Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

The Road to the White House: US military aid to Israel

Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

About 'The Road to the White House'

Question #7

Do you support President Bush's decision to increase the annual military aid to Israel from $2.4 billion to about $3b. for a period of 10 years, pending Congress approval? In principle, do you believe US aid to friendly Mideast and Gulf nations (whether Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia or Qatar) should be cut in return for greater domestic investment?

Contributors: (read it all or click on name to read post)

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York (D)

Senator Barack Obama of Illinois (D)

Senator John McCain of Arizona (R)

Former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina (D)

 

 Hillary Clinton: I support the recently announced Memorandum of Understanding signed between the United States and Israel to increase US military aid to Israel. Now, more than ever, it important that we help Israel keep its qualitative and technological military edge in an increasingly dangerous region.

Decisions that impact the national security of the United States must be made based on our best interests. Therefore, it is a false choice to try to set a choice between national security and domestic investment. The United States must be able to do both.

However, I do have reservations about the Bush Administration's announcement of a substantial military aid package to countries in the Persian Gulf.
      
First, I want to be certain that Israel's qualitative edge is sustained no matter what the United States ultimately sells to Saudi Arabia and others.

Second, I have concerns about the sequencing. I think we needed to see evidence of genuine Saudi cooperation in pursing stability in Iraq and Lebanon and in supporting our efforts to foster peace between the Israelis and Palestinian, before we move ahead with such a significant arms sale. We also need Saudi cooperation in stopping the export of radical Islam from the Kingdom.

 Barack Obama: I support the recent agreement to increase military assistance, as part of the United States' unique defense relationship with Israel, which serves the security interests of both our countries. The current Administration's failed policies in Iraq, in a war that never should have been authorized, have strengthened Iran and emboldened Hamas and Hizbullah, heightening the threats to Israel.

That makes it more important than ever that the United States live up to its commitment to ensure Israel's qualitative military edge, which will help Israel deter and repel attacks from as far as Teheran and as close as Gaza. 
 
The current Administration's approach to the federal budget has resulted in massive deficits, with every dime they spend adding to our nation's debt. By getting back to sound budgeting practices, we can invest in our priorities at home and abroad without having to make our children pay for it. 

As president, I will double our annual investment in foreign assistance to $50 billion by 2012 and ensure that those new resources are directed toward worthwhile goals. 

Extremely poor societies and weak states provide optimal breeding grounds for disease, terrorism, and conflict, so the United States has a direct national security interest in dramatically reducing global poverty and joining with our allies in sharing more of our riches to help those most in need. 

We need to invest in building capable, democratic states that can establish healthy and educated communities, develop markets, and generate wealth. Such states would also have greater institutional capacities to fight terrorism, halt the spread of deadly weapons, and build health-care infrastructures to prevent, detect, and treat deadly diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and avian flu. 

Our rapidly growing international AIDS programs have demonstrated that increased foreign assistance can make a real difference. As part of this new funding, I will capitalize a $2 billion Global Education Fund that will bring the world together in eliminating the global education deficit, and counter the radical madrasas that have filled so many young minds with messages of hate.

But our assistance will not come as a blank check. I will couple our support with an insistent call for reform, to combat the corruption that rots societies and governments from within. I will also insist that any nation we provide assistance to refrain from actions that undermine important American national interests.

For example, Egypt is an important ally, and our aid to them since the Camp David Accords has served our interests. But I question promising billions more in arms ahead of help for creating a more just society in Egypt. And promising this aid without a commitment from Egypt for a serious effort to end the smuggling of arms to Gaza, which is a serious threat, makes little sense.
 
In the case of the Gulf states, we should insist on a demonstrated commitment to combat terror and extremism, in Iraq and beyond, before promising massive arms sales. We should also insist that the Saudis, especially, participate constructively in any effort to solve the Israeli-Palestinian situation. We should be rewarding people for stepping up to the plate after they do so, not in hopes of their doing so.

 John McCain: I strongly support increased US assistance, to include providing needed military equipment and technology, for our democratic ally Israel in order to maintain its qualitative military edge relative to its regional adversaries as they acquire and seek more potent military capabilities - often from outside suppliers, such as Russia in the case of Syria and Iran.

Israel's enemies are too numerous, its margin of error too small, and our shared interests and values too great for any other position. 

In the US Senate, I have supported efforts, for example, to rebalance US assistance to Egypt from large-scale military aid to greater support for governance, judicial, and educational reforms.  I also support greater US assistance for real judicial, governance, and educational reforms across the broader Middle East, including in Saudi Arabia. 

Expanding economic opportunity and promoting democratic institutions, grounded in, among other things, a functioning and impartial judiciary, a free press, a robust political opposition, and respect for women's and minority rights, are vital elements to an enduring peace in the region.   

 John Edwards: I strongly support the decision to increase aid to Israel ? our ally and partner ? to ensure its security, while doing everything in our power to achieve peace and stability in this vital part of the world. Israel and the US have a deep and fruitful friendship. 

The US must do everything it can, through diplomatic, economic, and military aid, to maintain Israel ?s qualitative edge and keep Israel strong and safe in a dangerous region.  America must always stand by our friend, the only democracy in the region.

With respect to other countries in the region - including Saudi Arabia - I believe we must use both carrots and sticks to manage our relationships to ensure that they invest in policies that benefit regional stability and the security of America and our allies. 

That is why I have opposed, for example, a proposed $20 billion arms deal that isn't in the long-term interests of our country or the region. This deal has serious shortcomings?it doesn't force Saudi Arabia to stop terrorists from going into Iraq , make a real effort to help stabilize Iraq , lead regional security talks or assure the arms will not be used for offensive purposes. Congress should do the right thing and block the deal. 

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  Mikhail, Thursday Dec 20, 2007
No aid for any country, including Israel.
2  |  Jonathan,Arkansas, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
For Isreal Only!
3  |  Michael A. Shoemaker, Eugene, Oregon, Friday Jan 18, 2008
It's amazing, how at election time ALL the candidates seem to be pro-Israel; but once they get in office, be they Democrat or Republican, they do their darndest to feed Israel to the crocidiles.
4  |  Aharon HaCohen, Wednesday Jan 23, 2008
Mike Huckabee has some od the best answers to Israel-related questions, but for some reason you decided not to include him in the debate. It is a disgrace!
5  |  Cynthia Minde Arizona, Wednesday Feb 06, 2008
No matter what we think and no matter what you feel right now at this moment We are doing the right thing. It says in the Bible that we are to support and protect Iseral. If we pull out and leave her on her own we will answer for it. Any Nation that forces Iseral to "divide the land" will come under the swift and certain judgment of God (Joel 3:2)
6  |  Natan Finol, Caracas, Thursday Feb 14, 2008
All the land is Israel's land, the Torah says that. If any nation wants support us to protect Israel must be wellcome, but God's help is the most important thing in any case.
7  |  jan welch okla, Saturday Feb 16, 2008
Isarael only & for pete sake dont ever give up Jerusalem...No more land for peace
8  |  JAMES RW, PENNSYLVANIA -USA, Thursday Mar 06, 2008
I believe increasing military aid to Israel should a top priority since Iran, Russia seem to be increasingly upgrading missile technology as well as making new advanced ones. These advanced weopons are a dangerous venture for Israelis and the whole of middle East. Israel needs as much help as she can get from USA and other friendly nations to defend itself against determined STATES THAT SEEK her Destruction. If not, then something should be done to counteract the growing and hostile IRAN!
9  |  Jenny Miller, Sunday Mar 16, 2008
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem. Support Israel as God commands: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.
10  |  Peggy Stevens, Friday Apr 04, 2008
The USA must always support Israel militarily, politically, spiritually, and physically. This must be done to assure the existance of America. God will bless those who bless Israel and destroy those who hurt Israel. God means just what He says. He chose Israel. He blessed the world through Israel with the death of His only Son. Jesus arose the third day and carries with Him salvation for ALL. GOD Bless Israel and her people.
11  |  Diane Davis, Sunday May 25, 2008
As for as land is concerned. 1King 9:11 King solomon gave Hiram twent twenty cities in the land of Galilee. New testament ,Matthrew 4:15....Galilee of the Gentiles.God i s on the side of righteousness. Romans 2:11For their is no respect of persons with God.New Testament ,Hebrews 12:14 Follow peace with ALL MEN,and holiness without no man shall see the Lord.Matthrew 6 :44 Love your ememies,bless those that curse you,..,..That you may be the children of your Father which is in heaven; seem I can not curse or do evil anyone ,if I am to be blessed.
12  |  Big Jim, Monday May 26, 2008
Support of Israel from Bush is much stronger than support by Obama. Like Obama says if my policies are wrong vote against me. Okay, I will vote against you.
13  |  Sherry, Las Vegas, Friday Jun 06, 2008
Peggy Stevens, it's extremely difficult to understand the bible without being savvy in history and geography. Do not reference the bible unless you've truly been a student. If you really want to support and protect Isreal............then you are in the wrong territory.
14  |  donald keith manka, Tuesday Sep 02, 2008
bush has turned his back on israel about 4 years ago. trying to trade peace for land the got the land and israel never got the peace. when but stopped the war and started the police action as far as i was conserned no more bush. when bush turned his back on israel then he also turned his back on GOD. and now we are paying for bush turning his back on israel and the jewish people and god. i love god but i also love israel and the jewish people and i will never turn my back on israel and the jewish people amen/shalom
15  |  Zemule - UK, Saturday Oct 11, 2008
To me it sounds like comedy. America's economy needs to be aided as well. To render millitary help will cost tax payers money which USA does not have at the moment. If such help will be carried out may not be genuine but shere pomp.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

The Road to the White House JPost BlogCentral special: US presidential candidates on matters of importance to Israel, the Middle East and the Jewish World.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Most Commented Posts

  1. Sarah Palin deserves respect
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
  2. Leaders and leadership: Is something missing?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
  3. America's interests: a bedside briefing
    Posted in Inside the Middle East by Martin Kramer
    Monday Oct 06, 2008
  4. Today, I killed a chicken
    Posted in Jewlicious by ck
    Monday Oct 06, 2008
  5. Jobs for the boys
    Posted in Israel Stories by Jeremy Cardash
    Tuesday Oct 07, 2008

Recent Comments

Zemule - UK: To me it sounds like comedy. America's economy needs to be aided as well. To render millitary help will cost tax payers money which USA does not have at the moment. If such help will be carried out may not be genuine but shere pomp.
Laura McConkey: Mr. Shoemaker, you are obviously very ignorant of the situation and should keep your comments to yourself. Read your history--Israel has always been subject to the kind of terrorism and ignorant bigotry of people like yourself who fail to understand the facts. Nothing could ever warrant the type of terrorism that Hamas has perpetrated on the Israelis, who are simply trying to live in the land that was given to them in 1948. If you ever take the time to visit Israel, you may (as I did) meet lovely Lebanese, Syrian, and Palestinian people who live peacefully under Israeli rule.
breeze, usa: we homeschool. not every American has it mixed up about church and state It was supposed to keep the state out of the church, not keep church out of the school. But in all honesty, i do not want just anyone to teach my child the Bible, i want it taught God's way and what he wants, not what man's interpretation is and what man's opinion is. So homeschool it is God leads we will follow.