Tuesday Jan 01, 2008

The Weekly Portion: 2008 defense budget dangerously lacking

Posted by MK Ephraim Sneh
Comments: 7
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Last week, the NIS 305 billion 2008 state budget was approved.  In eleven votes for the  budget, out of sixteen in which I participated, I was a member of the coalition. Last week, for the first time, I voted against the budget in breach of the coalition pact. Why?

It is in the social domain that the Labor faction has made respectable achievements, specifically in the cancellation of the anti-social decrees initiated by the Treasury. I've written previously on the expansion of the 'Health Basket'. May all my colleagues who worked hard for these achievements be blessed.

As a member of the special defense budget commission, in recent weeks, I have focused all my efforts on the matter. Last Monday, a final draft of the defense budget was presented to the commission as well as the works planned by Labor on which the budget was based on.

Four main discrepancies were discovered in the defense budget for 2008. This is due to the fact that the budget lacks NIS 14 billion and the optimal needs for defense are not being met. Specifically, we are talking about gaps within the budget that exist based not on need but because of budget cuts. What are these four discrepancies?

After all the commissions for the investigation and review of the Second Lebanon War, there are sill severe deficiencies in the readiness of the military while the Home Front Command received but a quarter of the minimal finances required to undergo the changes needed to improve home front security. There is not even a budget to meet the security needs of those who live on the front lines or for armored buses in the West Bank.

The budget for personal protection kits for civilians (gas masks, etc.) is 40% below what is needed. Today, half of Israel's population does not have protection kits in working order. A tri-annual plan was prepared in order to complete the distribution of protection kits, however, due to the budget cuts, not even one new protection kit will be assigned. There is growing suspicion that the factories making them will shut down the production line.

In closed discussions with the special committee, it became clear that hundreds of millions of shekels are missing for the IDF to implement the most necessary changes for the upcoming year. This, when the general budget allocated for defense is NIS 1.1 billion less compared to 2007. I cannot give any more details but I can say we are talking about essential expenses.

And the last one: a proper response to the Iranian threat is delayed due to a lack of resources. When, according to all the signs that the threat is looming, when even American intelligence tells us that there is a possibility that Iran will complete its quest for a nuclear bomb by 2010, the lack of response from Israel is a failure of unprecedented proportions.

How much money are we talking about exactly? Half of one percent of the budget, less than a billion shekels for all the issues combined.

When the strategic regional situation is worsening, according to all intelligence evaluations, a country cannot waive defending its citizens because of less than one percent of its budget. Even if this meant a deficit in the budget of less than one percent, it would be justified.

In European countries, a budget deficit of up to 3% is allowed. In Israel, this is not permitted. The year 2007 ended with a surplus of billions of shekels in the treasury's coffer. If the economic ideology of restraining government expenses is more important than defending the country's citizens, then there is a severe moral flaw here.

I must point out that Defense Minister Ehud Barak, who in two different instances tried to talk me out of voting against the budget, completely accepts my stance, on the professional-defense aspect and on the moral aspect.

It is irritating that 2 years ago last week, 7 months before the Second Lebanon war began, I said similar things at a press conference I called for in the Knesset. I warned then that our strength has been eroded by 30%, that the military's readiness had been severely affected by [Binyamin] Netanyahu's cuts to the defense budget. What happened next is widely known.

I belong to a generation for which the Yom Kippur war was a molding experience. The struggle for Israel's security and defense was a responsibility I took personally during the latter stages of that same war, in which I ended up with blood-soaked clothes on the edges of Ismailiya. I will continue doing so, even alone.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   K. Banayan, Tel Aviv, Wednesday Jan 02, 2008

Dear Ephraim,

I agree with you wholeheartedly; We do face difficult and challenging times and must be prepared to meet them. What else are you doing to rectify this situation? What can Israeli citizens and diaspora Jews do to help turn this situtation around and make sure we are ready? You need to be more active and more vocal about this.

2  |   Philip R., Tel Aviv, Wednesday Jan 02, 2008

Why continue with this "existential threat" paranoia? Nobody threatens our existance anymore, not since 1948. The government should look into poverty rates and internal problems, such as corruption, instead of doing what the government has been doing for decades: Diverting Israeli's attention to imaginary "enemies" that "surround" Israel. Enough under siege mentality. Everyone is sick of generals runnning this country.

3  |   DONALD MASON, Thursday Jan 03, 2008

Philip,
Are you saying that Iran isn’t developing nuclear weapons or that it doesn't intend using them against Israel? Are you denying the origin of the rockets that are fired into Israel every day? Is it your opinion that the stated aim of Hamas and Hizbullah to bring Israel's existence to an end is a conspiracy managed by Israel's generals? Are you of the view that the de facto rulers of Israel is the IDF? My questions aren’t rhetorical; I'm simply trying to understand what evidence you – being based in Tel Aviv itself - have used to base your conclusions on.

4  |   Philip R., Tel Aviv, Thursday Jan 03, 2008

Donald, Iran is developing nuclear technology that can be converted into a nuclear weapon. If we assume that Iran wants to liberate Palestine from Zionist occupation, I don't see how nuking Israel and killing all of its Jewish and Palestinian inhabitants, destroying Jerusalem and its holy sites will help him achieve this goal.

5  |   Philip R., Tel Aviv, Thursday Jan 03, 2008

On the question of Hamas and Hizballah, I really think that Hamas and Hizballah operatives cannot be viewed as an "existential" threat to a state that posesses the largest and the most powerfull military in the region, including full range of nuclear arsenal with delivery capabilities. On the question of de-facto rulers - of course, up until the Olmert administration, 2 of the 3 main positions (PM, DM, FM) were always occupied by career soliders, generals.

6  |   Philip R., Tel Aviv, Thursday Jan 03, 2008

We have to face it. Israel was always run by a military junta, and junta needs an external threat to remain in power. IDF doesn't invent threats, but I believe that it is certainly interested in the state of limited, managable conflict to keep the country occupied with "threats." This is how it always was.

7  |   don walker, Monday Feb 04, 2008

FOMER DEP DEFENCE MIN DR MK SNEH IS RIGHT ABOUT A STRONG MILITARY. STOP GIVING AWAY YOUR LAND FOR PEACE. THAT IS A HUGE MISTAKE. DIVIDE JERUSALEM???? ARE YOU CRAZY! DON WALKER USA

Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

The Weekly Portion Former Deputy Defense Minister Dr. MK Ephraim Sneh comments on the headlines of the past week.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. World opinion: who cares?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Glen A. Fritz
    Tuesday Nov 17, 2009
  2. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  3. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Brian Sandridge CT, USA: If America won't even establish a naval blockade on Iran, and do all the other things mentioned above like economic boycott by the Anglosphere with maybe EU support, why would anyone believe that the US would retaliate with a nuclear strike on Iran. What if Russia places an "umbrella" around Iran? Will the US trade say Seattle for Tel Aviv? No, Israel better recall that only the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob has brought them like Wings of the Eagle back to the land promised their ancestors. Do not lean on weak reeds!
Daniel Gritsky, London: What's interesting is that americans tend to view guns and weapons differently than non-americans do. For instance, if you check out http://www.thegunpoll.com you can see a survey that clearly shows americans want to be in control of weapons much differently than internationals do. Pretty interesting
Lars, Mad City, USA: This is a joke, right? You can't possibly believe that the United States, the UN, or ANY other country is going to prevent Iran from getting their bomb? If it isn't already in the protective shelter, it sure will be. Dr. Sneh, you are correct that the powers in the United States, occupied as they are with a finanacial crisis, NEVER intended to do anything but talk about Iran and a Nuke. It is, as it always has been "an Isreali problem"...if not now, it will be. The UN and Europe won't lift a finger either. Peaceful men like you shall one day know that "talk" is only good for tea parties.