Wednesday Sep 17, 2008

A Woman's Own: Where is the 'Women for Livni' group?

Posted by Elana Maryles Sztokman
Comments: 10
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

On Tuesday, the National Organization of Women and five other feminist groups in the US announced the formation of "Women for Obama" to actively campaign for Obama. "We don't think it's much to break a glass ceiling for one woman and leave millions of women behind," said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation. In other words, Sarah Palin as VP may be good for Sarah Palin, but her policies on issues such as abortion, health care, and the environment will ultimately hurt many more.

This turn of events has gotten me asking myself, where are the "Women for Livni" groups?

There are none.

This is quite astounding in a way. I mean, today Israel is going to be receiving a new head of state, possibly a woman, possible the first woman in forty years, only the second one in all of Israeli history, and women - and men - are mostly quiet. The feeling is of, 'well, another day at the office'. Why is that?

One reason has nothing to do with gender. The civic apathy that cuts across the country is a direct function of the distorted political system. Sure, we're "getting" a new prime minister - exactly that way - but who is electing her? A total of 74,000 people? That's less than 1% of the population!

The electoral system continues to astound me with the lack of power it offers the people. The main source of corruption in the Israeli government is this: there is no direct representation, the people are powerless in choosing their leaders, and when politicians get elected, they have zero incentive to listen to the people. Knesset members are accountable only to one another to maintain their positions. There is no reason at all for "leaders" to heed the people.

Olmert has been the most glaring example of this warped phenomenon. How does a man with less than 5% approval rating, with hundreds of thousands of protesters calling for his resignation, stay in office for nearly three years? The answer is this - there may have been twice as many people calling for his resignation in Rabin square than all the Kadima members going to vote today, but it was those Kadima voters who put him in office and not the protesters. The protesters continue to be irrelevant.

The civic passivity engendered by a system that neuters its general populace can be seen across the board. But I think that Livni herself promotes a certain passivity as well. She has not spoken out for political reform, she has not spoken out for gender, and she has not even spoken out for herself. She sits there passively as Olmert defends her against attacks from Barak - in fact she appears to sits quietly next to Olmert all the time. Her entire body language is more often than not passive.

Certainly we admire her for not getting her hands "dirty", for not engaging in mudslinging. And the passivity has enabled her to survive in this system. But the result is that her constituency, if it exists, the people who really want her to be a clean alternative to Olmert, are sitting quietly on the sidelines. There isn't even a "Women for Livni" group. She could have come to women's groups around the country to speak, to inspire, to talk about social change and Israeli society. But she didn't. She could have rallied us up, gotten us excited, given women a voice, heard what we have to say about the country, given us hope. But she saw no reason to do that. The women are not electing her.

Livni is also a bit in denial about the entire gender thing. She has said that she doesn't want to be looked at as a woman. This is also why she has not been an active legislator on behalf of women's issues either. Just as women in the US are faced with the dilemma of choosing a woman versus choosing a candidate who is good for women, here too, the sense is that the woman candidate is not necessarily one who will be good for women. This, too, keeps women from being Livni's cheerleaders. Even if we do stand on street corners with posters for Livni, can we count on her to cheer for women once she becomes head of state? I'm not certain.

So we are getting a new head of State in Israel, possibly changing women's history, at least in the books.

