|
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
The Weekly Portion: Put an end to Hamas' regime Posted by MK Ephraim Sneh
Comments: 72
The deterioration of the situation is Gaza is still in full swing. The barrage of Kassams on Sderot and the firing of rockets at Ashkelon is a calculated escalation on the part of Hamas. It is a retaliatory action for the successful targeted killings of terrorists who, in the absence of the assassination on Wednesday morning, would have executed an attack that would have extracted a high price from us. It is important to mention this fact since there is a general feeling that the IDF is not doing enough and that is completely untrue. Even so, the frustration here is still high, inasmuch as the rockets keep coming despite the offensive operations that the IDF is undertaking in Gaza, and the range has been expanded to include Ashkelon. With frustrating and confusing conditions, come futile ideas - defeatist and adventurous especially. Therefore, it is important to state clearly what is possible and what is necessary. First - what should not be done. * We should not entertain ideas such as 'hudna' [truce] and 'calm' with Hamas. It is a tempting idea in the short term, but most dangerous in the long term. A cease-fire would allow Hamas to rearm and strengthen its hold on Gaza. Our objective is not stopping the Kassam rockets but putting an end to the Hamas regime. If we do not, when the time comes to undertake a large-scale operation in Gaza, the price would rise greatly. * We should not proceed with a large-scale operation without clearly defining our objectives and without an exit strategy after said objectives are achieved. In other words, we should find a way not to repeat the errors on the Second Lebanon War. What should be done? * There is no escaping the fact that we must break Hamas' military power in the Strip. Iran should not be allowed to establish an advanced base, styled after southern Lebanon, on the outskirts of Sderot and mere kilometers from Ashkelon. However, we must not proceed as such without knowing who we "hand over the keys" to at the close of the operation. In other words, we must not repeat the mistakes on the disengagement. We must remember - Hamas controls Gaza as a result of its military might and its oppressive regime. Hamas is not popular. In all the surveys conducted, support for the organization is less than 20%. In the polls, its "head", Ismail Haniyeh, receives much less support than Marwan Barghouti and Mahmoud Abbas. There is one more important thing to be done that is essential to changing the reality in Gaza, which many do not understand. I am referring to the economic situation. A million and a half Gazan residents exist on 10 shekels a day on average. Whoever controls Gaza will not be able to rein in terror activities without providing basic needs to the population. Nations around the world in general, and rich Arab nations in particular (100$ a barrel for oil!) make do with wagging their tongues about the suffering of the Palestinians and do not lift a finger to ease it. There is a real need for an economic plan for Gaza that would operate only after the ousting of Hamas. There are many projects in the transportation, energy, construction and industrial fields that should be undertaken by private companies as business ventures. To those who don't understand, I know, that things look absurd. Why should we speak of employment in Gaza when Grad-missiles rain down on Ashkelon? But, whoever aims seriously for change on the ground and is not merely satisfied with uttering popular slogans, needs to address the root of the problem. Those with in-depth knowledge of the situation know that we cannot change the military and political situation in Gaza without changing the economic reality. It is in the interest of Israel. Permit me one last comment even if it will not be understood by many. There is no defeating Hamas militarily without defeating it politically. A political defeat means achieving an agreement through negotiations with the Palestinian Authority. There is no purpose to an agreement if it does not break Hamas' might. There is no purpose to breaking Hamas' might if we do not reach a political agreement. These two matters are co-dependent.
1 |
sandra chitayat, montreal, canada,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
I fully support Ephraim Sneh's comments, thank him for articulating what needs to be done. Nothing short of rooting out the present
2 |
Martin Leaf USA,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Which is more popular , Hamas in Gaza, or Kadima in Israel? You assume if Israel does x or y the "Palestinians" will stop terror. That will never happen. Bolstering the Gaza economy when many Jews in Israel live in poverty ?
3 |
Anthony Engelen, the Netherlands,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
We, my wife and I have lived near Gaza for 5
4 |
Reuven Ben-Daniel Israel,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Quote from JPost today "Israel allowed the transfer of medical and food aid into the Gaza Strip via the Sufa Crossing on Sunday, the IDF spokesperson announced.
5 |
Victor D,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Here is your solution. Send ten rockets for evey one into Gaza. Don't send troops...just make it miserable for Gazans and Hamas to live. Everytime a Hamas rat rides in a car...blow it up! It's called WAR! Olemrt and company needs a set of batzum.
6 |
BEN MOSER,UNITED STATES,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
If I saw my enemy receiving large packages every day that were olive drab in color would I wonder? If i saw my enemy assembling something in his yard that looked like a weapon, would I become concerned? If I saw that my enemy was aiming this weapon at me would I act ? The answer is I would have killed my enemy when the first package arrived, for I would have known his intent and eliminated the threat.
7 |
Paul Schneider Howell NJ,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Who would have believed missles would
8 |
Joseph L Shakant,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
In addition to all the concerned nations playing a vitat role in helping the Gazans economically in Gaza, it is important that thpught be given toa partial resettlement of willing and interested residents onto Arab lands elsewhere. New cities and developments there, with active Arab involvement building and paying for projects-roads, schools,hospitals,industrial startups,etc.-could augur in a new era meaningfully enabling positive change for a downtrodden people who now view violence as their only salvation. Joseph l shalant shalantlaw@aol.com
9 |
Greg Wilson, USA,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
I agree that Hamas must be eliminated as a political and military organization, and now is the time to do it. What amazes me is that Hamas holds huge rallies calling for "Death to Israel" and then when Israel reacts to protect it's citizens from Hamas-sanctioned rocket attacks, the Palestinians start screaming, "Genocide", "Terrorism", "Atrocities". Don't the Palestinians know that repeatedly screaming "I'm going to kill you" to someone more powerful, and then attacking them is the path to certain suicide?
10 |
Reginald,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
(I) The daily barrage of rockets against Israeli towns and cities is the result of foolish Oslo peace process brought entirely upon Israel by the Israeli leaders, from Late Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Peres, Ehud Barak, Ehud Olmert. The capitulation and forceful ethnic cleansing of Jews living in Israel from Samaria, for the purpose of appeasing terrorists, and quartets, consisting of USA,EU, UN, Russia and the Arab and Islamic world because of their crude petroleum
11 |
Reginald,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
In June 1982, before Israeli invasion of Lebanon under late Israeli PM, and under Ariel Sharon as defence minister, PLO, terrorists organisation used to launch rockets from Lebanon into Israel. Then the uncompromising Menachem Begin and his defense chief Ariel Sharon sent the IDF to expel PLO headed by the late terror sage Yasser Arafat and actually succeeded in expelling PLO, but under the arm twisting of the Late American president, Ronald Regan for total decimation of terror PLO, was averted.
12 |
Paul Kupferman,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
The "thorn in Israel's side that Torah long ago fortold, is still with us. If you don't remember, all you so-called "secular" Jews who read this is - it is the sons of Ishmael. Unless, of course you think that the TORAH is a fable, as so many so-called intellectuals believe. I thank G-d that the head of Israel's defense forces is now is the most decorated war veteran of Israel. It's a sad truth and present reality that their hatred of Israel is really a hatred of HaShem himself and his chosen people.
13 |
Reginald,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
(II) Israel gained peace in its northern frontier as a result of this and then set up Christian Lebanese allies that act as a buffer force against Iranian and Syrian backed Hezbollah. Then the late Yitzhak Rabin thought to do the Arab world some good by inviting and bringing Terrorist Arafat back into Israel with a promise of land for peace, i.e. the Oslo debacle. What has this achieved instead more Israelis have lost their lives as a result of this foolish idea. Ehud Barak came to the scene, dismantled Christian Lebanese force and withdrew from Lebanon.
14 |
Reginald,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
(IV) Ehud Barak came to the scene, dismantled Christian Lebanese force and withdrew from Lebanon.
15 |
Reginald,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Solution is as follow: 1) Tell the world to go to blazes with their version of morality which is nothing but a trungeon stick to cast Israel in a bad light for fighting a war of survival as a Jewish nation. 2) Cleanse Samaria including Judea of Terrorists who are using psudonames as militants, resistance fighters to murder women, babies in Israel. 3) Tell the USA that if it truly values its relationship to Israel as an Israeli ally and friend, it must accept that there is not going to be a Palestinian state on the land of Israel.
16 |
Steve Gure Coconut Creek, Fl USA,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Every inteligent person with any common sense knows what has to be done but it is not being done by the present Israeli leadership. hAMAS HAS TO BE COMPLETELY DESTROYED. than depart. If they rebuilt and start againthe same thing has to be done. It is that simple.
17 |
tzvi/usa,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
it is good sneh wants to end hamas...BUT where was sneh when israel founded hamas?
18 |
Reuven Ben-Daniel Israel,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Quote from JPost headlines "Israel allowed the transfer of medical and food aid into the Gaza Strip via the Sufa Crossing on Sunday, the IDF spokesperson announced.
19 |
Norb,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
The secular Israeli government think they can evacuate mostly modern orthodox settlers, they gave up altogether regarding the ultra-orthodox. Only to be confronted by the religious Arab enemy. Here they can't evacuate nor avoid. This is a religiously led war with no place for the secular. I say hand over the reins to the chief rabbis for example. It couldn't get worse than it already is could it? Only the religious from both sides would respect one another and be free from foreign influences or narrow interests now plaguiing the secular. Rav Sonnenfeld succeeded a long time ago.
20 |
reginastawskin.y,,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
you can not make peace with people who are obsessed wit hate and their only goal is to kill you. gush katiff is a very painfull lesson and a rude awakining for many who refuse to see the painfull reality that it is unfortunately not a issisue of land but it is about the very exsistance of israel. we,jews always help our people, the arabs,however use their people for political power letting them starve just as long as they are a problem to israel.
21 |
HH,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Lets not forget that we need to thank Mr. Sneh and the Israeli left for the situation in Gaza. Since the evacuaton of gaza and hamas taking control of the strip the situation deteriorated. Why should we listen to the people that brought this disaster on us?
22 |
Arnold-Canada,
Sunday Mar 02, 2008
Sneh says Hamas must be broken. He says this requires an agreement with Abbas. He says Abbas is much more popular in Gaza than Hamas. If true, why need an agreement with him to break Hamas, & what good would it do? If Abbas's relative popularity achieves nothing now, why count on it achieving Hamas's demise later? The way to break Hamas is for Israel to break it militarily.
23 |
Arnold-Canada,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Sneh assumes Abbas & Fatah would come to an ageement with Israel & fulfill its terms. Yet, as JPost reported, since Annapolis Abbas & a PA spokesman have each said they will not compromise on 'right of return', & now Abbas says he eschews 'resistance' because it would not presently work, but he may return to it in the future. What does he have to say before Sneh can understand he is not to be trusted?
24 |
Arnold-Canada,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Sneh is right to advocate improving the living conditions of Pal'ns. However, why think an agreement with the PA is needed for this? Gen. Shamni has just said the PA is doing nothing to stop terrorism in & from the W Bank. Why think they would do so after signing an agreement? Projects are being planned NOW for improving Pal'n lives, & more can be developed. An agreement with Fatah terrorists is not needed for this.
25 |
Andrew, USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
The terrorists failed with their suicide bombers, now they've been replaced by rocket barrages. The rockets can't be launched without the tacit approval of civilian populations, which is reminiscent of families celebrating when their own children blew themselves up, slaughtering innocent people. How long can a country wait while an enemy perfects a method of attack, possibly leading up to chemical, biological or "dirty nuclear" warheads?
26 |
W. Lowery, USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Unleash the IDF. This world will be owned by terrorists if we continue to allow them to grow stronger behind women and children. Peace will come when we love our children more than the enemy.
27 |
Bob Margulies, West Hempstead, New York,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Many good point by MK Sneh. However, there is no need to link the need to defeat Hamas militarily and the perceived need to enter into an agreement with the PA in West Bank. In fact, the more you link the two the more you will not achieve either goal. The key is to first defeat the Hamas ( and the terrorists within the PA) militarily. Only after that is done will the arabs be "willing" to deal with Israel. Israel can only achieve a fair deal politically when it is in the strongest military position.
28 |
Jason Zichron Yacov Israel,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Deputy Defense Minister- it all sounds nice- where were you a few years ago? The only thing that will protect Israel is a clear cut victory and maintaining lands for depth- in a general peace treaty with neighboring nations. There will have to be a transfer of lands - both ways- for Israel's security, for the Palestinians. There is to much empty land in other Arab nations leaving the Palestinians and Israelis fighting over slivers.
29 |
Lionel M, New York,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Israel must be strong and vigilant, now and forever. Israel's ancient prophets faced the same problems. Until Israel's enemies turn their swords into plowshares no peace can be achieved. Dealmaking for a two-state solution at the same time Israel is threated with violence is not a roadmap to reach peace. It is an insincere subtifuge to gain a political advantage, and will increase the danger to Israel.
30 |
Yuri M. Rothman, USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I agree with Anthony's comments. Israel must do whatever has to be done to defend its borders and its citizens. Forget about the world opinion. Get rid of Hamas. Martins comments make some sence, but if think for a min., Germany killed 6mln of our people, and today is one of the trading partner and together with USA, is bigest supporter of the state of Israel. If there is a chance for peace and stability, Israel should reach out to help those who want its help to rebuild the economy and establish trade relationship. It is good for business and for everyone involved.......
31 |
Lawrence van Rijn,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
It is clear that this intense act of the IDF is a wake up call. Hamas can be hurt! All the cries should not silence that late morning at Sbarro when people quietly enjoying the day would never do so ever again, or those hit in the busses whom will never travel again.
32 |
Stu,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Sneh is at least, in part, wrong.His thinking is typical of all that has failed in the past. He is right that Hamas must be totally defeated. However,then supporting and enriching the group of enemies who installed Hamas (Hamas had the complete support of the people of Gaza and the PA is no different fundamentally.It would destroy Israel if it had the chance.)and politically changing the scene by negociating with the PA will not solve anything.When will you ever learn. We have enemies. Destroy them.They would destroy us in a moment(PA or Hamas-two sides of the same coin)if they had the chance.
33 |
Rafi Sarkassian /Jerusalem,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Many Israelis take the easy way out ....by feeling and thinking that by killing as many Palestinians like ( 100's a day or more ) they can get closser to their dream of ridding Palestine the Holy Land from its own people ...just like the Cowboys did with Red indians , when the bad news are that the Palestinians are not leaving peacefully (like in 1948) and the power the West provide israel now ...can't last for ever , Palestinians are fast learners ....take a lesson from History .
34 |
Zvi Lando,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Why should I, who is an active soldier in reserves, and my two sons who are in regular duty, fight in order to take from Hamas to give to Fatah? Sneh, a typical (Israeli) politician, doesn't mention that he is only talking like this because his party leader is the defence minister... I can just imagine if the Likud was in power now......!!!!!
35 |
Robert Goldman-USA!,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
i strongly agree with the idea that there should not be a truce or negotiation with Hamas as long as they continue to attack Isael with rockets and other attacks. Israel should continue to stand it's groun and defend itself against this terroist regime. i fully support the author with all that he says and agree that the Hamas Regime needs to be stoped immediatly. not only for the safety of israel but for the world aswell. Each day that these terroist regimes hold power is terrible.
36 |
rachel and orly rock!!!,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
we do beleive that there should not be a cease-fire, however someting must be done to end this war peacefully. i agree that the eonomic situation is indeed terrible and that even though israel does not support hamas, we need to help gaza economically and politically in order to eesatblish some sort of alliance and compensation for what is occuring.
37 |
Adiba Alia - Iraq,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I agree with this article, I think that Israel cannot just sit back and watch missiles be fired into there country. Israel needs to act strong and show them that they will retaliate, they need to make it clear that this needs to stop, then need to send Lebanon a messege showing they will not take weak actions anymore. Another reason I geel they need to attack strong is so that the possible supply's the Gaza is possibly reciving.
38 |
Zach Firestone, MI,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
What Hamas is doing to the people of Sderot is ridiculous and inhumane. To send kasam rockets on a village of INNOCENT human beings is more than insane. It is disgusting. These people are simple civilians who have done nothing wrong. Hamas is a group of terrorists who must learn that it is wrong to take the lives of innocent people.
39 |
jason, detroit, Michigan,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
i agree with what this article is saying israel will not achieve true peace by just blowing away hamas. That will not solve anything it will jsut make matters worse and make arabs more upset. Israel must work to find a way to nto upset them but clearly it is not an easy job
40 |
Joseph, Detroit, Michigan,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I fully agree with what is being written in this article. Israel can not achieve peace by simply blowing away Hamas. Israel must negociate with the PA in order to undermine Hamas's power in Gaza. Then, and only then, will violence be necessary
41 |
Derrick Zoolander, Michigan, USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I agree with this post that Israel must complete succesful negotiations with the Palestinian Authority. Many in Gaza support the PA, so it is possible for a political victory to be achieved without a forceful removal of Hamas leadership. If Israel along with the PA can win over the people of Gaza, then there is hope for the future to aid the humanitarian situation.
42 |
Daniel Chudnow, West Bloomfield, MI USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Economic aid to Gazans is a dangerous thing to give, because it can be used to fuel their attacks on Ashkelon and Sderot. Israel cannot, however, deny citizens of Gaza medical aid and food, because that will only fuel anti-Israel sentiment.
43 |
Jeff Carson,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
think of the people...there seems to be no right side, yes hamas is wrong as they fre thier rockets but to retaliate in things like cutting off there water is inhuman
44 |
Max & Mitch, Michigan, USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Sneh's proposed solution, although difficult, is likely the only way to end this conflict. As Bill Clinton said in his campaign, "It's the economy stupid." Let us not repeat the mistakes of the past and leave "the keys" in the hands of a potentially hostile entity. If the Palestinian people are able to support themselves and are not taken advantage of by their leaders, they will likely see the logic in a peaceful solution to this conflict.
45 |
Erinn Rachel & Madeline Cara & Noa Granot,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I believe that Sneh has the right to advocate on improving the living conditions of Pal'ns. What good would an agreement to break Hamas do? Why need the argeement in the first place? Why count on it achieving Hamas's demise later? We belive that that way to break Hamas is for Israel to possibily break its military. If this doesn't happen the world will be owned by terrorists if we continue to allow them to grow stronger behind women and children. Forget about the world opinion.
46 |
Nathan Chesterman and Jessica Curhan/Detroit, MI,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Mr. Sneh brings up many valid arguments as to why Hamas needs to be removed from power, and has identified the crux of the issue with Gaza. However, we feel that the solutions here are rather extreme, and quite unrealistic. Israel should start towards solving this problem on a small scale, rather than jumping ahead and biting off more than it can chew.
47 |
M and A, Media Center,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
We either need to do nothing which is not the ideal solution, or we need to pull out. We agree that Israel cannot just do nothing. War is not the answer. Terrorists cannot continue to blow people up. If we continue to fight, all they will do is fight back, and this will just create more chaos. These difficult times will pass soon. We know that the Israeli army will be able to make good choices and overcome all of this.
48 |
Mayer Danger Stein,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Which is more popular, Hamas in Gaza, or Kadima in Israel? You assume if Israel does x or y the "Palestinians" will stop terror. Strengthen the Gaza economy when many Jews in Israel live in poverty? In 2001 you said mortars launched from Gaza would cross all redlines. Sneh says Hamas must be broken. If Abbas's relative popularity achieves nothing now, why count on it achieving Hamas's demise later? The way to break Hamas is for Israel to break it militarily.
49 |
Michael S., Detroit,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I dont see any viable solution posed here... I see a politician playing both sides and making it seem like he has a solution. everything sounds wonderful, aside form the fact that fatah will gain the power as a result of the dismantling of hamas. yes action needs to be taken, but an exit strategy must be well thought out.
50 |
Michael Baum, USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
How long can a country wait while Hamas builds a method of attack, which could possibly lead to a chemical, biological or nuclear war? It is time that the Israeli government takes charge. The best way is to deteriorate the power of hamas and its leaders to ensure victory in the struggle for peace and justice.
51 |
Ian and Rina in the media center,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
We are confused with the arguments you have posed in your blog. First, you take a military stance, stating that the only way to effectively defeat Hamas is through violent tactics. However the last paragraph of your blog claims, "There is no defeating Hamas militarily without defeating it politically." This seems hypocritical to us because the term "politically" implies a non-violent stance, one that involves peace talks and a sense of calm. It's understandable that there is no concrete answer to this difficult problem, but the only way to make a change is to come up with viable ideas.
52 |
Susan,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I think that he makes a good point. He says that he has a set goal of getting rid of Hamas Rule. First he says that the only way to get rid of them is to use military force and it must occur sooner rather than later. In addtiton, Israel cannot just go in and leave they have to come up woth an exit plan. Then they need to develope a realtionship with the leaders that are left.
53 |
Hyman,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Hello,
54 |
Jan,USA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
Don't worry what other's say, you live there we don't. Israel must do whatever is necessary to protect herself. I don't want to see children killed but the sad thing is many will grow up to be terroist. I don't care how much land you give up for peace there will be no peace, it's a no brainer they just want to do away with the Jews.
55 |
Daniel Guslits Michigan, America,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I agree about the codependency of the hamas politcal power and its military might. If a political agreement is not reached then hamas will continue t heir reign of terror by means of military power. Additionally the other arab nations cannot play the victim role in this situation of the civilians of Gaza because they do not give aid to their own who are currently suffering. There is much to be done and along way to go before we reach peace. However peace will be realized in Israel
56 |
John Doe, Switzerland,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
It is not the matter of their (Israel's) goal to kill in order to complete a dream, rather that they are being attacked and the only way to retaliate would be by fighting back. If they do not fight for themselves, then who will? I think they need to previal against their opressers and fight back
57 |
Liz Traison, Detroit Michigan,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
As an American, I feel that it is hardly my place to comment on this situation. I sympathize greatly with those who live near s'derot and wish someting more could be done, on the other hand, what right to I have to say that soldiers should risk their lives for their defense? I just hope that there will be peace, especially in the coming year because I will be living in Jerusalem!
58 |
Lori , MI,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
If defeating Hamas was easy, it would already be done. I respect these suggestions, but think they are overly simplified. The situation is Gaza is political, millitant, emotional, and extremely complicated. I do admire that it is noted that the mistakes made in the Lebanon war should not be repeated. I love learning from history. It is a really good idea.
59 |
Sarah, West Bloomfield MI,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I agree with Sneh that Hamas must face consequence. However, it is not so simple to just say that, “we must break Hamas' military power in the Strip.” Israel can not just go into Gaza and completely wipe them out. Israel must be so careful with every action they do and if they did anything “extreme” the world’s response would most likely be negative. One “wrong” decision could have extreme consequences for Israel. Also, even if they do have the ability to take control over Hamas and the Gaza strip there are so many additional problems that would occur.
60 |
Leor, Ann Arbor MI,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I think that Sneh makes an essential point in two respects; a solution cannot be reached without finding the root of the problem and planning ahead. The economic situation is horrendous and the prevention of another Lebanon is vital especially considering the world's opinion. Though Sneh aims for the end goal of defeating Hammas and not stopping the rockets on Sederot, is there a way that this can be done without the bombing of the cities in the meantime? Will avoiding a cease fire and the deaths that occur in the meantime be worth the peace that is just possible? I hope so.
61 |
EREREEEEZZZZ!!!!! at FJJAJAAAAAJJAJAJAJAJAJA,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I think it is important that we put a good use to our defense forces. we should not let these evil terorists tear apart our country. we need to realize that if we dont do something soon, things wont get any better.
62 |
RUCHEL DEVRIES,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I think that Israel should do and is obligated to do whatever has to be done to defend its citizens and borders, no matter what the rest of the world thinks. We sould get rid of Hamas. Germany murdered 6 million Jews and today Germany works together with the US as trading partners. That can be seen as a probolem because the US in proabably Israel's bigest supporter. Israel should reach out to other countries who want to help them in order to obtain peace and stability. Israel needs help to rebuild her economy and establish trade relationship.
63 |
Sol Y, MI,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
The terrorists failed with their suicide bombers, now they've been replaced by rocket barrages. The rockets can't be launched without the tacit approval of civilian populations, which is reminiscent of families celebrating when their own children blew themselves up, slaughtering innocent people. How long can a country wait while an enemy perfects a method of attack, possibly leading up to chemical, biological or "dirty nuclear" warheads? the IDF should be more strict with hammas, if not out an end to it.
64 |
samuel appel,
Monday Mar 03, 2008
I agree the idf should first work towards removing the hamas threat, just stopping the missles is not enough. An exit strategy is important because hamas is not liked by the people of the land and if Israel spent some money to improve the livlyhood of the people it could be good PR and may work to end some tension. If Israel tries to leave without pouring some money into the infustructure it could end in disaster
65 |
Billy USA,
Tuesday Mar 04, 2008
Abbas would do the same thing to ISRAEL that hamas is trying tod He only left the gaza strip because he thinks he can get ISRAEl to give up JERUSALEM
66 |
jacqueline godfrey England,
Tuesday Mar 04, 2008
Some time ago our parish priest told our congregation that we must pray for the survival of the state of Israel .
67 |
Mark, New York,
Tuesday Mar 04, 2008
The democratically elected Hamas government is carrying out a war with the support and backing of its electorate. The only way to end the war with Gaza is the way the allies ended the war with Germany. Bomb the will to fight out of the population before you invade.
68 |
Logic, Israel,
Tuesday Mar 04, 2008
Here are three key questions no one has mentioned: 1. Why does the government pretend that Fatah is a preferred negotiating partner, when their long-term goals are the same as Hamas? 2. Why should Israel serve up Gaza on a silver platter to Fatah? 3. Why the focus on the Palestinian standard of living? These are the same arguments sold to the public during the 90s. If one reads Dr. Daniel Pipes' ideas on the subject, it is a poor strategy to fund the enemy before they have given up. Foreign aid only prolongs the conflict.
69 |
observeratory,
Tuesday Mar 04, 2008
Religious Arabs leaders deliberately warring and facing secular Israel leaders. The half-hearted secularists will result in mission not accomplished. Perhaps religious Israel leaders would achieve mission accomplished by peace, and if rejected, by war.
70 |
J. Janus, Pittsburgh, PA, USA,
Tuesday Mar 04, 2008
Hamas will never recognize Israel consequently there is no advantage or fairness or reasonable outcome to negotiate with Hamas. It is time to re-occupy Gaza and take Hamas out and set up large camps like the British did to the Boars during the Boar War. Let Fatah Re-occupy Gaza and then talk peace again. Hamas will be released upon a time table that secures the peace under Fatah rule of Gaza. The Land of Easu was never intended to be part of Israel in ancient or modern times.
71 |
The dark side,
Thursday May 01, 2008
Dealing with radical islam.
Lessons for the future by learning from the past leads to 'the final solution'. There is knowledge to seek in Europe...
72 |
Yuri M. Rothman; USA,
Sunday Aug 10, 2008
I've read many comments, and they make some sence in their substance, but nobody yet sees the bigger picture that is like a big cloud that has darkened the entire region and is waiting to drop its weight and flood the Middle East. It is Iran that should be the main concern to all of us. Cut the heart out of the Hidra, and the heads will fall on their own.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |