|
Tuesday Mar 24, 2009
A Woman's Own: Shame on you, Gila Katsav Posted by Elana Sztokman
Comments: 15
I have my own Moshe Katsav story. When Katsav, then Israel's president, visited Australia in March 2005, and I was working at JNF in the Israeli-professional hub of Beth Weizmann, I was asked to join the president's local support staff for those few days. At the time it was a big thrill, and of course all of Jewish Australia was abuzz over the impending Israeli presidential visit Down Under.
Well, I had an even greater thrill when one of Katsav's senior staffers came into the back room and said, "The President would like a massage. Does anyone know a good massage therapist?" Well, I knew one! My husband, Jacob, was working as a massage therapist - and was a die-hard Zionist who would undoubtedly jump at the opportunity to serve the State of Israel in whatever manner happened to be available. The massage required some logistical maneuvers: Katsav was staying in the city and was giving his big speech to the community on Saturday night (a speech which turned out to be a dud - he was thereafter noted for being an exceptionally boring orator, and that was before the three-hour flop we witnessed last week). So anyway, Jacob had to rush to the city as soon as Shabbat was over in order to get the president's massage in before the Big Speech. Jacob prepared his stuff on Friday, and the second Shabbat was out, he grabbed his table and jumped into the car. Within five minutes, however, the call came. "Forget the massage," the senior staffer said. "The President does not get massages from men. Only from women." At the time, we shrugged off this event as, well, an expression of the many phobias of heterosexual men (think George Costanza). But in light of all that has emerged since about Katsav, especially this week when he was indicted for two counts of rape and several accounts of sexual assault, with graphic descriptions provided by no less than nine different women from various periods in his life, a clear picture of Katsav and his alleged attitude toward women has emerged. The charge sheet paints a portrait of a controlling, manipulative, sexually obsessed and vicious rapist. Perhaps the most startling of these images comes from Gila Katsav, the silent and dutiful "Stand by Your Man" woman, protector and protected, whose intermittent expressions of undying support for her accused husband add mystery and enigma to the entire story. Yediot journalist Merav Betito interviewed Moshe and Gila this week, not only to talk about the mister's ill-fated attempt at vindication through his rambling, chaotic and at times verbally violent three-hour diatribe, but also to get the story from the missus. As Moshe went on and on about the minutiae of the case, sifting through boxes of testimony, he said to the reporter, "I'm going to get you more examples of this - Gila they're on page 29. Find the page." Gila, in her wife-slash-secretary role, had just emerged from the kitchen where she was washing dishes from lunch, (By the way, considering the taxpayers just gave Katsav a multi-million shekel living allowance, why doesn't Gila at least have some help in the kitchen?) and hastily found him the page he needed. "You see?" she said. "You still need me." The entire scene is chilling not only in the way it suggests layers of Katsav's troubling relationships with women, but also because of the interaction between man and wife that forms the cornerstone of their definitions of gender. Perhaps most disturbing is the way Gila seems to be frantically trying to prove Katsav needs her. Given the surrounding circumstances, one would think Moshe would be down on his knees in gratitude that she has stayed with him throughout this fiasco, trying to prove to her that she should stay with him! This pose of servitude coupled with the fearfulness that the powerful spouse will abandon her for no longer being "needed" is the classic abused woman's stance. Put up with everything, be pushed around and serve every need of the man, in exchange for the "privilege" of being allowed to remain in his presence. Throughout the interview, Katsav displayed other signature signs of a man who has no respect for women. He repeatedly referred to his accusers, as well as the women who worked for him generally, as banot (girls) and not women, a common sting in Israeli society even among the most high level professional settings, a usage that systematically infantilizes women. Similarly, he disparagingly dismissed the reporter's questions and her entire professional identity by calling her gvirti, loosely translated as "Hey, lady." The reporter thus did not have a name, an identity or status in front of him. He did not call her, "Ms. Betito" or even "Merav," but just this dismissive, biting, "You are nothing to me" term of gvirti. It is a classic expression of the manipulative, abusive man, trying to control the women around him and prove he is stronger, more powerful and superior to all those around him. (If you ever want to get on my bad side, try calling me gveret.) It is one of the most embedded put-downs for women in the Hebrew language - right after banot. When I think about Gila Katsav, I am torn between sympathy and indifference. Like many unfortunate women, she seems trapped in patterns of behavior that place her as perpetually and innately inferior, behaviors that accumulate - in this case, over decades - and embed self-perceptions that are difficult to unravel and emerge from. After years of having apparently been treated as an subservient creature, how can she be expected to think of herself as deserving of dignity and equality? But at a certain point, I stop feeling sorry for women like Gila. Despite these challenges, she has not stood up for herself, challenged existing hierarchical gender patterns, or accessed her own sources of power and strength. She has chosen to remain wife of, server of, unquestioning supporter of a man whose attitude toward women is troubling at best, cruel and criminal at worst. I feel bad for her, but I am also very disappointed in her. Her support enables him. It is because she runs around him like a Charles Dickens character saying "Yes, sir" that Moshe Katsav is able to walk around thinking to himself, I am invincible. She has given him that power. Shame on you, Gila Katsav. You could have been a model for women in modern society, challenging accepted norms, helping your husband become remorseful and demonstrating that he should be ashamed of his alleged actions, not entitled to national attention and indefinite taxpayer support. Instead of standing up for yourself, you have empowered alleged abuse. You have missed an opportunity to help yourself while helping Israel work towards a better society. You have continued to promote a misguided and damaging model for women. History will certainly judge Moshe Katzav. But history will no doubt judge Gila Katzav as well.
