|
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
Center Field: 'J Street' to the Left of me, jokers to the Right... Posted by Gil Troy
Comments: 26
When one is attacked from both sides, it's easy to feel virtuous. Having opponents from the far left and the far right does not guarantee you're a moderate. It simply situates you in what farmers who trusted butter over its artificial modern substitute would have called the "margarine middle." Last week I was hit from both extremes. There seems to be a missing "nuance gene" when it comes to Israel. The most reasonable people, the most skilled professionals, somehow find themselves behaving irrationally, talking wildly and acting sloppily when the topic is raised. My previous blog, "Israel's self-hating Jews," which condemned Ariel Mayor Ron Nachman for blaming the Obama settlement freeze idea on the president's "Jew boy" advisers, triggered numerous attacks against me for daring to question the mayor's horrific choice of words. You would have thought Mayor Nachman was the holy Reb Nachman of Breslav, given his devotees' intensity. My critics refused to acknowledge that using such language - when trying to convince a State Department delegation, no less - was crude, rude and self-defeating. Nachman's followers took an attack on him as an attack on them, on Israel, on the Jewish people and on truth itself, while perceiving it as a deluded defense of Obama's foreign policy, despite my criticisms of the administration's Israel strategy. Most disturbingly, they felt completely justified using offensive, racist language to describe fellow Jews with whom they disagree, thus undercutting those of us who have been forced to spend far too much time fighting anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism, racism, and ethnic stereotyping of all kinds. These rhetorical bomb-throwers confirmed every liberal caricature of the aggressive, self-righteous, my-way-or-the-highway settlers - but characteristically blamed me for helping to perpetuate that stereotype. Let me say regarding the "Jew boy" issue what I say when anti-Semites masquerading as "mere" anti-Zionists compare Israelis to Nazis. Intelligent people can find a rich choice of words to convey disdain without resorting to cheap, ugly, inflammatory anti-Semitic language that reveals the critics' own prejudices. It is particularly obnoxious and foolish to call Obama advisers who happen to be Jewish "Jew boys" and accuse them of dictating his policy. It absolves non-Jews like George Mitchell, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama himself of any responsibility. It perpetuates the myth of undue Jewish influence on American administrations, be they right or left. It only alienates potential allies. At the same time, looking to the Left, I read The New York Times Magazine's portrayal of J-Street, "The New Israel Lobby," which defines itself as "pro-peace," as if other Jewish political organizations were not. This love letter masquerading as serious journalism read more like this new organization's PR release than a piece written by the usually thoughtful, critical journalist James Traub, whose work I have long respected. As Shmuel Rosner noted in his blog, Traub failed to interview even one person "on the record" criticizing the new lobby. Most disturbing, however, was the crude caricature of the pro-Israel community underlying Traub's analysis. Traub pitted his heroes, the progressive, modern, post-Woodstock, charmingly American, Bohemian, Obamanian J-Street lobbyists against the villains of his piece, the old-fashioned and hopelessly anachronistic, Holocaust-obsessed paranoids running the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), who play to Jews' "ancestral impulses." "This is the world that shaped the mainstream American Jewish groups," Traub writes, describing the ADL's Abraham Foxman's birth in Poland, the ZOA's Morton Klein's birth in a displaced persons camp, and the enduring post-Holocaust obsession with "eternal vigilance" and "marketing" a sense of "besetting peril." There was nowhere in this dualistic universe for someone like Jennifer Laszlo Mizrahi, who campaigned for Bill Clinton and Al Gore in 2000, and who, being in her mid-forties, is younger than Foxman or Klein, yet founded "The Israel Project." Or the elegant, diplomatic, non-Holocaust obsessed head of the American Jewish Committee, David Harris, who was twenty in 1969, Woodstock summer, and eloquently defends Israel as a liberal democracy. Or, for that matter, the hundreds of thousands of even younger, hipper Jews in their 20s or 30s who have visited Israel through Birthright Israel and neither bashed Israel during the Gaza War as J Street did, nor reek of herring and the Holocaust the way Traub implied most Israel supporters do. J-Street, President Obama, and, apparently certain New York Times reporters must understand that supporting Israel is not a psychosis, and not necessarily expansionist. Imposing "settlement freezes" and caricaturing Zionism as only being about the Holocaust ignores the central problem for many of us in the genuine middle. Millions of peace-loving Israelis and American Jews supported Oslo but saw it feed Palestinian terror that killed over a thousand innocents. Millions even supported the Gaza disengagement, but then saw Hamas launch thousands of rockets into the Negev. Those of us in this genuine middle take seriously the vicious, exterminationist anti-Semitic rhetoric among the Palestinians, in the Hamas Charter and in the Arab media because we have seen what happens when you don't. Until those who fancy themselves "pro-peace" figure out how to acknowledge that pain and point the Palestinians and the Arabs toward real change, they will fail to sway that peace consensus among Israelis and Jews that has always opted for compromise and a shot at reconciliation. Call us the "twice-burned" in the middle - refusing to indulge in "Jew boy" rhetoric and not obsessed with the Holocaust. Our historical memories are much shorter. We are justifiably worried about Palestinian terrorism, Hamas extremism, the Islamist culture of martyrdom, and the continuing calls for Israel's destruction. We desperately await reassurance - from the Palestinians, their Arab allies and their Western enablers.
