|
Sunday Sep 28, 2008
Building Bridges: The radicalization of the right-wing Posted by Yariv Oppenheimer
Comments: 29
From the moment I joined 'Peace Now', threats, hate mail and hostile telephone calls have become the norm. Sometimes, the actual amount of letters and phone calls served to indicate the level of influence of 'Peace Now'. In periods where we were able to influence the public agenda, public attacks on the organization and on our persons increased accordingly and when our voice resonated less, the threats lessened accordingly. Nevertheless, I never felt that there was a tangible reason for worry, beyond the episodes of spontaneous violence during demonstrations, particularly in settlements. The feeling was that hate mail would not translate into actual physical harm. On Thursday night, my feelings of personal safety - as well as those of my friends - were shattered the moment we received news that an explosive device had detonated outside Prof. Ze'ev Sternhell's home. The device was not big and it was lucky that Prof. Sternhell was only lightly hurt, but the echo of the explosion was heard across the country. There are those who opine that the political struggle on the fate of the settlements has already been decided and that the conflict between left and right is history. The explosion in Sternhell's home, the slashing of reserve soldiers' tires in protest to their part in evacuating an illegal structure, and the abuse of Palestinians in the territories all prove that even though it has been transformed, the struggle for the fate of the settlements and Israel's image is more important than ever. For the past two years, the mass demonstrations organized by Yesha, the distribution of the orange ribbons and the sticker and poster proliferation have given way to acts of violence, the establishment of illegal outposts, violent demonstrations and the harming of peace activists, IDF soldiers and Palestinians. The settlement industry has grown to include thousands of impassioned youths who see the state and 'democracy' as direct enemies. For them, the vision of a Greater Israel trumps everything. As long as Israeli democracy upheld the decision to invest and build beyond the Green Line, settlement youths saw themselves as an inseparable part of the State of Israel. However, should that same democracy make a decision that is contradictory to their beliefs, the State and its institutions would become enemies of the Jewish People and all acts to fight it would become justified, including violence. So far, unfortunately, this new tactic is working. Recently, the Shin Bet and the IDF advised the defense minister not to forcibly evacuate the Migron outpost, which was built on private Palestinian land, and to do everything possible to reach a consensus on the evacuation so as to avoid a violent clash with settlers. The defense minister heeded the advice and chose not to put the IDF and police forces in a situation in which they would clash with the 'hilltop thugs'. In doing so, he enabled those who are breaking the law to continue living in the outpost for years to come. In a similar fashion, the physical attacks have recently turned against Yesha's veteran leadership which has tried to keep a relatively moderate tone in its struggle with the Israeli government. The slashing of tires of the heads of the Amana settler movement in protest of the discussions on the fate of West Bank settlements, led the Religious-Zionist movement to understand that it had created a monster. I do not know who detonated the device at the entrance to Prof. Sternhell's home, but I do know that a growing group of extreme right-wing activists is succeeding in terrorizing Israeli society and influencing its policies using violence. The radicalization of right-wing activities is not only the Palestinians' problems, but of Israeli society as a whole, right and left as one. The continuation of apathy and lack of willingness to deal with the phenomenon only strengthen the extremists and endanger not only the chance for peace but Israeli democracy itself.
1 | MG, Englewood, NJ, USA, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
Wow, so the "settlers'" (as you call them) tactics are working? How nice to hear such good news so early in the morning. And may their numbers increase, and may you and your Piece Now buddies finally wake up from your dream that the arabs want peace.
2 | Yosef, Israel, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
Why is Arab violence, LETHAL violence kosher in the eyes of peace now? And if it isn't , where are your complaints?
3 | Herbert Kaine Hebron, Israel, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
In 1996, the left wing set up "Eyal", a fake right wing underground group. Eitan Oren played a major role in publicizing this group. I cannot help wondering whether this attack was staged as well, for the following reasons
1) If this shadow group was against the state of Israel, as its fliers maintain, why did they attack a marginal leftist activist instead of the state itself?
2) If the right wing wanted to assassinated Sternhell, why didnt they use guns, which are widely available?
3) Who benefits from a "assassination attempt" of Sternehll
4 | Daniel-Atlanta, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
I have a suggestion. Let the "Peace Now" folks live in the settlements that get attacked for a year, and let the settlers live in the safety of Tel Aviv for a year. That should improve everyone's perspective.
5 | Joel, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
The willingness of Peace Now and the rest of the anti-settlement Left to work with organizations that have no hesitation about endangering Israel's security is a radicalization that threatens mass casualties. This doesn't excuse physical attacks or threats against Sternhell, Oppenheimer, or anyone else. But when Peace Now objects not only to settlements, but to any practical way of defending those who live in them, it shouldn't claim to have clean hands when Jewish residents of Yesha are attacked by Arabs (which, come to think of it, was what Sternhell recommended).
6 | gb, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
I don't excuse people resorting to violence. I also have nothing but contempt for unpopular unrepresentative governments that make policies and put into effect drastic strategic measures that fundamentally weaken the defense of the nation without voter approval. I have nothing but scorn for the Oppenheimers of the world, whose ideas got a lot of people killed, pushing for these policies knowing that, if it ever came to a vote, 10% of the public would support it.
7 | The Raccoon, Central Israel, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
I wholeheartedly agree that radicalization in the Israeli society is a problem... but it's a radicalization that started with the trampling of democracy by our leftist courts, the decay of our political system and the arrogance of our left-leaning leaders: even now some in this corrupt Knesset freely admit that they are not going to election because they know the Right will win and win big.
8 | Michael Dar - Arad Israel, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
Sternhell's latest come just on time to revive the defunct "Peace in our time" movement. Apparently to set the tone and settings for yet another transfer and deportation from Jews this time from Jerusalem, Judea and Samaria. Just as Rabin's assassination predisposed the public to accept, against all logic, the infamous and illegal Oslo rip-off. Assassination attempt with a "fire-cracker"..what a joke! To whom does that ridiculous event profit...answer: the subversive lefties and their foreign paymaster!
9 | Jan P, Sunday Sep 28, 2008
The violence from the settlers is a direct result of the perception that the Olmert-Livni-Barak government does not protect the citizens of Israel.
On the other-hand the Olmert-Livni-Barak government can't find enough concessions to make to the Arabs, getting virtually nothing in return. Why, for example, did they trade living terrorists for dead israelis whithout securing Schalit's release first?
When I see a Palestinian "Peace Now" and when I see left wing Palestinain papers calling for concessions to Israel, then I will think we cna ahve peacee. Now, it seems to be an illusion.
10 | mica amherst, Monday Sep 29, 2008
When hasn't the left wanted to silence the right. Freedom of speech is only for those who agree with you eh opie? This was obviously not an assassination attempt. And the radicalization is coming from those who wish to silence anyone not on the extreme left.
11 | Mark, Monday Sep 29, 2008
"Peace" - achieved only through strength, if you want true peace. "Peace Now" - sure, if you want peace now, just capitulate to the enemy and agree to peace on his terms. Peace has to be earned. Don't sully the blood and sweat and tears sacrificed by so many Israelis over 60 years but offering "Peace Now" to the enemy whose only idea of peace is violent victory.
12 | danny, Monday Sep 29, 2008
yariv,
it seems like only right wing extrimists are readung this site... i think your work is very important. keep it up!
13 | Vinegar Hill, Madrid, Spain., Monday Sep 29, 2008
Well done Yariv! It is a pity there are not more writers sharing your views. The aggressive, abusive comments aimed at you by many, demonstrate to the world how difficult the road to peace has become. Good luck and keep up the good work.
14 | Ruben,, Monday Sep 29, 2008
@danny, #12: So anyone who doesn't agree with Yariv, is automatically a right-wing extremist... phew! That makes things so much easier! (:scorn)
15 | MG in Englewood, NJ, USA, Monday Sep 29, 2008
How's this for a different assessment, Dano? Fewer people agree with Appeasement Now than you and Oppenheimer would like us to believe. May the New Year finally bring people with "saichel" and Jewish pride into power, and may the left sink into oblivion.
16 | rachamim ben ami -bat yam, Tuesday Sep 30, 2008
I had to smile at your inclusion, more than once, of the IDF with those whom you imagine to be part of the persecuted masses, Peaceniks, even Arabs. I know you are among the rare Peacenik who does do his Service to the State and I offer respect where itis due- but do not for a second pretend that the IDF is in the same universe as your misled ideologues. We serve the State, not your or any other ideology and indeed you have admitted as much in various interviews!
To state otherwise at this particular juncture is entirely self serving and totally disingenuous.
17 | VN, Tuesday Sep 30, 2008
It is true the settlements get attacked, but do the settlements rightfully and righteously belong there? Do the settlements rightfully and righteously belong there? When the colonial troops invaded Native American lands in the US, were the natives expected to sit and take the violence and humilliation, just for the foreigner's sake? Israel is a new country, less than 100 years old, despite Biblical or Toraic claims. It has much to learn of its boundaries, much to learn of its neighbors. Do not complain about war when you nurse war.
18 | David, America, Tuesday Sep 30, 2008
FIrst, I say I condemn the attack. You seem to forget that "achieving peace -at all costs- is pretty much the same you are advocating against... That's radical. Both sides must seek peace. *both* sides not just us, and seeking peace no matter the price leads to radicalization. BTW what kind of peace? We need peace now, sure we do, but for how long? We can not afford to spend so much to get peace for two weeks... and that's the most likely scenario if Peace Now "peace" projects materialize. This is not the first fight among RIght and Left in Israel, and the Left has no clean hands either...
19 | Dan J, Tuesday Sep 30, 2008
Mr. Yariv O...although I disagree with your philosphy of peace..I want to say that I am sad by the vile threats you and your groups receive. That's a shame. Freedom of speech is so important (espec for us Jews). I wish you were right..a chance for peace..But these pogromchiks want us Jews gone ...period!
20 | Chaim, Israel, Tuesday Sep 30, 2008
The mass suppression of Israeli Jews can not have a pretty ending. Oppenheimer complains about the increasing violence of those he plans to drive from our homes in Judea and Samaria. I submit that, when all is said and done, it is NORMAL to resist deportation by violence when all democratic options have been closed down. As Thomas Jefferson put it, "I will plead with humane men but with tyrants I will give no quarter". I don't know if rightists really were behind the attack on Sternhell. Many times rightists have been falsely blamed. However, the suppression of Jewish patriots MUST END!
21 | alex issael, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
I CAN STOP MYSELF WITH YOUR NONESENCE PEACE NO
DID WE GET PEACE WHEN WE LEFT GAZA?
AND I AM 7 KM FROM IT IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN.
22 | PW Virginia USA, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
#17...your analogy with the native Americans is just plain wrong...The vast majority of Arabs came to the land of Israel after the Jews and British brought jobs and prosperity. Check the census records from the 1920's for facts instead of mistaken analogies and Arab propaganda....
23 | Michael Dar -Arad- Israel, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
In case nobody noticed, the left is always aboven the law in our "stupid" country. Scores of academics betray us while being paid by the state. Hundreds of leftist fringe (so-called) peace groups like "peace in our time" are heavely financed by international organizations and foreign governments to promote anti-Israel subversive activities, ideologies etc. Illegal policies lead by our politicians and pushed forwards by illegal means and corruption are never denounced by the left nor punished by law-enforcement apparatus which is politicised and are obviously part of the global stank.
24 | Dave, Israel, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
I'm all for peace, even with giving up some land. However, there is no-one to make peace with. If Israel negotiates with Hamas, Fatah will declare Jihad. If Israel negotiate's with Fatah, Hizbullah and Hamas will not be satisfied and will create a new power struggle between them. Not to mention the other groups. When the Palestinians give their leadership a unified mandate to actually negotiate, then perhaps the ideology of the left will make sense. Until then, Israel must maintain strong fence.
25 | Brian - Aliyah, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
Yariv Oppenheimer and the entire RADICAL LEFT, are really working overtime doing everything they can with to launch this all out propaganda media blitz with the soul purpose of demonizing the right, last I checked, the right stood for Israeli security, and uniting and protecting the Jewish people. The lefts campaign against the right is soooo transparent, I have to wonder why they are launching this campaign against the right who want a secure strong, independent Israel and to protect Israels citizens. If the left is so against these ideals, makes you wonder what their ideals are.
26 | Izzy M, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
#17...The last "Palestinian" was Goliath..and little David creamed his BIG TUCHAS! Little David is still around only today He has tanks and planes instead of a sling shot!
27 | William, Israel, Wednesday Oct 01, 2008
Ridiculous. The Arabs dont want real peace according to Western concepts of peace...Their peace is informed by their religion which defines it as supremecy over "the other".
This is a fact. Anyone can check it out...in their literature, history, and modern media, interviews...and of course action....rejetion of offers, offesive wars, statements by leaders to destroy us. Has nothing to do with settlements in Judai and Sumaria but Settlements in anywhere including Tel Aviv.
Any Takers for a deal like They are offering my Jewish Brethren? I thought not.
28 | rachamim ben ami ...bat yam, israel, Saturday Oct 04, 2008
Re #17/VN:If you insist on drawing analogies with the US' Wild West, we Jews are the Native Americans. It is our land. 4500 years of continuous residence despite periodic loss of sovereignity. Name a single US Tribe with even half those years in a specific area.
Look at an Atlas. From Morocco to Western China you will see Arabs and Islamic Nations. From the Philippines over to the Sub-Sahrah mor than 1 billion Muslims who came to that culture via colonialisation and usurping of natural cultures.
By a miracle we have been able to REGAIN our sovereignity and you imagine us to be SETTLERS?
29 | Michael Dar, Saturday Oct 04, 2008
R e to # 26 - Izzy M You are historically wrong. The Philistines of then are not the Palestinians of today. Most of nowadays so-called Palestinians are for a part an amalgamation of people of various origines which remained after conquests and for the biggest part quite recent imports..Egyptians brought in by the thousands by Mohamed Ali (1830). Muslim Serbs by the Turks, Egyptians by the British (WW2), 30 thousand Arabs from Hauran-Syria, and the (mostly illegal) immigration of 100 thousand Arabs during the British Mandate. Arabs with an immemorial presence or roots in the country is a myth.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |