JPost.com  »   BlogCentral  »  Rosner's Domain
Monday Dec 01, 2008

Rosner's Domain: Dialogue - yes; A breakthrough? - probably not

Posted by SHMUEL ROSNER
Comments: 2
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

David Ignatius has been one of the most consistent supporters of dialogue with Iran. In 2006, he wrote:

There's no guarantee that a policy of engagement will work. The Iranian regime’s desire to acquire nuclear weapons may be so unyielding that Tehran and Washington will remain on a collision course. But America and its allies will be in a stronger position for responding to Iranian calls for dialogue. Openness isn’t a concession by America, it’s a strategic weapon.

But Sunday he revealed how skeptical he really is. Yes - he still wants dialogue, but the "there's no guarantee" that it could work has been changed to something even less hopeful:

It's easy to criticize the Bush record on Iran. But anyone who thinks it will be easy for Obama to make a breakthrough hasn't been paying attention. Iran moves closer every day to becoming a nuclear-weapons power. It views America as an aggressive adversary that wants regime change, no matter what Washington says. Dialogue is worth a try, but Obama and his advisers should start thinking about what they will do if negotiations fail.

Ignatius offers a fair criticism of the Bush Administration for its "double failure on Iran":

Administration hard-liners haven't checked Tehran's drive to acquire nuclear-weapons technology, and moderates haven't engaged Iran in negotiation and dialogue.

But other than the call for dialogue and his well-established stance against aggressive action - "Military action would be irrational for both sides," Ignatius doesn't offer much. It is hard to tell what he'd like Obama to do. And even more importantly - his article skips the most relevant question: what price should the U.S. be willing to pay in order to stop Iran from cruising toward its goal of nuclear weaponry? So far, the answer has been "no price": The U.S. is willing to try international sanctions and dialogue. Ignatius's skepticism is well-founded: Defeating a determined rival with such approaches is not likely to happen.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  St. Sobolovski, USA, Tuesday Dec 02, 2008
You cannot dialog with a terrorist (leader of Iran) and expect to get results. Since endless talking won't work, try something else.
2  |  American, Tuesday Dec 02, 2008
The carrot has to be big. The dialogue has to be perceived as on an equal level. The consequences of permanent sanctions with teeth by a united front on a long term basis has to be laid out inthe strongest terms. Russia is going to have to meet us part way. It doesn't sound likely but I will hold on to hope and I am sure other options in case of failure are being quietly discussed. There is no nice solution to this problem. Just the better of two bad choices. I will take a level headed President and an experienced team over open military threats that only heighten the danger.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

Search this blog

Recent Comments

EWU, Brazil: Hillary will defend Isreal behind closed doors and then say and do in public what President Obama sets as US policy following the closed door sessions.
Ronald USA: The 'land for peace' pressure Israel crowd is taking a beating, these days, on their policy prescriptions for Gaza - just as Hamas is taking the military whooping they richly deserve. I don't think Hilliary will do anything much different from Rice. I think she just wants to broaden her life experiences, enjoy a wide variety of international state dinners, and pad her resume. I can't imagine that Hilliary has a passion to make a unique imprint on the Israel-Arab conflict. There is nothing in her background or writings that suggest it will be anything other than business as usual for Hillary.
LK, Geneva, Switzerland: Above all else, Hilary Clinton is a shrewd, self-promoting politician who quickly grasps which way the wind is blowing for maximum advantage. Hilary's first interest is Hilary . She's been badly burned by her and her husband's previous relationships with the Palestiniams and she's got a long memory. She is going to surprise us and serve Israel's interests in a manner which is going to be very pleasing to the Jewish state.
Archives