|
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Center Field: Honoring Mary Robinson, Obama honors appeasement of anti-Semitism Posted by Gil Troy
Comments: 40
In the latest example of President Barack Obama's utter and complete tone-deafness regarding Jewish sensibilities, the White House has announced that Mary Robinson will be one of sixteen recipients of the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest civilian honor in the United States. While Robinson has had a distinguished career as the President of Ireland and a human rights activist, she has also displayed a consistent anti-Israel animus. Most disturbing, she was one of the people most responsible for the great debacle at Durban, 2001, when a conference convened to fight racism became a UN-sponsored hate-fest against Jews. At a time when Barack Obama should be honoring Winston Churchills in the fight against anti-Semitism, he has chosen a Neville Chamberlain, someone who appeased the haters at Durban and in the UN again and again, until it was too late. As the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights from 1997 until 2002, Robinson consistently displayed a pro-Palestinian bias during a fragile moment in the search for Middle East peace. When Yasser Arafat led the Palestinians away from negotiations back toward terror in 2000, Robinson could have stood up and urged the Palestinians to eschew violence. Instead, she and the UN Human Rights Commission continued to demonize Israel, implicitly encouraging Palestinian terrorism. Making matters worse, she presided over the infamous World Conference Against Racism in Durban in 2001. She repeatedly ignored the pleas of distinguished human rights activists including the late Congressman Tom Lantos and the US secretary of state at the time Colin Powell to stop the Durban conference from degenerating into an orgy of Israel- and Jew-bashing. In fairness, eventually she herself was so appalled by a cartoon the Arab Lawyers' Union distributed equating the Star of David with the Swastika that she proclaimed at an official dinner "When I see something like this, I am a Jew." Nevertheless it was too little, too late. And in her closing remarks Robinson declared "we... succeeded," a shocking statement considering that anti-Zionists hijacked the conference, demonizing Israel, bullying Jewish participants and distributing crude anti-Semitic images of hooked-nose Jews at the parallel NGO forum. For at least three years after the conference, Mary Robinson continued to celebrate Durban's success. It was only in response to public campaigns at McGill University (which, full disclosure, I led) and at Emory University against her receiving honorary doctorates in 2004 that she began to acknowledge Durbans legacy as mixed. As such, she was also responsible for trying to sanitize the historical record and soft-pedal the Durban disgrace. For many in the human rights community, when they hear Durban, Mary Robinson, Human Rights and the UN, their knees go wobbly. For others of us, we hear Durban - and everything associated with it - and our stomachs get queasy. Mary Robinson failed at Durban. Mary Robinson failed when in the Regional Conference in Teheran in February, 2001 leading up to Durban she watched as Israel was targeted and demonized, allowing the anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism to fester. Mary Robinson failed when in that already inflamed atmosphere she allowed the Palestinian conflict to be singled out, acknowledging on August 9, 2001 the need for "Recognition of the accumulated sense of grievance and frustration because of prolonged military occupation, now in its fourth decade." This behavior violated the UN protocols whereby at human rights world conferences such as at the UN Vienna World Conference on Human Rights in 1993, and the UN Beijing World Conference on Women in 1995, no single state or conflict was to be singled out. And Mary Robinson failed when she refused to distance herself from the conference - in fact boasted about it. In fighting modern anti-Semitism, the moral neutrality of the politically correct - which often masks moral sloppiness or even outright bias - is particularly insidious. To see the President of the United States honor someone who has been part of the problem rather than part of the solution is sickening. The President also awarded Senator Edward Kennedy and the late Congressman Jack Kemp with the Medal of Freedom. Mary Robinson - and apparently Barack Obama himself - could learn from both their examples how to defend human rights without enabling the modern-day demonization of Israel and the Jewish people. So far, the American Jewish community has been afraid to criticize Obama. Most have stood silent as he has singled out Israel for criticism while making nice to Iran and other dictatorships. When American Jewish leaders were finally granted an audience with the president, the meeting was initially kept off the his daily schedule and, by all reports, was deferential, not confrontational. How many more examples of presidential insensitivity to Jewish concerns will it take for American Jews to remember that as citizens in a democracy, it is our right and responsibility to stand up for ourselves. And in the case of Mary Robinson's undeserved honor, it is our right and responsibility to stand up for American integrity, making sure that the Presidential Medal of Freedom is not awarded to those whose commitment to liberty and justice for all is spotty and trendy rather than consistent and enduring.
