brothers and fathers. Anyone who targets them should be jailed; those who facilitate such attacks should be shunned.

After the Sternhell bombing, in the dying days of his administration, while giving interviews sounding more left wing than he ever did so he could guarantee adulation and steady speech income when he travels abroad, Ehud Olmert lectured his fellow citizens about avoiding "lawlessness." Olmert's unsuitability to teach anyone about respect for the law underlined his utter inadequacy as the country's leader.

BOTH VIOLENCE and democracy define Israel's history, interwoven like the two DNA strands. There is an element of the Wild West in the country, which despite its flaws remains the Middle East's only real democracy. At its best, this unruliness is part of its appeal, making it compelling as a country-still-in-formation, as a place that can be more open, more malleable, more creative than the more staid West. At its worst, this rowdiness reveals itself in the ugly violence coursing through the society; in the rough way parents handle children, then children handle each other; in the growing crime rate; in occasional outbursts against Palestinians. Like all functional democracies, Israel must forge a community that indulges individuals enough so they flourish without spoiling them so much they harm others.

The balance is delicate, the stakes are high. The Sternhell pipe bombing reflects not only twisted individuals whose moral system has imploded but an ugly strain within society. If America the celebrity-obsessed produces glory hounds like the men who shot Ronald Reagan and killed John Lennon, a politically charged Israel produces ideological fanatics like the criminals who targeted Sternhell.

Fortunately, Israeli society is healthy enough to be united in disgust by this hooliganism. The attack was as evil as it was self-defeating. Instinctively - and blessedly as a disincentive to copycats - reporters echoed Sternhell's most provocative pronouncements, broadcasting them more loudly than ever in response to this horrific attempt to silence him. All of us who love Israel, who cherish democracy, must embrace Sternhell as he recovers. And in that group hug we should utter the mantra of a healthy democracy rooted in mutuality, fostering civility: Whether or not I agree with you, I will defend to the death your right to express your ideas (knowing that it protects my rights too).

