JPost.com  »   BlogCentral  »  Rosner's Domain
Sunday Jun 28, 2009

Rosner's Domain: More on Conservative Judaism, Israel and Tikkun Olam

Posted by SHMUEL ROSNER
Comments: 7
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Follow Rosner's Domain on Twitter!!!

Of the many responses to the Q&A with rabbi Samuels on the state of conservative Judaism,, I dug these two that I thought were more interesting than other.

First, my friend Seymour of Berkeley:

What I found most interesting in Samuel's responses to Shmuel's questions is not a single word about the centrality of the state of Israel in Jewish thinking -- a real life, struggling pluralistic state. We can get so caught up in ideologies of universalism and tikkun olaming we fail to attend to what makes Jews and Judaism uniquely different and set apart and why Israel as a secure Jewish homeland requires our top priority of active attention and support.

Second, this sarcastic response:

I think everything is fine and dandy in the conservative movement/ Last week I performed burial ceremonies for 10 Jews and in the last 6 months I performed burial ceremonies for 250 Jews. Also in the last year I performed 1 marriage ceremony and 2 yrs ago I attended a bris. So you see everything is going as planned.

Just to make sure I'm understood: I do not agree with the second comment, and not sure about the first one. You can read more about American Jews and Israel in my dialogue with Jack Wertheimer, but it isn't dealing specifically with conservative Jews. Here's a paragraph from previous dialogue dealing with conservative Jews. Quite outdated (it's from 2006), but I'm not sure much had changed. Background: the Q&A was on the Conservative movement's decision to "enable homosexuals to serve as rabbis and cantors" and to "allow rabbis to conduct commitment ceremonies of gay couples". Here's rabbi Jerome Epstein:

Although some observers of Jewish life have assumed that the recent decisions of the Law Committee were influenced by desires by some to stimulate growth in the Conservative Movement, nothing could be further from the truth. Rather the decision was made in response to the pain of gay and lesbian Jews --- based on interpretations of Jewish sources. Many lesbians and gays are seeking to play a more complete role in Jewish life with heightened commitment. They are inspired by halakha and are seeking a way to live within its framework. Some, within the Conservative movement have found a path to provide that means.

Follow Rosner's Domain on Twitter!!!

 

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  Randy, New York, Monday Jun 29, 2009
The Jewish state is interested in stealing land from the Palestinians, building settlements for fanatical Jewish settlers on land that doesn't belong to them, and in getting America bogged down in wars for Israel's sake. No more American blood for Israel. Period.
2  |  Mike Feldman, Canada, Monday Jun 29, 2009
Randy-If you look to the header on this blog you will see that it is about your thoughts on the state of Conservative Judaism. The question is not 'Do you think the Jewish state is interested in stealing land from the Palestinians." That's to-days blog on Al-Jazeera.
3  |  RKMD, Suffern, NY USA, Monday Jun 29, 2009
Randy: You embarrass yourself with uninformed vitriol. Judea and Samaria are "disputed territories" by international law. The Jewish communities are built predominantly on previously government owned land under the Ottomans, then the British Mandate, and even the illegal occupation by Jordan 1948-1967 which was recognizied only by Britain and Pakistan. The even more numerous Arab communities constructed on these territories doesn't seem to represent an issue for you. How sad for you to be angry and wrong simultaneously.
4  |  Tzvi/amerikkka, Monday Jun 29, 2009
the author of the second comment obviously feels that the cons/ref movements are run by 5th column spies that have been tasked with destroying the Jewish people. When you see how these rabbis refuse to do kiruv work refuse to tell their followers to stop using birth control ane be fruitful and multiply and demand their followeres marry fellow jews. I have no choice bu to agree with the sarcastic post
5  |  DJStahl, USA, Tuesday Jun 30, 2009
I heard Eliot Dorff cite a Shai Cherry, who said the Torah's prohibition against homosexuality can only apply to bisexuals, who have a choice. Classic psychiatry -- pre-1973 -- similarly saw homosexuality as a stage everyone goes through, in which some get stuck. Current belief tho is that everyone somehow is preordained as straight, bi, or homosexual. Mystical -- no biology to support this belief thus far. This current belief trumps Torah and classic psychiatry, tho with little evidence. So nu -- Torah isn't for homosexuals. Let them become Unitarians. Who says they need to practice Judaism?
6  |  pierre, Sunday Jul 05, 2009
I was amazed with R. Samuels emphasis on "commitments" 'particular' to Cons. Jud. - all from the +/- 20yrs at best; blanket 'Egalitarianism' (not recognition of HALACHIC pluralism), Tikkun Olam, etc...reminds me very much of Chesteron's insight from "Orthodoxy"; the image of heaven ever changes for them, so Gradgrinds factory remains the same. Independent spirit as evidenced in the Traditional Cons. kehillot is reviled by her as not abiding by her vaunted quest for totalitarian 'egalitarianism'. Twined cords that made the rope to heaven cut 1by1; evolution trumped by Genetic Modification.
7  |  pierre, Sunday Jul 05, 2009
Per my previous comment; the independent spirit of (selectively) Traditional kehillot and their community-selected moreh d'atra is something otherwise celebrated by committed Jews - but not by the establishments made of such Jews! Otherwise hegemonist voices like Samuels would not prevail; Genetic Modification again OTHERWISE reviled and fought vigorously by privileged westerners when it comes to their food...is CELEBRATED when it comes to the mesorah they "pass" to their children. Inches from the Charedim, who also engineer their past/present/future in accord with current reactionary ethics.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

Search this blog

The Israel Factor, Sep. 2009: Obama is rapidly losing favor with panel of Israeli experts

Recent Comments

new_york_loner: #26, Howard: I never use tin foil for headwear. I only use the finest in Alcoa aluminum foil - freshness counts, I get my aluminum foil directly from the source. Seriously, I understand that everything on the internet is subject to a degree of skepticism, especially sites maintained by professional zealots, NGO's, lobbyists and governmental agencies. The Israelis use assassination as a regular tool of "diplomacy", they killed Count Bernadotte, even though he had saved thousands of Jews from the Nazis. During Cast Lead, dozens of Hamas leaders were assassinated by the IDF. It's their MO.
Mike Feldman Canada: Duncan CONT to return to a Judenfrei homeland after their fwllow Arab armies wiped out the Jews. Your constant use of the word ïndigenous" in reference to a people who adapted a name less than 40 years ago shows that you are the one with a blindspot.I would think you'd know by now that whatever you're sellin', I'm not buyin". Not sure if anyone is.
Mike Feldman, Canada: #74. Duncan When you have nothing to say, you go back to your original, now often repeated message. #62 places no fault on the Palestinians for expelling a million Jews from Arab countries. It points out the difference between real ethnic cleansing and your contrived ethnic cleansing, which does not exist. The only thing that ties the Palestinians to the Holocaust is significant. It is the Grand Mufti who colaborated with the Nazis. However, I did not refer to it in #62. I have stated often before that the Arabs (who were not yet called Palestinians) left the war zone in 47-48, hoping CONT
Archives