Wednesday Feb 04, 2009

Testing loyalty

Posted by Rabbi Michael Marmur
Comments: 12
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

"This is preeminently the time to speak the truth, the whole truth, frankly and boldly. Nor need we shrink from honestly facing conditions in our country today. This great Nation will endure as it has endured, will revive and will prosper. So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is fear itself - nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance."

In order to avoid any unpleasantness with copyright lawyers I should make clear that these stirring words are not mine. And however germane they may appear to be to these times and this region, their origin (as many of my readers will have identified) is different. It was with these words that Franklin Delano Roosevelt accepted the office of President of the United States of America, a little over 75 years ago.

FDR's words are as applicable as ever, but his pellucid oratory is certainly out of place in the current Israeli climate of political debate. The words employed by the candidates range between blunt and crude, and some manage to bring the best of both of these epithets to bear. We are living in violent times, and the violence is seeping into every aspect of our lives. Add to the mix the subtle tones of Reality TV, and the result is inevitable: an undignified scramble for power, with cut-and-thrust of political debate replaced by character assassination.

Roosevelt's message is an inspiration, but it is not strictly true. We do have things to fear beyond fear itself. Iran has not been developing their ballistic capacity in order to send us messages of hope and reconciliation. There are palpable risks and dangers out there in the world, just as there were in the year of the Roosevelt inauguration. Beyond the geo-political sphere, there are formidable risks facing us economically, culturally and spiritually.

But on another level, FDR's message is profound and significant, and it has been echoed in recent weeks by the new occupant of the Oval Office. Fear Itself is playing an insidious role: it has been one of the key factors in the strong showing of Avigdor Lieberman's party Israel Beiteinu in the polls, only days before the general elections.

By all accounts, Lieberman's party is set to make a strong showing in the elections. Hundreds of thousands of non-Orthodox votes which have moved from one party to another in recent years (both Shinui and the Pensioners have benefited in the past) will strengthen Israel Beiteinu. They have run an insidious campaign, preying on Fear Itself. They suggest that most Israeli-Arabs are disloyal to the State, and therefore they should have citizenship rights revoked. They call for an oath of allegiance to the Jewish State - anyone who refuses to take it has forfeited their rights.

Their claim has the air of plausibility, but it's bogus. By raising the specter of a Fifth Column (comprising a fifth of the population), Lieberman is deliberately playing with fire. He is speaking to the lowest common denominator: fear itself. If the only kind of Israeli-Arab who will be tolerated here is one who speaks Yiddish and eats gefilte fish; if the values of the Inquisition come to dominate the values of the Enlightenment; if the politics of hate overtake the politics of hope - then we lose any claim to be a Jewish State in the best sense.

Many of the folks I mix with (you know the type: liberal self-haters and treasonous defeatists) are grappling with another kind of fear as elections approach. Along with the fear of Teheran and of Terror, we are afraid that the fear of fear itself will drive Israel farther away from what it might be. I am afraid that as we obsess (understandably but regrettably) over Power, we lose more and more of our Potential. Suggesting that Israeli-Arabs have to come out as Zionists in order to be a full part of the State is either disingenuous or inane. Israelis of integrity should state this loudly and clearly. Terror which paralyzes efforts for change has to be overcome.

I look forward to casting my vote on Tuesday: it's a great privilege to be part of history in this way, and it should not be taken lightly. It's not for me to tell people how they should vote, and sadly our Movement doesn't go in for rabbinic instructions in such matters. I am prepared to make the following revelation: I will be voting for a party which works for an Israel of justice and equity; which strives for a better balance in the environment and in the relationship between Religion and State. I'm for a party which sees something beyond fear itself. As a Jew and a Zionist, that's the Israel I am part of, and to which I am loyal. When did all that become treason?  

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
1  |   Shalom, Cherry Hill, NJ, Wednesday Feb 04, 2009 Perhaps you could define what you mean by ‘justice and equity’. If a political party advocates the destruction of the state, does it deserve representation in govt? Is it fair to the majority of citizens to have self declared enemies vote on laws? Perhaps loyalty oaths go too far, but should the govt pay national insurance benefits to the family of a terrorist? Is it more just to spare Arabs from the inconvenience of checkpoints since many are not terrorists, or to protect the Jewish intended victims from the Arabs who are terrorist?
2  |   BigJew, Thursday Feb 05, 2009 I like how he starts off quoting FDR about unreasonable fear but forgets to mention that it was FDR who interned thousands of Japanese because he saw them as a possible fifth column during WWII.
3  |   Joel, Thursday Feb 05, 2009 This guy lives in Lala land. Keep on ignoring the demographic issue Marmur, keep it up.
4  |   samg NY USA, Thursday Feb 05, 2009 Its funny to see another Jpost columnist rush to join the "the Israeli arabs are our friends, how dare you question thier loyalty" group - yet NOT answer the question. I dont ask the arabs to be Zionists, we ask that if they want to be part of Israeli society to 1) respect 3000yrs of Jewish history 2) stop working from within to destroy it 3) pay taxes & do military service (yes Id ask the Haraidim to as well) and 4) stop pretending we just showed up here one day. As in America ALL races, creeds and colors get equal treatment but also are equally demanded of! Answer the q next time "Rabbi"
5  |   J. Benjamin, New York, Thursday Feb 05, 2009 The unavoidable implication of the statement "[s]uggesting that Israeli-Arabs have to come out as Zionists in order to be a full part of the State is either disingenuous or inane" is that Arabs in Israel are fine if left to their own devices. What was that about inanity? If you wish to cite Roosevelt's use of the word 'truth,' then you must be willing to face it yourself: Arabs, whether within Israel or without, do not have the best interests of the Jews or Israel at heart. Your failure to accept this fact is your undoing, both as an honest intellectual and as a common sense citizen.
6  |   Dara, Jerusalem/Canada, Thursday Feb 05, 2009 Dear Rabbi Marmur, Thank you for your thoughtful piece on this issue- I can see how easy it is for some to get caught up in the 'bogus' claims such as those regarding compelling Israeli Arabs to pledge an oath of allegiance to the Jewish state or else. I hope that next Tuesday hope prevails over fear...
7  |   Felton McLaughlin Atlanta, Georgia, Friday Feb 06, 2009 You would think that Israel and all Jews would understand. The majority of the world hates or at the very least barely tolerates us. The world does not care about the day care, shopping centers or dead Israeli women and children. They are angry because we will not just lay down and die like good Jews. Has anyone other than me noticed a pattern. Since 1976 the cant has been, 'if you just withdraw from....(fill in the blank)' we won't attack. Oh it is not us attacking! It is (fill in the blank). WAKE UP!!!! Israel will never have peace until the last 5000 Jews are on a ship and its sunk
8  |   Svetlana in Canada, Friday Feb 06, 2009 Lieberman was voicing his concerns about Israeli Arabs from the time his party was created. Israelis are supporting him now because they just witnessed a war where local Arabs were demonstrating and publicly supporting the enemy. If this is not treason, I don`t know what is. The kind of people I mix with (you know the type: right wing extremist) do not expect Arabs to like gefilte fish but we do expect the MK not to collaborate with the enemies during the war and not to call for Israel`s destruction.
9  |   ron t., Friday Feb 06, 2009 It was F.D.R. that refused to act at all on behalf of the millions of Jewish victims. Yet in you bestr Masorti free tradition it is precisely that same F.D.R. whom you so proudly quote.
10  |   George, Virginia USA, Saturday Feb 07, 2009 This is one of the worst opinion pieces I've ever read! The writer is either using incompetent demagoguery or intellectual laziness in the worst degree. He does not even bother to try to show how Lieberman is wrong. His whole argument is: "Lieberman is using fear therefore do not vote for Lieberman". Oh for goodness sake, give us some survey, or some logic, or at least some anecdotal evidence, anything, ANYTHING, that would show that you are right. This piece is insulting to anyone with an IQ higher than that of a cow. So if you can't even try to prove that Lieberman is wrong, hmmmmm...
11  |   Israel Hazak-Kfar Glikson, Sunday Feb 08, 2009 So what´s wrong with loyalty? What´s wrong in asking for it and giving it in return? The relation between Hashem and Jews is about loyalty. The relations among Jews is about loyalty, from the politician to the simplest citizen. The relation to our values is about loyalty. Why should we keep them otherwise? Israel has been established because of our loyalty to our heritage. What is wrong in inviting an Israeli Arab to be loyal towards the state where he lives, where he votes, where he makes a living? It is his duty! It is also the duty of every Jew, in or outside Israel.
12  |   Len NUC, Tuesday Feb 10, 2009 Rabbi, If you don't like Lieberman because he's speaking to "the lowest common denominator - fear" it's only because the Reform doesn't want the competition.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Reform Reflections

Michael Marmur is the Vice-President for Academic Affairs of the Hebrew Union College - Jewish Institute of Religion, and is based in Jerusalem.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  2. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  3. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. The shawl and the hood
    Posted in Reform Reflections by Rabbi Michael Marmur
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Avrohom - Israel: Poor Mr. Marmur! He rails against all things Torah, all things halacha. He comes with his agenda to create discord in Israel in the hopes of consolidating power. How sad. Reform Jewish social group has a 2-pronged approach: condemn Torah and encourage Jews to eat less meat and blog more (and call it Oral Torah!). And the reform social group wants to be taken seriously as a true Judaic religion? B'moshav laitzim lo yashav!
Sarah America: I am not Jewish, and I hate to admit that I know little of the faith. I read this article for a class in college and am writing a paper on pluralism. I found it very interesting as I had absolutely no idea that there were variations in Judaism! I have seen the differences in Christianity and how they have torn apart and seperated people who fundamentally have the same core beliefs. Christ should bring us together not tear us apart. Language is complex and the meaning comes from our own interpretations. It is sad to have such things come between people. Divided we fall! Great discussion everyone
David Newton, USA: Israel O' Israel Shalom Rabbi Marmur If you keep putting off Yeshua your future children will not be the annointed Prophet's because the Prophet's of today, believe in Yeshua because he was the final sacrifice for sin. The B'rit Hadasha supports Isaiah 9v6. What books or other stories are recorded to support a child being born on earth called mighty God, Everlasting Father and Prince of Peace. Your bar/bat mitzvah's for years have been speaking of Yeshua...now is the time to accept him to teach Israel the right path..... Your annointed Prophet