But as long as women remain passive in the civic process, real social change will remain elusive.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Joseph, New York City, USA, Thursday Sep 18, 2008
I think evaluating Livni's qualifications without regard to her gender is a step foward. Consider how Catholics advanced in American politics. In the 1928 election, anti-Catholic sentiment hurt Alfred Smith's presidential campaign. In 1960, Kennedy addressed concerns about his religion in a historic speech and won the presidency. This year, Biden is on the ticket with Obama, but no one sees him as the "Catholic candidate", because being Catholic is no longer a political liability. The highest level of acceptance is when no one bothers to mention what demographic group you're in.
2  |   Sharona Israel, Thursday Sep 18, 2008
There is no Women for Sarah Palin group either. I wouldn't dream of voting for Livni or any other Kadima candidate woman or not.
3  |   Brian , USA, Thursday Sep 18, 2008
third in Israeli history, Devorah Ruled over ancient Israel, during war, book of Judges chapters 4-7
4  |   Elana Sztokman, Thursday Sep 18, 2008
Actually, there is a Women for Palin group -- [ Link to page ] / But I'm not trying to say Livni should be evaluated on the basis of being a woman. I'm saying it would be nice if a woman candidate expressed a commitment to women's issues, such as repairing gender pay gaps, or addressing the gender inequality in economic and political leadership. She sort of says, there is no gender problem in society because she's fine. But she's lucky, and it would be nice if she acknowledged the difficulties other women face, and committed to improving society.
5  |   Yitzhak US, Friday Sep 19, 2008
The major point is that she isn't qualified to be PM period, woman or man. She has been negotiating and she has put Jerusalem on the table. If she says she hasn't she is a liar as well.She is weak.She is not a believer.When will the people of Israel not recognize you are a covenant people.STOP TRYING TO BE LIKE THE GOYIM AROUND YOU! She will give back most of Judea & Samaria.Whether you believe it or not the Land belongs to The G-d of Abraham,Isaac & Jacob.He will not allow anyone,woman or man,Jew or gentile, to divide His Land.He gave to the Jews for an everlasting possession.EARLY ELECTION!
6  |   yona loriner, Friday Sep 19, 2008
yep guess there r none
7  |   Adalberto-Portugal, Friday Sep 19, 2008
Hi ,I m Adalberto,studying economics in Portugal.About Livni I agree entirely with Joseph,from New York-USA .He said that «evaluating Livni´s qualifications without regard to her gender is a step forward.I think that this is the key factor,because Livni´s biography itself proves that she is able to do any job and she doesnt need to be evaluated on the basis of being a woman.Offcourse I believe that if elected she will be also concern about many specific women issues. Regards,Adalberto..
8  |   Roberto Argentina/Mexico, Saturday Sep 20, 2008
Livni head of state? Correct me if I am wrong, but I think that the actual head of state is the President. Livni would be a future Prime Minister, who is not the "head of state".
9  |   Rafi, Baltimore, Sunday Sep 21, 2008
I believe Adalberto is technically correct - Peres would probably technically be Israel's "head of state," except that the Israeli Presidency is more of a figurehead position than anything else - the nitty gritty politics takes place in the Prime Minister's Office.'' I also don't know how much Livni is really looking forward to this position - it's bound to kill her politically and she's still young. I commend her for not playing on the women's rights card - it's not likely to be a big issue in Israel during her term.
10  |   Daniel in San Jose, CA, Sunday Sep 21, 2008
The people of Israel really wanted Ariel Sharon. Since Israel's electoral system didn't allow them to vote for him directly, they had to vote for Kadima instead and got this large assortment of political opportunists and coatail riders along with him. Now that he is gone, Israel is stuck with the choice of these 74,000 people until the next election. Tzipi wasn't evaluated by her gender or anything else She was next in line in Kadima after Sharon and Olmert. She did run the foreign ministry efficiently & without scandal. Too bad she had to implement Olmert's foreign policy in that job.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

A Woman's Own The Talmud says there are seventy faces to the Torah. I believe there are seventy faces to the person. I am a teacher, writer, researcher, activist, educator, thinker, organizer, fundraiser, feminist, parent, spouse, daughter, sister and friend. Or, if you prefer, I am an Israeli, American, energetic, opinionated, passionate, religious, determined and generally optimistic Jewish woman. It's not quite seventy, but we're getting there.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. World opinion: who cares?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Glen A. Fritz
    Tuesday Nov 17, 2009
  2. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  3. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

DALevit Palm Springs, CA USA: With all due respect, your post implies that the "separation" is indefinite, and yet it is only for the two weeks during the time of the female's flow. Is the morbid sentiment expressed really necessary, when all will all go back to normal soon? Is that 2 weeks enough to nullify everything else good about the relationship? Won't there be plenty of hugs and kisses in a few days, after the period of uncleanness passes? Anyone reading this with no knowledge of the Orthodox ways would get a terribly distorted view of things from reading this. DAL
Dr S McCosker Australia: I have a suggestion for Tal & Melchior. Google 'Peter Andrews' 'Australian Story' 'Natural Sequence Farming', 'Natural Sequence Association'. What Andrews does in arid infertile Aussie landscapes, to turn flash-flooding gullies into healthy streams, recharge aquifers, heal salinised soil, stop erosion, build soil fertility, restore biodiversity [& thus boost farm productivity & animal & human health]- ought to work in Israel. I urge Tal & Melchior: invite Andrews to Israel & show him the Negev & give him a wadi & an eroded hillside to work his magic on, for a demo project.
Joseph London: An interesting alternative interpretation of the saying of the Sages. Many of us understand it to refer to a chavruta in learning, i.e. a partner to share one's learning, not a marriage partner. There are, of course, many sayings praising marriage such as all the blessings a man receives are because of his wife, etc..