1 |
DavidM,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
It is a disgrace that Mary Robinson is getting a medal at the White House. She should not even be invited to take the tourist tour at the White House. She has a long record of coddling tyrants and terrorists. She sat silent as nazi style speeches were given in Durban and bestowed her honors on the most vile speakers. She has never uttered a nice word about the USA so it is baffling why she would be given an American award. The ceremony will be an exercise in self flagellation. It will be a total embarassment to the USA.
2 |
Sylvie,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
What is disgraceful is that any one who even mildy criticizes Israel's expansionist and apartheid policies is then denounced as a hater of Jews. Anyone who is dedicated to exposing human rights abuses knows that Robinson is merely doing her job.
3 |
Martin K,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
So let me get this right: ts currently the point of Jerusalem Post that US decisions and policies should be controlled by the Israeli public perception, and that all critics of Israel are enemies of Israel, and quite possibly anti-semitic? Are you aware, sirs, that youre increasingly slipping into modes of reasoning most often seen by the mentally ill, where the whole world evolves solely around the patient and his projections? Face it: The US has a centre-left government, while Israel has an extreme-right government, much alike to what Le Pen or Hader would have created. Get real.
4 |
Hofikoman,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
The Time for American Jewry to stand up to Obama has indeed arrived, and this is an excellent issue on which to take a stand. But will anything actually happen? American Jewry is in fact not organized at the grass roots, and certainly not around the issue of defending Isael and Jewry's fundamental iintegrity. For consider the internal Jewish cultural war. Each side denies the integrity of the other side. Is it any wonder than that so many Jews turn off from this pathology. The real test of Zionism is to finally transcend the blame game and make 'center field' more than a blog site.
5 |
Elise westchester county,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
It is beyond my understanding how the Jews who have a voice in the Obama administation accept his total dieregard for anti-semtic actions. How the adminstiration can award such a major honor to anyone who acquiesed to any kind of hate is deplorable. But the irony is that if it was any other form of hate other than anti-semitism the award would not be being given. In fact she would have been held up to derision and would have been held accountable. Unfortunately, every generation of Jews has their Josephus, does it not? It seems we have too.
6 |
PZ,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Cry me a river, Gil. Bibi needs to freeze the settlements. Period. That is the only legitimate Zionist answer. Everything else is commentary.
7 |
Labhras Ireland,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Did not think you would publish my post.Just cannot take an opposing argument hmmm.
What was it you claimed to be---a passionate moderate.
Yeah like fox news is fair and balanced.
Pathetic.
8 |
neil sutherland,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
I have been reading Isreal newpapers for the last few weeks. The news articles are ok.
However, the columnists or blogs are kind of shocking to me.
In canada, we have no official discrimination, yet, ironically, the government is constantly warning us not to be prejudiced.
israel appears to be the opposite. I read of thwe Security Miinister caliing a security guard a 'dirty' Arab, and his office dismised it as 'common slang'. etc etc.
yet, every column - blog today and other days gets irrate at any suggessiion that improvement is order.
rods darsI
9 |
Amnon, the Great AMERICAN Southwest,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
hello gil,
remember me? I wrote you before separately, which I shall again. I warned you and others that Obama was no good at all, that he was a rotten anti-semite and an islamophile of the worst kind, that his own views reflected those of his buddies like Daddy Jerry. You told me you hoped otherwise, that he'd be a Centrist, but even you had your doubts.
This plus his refusal to name an adviser on Anti-Semitism, his stone silence in the face of rapes and murders of women in Iran, but hey, how he goes bananas if a Jew builds a home on his own land speaks volumes about what a turd he is.