1 |
Moshe, Kfar Sava,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
"We desperately await reassurance from the Palestinians, their Arab allies..." -- Mr. Troy, you can't possibly be that naive, can you? Or unaware of the reality? Or dishonest? Or was this supposed to be sarcasm? It's not funny, really. Especially because we have policy-makers who act like they take this seriously. Anyone who even in jest ties his policies and outlook to such an outrageously pathological statement has no credibility. Why do you bother writing?
2 |
Georgette, New York,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
I wholeheartedly agree with Gil Troy. James Traub's press release about J Street, masquerading as an article, in this week's New York Times Magazine, is outrageous. J Street is oh-so-cool in Traub's mind, while the pro-Israel mainstream is viewed as an anachronism. Thus, anyone unfortunate enough to be born when Jews were in real trouble in the 1930s and 1940s is ruled out, in Traub's mind, as tainted goods. Instead, the robotic ideologues of J Street are worshiped. The New York Times ought to be ashamed of itself!
3 |
Ronald USA,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
I agree with Mr. Troy that mayor Nachman's use of the English language left a lot to be desired and will not persuade anyone that he knows what he is talking about when it comes to US politics. The point I would make is that Obama's Jewish advisors are not his primary sources of information and policy toward Israel. They have not been the major architects. People like Zbigniew Brezenski, Samantha Powers, Anthony Lake, Susan Rice, and Robert Malley have been. Even if Emanuel and Axelrod were not in their positions, the policy would be the same - bad for Israel.
4 |
Colin Beck, Surrey, B.C., Canada,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
''The enemy was in front of me, to the right of me, and to the left of me, so I attacked.'' [Field Marshall Foche, Commander in chief of the French & Allied armies in W.W. 1] Well, not exactly, the French army did attack directly into the German army shredding machine, but Marshall Foche never made it out of the chalet, and spent most of the war within 50 feet of a good wine cellar. Most bums sitting on a park bench nursing a bottle of cheap booze are Marshall Foches in denial. All the enemy wanted to do was kick the bum off his perch, so somebody else could feed the pigeons. -- W.W.1 = W.W.3
5 |
David Zanger,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
I certainly am not waiting for reassurance from the same people who have been thinking of ways to kill and maim us for centuries. You should be seeking reassurance from the IDF that they are still willing to defend people who cling to a label like moderate in the face of enemy extremism. What is there to be moderate about anyway? Rocket fire, blood libels? Kidnappings and war? And why are you NOT obsessed with the holocaust? How could you not be? Is it not the single worst thing ever perpetrated by gentiles against Jews? Are the conditions not set for another one?