The writer is professor of history at McGill University and author of Why I Am A Zionist: Israel, Jewish Identity and the Challenges of Today and Leading from the Center: Why Moderates Make the Best Presidents.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  Nat, Sunday Oct 12, 2008
It's much deeper than shallow analysis of this or that terrible incident. It's about lack of infrastructure starting with the electoral system. It's about lack of changing above by the apathetic public at large who succumb to the handful of mostly temporary political appointees at the top who are left alone to make the decisions. It's about the lack of planning ahead for the good of society at large. And about letting the boat steer by itself as a result. It's about no Abba at the helm for so many, many years, and instead trying to "keep up with the Americans".
2  |  roland Jerusalem, Monday Oct 13, 2008
proffesor, 1) let's put aside that the Sternhell incident in all likely wil turn out to have been a provocation and not an attack. 2) His ideas are not simply unpopular but justifiable and worthy of debate. He has all too often incited against Zionism and judiasm and all but called arabs to murder Jews and Israelis from segments of the population whith whom he disagrees. IN other countries he would long ago have been brought to trail. I think it wise not to compare you free expresion with his incitement. We censure holocaust deniers and fomentors of andtisemitism and other forms of h
3  |  Berg in VA -USA, Monday Oct 13, 2008
Sounds like a good idea. But that's all. The polarization going on in Israel and the US is ramping up into a form of religous civil war. Call it Humanism vs. Biblical theism. On a vast ice floe splitting in 2, staying somewhere in between is a non-option. Humanists make up their rules as they go along, basing them ultimately and only on expedience. Theists adopt their rules from their Bible which they must assume to be authoritative. MUST assume? Yes, since to do otherwise would be to play G-d, leading in turn to "I AM GOD". Theists recoil from that idea, Humanists, like Eve, ask "why not?"
4  |  JD (Colorado, United States), Monday Oct 13, 2008
You hit the nail on the head with this comment: "People frequently swing rights as clubs, claiming their right to free speech without extending that freedom to others who disagree with them." This is the epitome of a liberal, secular progressive philosophy. I am saddened to see that Israel is affected by this just as my country is (the United States). You're in a difficult spot as a professor with principles, and I feel your pain! (USAF Veteran, Grad Student, Gainfully Employed, etc). www.offeringcommonsense.blogspot.com
5  |  Gnarlodious in Santa Fe, Tuesday Oct 14, 2008
You would think your liberal colleague would embrace you for being pro-Israel. After all, Israel is a modern democracy where homosexuals cavort in the streets of Jerusalem under court-ordered police protection funded with taxpayer shekels. However this is not a problem of you being labeled a "right-wing conservative", it is more about you being a Jew. Specifically, a pro-Israel Jew. If you were a liberal Jew you would have been worthy of help, because then you would be anti-Israel. Alas, it is now OK to like Jews as long as those Jews hate Israel. And I say that as a pro-Israel liberal Jew.
6  |  Negev Girl, Metar, Wednesday Oct 15, 2008
"And the particular pathology of the settler community, characterized by illegal outposts, bursts of rioting and a growing disrespect for the police and the army is a ticking time bomb that must be defused" This is YOUR quote, Gil. You could have written the EXACT same thing about Israeli Arabs (of course it doesn't represent all, but a growing number!) but you wouldn't because that would be "racist".. But you don't mind generalizing about a few hundred thousand people , many whose sons, husbands, brothers, fathers, etc. are in elite units in the army doing what you are NOT. For shame!
7  |  Ben Ami, Tel Aviv, Israel, Wednesday Oct 15, 2008
Well, Negev Girl, I too served in an elite unit (paratroopers), and I fought in the 6 Day War and in the Yom Kippur War, so I certainly have earned the privilege to tell you that Gil Troy is right. It is no generalization to say that the West Bank settlers have a growing disrespect for the police and the army and that they are a ticking time bomb that must be defused. You cannot deny that this DOES characterize them, and that is why they are more a threat to the state of Israel than are the Arabs. Many of the settlers are blinded by fanaticism and they are trying to lead us to another Metzada.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Center Field McGill history professor Gil Troy - a passionate moderate - looks at the American presidency, American history, Zionism, Judaism and Israel today.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. A moral army
    Posted in Army Life by A.J.
    Monday Nov 17, 2008
  2. Ben Hur loves Zion
    Posted in Ten Tribes Challenge - India by Amir Mizroch
    Wednesday Nov 19, 2008
  3. Yes we can (stop talking about Obama)
    Posted in Majoring in Aliyah by Lahav Harkov
    Wednesday Nov 19, 2008
  4. Expectations from Sderot
    Posted in Living with Rockets by Anav Silverman
    Wednesday Nov 19, 2008
  5. An unfortunate drop of discrimination
    Posted in Israel Stories by Jeremy Cardash
    Thursday Nov 20, 2008

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

glrex in Los Angeles, CA: Alan G., sadly, there are some scholars who signed on, Elliot Dorff, for example. He has always been a flaming liberal, but he knows his stuff despite the fact that he often reaches conclusions with which many would disagree. Rene, in L.A., you should check out my Conservative synagogue, Sinai Temple. It is not politically conservative per se, but its rabbi (Wolpe) does not advocate for politicians. He's a staunch & vocal advocate for a strong Israel. (He's not a flaming liberal like the rest of them). There are actually conservatives at Sinai, which is unusual outside the Orthodox movement.
Glenn Sonnenberg, Los Angeles: To Rene Jacobs: There are reform synagogues in Los Angeles that have rabbis with views outside the mainstream of the liberal elites. We belong to Stephen S. Wise, which has rabbis with a variety of political views. The clergy does not shove their views down the congregation's throat in sermons. Our clergy is learned, thoughtful, passionate, supportive of Israel and, most importantly, regardless of their personal beliefs, patient and tolerant of the views of others. I commend our temple and community for your consideration. We also are former members of your congregation.
Sally in Marin County: To Michael and Rene: We have tried to leave our super liberal conservative 'gogue but we live in Marin County and there is only one conservative temple. We still have one more child to bar mitzvah, but we hate it and often leave services angry and disturbed. Since we can't leave, I have started to organize conservatives at our temple, so we have a stronger voice. We are few, but just beginning to unite. By the way, community organizers have infiltrated our 'gogue. I'm sure they are in others. Anyone out there w/ experience dealing w/ this? The lines are truly blurred.