JPost.com  »   BlogCentral  »  Rosner's Domain
Tuesday Oct 06, 2009

Rosner's Domain: David Paul on Jewish political influence in Congressional districts

Posted by SHMUEL ROSNER
Comments: 10
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Follow Rosner's Domain on Twitter! / Join me on Facebook!

 Not very long ago, I linked from this page to David Paul's new study: Jewish Population Survey of Congressional Districts: 2000 and 2006.Now it's time to discuss it with the author.

David Paul is the Associate Dean for Student Services and Instruction for the Whidbey Island Campus of Skagit Valley College.  He earned his Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2001. He taught for six years for Ohio State University-Newark, and he was given the 2005 Teaching Excellence Award.  He and his wife, Rachel Anderson Paul, recently finished a project which analyzes the effect of ethnic interest groups in the foreign policy, as well as intermestic policies such as trade, agriculture, and immigration. Their book, Ethnic Lobbies and U.S. Foreign Policy, was published in October 2008 by Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Here we go...

1. What is it exactly that we didn't know prior to your study and do know now?

We simply did not know the degree to which Jewish Americans were concentrated or dispersed across U.S. congressional districts before this study. And, while knew that there were large populations of Jews in some districts, we had no way to accurately gauge their numbers. In contrast, because of US Census data, we knew the populations of other ethnic groups across all congressional districts (although there are concerns that some ethnic groups are undercounted by the Census). 

2. Can you describe in simple words what's special about the method you were using - in other words: how did you count "Jews in every district"?

Whenever possible, I relied on survey data that were collected by local Jewish federations and other community groups. Many Jewish federations have conducted careful, in-depth studies of the Jewish population in their community, and this provided me with very good data at the level of ZIP (postal) codes. While this cannot account for every Jew in every district, collectively these surveys provide a very good foundation for estimating the Jewish populations across the United States. Aside from census data collected on racial groups (such as on African Americans, Asian Americans, and Hispanic Americans), we probably have better data for the actual number of Jewish Americans than we do for any other ethnic group in the United States.

3. What did you find that you find the most surprising?

What I found most surprising was the number of suburban districts with significant Jewish populations. While Jewish Americans still tend to live in concentrated areas, there have been significant shifts in some Jewish communities. For example, there are much larger Jewish populations living in some suburban congressional districts around Philadelphia, Atlanta, and Washington DC than there were 20 years ago. There is also strong growth in the suburban congressional districts of many Western cities with expanding Jewish populations like San Francisco, Denver, and Phoenix.

4. Clearly, many Jewish legislators come from districts in which many Jews reside. Does this mean that we should not be as impressed by the record-number of Jewish legislators in Congress?

It's no surprise that districts with large Jewish populations are often represented by Jews. We see that with other groups as well. However, Jews are also elected to Congress in districts without significant Jewish populations. That's a testament to the degree to which many Jewish Americans are active in the U.S. political system. As is true with most members of Congress, most Jewish representatives have held other political offices (such as serving as a city councilmember, mayor, or state representative), which allows them to build name recognition, political skills, and fundraising capabilities. Doing so gives them a better chance of running a successful congressional campaign, even if there are not large numbers of Jewish voters in their district.

5. What are the main changes between 2000 and 2006, and can we learn something from these changes as we get closer to the 2010 election cycle?

Most of the changes between 2000 and 2006 were marginal and due to redistricting. The 2008 election failed to shift Jewish voters away from the Democratic Party; in fact, Obama did very well among Jews. Because of this, I don't think we will see any major changes in the 2010 election cycle. States will redistrict after the 2010 Census, and we could see shifts in Jewish populations across congressional districts in 2012 as a result. Of course, we are likely to continue to see a growth in Jews in some areas, especially in the Western United States.

6. In your experience, will such study might re-ignite complains about "Jewish influence" on Capitol Hill?

I don't think it will. In fact, it might do the opposite. For example, when Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney lost her reelection bid in the 2002 Democratic primary, many noted the degree to which Jewish donors supported her opponent, Denise Majette. McKinney was viewed as being pro-Palestinian, and many saw her defeat as an attempt to silence a critic of Israel. The county-level data at the time indicated there were only a few thousand Jews living in her district. However, we now know there were nearly 22,000 Jews in McKinney's district. That's a substantial difference.   

7. How come Jews still tend to congregate more than most other groups, and what does it mean politically?

Why Jews tend to congregate is a difficult question for me to answer, because I am not a Jewish scholar or a sociologist. From a political perspective, these concentrated populations have allowed Jews to have more political power because they command the attention of elected leaders. Further, although there are divisions among Jewish Americans, there are fundamental issues (such as supporting the creation and protection of Israel) that nearly all Jews support.

8. Is there a "magic number" of Jewish impact - the percentage of Jews necessary in a district to make a difference (politically speaking of course)?

There is no magic number for Jews to make an impact. In other research my wife and I conducted, we interviewed members of Congress who represent districts with only a few hundred or thousand Jewish voters reported having active Jewish constituents who were passionate about promoting Israel and other issues important to the Jewish community. Of course, have a bigger population is usually helpful, since elected officials tend to court or try to appease larger blocs of voters. 

We also examined the effect of ethnic groups have significant populations across a number of congressional districts. It's intuitive that ethnic groups that have large populations across many districts will have more political clout (and we certainly found evidence of that). But we also found evidence that having a population of at least one percent or 2.5 percent across a number of congressional districts can increase the influence of an ethnic group.

 

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  Bloodyscot Dallas, Texas, Wednesday Oct 07, 2009
While in Jews spreading out can help get their views across it also hurts in that other ethnic groups control the elections by the number of their votes. I have found that Jews money in campaign contributions effect elections far more than Jews votes. With the Jewish population down to around 1.6% and Muslims up to 1.2%, the value of Jewish votes will matter less and less but money is the key in many of the elections. I have also learn that many foreign Muslims in the last few months have been buy up stock in US companies, maybe to put more Muslims in key management positions.
2  |  Terry - Eilat, Israel, Wednesday Oct 07, 2009
Just meaningless nonsense. As long as the careers of Jewish politicians are linked to the success of the Democratic Party, while Jewish organizations are similarly linked, & prominent members of the Jewish community personally profit from ties to the Democratic Party & ''liberalism'' - then, Jewish influence is a moot point. Anti-Israel & even anti-Jewish policies will be covered over with lots of BS rhetoric by Jewish politicians.
3  |  Mike Feldman, Canada, Wednesday Oct 07, 2009
The defeat of Cynthia McKinney didn't require the help of the Jewish vote. She was and is certifiable. I'm pretty sure that the tendancy of living in communities is a phenomenon that is not unique to Jews.I have no doubts what the results of a contest between a Jewish Republican running against a Jewish Democrat in an area with a large Jewish voter concentration would be.
4  |  Tom, US, Thursday Oct 08, 2009
Sibel Edmonds thoroughly exposes the mossad through their Turk intel regarding the USA and this makes Israel completely on it's own regarding the USA. Your ass is flapping in the wind and this CIA agent will take every shot at it that I get !
5  |  cares1996, Thursday Oct 08, 2009
hey #3 there`s alot of certifiable people in the party,that was eminent result of taking on too many causes for sake of power,money or what is referred to as support.That said and alot more relevant is the census and subsequent redistricting/appropriations resulting from them,the democratic party realizes there in eminent peril due to unfullfilled gaphs on an unprescedented scale,today we`ve been told 875 billion give or more likely take 100 billion isn`t spending its saving,gosh darn free,its just another insult,there proposed saving is 76000 dollars per family this year.MAYBE MATH ISN`T MATH
6  |  Tzvi/amerikkka, Friday Oct 09, 2009
eichman woul dbe proud of you
7  |  Den, Saturday Oct 10, 2009
There's far more Italian Americans then Jewish Americans. If they voted in a block, we'd be calling the President - El Duce. The sad fact is block voting weakens our democracy and polarizes our elected officials. I tend to think the true Jewish vote is more of a Zionist voting ideolegy. You can lump all Jews in this category.
8  |  Den, Saturday Oct 10, 2009
There's far more Italian Americans then Jewish Americans. If they voted in a block, we'd be calling the President - El Duce. The sad fact is block voting weakens our democracy and polarizes our elected officials. I tend to think the true Jewish vote is more of a Zionist voting ideolegy. You can lump all Jews in this category.
9  |  New_york_loner Rochester, NY USA, Saturday Oct 10, 2009
Here's the rub - Israel is not a state within our union of American states. The national interests of Jewish State in Palestine cannot possibly be identical to, or even congruent with the national interests of the United States of America. The question is: Will these Israel-loving lawmakers, pro-Israel interest groups and pro-Israel PACs support and vote for the US or for Israel, whenever their is a discrepancy or divergence of interests between the US and Israel? Loyalty oaths for Atab Israelis? Maybe loyalty oaths for American Jews are just as appropriate.
10  |  New_york_loner Rochester, NY USA, Saturday Oct 10, 2009
Here's the rub - Israel is not a state within our union of American states. The national interests of Jewish State in Palestine cannot possibly be identical to, or even congruent with the national interests of the United States of America. The question is: Will these Israel-loving lawmakers, pro-Israel interest groups and pro-Israel PACs support and vote for the US or for Israel, whenever their is a discrepancy or divergence of interests between the US and Israel? Loyalty oaths for Atab Israelis? Maybe loyalty oaths for American Jews are just as appropriate.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

Search this blog

The Israel Factor, Sep. 2009: Obama is rapidly losing favor with panel of Israeli experts

Recent Comments

Speakout, Norway: # 55 Jewish Midwife :: AMEN !!
andy-london: Until bibi takes a firm stand all your land for appeasement will never be enough.It's funny 30 years ago today the iranian nutters stormed the u.s.embassy and held the people captive for14 months.It was during wimp carter's watch and we all know about the botched helicopter rescue attempt.The last day of the wimp's presidency they suddenly let them go.Why?simply because a real man of iron got the presidency and they KNEW not to play about with this man.Ronald Reagan was not a man who'd give in to terrorists,so netanyahu take a leaf out of his book [so to speak]
andy-london: Until bibi takes a firm stand all your land for appeasement will never be enough.It's funny 30 years ago today the iranian nutters stormed the u.s.embassy and held the people captive for14 months.It was during wimp carter's watch and we all know about the botched helicopter rescue attempt.The last day of the wimp's presidency they suddenly let them go.Why?simply because a real man of iron got the presidency and they KNEW not to play about with this man.Ronald Reagan was not a man who'd give in to terrorists,so netanyahu take a leaf out of his book [so to speak]
Archives