10 |
Shalom Thein, Jerusalem, Israel,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Obama's foreign policy is plagued with twists and distortion of truth and abuse of human dignity. America has always been the paradigma of democracy, human rights, the country of oportunities and the leader in the fight for freedom. Obama utilizes all his natural skills and talents,with which he is gifted, to strengthen, encourage and promote evil, whether terrorist groups or oppresive-agressive regimes, depicting good as bad and bad as good and taking hostile steps against Israel and what Israel represents, thereby going against everything that America has traditionally stood for.
11 |
Gil Troy, Val David, Quebec,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
I was very careful in my article and did NOT call Mary Robinson anti-Semitic. I don't believe she is - but you shouldn't get a medal from the US for not being anti-Semitic. II warned against the moral neutrality of the politically correct and Obama's tone-deafness given her failure to fight anti-Western forces at the UN, especially at Durban -- I am always happy to learn from critics, but please do not distort my words.
12 |
Ed, UK,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
You say Mary Robinson displayed "consistent anti-Israel animus", yet your best and only concrete example of this animus is Durban 2001, where she famously spoke out against anti-semitism.
I have no idea what the criteria are for someone to get a Medal of Freedom, but if your objection here is that the individual concerned is anti-semitic/Israeli/zionist (it's hard to tell from your piece what precisely is the argument), and you present just one example of this animus, indeed an example where your target behaved quite commendably, I'm thinking your case is a little thin.
13 |
John K., Kenner, Louisiana,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
I disagree to a slight degree. The problem is not that Obama chose to honor a Neville Chamberlain when he should be seeking Winton Churchills, but that at a time when the United States needs a Winston Churchill, it chose a weak Neville Chamberlain.
14 |
Krissy McDonald,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Obama is sickening. All he wants to do is please everybody, not actually stand for anything or get anything done. The Jews really do need to stand up to this travesty of a President.
15 |
A Former Student, United States,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
President Obama, like President Carter, holds extreme anti-Zionist views and must be called out for them. Fortunately, Professor Troy uses his platform as a distinguished university professor to stand up for Israel and democracy, while refusing to be intimidated by his left-wing peers in academia. What an example for us all!
16 |
Reuven, USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Most American Jews have chosen the Democratic Party as their new Torah. They have no stake or interest in Israel's survival as a flesh-and-blood country. Only Jews who are helpless victims are truly moral. Unfortunately, most American Jews will love Obama no matter what.
17 |
The other Bob USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Sylvie, I'd like 4 U to explain just how Israel is an apartheid state when 20% of its population isn't Jewish. How is it "expansionist" when the disputed territory was taken in a defensive campaign to throw back invading Arab forces & the Arabs have rejected every proposal in negotiations? Martin, is freedom of speech only a good thing when U agree w/ what is said. No one is saying US policy should be dictated by Israei public opinion. But, would U deny Israelis from expressing an opinion? Particularly they're the ones who'll have to live w/ the consequences while UR safe & comfy in the USA.
18 |
The other Bob,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Martin, when people defend a suicide bomber who blew up a pizza parlor full of school children as "resistance", but call Israeli raids/strikes to capture or kill the terrorists as war crimes, you're damned right I'll scream anti-semitism. Nazi Germany was extreme right. Are you equating Israel with Nazi Germany?
19 |
Ardillaun,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
America has more to consider than the sensibilities a few Israeli extremists. President Robinson is widely admired in Ireland and across the world. If Obama had buckled to those who make false accusations against her, he would have sent the wrong message abroad and would have created a problem for himself in Ireland.
20 |
arthur jersey city NJ USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Robinson also met plo leaders in Orient House in intentional violation of Olo. She is simply anti Israel and anti Jewish. Her list of transgressions is longer than the article. This reveals the depth of Obamas anti Israel position. This is a message. Wake up US Jews
21 |
art jersey city,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
This is a slap in the face of Israel. The only consistent part of robinsons' philosophy is being anti Israel. She intentionally violated Oslo and met arafat in Orient House. Hardly and act of peace or respect. she deserves no commendation only exposure as an enemy of Israel. One must question why Irish snipers were recruited by hamas.
22 |
Elizabeth, London,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
Which part of the word 'Obama' you people cannot understand? Of course he will honor Mary Robinson or any other Jew-bashing creature that just turns up.
23 |
Ellis,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
Let obama pin that medal on Mary Robinson and let her think she is beyond reproach. Afterall she is getting this medal from a racist president who surrounds himself with some very questionable characters. As Jews we should know by now that nothing in this world is fair...Israel sits amidst a sea of barbarians and yet Israel is the bad one...Jews live quietly all over the world yet the world does not leave them alone...this is what we call "The Longest Hatred"...but we survive and flourish despite the hatred that surrounds us.Who cares about the medal..Mary Robinson can wear her medal in hell.
24 |
psk,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
We read Obama, when what is meant is the O administration. One doubts the President personally reviewed the whole list. But let that rest. He may advertently encourage evil, but I doubt that is his intent. The Public Row with Israel was supposed to play well in Arab and Islamic diplomatic circles, but instead he has just received two slaps (well, Hillary takes the blow, O gets it on the rebound). The horrors of Durban disappeared from the media on 11 Sept. 2001. Now the Mistress of Ceremony will be crowned in the Black House. His military & intel people will set him straight, one hopes.
25 |
Dr. Stephen MUnch Arizona,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
The comment concerning Obama's hidden agenda is exactly correct. Persons who are concerned abput truth and demaocracy should now se the under the table as well as eveil agenda of trying to destroy the US constitution as well as his true anti-semetic viewpoints.
No body raised any decent when many Jews were fored to leave thier homes. Homes that were built with love and care. Palastiniens were relocated and the facts revealed why and the UN the mother of all hypocracy screaming look waht Isreal has done.
26 |
moron galut,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
mary robinson is an anti-semite so this is a warning from bho of more bad relations with israel-perhaps bho sees the jewish community as a captive constituency committed to left -as appeasers like him who will vote democrat no matter what-is he right?
27 |
John Reilly San Diego,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
Why won't American Jews criticize Obama?
It is not just because he is liberal
-American Jews don't like Jimmy Carter, who's policies were almost identical to Obama's.
So why does Obama get a pass?
Could it be- because he's black?
This operates on 2 levels
1. Many American Jews are genuinely proud there is a black President.
2. On the other hand, many urban Jews grew up in neighborhoods where they
were in mortal fear of blacks in their public high schools
-and are habitually kowtowing to blacks, avoiding offense to them at any cost.
A real ghetto mentality.
28 |
John Williams,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
Why do you think that anything the President of the USA does has to have the approval of Israel.
29 |
Fnord,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
John Reilly: Why wont US jews critizise Obama? Why does he have a 70+% approval? Could it be that the Lieberman/Hagee/birther coalition wich is currently leading the front both in the US and here at the Jpost to most outsiders and rational folks seeem, ummm, batshit insane? Sit doown and read the commentariat on Jpost these days: Rabidly racist, rabidly hateful, rabidly negativist and more often than not looneyfringe religious. Now go figure.
30 |
Moises, Panama,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
It's interesting how perception of racism is defined by the victims, except when it comes to Jews. Even though the author of this article does not call Mrs. Robinson an anti-semite, most of the critics here need to point out how we Jews label as such " anybody who does not agree with us" or the like, or how we are "crazy" compared to everybody else.
This shows how what we Jews perceived as acceptance was only that we were momentarily useful - and in the famous words of Pirke Avot: "batel davar, batel ahava".
I for one, believe that we need only G-d, so say what you like, haters.
31 |
Brendan Butler Ireland,
Wednesday Aug 05, 2009
When I read an article like this it saddens me greatly as it shows how any criticism of Israel is deliberately misinterpreted as anti semitism. As an Irish person I am extremely proud of mary Robinson for her fearlessness in speaking out for human rights while High Commissioner for human rights especially against the Algerian Government .
32 |
Pat.... Ireland,
Thursday Aug 06, 2009
Mary Robinson is fearless and honest she does not hide behind words and stand up for what she believes in. It is shocking and show how twisted this newspaper is to display such views. It people do not agree with Israel policies they are labeled with anti semitism. Mary Robinson stands for blacks and whites for men and women and Jews and Arabs. In the past she has even spoken out again'st Ireland in relation to its treatment of homosexuals and immigrants to ireland. From what i can see in this world it is only acceptable to be Anti Arabs.
33 |
Eoin Canada,
Saturday Aug 08, 2009
first of all, Gil your article is ridiculous, it reads like some propaganda story from the enquirer, saying things like-"degenerating into an orgy of Israel- and Jew-bashing" is completely iresponsible and misleadin. you seem to hold a common misconception that criticising Israels policies is the same thing as being an anti-semite!! Mary Robinson is a great woman who has done more for human rights than most and fully deserves any awards she recieves. And finally,what right does anyone from Israel have to try and influence who the White House gives an award to??
34 |
Jim in Pennsylvania,
Saturday Aug 08, 2009
I think it would be unwise for the Israelis and the Jewish Americans to rile the Hibernian community. They don't call them the "Fighting Irish" for nothing.
35 |
rose israel,
Sunday Aug 09, 2009
Obama is a huge treath to the democratic world..
he knows how to talk well .
be aware he acts as a true anti semitic
36 |
azpaull,
Tuesday Aug 11, 2009
While her award is NOT based upon her acts/stmts on this one issue, it is my conclusion that her encouragement - silent or overt - of blatant anti-Jewish/Israel should disqualify her.
Thank you, Mr. Troy. I was looking for more on what Ms. Robinson has actually said - her defense (the Irish Times article) that she didn't have control over the Durban conf (or subsequent ones) struck me as a bit "off" because she didn't condemn the Durban results. Based on your obvious knowledge of the subject, I am concluding that she has NOT spoken out against the anti-Semitism of the Durban conf, etc.
37 |
Colm . Dublin Ireland,
Thursday Aug 13, 2009
As an Irish man a word of advice to Israel. Never pick a fight with the Irish goes without saying you will lose. Great seeing the picture of Obama awarding her with this award. Also I've read several articles that say Israeli NGO's even supported this guess they Anti Semitic as well.
38 |
john cork,
Thursday Aug 13, 2009
As an Irish man I am absalutley thrilled to see Mary Robinson receive this award. Its good to know she has been standing up for true injustis in this world, Jewish demonisation of Palistine. Im not anti-semetic I just know that israel has destroyed Palistine and its people and it is truely unbeleivable that jewish people can look away and pay no attention to the destruction they are causing and then demonise people who try to stand up against it. Stop calling people who dont agree with you anti-semetic
39 |
David New York,
Saturday Aug 15, 2009
The lack of a cohesive or indeed clear argument to sustain the charge that the former President of Ireland "presided over ... an orgy of Israel- and Jew-bashing", highlights the futility of attacking all those who legitimately challenge and criticize the more gruesome/inhuman consequences of current Israeli foreign policy , as anti-semites. Jewish people are a genuinely brilliant people. Considering many Jew's and Israeli's share such critical views, further affirms the futility of this Dershowitz style silencing charade. Do you honestly believe Israel should dictate to the US in such a way?
40 |
Rita L. Sydney Australia,
Friday Oct 30, 2009
It's just not trendy to stand up against anti-semitism and the demonisation of the jewish people, and Obama, Robinson, the UN and that Iranian Hitler-look-and-speak-and-act-alike "Imadinnerjacket" are all ever so trendy. I say YUK!! to this 4-leaved-clover !
Incidentally, I am German born and am disgusted at the demonisation of the jewish people, a near exact repeat of what happened in the land of my fathers only soooo recently.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |