Monday Mar 17, 2008

The Weekly Portion: Keep up the pressure

Posted by MK Ephraim Sneh
Comments: 6
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

The killing of a senior Islamic Jihad operative in the West Bank and the renewal of attacks on the western Negev last week only illustrated further the threat posed by Islamic terror.

These incidents brought to light the purpose of using targeted killings against senior operatives who are known to be carrying high-trajectory weapons aimed at our cities - we're not just talking about Sderot anymore and the areas in the western Negev, we are now also talking about our cities in the north.

In order to understand the answer, one must be aware of these fundamental facts:

* Targeted killings is one of the most productive means of fighting terror and disrupting terrorist activity. We cannot seriously counter terror without attacking its leaders

* There is no chance for a real de-escalation of attacks against Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip. Iran, who funds and trains these organizations' operatives, is interested in maintaining a steady flow of attacks against Israeli citizens in order to exhaust our society and bring about its collapse. Hamas's attempts at a ceasefire testifies to the heavy blow it was dealt and its urgent need to regroup, rearm and consolidate its power in the Gaza Strip.

* Israel must not accept the terms under which Hamas and Islamic Jihad are attempting to reach a ceasefire. The halting of attacks on our cities from the Gaza Strip would grant immunity for these same terror organizations in the West Bank, where they are trying to build the infrastructure for future attacks against Israel and prepare the ground for a future takeover, a la Gaza Strip. If Israel does not disrupt and thwart the terror organizations' efforts to strengthen their influence in the West Bank, we will find ourselves facing an unacceptable reality, worse than the existing one in the western Negev

* Israel must break Hamas's military power and bring about its ousting in the Gaza Strip. Israel cannot accept the existence of an Iranian base on its southern borders. Since May 2000, I have been saying similar things about Hizbullah and in the summer of 2006, I was proved right

It is because of all of the above that we cannot drop the ball on the continued and focused fight against terror organizations and their leaders. If we do - we will not change the enemy's ultimate goal. We may achieve a short period of calm but we will pay for this in the future with many casualties. The operations against terrorist leaders must be focused on fitting targets, "quality targets", so that the price we are paying will bring about a result that would justify it.

However, we must not delude ourselves into thinking that the achievements in the fight against terror, however significant they may be, will bring about a change in our reality or even a victory in this war.

There is no victory over Hamas without a political agreement with the representatives of the majority of the Palestinian people. Support for Hamas, which stood at 43% at its peak (in the 2006 January elections) has dropped dramatically in the past year and stands today at 20%. This is according to surveys conducted in the Strip. In all the surveys, Mahmoud Abbas holds a significant lead over Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas "Prime Minister". If negotiations proceed seriously, it is possible to complete an agreement by the end of the year.

Our military effort is only worth the work if it brings about a change in the reality in Gaza; that is a political change and not just a military change.

To conclude, I'd like to make one comment on a related issue.

I recently visited Japan as a guest of the government. I toured the city of Hiroshima which absorbed the first-ever atomic bomb attack in August 1945. An impressive museum documents the horror of the event. That bomb was considered small, with "only" 20,000 tons of explosives. Hiroshima, whose homes were built low and whose population amounted to 200,000 was completely obliterated. Years after, 'survivors' died of various illnesses while severe burns caused deformations on the bodies of many others who died of great suffering.

I toured the museum for hours, saw the pictures and the presentations and thought of us. Of Haifa and the cities on the coast, of Tel Aviv and its surroundings. I understood in Hiroshima something that I have been cautioning against for over 15 years. To us - this won't happen. The Ayatollahs in Teheran must not obtain nuclear weapons. At any cost.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  Ray Bright, Tuesday Mar 18, 2008
Thanks God for Hamas. At least they are honest. Fatah on the other hand, is devious. They can get by political means what Hamas cannot achieve militarily. Fatah is just as anti-Israeli as Hamas. Peace process is just as tactic for them.
2  |  nussan, Tuesday Mar 18, 2008
Targeting has not at all ended rockets on western Negev. And placement of women and kids at Hamas launching sites to suffer Israel return fire places Israel in bad light. Needed is massive overtaking of Hamas operatives once and for all. This Israel refrains from doing and the world mocks. What can Israel expect from the world when itself is seen as voluntarily exposing its own population to rocket attacks by a small militia.
3  |  Arnold - Canada, Tuesday Mar 18, 2008
By Sneh's reasoning, Israel should target Hamas's leaders, to disrupt as much as possible Hamas's ability to organize its continuing war against Israel. As for Abbas & the PA, Sneh's claims of their relative popularity over Hamas are outdated. JPost has just reported that a new poll shows Haniyeh more popular than Abbas, & Hamas gaining popularity at the PA's expense. Israeli security leaders, Diskin, Yadlin, Shamni, have warned that IDF withdrawal would lead to Hamas taking over in the West Bank.
4  |  Jeff Jaffee, Wednesday Mar 19, 2008
The government made a correct decision and IDF did a great job by finding and killing murderers. When it comes to Israel, there is no difference between Hamas and Fatah. The Palestinian autonomy is a fascist state that teaches Jew-hatred thru schools and the media.
5  |  S McCosker Australia, Wednesday Mar 19, 2008
I am only a PHD grad and housewife but I read the Quran 20 years ago - after that my nightmare was Jihad-with-Nukes. After reading Robert Spencer's, Bat Yeor's and Andrew Bostom's scholarly works I say - beware. Muhammad said 'war is deceit'. Hamas is Fast Jihad & Fatah is Slow Jihad but the aim is the same - all Israeli Jews dead, gone or dhimmi. Jihad backs off from just one thing - massive superior force (ignore calls for hudna; sign no deals for they will destroy you as Muhammad's specious Treaty of Hudaybiyya destroyed the Meccans). Let Orde Wingate's tactics prevail.
6  |  gerald goldstein Canada, Thursday Mar 20, 2008
M, Sneh advises us with all his wisdom and I consider him as one of the cleverest and deepest Israeli politician.If he says«At any cost», we must understand the urgency and depth of the efforts Isreal must consider now in dealing with Iran. All must be made to help and prepare for a successful strike as soon as possible.There is no higher priority. We must help with all our means and forget about the hypocrits' criticism. We Jews are alone and must unify in such efforts.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

The Weekly Portion Former Deputy Defense Minister Dr. MK Ephraim Sneh comments on the headlines of the past week.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. Why are Palestinian refugees different from all other refugees?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Wednesday Aug 06, 2008
  2. Blaming the Jews as a form of intimidation
    Posted in A Point of View by Abraham Foxman
    Sunday Aug 03, 2008
  3. Peace and the media
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Sunday Aug 03, 2008
  4. Everything in triplicate
    Posted in Israel Stories by Jeremy Cardash
    Monday Aug 04, 2008
  5. Knesset lobby group for Sderot?
    Posted in Living with Rockets by Anav Silverman
    Wednesday Aug 06, 2008

Recent Comments

Mark, Israel: Disgusting! Any corruption, any breaking of the moral norms are forgivable - if they move they us on "road to peace"?! It's that kind of moral corruption and hypocrisy that has been eating away at our society since Oslo accords were purchased at a discount price of Mitsubishi for the renegade MP becoming minister. Want to make peace? Do it cleanly and not by using dirty leverage on failed PMs!
H.H Israel: I have no idea what the shooting of Ms lautin has to do with the resignation of our PM. If this was an attempt to express Mr. Sneh disrespect to the police and the security forces in one article it is also a proof of the writer political agenda. I agree with Sneh that Olmert is innocent till proven guilty, but he is the most despised PM in Israeli history. He led Israel from failure to failure. He should have resigned after the 2nd Lebanon war and take responsibility for all the people that died in vain.
Ben Menachem: The entire political system stinks and if not changed will lead to more of the same.