Thursday Aug 28, 2008

A Woman's Own: The F Word (It's not what you think)

Posted by Elana Maryles Sztokman
Comments: 9
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

What is it about the word "feminism" that makes some women squirm and some men shudder? Even people who believe in much of what feminism stands for - human dignity for all, repairing social injustices, offering equal opportunities and respect for women - often prefer not to call themselves feminists. Why is that?

I thought about this recently as I read a blog by 22-year old Kim Gouz, published in Haaretz recently, in which she describes her transition from American non-feminist to Israeli feminist. Her lovely essay, in which she chronicles shocking encounters with one injustice after another in Israel, the journey that has eventually led her to adopt this admirable pose, opens with a statement that is nonetheless jarring to those of us who have been there for some time already: "I was not the pro-choice pushing, anti-pornography ranting, condom-dispersing type."

So that is what I am? Ranting and standing on street-corners in a plastic costume resembling male genitals? The only epithet missing from this vivid description is the all-time favorite 'feminazi'.....

Already by the 1990s, Susan Faludi, in her book Backlash: The Undeclared War Against Women, brilliantly documented the anti-feminist sentiment spilling across American and influencing politics and popular media. The extent to which political leaders will vilify women activists in order to protect their own hinds, is astounding . Faludi, whose investigative skills are unparalleled, eloquently illustrates that this backlash against feminists is extreme, purposeful, and beyond anything that exists in other political discourses. When it comes to women's issues, the personal is political indeed.

More recently, a fascinating study came out in 2005 issue of Gender and Society examining the incongruity between people's beliefs about gender and their self-identification as feminists. Janice McCabe, in "What's in a Label? The Relationship between Feminist Self-Identification and "Feminist" Attitudes among US Women and Men", argues that people's reluctance to identify as feminists stems in part from the anti-feminist backlash (who wants to join 'feminazis?'), in part from the image of feminists as radicals and militants, and in part, ironically, from the fact that young women are so successful in their lives that feminism is not relevant to them.

In other words, feminism has done such a good job at improving women's lives in America - in spite of the challenging political conditions - that young women, like Kim Gouz, have no need for or interest in feminism. This latter theory may find some anecdotal evidence in Gouz's personal journey. When smart young women encounter head-on those shocking phenomena that feminists have been ranting about for two generations now, they, too, may find themselves shouting. It's interesting, really. If I think about myself in my early twenties, my journey into feminism was probably not that much different from Kim's.

I've done some work on this issue of feminist self-report in the context of research I'm conducting on Jewish masculinities. I've interviewed some 50 religious men about issues of identity, gender, religion, and relationships. So far I've found a similar reluctance among many men - even men who are promoting women's equality in their daily lives - to call themselves feminists. Thankfully, though, it is not the case for all men. I have spoken to some inspiring folk who dare to be fully feminist and who are completely dedicated to fairness and justice between the genders. One such man, we'll call him 'Azriel' from LA, is so passionately feminist that he has spent much of his volunteer time protesting for not only women's rights but also gay and lesbian rights. He does this neither as a woman nor as a homosexual, but just as a person who believes that this is what human beings ought to be doing in their lives. He believes, in fact, that this is God's work. I couldn't agree more.

It was so deeply inspiring to me that I wanted to share here some of his words:

I think it's our responsibility to teach our sons to be feminists, and I think it's our responsibility to teach straight people to be advocates for everybody who is another. But it goes beyond that. It's our lives that are enriched with everybody who is fully engaged. I mean, we'll be a stronger community if everybody feels that they have a place in it. I want people to be able to bite onto as much as they want to bite into."