1 |
elless,
Tuesday Mar 24, 2009
It seems from my your earlier blog that you are a "man-hater" and will never change..your vicious comments stand for NIL
2 |
Edward,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Shame on YOU Ms. Stockman. Your obsession and obvious inferior complex as a women has already passed judgement on the man before he even goes to trial. How dare you even publicize the story with your husband and Katzav. I don't pity Gila. I pity you who has nothing better to do with your life than to rant and rave about these dumb feminist issues. Your poor husbnad that has to put up with such drivel. Judging by past comments on this blog, thank goodness very few people could care less what you have to say.
3 |
Meir, Tel Aviv,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
What a pathetic article. A little bit of anecdotal evidence and she's condemning a woman based on unproven allegations about her husband.
"Gvirti" isn't necessarily a put down. It's the equivalent of Ma'am. Of course if it's said with sarcasm it's insulting, but the writer seems to put one and one together and make fifty.
"Giveret" is a respectful term to address woman who's name you don't know. Why it should bother the writer to be referred to as such is beyond me.
Is her feminist agenda so warped that she needs to base her whole article on hearsay and suggestion?
4 |
Concerned,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Know one knows what really goes on inside a marriage except the people who are in it. If the blogger is married, I hope she never experiences the pain of someone taking one or two isolated incidents (like a joke about "you still need me") to generalize and tear down her relationship in a public forum.
A lof of what was written here (like the description of Katsav being a bad public speaker) was just mean-spirited lashon ha'ra. I am certainly no fan of Moshe Katsav, but his wife is guilty of no crime.
5 |
Sarah Benjamin,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Your write-up consists of only allegations, innuendo, and slander. In addition, Elana Sztokman, you are guilty of embarassing the Katzav family in public. All he is asking is to have his day in court to prove his innocence. You are trying to deny the man and his family a basic right. Shame on YOU, Elana Sztokman, and not on the Katzavs.
6 |
Miriam Ashkelon,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Ms Stockman we all have our thoughts on the Katzav indicment - but you have spitefully indicted his wife on heresay and blatant loshen hara. Yet you say you are religious. I am well into my seventies safta, and it would have been better if you were "wise in YOUR old age and not seeking attention through a stupid blog.
7 |
Taytelbaum,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Correction.
Mrs Stockman,
'Helping your husband become remorseful," is exquisite in this article. ---
And the "You see, you still need me," bit can be interpret as superficial. Like when Hyman Roth's wife in the Godfather II movie, walking up and down the room with sandwiches, when Michael, the obscure Plutocrate and danger itself, came to visit H.R. in Miami.
And what do all the husbands, boyfriends or men say when their women are being 'mistreated' by Katzav, or abused? Cant they just walk up to him and say, "Do you mind?"
8 |
Rachel,Israel,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
SHAME ON YOU ELANA SZTOKMAN. Some decisions in life are so personal that they should be protected from other people's judgement. You, by prying and judging a person whose situation you know nothing about, have done something much more immoral than Gila may have done. As far as Merav Betito goes, I am appalled that she would repeat a private conversation which took place between a couple who welcomed her into their home, and use it to attack them. You both need to do some serious soul searching.(And JPOST, too. This is not supposed to be a tabloid.)
9 |
Peppi, Jerusalem,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Bravo Ms. Sztokman. Wello written and honest.
10 |
Rachel, Tel Aviv, Israel,
Wednesday Mar 25, 2009
Clearly Elana Sztokman doesnt know Hebrew too well (when did she immigrate?). "Gvirti" means ma'am or madam -- a polite form of address. I'm certainly no admirer of Moshe Katzav, but Sztokman: Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill.
11 |
Alex Flint,
Thursday Mar 26, 2009
What's wrong with this lady? Is she seriously going after the accused's spouse? What a rotten, vindictive, nasty, horrible thing to do to an innocent bystander going through a very humilating chapter in her life.
Note to Gila Katsav: I hope you didn't read this sick woman's rant about you, but if you did please note that her insanity belongs to her alone. May you find solace from your suffering soon, and better days ahead. You are not responsible for any wrongdoing, and much of the hyped incrimination of this article doesn't pertain to your husband either.
12 |
Armin Schon, Nes Ziona, Israel,
Thursday Mar 26, 2009
Gee, I just wasted 5 minutes of my life reading this intellectual garbage. How dare you talk about a woman you know nothing about like that, Ms. Sztokman. You remind me of an old women spending all day long by the window bitching abour the neighbours. Shame on you.
13 |
Eliyahu,
Thursday Mar 26, 2009
And what would you have called the wives of the patriarchs with more than one wife?
14 |
Maya, Sweden,
Thursday Mar 26, 2009
I find the author exposes tendencies in human behaviour that are detrimental to themselves and others, based on the glimts and hints she got from the Katsavs. What's wrong with that? I find it very illuminating, even if not everybody might agree that it indeed are tendencies she observed. Well done and well put, Elana! - Katsav's intimidating speech and attitude reminds me of all big crook's intimidating approach to others, which I first observed in Larry King's interviews with the former Enron boss. They're jumping right into the face of their interlocutors, even unprovoked! - Shalom.
15 |
David,
Sunday Apr 12, 2009
This writer is correct. And even if she is not the talk backs here are vicious and hurtful. WHat kind of people curse out and attack a blogger who has her or his insights on a particular matter. Only time will tell if Katzav is a full blown rapist or only a person who is simply a womanizer, indecent human being who admits in having consentual 'affairs' with the women around him. 9 women are included in his indictment.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |