Iran or the Golan

Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's relaxing vacation in the Golan is just bad timing. It serves to fuel the conflict that exists within Israeli society which grapples between staying in the Golan Heights and the need for a peace agreement with Syria.

Truthfully, when the North is brimming with tourists and activities, when Golan wineries are awarded international prizes and when the Golan's communities see renewed vigor, it seems unnecessary and unrealistic to give up the Golan. The Israeli public does not sense directly the extent of the damage caused to our country due to the lack of peace with Syria nor does it understand the hefty price we are paying because of the continued hostilities with Syria.

Now is not the time to punish Olmert

In a respectful, official and honest manner, without bold statements and dramatic speeches, Ehud Barak announced that despite the political temptation to oust Olmert and present himself a political alternative, he was choosing to stay in the government for the good of the country and to achieve personal goals.

There are no objections to the fact that in the short-term, the option to dissolve the coalition is the best possible scenario Barak could face; crushing Kadima, fulfilling his promise to go to elections and displaying responsibility and moral values which would have played to his advantage mere hours after he would have announced his resignation from the government.

Olmert must remain the PM

In preparation for the publishing of the final Winograd Report on the Second Lebanon War, the legitimate demand from Labor Chairman and Defense Minister Ehud Barak to announce that he intends to leave the government if and when Prime Minister Ehud Olmert remains in his position is resurfacing. 

I admit that it is not easy to deal with the simplistic and popular catch-phrase which argues that those who failed should "take responsibility" and go home, as if we are talking about a soccer coach or a government clerk who erred.

The attempt to portray the issue as if it were Olmert's personal matter buys him wide leverage in the battle with many who turn a blind eye to the dramatic consequences of such a move.

About this blog

Building Bridges Peace Now General Secretary Yariv Oppenheimer lays out his visions on how to fulfill the Zionist dream.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Hillel Green, Modi'in, Israel: Israel is not our land. It is land set aside by G-d as the home for the Jews. We are its guardians and car givers. It is now ours to give away. We merely occupy it under that wahtchful eye G-d. We must remebter that Israel was given to all Jews i.e. not the heredi, not the naqtionalists, not the traditional, not the orthodox, not the the masorti, not the reform, not the re-constructionists. Haman. Hitler, et. al did not care what kind of Jew you were. They considered us all Jews. So should we! w2e must remember that
David Washington, D.C.: Mr Oppenheimer writes, "the extreme right proved that the Israeli government understood only force and that the use of violent thuggish approaches were well worth it." A rather bold statement. Interesting that Mr. Oppenheimer promotes the use of force against Jewish settlers and consistently condemns it in response to Palestinian terrorism. Who is the bigger enemy Mr. Oppenheimer?
Miryam Alfandari Istanbul Turkey: Dear H.Gerez.OK, the Arabs intended too many times to throw the Israeli people into the sea and still, for SOME ONLY Tel-Aviv is occupied.BUT MAJORITY of BOTH people(Arabs and Jews) living in Israel in PRESENT time, WHO are serving in the wars and now living in this constant war of terror.BOTH have RIGHT to and WANT to live in a secure Peace which requires concessions from BOTH side.BOTH are ready to these concessions BECAUSE they can see, realise clearly better than me or/and you that these concessions are LESS DANGEROUS than the ongoing and near future situation for them. Consider it pease.