Thank you Azriel, for giving us words of hope.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Gnarlodious, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
You rock.
2  |   shlomo from jerusalem, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
The fact that you praise gay and lesbian rights proves that you are an opponent of the Torah which clearly forbids such activity. SEE LEVITICUS 18:22
3  |   nkd, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
The problem with feminism and what makes us all uncomfortable is that they are not emphasizing their femininity while seeking equality, they rather want to be men. Case in point: religious rituals - they are looking to read the Torah, get aliyahs, etc. - roles throughout history assigned to men. Why not remain a woman but seek equality in esteem and importance. Rather than celebrating the birth of a girl with a kiddush or open-house, they have to make a feminized version of a bris. I am all for women climbing the corporate ladder, but remain women.
4  |   Jackie, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
Brilliant! Women and men should be proud to be feminists!
5  |   Akiva Goldberg, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
The so-called "feminists" are not really feminists...they are just trying to masculinize women. Men and women are equally but not arithmetically like the "feminists" believe. Being equal does not mean 50% of the MKs are men so 50% should be women...NO...it means women should have equal opportunity, if they choose to follow that path. Just because a woman chooses a different role than her husband (ie. to stay at home) does not mean her role is any less important or inequal to that of a man. On the contrary, in Judaism and in our society, there is no job more important than raising children.
6  |   THK Toronto Canada, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
Feminism, by design, was simply a movement to promote equality for half the world's population, namely it's women. Zionism, by design, was a movement to promote the return of Jews to their historical homeland. Both these movements having succeeded in promoting their ideas, are now faced with redefining their orignal intent, but the evolution of ideas, like everything else, has the defects of its merits. This is prime ground for the naysayers to jump on, so the solution is not to redesign feminism, but to rename it.
7  |   Tony - Reno Nevada USA, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
"What is it about the word "feminism" that makes some women squirm and some men shudder? Even people who believe in much of what feminism stands for - human dignity for all, repairing social injustices, offering equal opportunities and respect for women - often prefer not to call themselves feminists. Why is that?" It is not that simple. If it were only about your statement then great. What feminism IS about is social manipulation that demonizes men and the ultimate control of all social systems that eventually relegate men to drone status. It's human dignity for women but not for men.
8  |   Adam, USA, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
The problem is your assumptions, that feminism stands for "human dignity for all, repairing social injustices, offering equal opportunities and respect for women" This is wrong. Feminism, at least in its contemporary form, believes that men are pigs, women should be completely independent of men, that there is no difference between the sexes, that gender is a social construct, and eliminates women's self-respect for their womanhood. There was more respect for women back in the day when men were supposed to stand up for women, but now the feminist movement has turned men into beasts and wimps.
9  |   Frank in Boston, Thursday Aug 28, 2008
I have yet to meet a feminist that radiates genuine feminity. Early feminists had a real sense of dignity and womanhood and worked to bring that dignity to other women. But in no time the bad apples came forward. Feminism, once standing for something of real value, now incorporates the perverse. Women of grace are now replaced by women with selfish ulterior motives. What does lesbianism have to do with true women's rights? How did the perverse become part of a dignified cause? Who can blame others for being offended and repulsed by such things, and the people that champion them?
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

A Woman's Own The Talmud says there are seventy faces to the Torah. I believe there are seventy faces to the person. I am a teacher, writer, researcher, activist, educator, thinker, organizer, fundraiser, feminist, parent, spouse, daughter, sister and friend. Or, if you prefer, I am an Israeli, American, energetic, opinionated, passionate, religious, determined and generally optimistic Jewish woman. It's not quite seventy, but we're getting there.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. World opinion: who cares?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Glen A. Fritz
    Tuesday Nov 17, 2009
  2. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  3. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

DALevit Palm Springs, CA USA: With all due respect, your post implies that the "separation" is indefinite, and yet it is only for the two weeks during the time of the female's flow. Is the morbid sentiment expressed really necessary, when all will all go back to normal soon? Is that 2 weeks enough to nullify everything else good about the relationship? Won't there be plenty of hugs and kisses in a few days, after the period of uncleanness passes? Anyone reading this with no knowledge of the Orthodox ways would get a terribly distorted view of things from reading this. DAL
Dr S McCosker Australia: I have a suggestion for Tal & Melchior. Google 'Peter Andrews' 'Australian Story' 'Natural Sequence Farming', 'Natural Sequence Association'. What Andrews does in arid infertile Aussie landscapes, to turn flash-flooding gullies into healthy streams, recharge aquifers, heal salinised soil, stop erosion, build soil fertility, restore biodiversity [& thus boost farm productivity & animal & human health]- ought to work in Israel. I urge Tal & Melchior: invite Andrews to Israel & show him the Negev & give him a wadi & an eroded hillside to work his magic on, for a demo project.
Joseph London: An interesting alternative interpretation of the saying of the Sages. Many of us understand it to refer to a chavruta in learning, i.e. a partner to share one's learning, not a marriage partner. There are, of course, many sayings praising marriage such as all the blessings a man receives are because of his wife, etc..