6 |
Colin Beck, Surrey, B.C., Canada,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
''The enemy was in front of me, to the left of me, and to the right of me, so I attacked.'' That's what a drunk says when he crosses the street with a cheap bottle of booze under his arm. --- All the main causes of World War One are present today in the mid east. The #1 cause of World War one, Two and now Three is mentioned in Daniel 11:30. Being GRIEVED [pre-war] and having INDIGNATION [war] against the Holy Covenant, and having INTELLIGENCE WITH [swapping information with] them that forsake the Holy Covenant. The enemy wants GOD'S PEOPLE to take a Trojan horse pandemic virus into the temple.
7 |
Jan, Australia,
Sunday Sep 13, 2009
I have read books on the theory of how we position ourselves. They have done scientific studies where groups of people clearly biased to issues are presented with a series of news reports. Some were pro, some were anti and some contained exactly half-and-half of two viewpoints. Consistently people biased to one side voted the half-and-half biased to the opposition. This is scientific fact. For the biased there is no middle ground: those who are not 'for' are seen as 'against' Only the truly unbiased (those who don't care) see both sides. Clearly, regarding Israel only a very few don't care.
8 |
Ron, California,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
A very insightful article. However, to imply that those who have a healthy awareness and understanding of the Holocaust are obsessed, is unfair. The fact is that as unhip and out of style as it may seem, the Holocaust is always relevant, because it happened. Unfortunately, today's generation, which is far removed from that nightmare, is less able to appreciate that fact than those who lived during that hell.
9 |
J Burrows,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
robin
The fact that a blog entry "New York Times Censored Cartoon" went viral suggests a tipping point may be coming on US public opinion about Israel
10 |
Mark, Ottawa, Canada,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
The Obama Administration and their ME policy supporters such as J-Street are terribly mistaken if they think that additional compromises by Israel will lead to peace.There is no Arab partner for peace, at least not now. The leaders of Saudi Arabia, who advance the "Saudi peace initiative" are loathe to consider confidence building measures, such as allowing Israeli civil aircraft to fly over the kingdom en route to third country destinations. The Arab proposals are only meant to further endanger Israel and Jews everywhere. Any defence of such proposals is at cross purposes with true peace .
11 |
Shel Zahav,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
American newspapers, including the New York Times, no longer inform most people. The influence of newspapers is waning and with it, much of "leftism". A tipping point indeed has been reached and the rout has begun.
12 |
Chris USA,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
You point out but fail to specifically mention that these attacks against you and Israel appear to be public policy initiatives engineered by the US administration. I wonder if you are even aware of this possibility? Certainly it fits the rational and character of these attacks. Unless some one knows a better reason I suspect I am right...
13 |
Dr. Naftali Moses,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
Excellent piece. raq hazaq ve'emats!
14 |
Shlomo, Israel,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
"Jokers" is a much nicer term than "thugs" and "hoodlums". You could use it for the guys from "j" street (J is for joker, jerk, and johns, even Janis faced jerks).
You still have to work on your obvious disdain for all things right of center. Like it or not, the right wing is legitimate, especially in Israel where the Left has led us to so many tragedies.
15 |
Terry - Eilat, Israel,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
Stop babbling about ''peace'' - we will NEVER get peace, it's completely divorced from reality to even think about it, nothing but rhetoric disconnected from reality. All we are doing is talking to ourselves. J-Street & Co. are far-left extremists hiding behind liberal rhetoric, they are anti-Israel anti-Semites financed by Arabs & Iranians & George Soros. As for Mr Emanuel & Axelrod, they're no better than the J-Street crowd & deserve zero respect.
16 |
Adam, USA,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
I find this series of articles offensive. I think that Obama, and Samantha Powers, and Bresenski are anti-Jews. I think that Axelrod and Emanual do NOT hate themselves - just the opposite, their unmitigated narcissism means they will step on the neck of most any Jew (including their parents) to get ahead.
And to call us Jews "Holocaust" obsessed is Holocaust denial-light.
A deeper truth would be to examine how the Germans successfully seeded the Arab world with Nazism and how the "Palestinians" carry the torch of evil intentions towards Jews for the rest of the world.
17 |
Sharona Israel,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
I am not waiting "desperately" for Arab "reassurance". Not now and not ever. Every compromise or withdrawal has been met with thousands upon thousands of missiles and dead Israelis. Saudi Arabia has been upping the pressure on American companies to comply with their boycott rules. Yale U trembles in the face of Muslim violence. Americans! Start fitting your daughters for the burkha and the reality of Islam, as in Saudi Arabia. Under Shaaria law advocated by one of Obamination's advisors they will never even be allowed to drive. Memo to Gil Troy- they ARE jewboys.
18 |
Rafael France/US,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
It is fitting that the NYT poo poohs memories of the Holocaust. After all, the NYT airbrushed the Holocaust out of the news fit to print during WW II. The one article it printed was in the back pages in spite of a flood of reports on it. When will well-meaning Jstreeters withdraw their ostrich heads from the sand and do a little homework regarding the similarities between the Islamists' call for countrycide of Israel parroting Hiter and Goebbels and the run-up to the Holocaust? With nukes, they could do more in a second than Hitler did in 4 years. Ignoring history invites its repetition.
19 |
samg, nyc ny,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
Hmm a very "Charlie Brown article", which proves nothing. Being wishy washy and squarely in the middle doesnt absolve one of anything, nor prove you are "the moderate voice". I dont expect Obama, Clinton to be pro Israel,we all know they arent. When Obama can go on his arab appology tour and purposely neglect to mention Israels 2500yr history - thats NOT pro Israel. J-Street is the Haartez crowd - those who think that the arabs that started 5 wars and stole Jewish history are the people you try and accomodate (Just say NO). Rahm ect should know better but dont, they are the New J-Street.
20 |
David usa,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
A voice of reason from the "margarine middle". Nevertheless, given the bankrupt artery-clogging policies of the AIPAC butter , I'll try the new J-Street saturated fat-free margarine with renewed hope for a healthier future.
21 |
Alan-NYC,
Monday Sep 14, 2009
To 21st century "liberalism",Israel is its greatest bete noir."White" Israel as oppressor of "Brown" Palestine.They don't condemn "brown" oppressors like Robert Mugabee or the rulers of Sudan who commit genocide but offer them cover.The left has a new definition of free speech: shouting down/banning pro-Israel speakers & boycotts against Israeli academics & films.It calls Israel nazis & takes the terms of Jewish oppression like ghetto & Holocaust & makes them the property of the Palestinians.Obama as an astute politican suger coats this using other words but in reality there is no difference
22 |
Allyson Rowen Taylor,
Tuesday Sep 15, 2009
Gil Troy is right on in his analysis of the "pro peace movement". As a co founder of "Z" Street, an new organization dedicated to the sovernity of the state of Israel and it's right to self defense, with Jews, Christians and others as members, we too, are "pro peace". No Jewish organization loves war, and would not welcome peace. But at what cost? The J Street members have never once addresses who "the others" would be that could be part of the new Palestian state. They refuse to discuss the implications of a border that sits one mile from Ben Gurion Airport. This is a very complicated issue.
23 |
Yidl, Medicine Hat AB,
Tuesday Sep 15, 2009
Why is nobody investigating who these J Street clowns are?
How many are Jews, how many are Gentiles?
How many of those Jews are married to Jews?
Who are their children?
Did they or their children ever live in Israel?
What is their occupation?
Are they financially profiting from their political activities, like Peace now?
Once this info comes to the open, we'll have a clear picture who is fighting for what.
24 |
Albert Reingewirtz PA, USA,
Saturday Sep 19, 2009
"the enduring post-Holocaust obsession with "eternal vigilance" and "marketing" a sense of "besetting peril."" You bet your you know what! I lost most of my family and barely survived. American Jews voted for Roosevelt and now for Obama. One close the doors of escape to the USA the other spend 20 years cheering Wright. You bet we look at Jews siding with anti-Semitism and anti-Israel! The same American Jews regarded helping Soviet Jews as a political act! You bet I am offended that any Jew voted for Obama. Non-longer a fanatic Democrat!
25 |
Alan,
Sunday Sep 20, 2009
No I disagree, only JStreet is telling people the real truth about what is happening!
Tripwire08@cs.com
26 |
Philip Greenberg, Westmount, Quebec,
Wednesday Sep 23, 2009
First rate analysis and first rate writing. Keep up the good fight for rationality, civility and support for what is right and true.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |