|
Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
Building Bridges: Lieberman - a strategic threat Posted by Yariv Oppenheimer
Comments: 41
At the end of March 2006, Israel's citizens voted unambiguously for compromise and national agreement and awarded the "Kadima" party leadership of the country. For the first time in 2 decades, the 'Center-Left' - including Kadima, the pensioners' party, Meretz, Labor and the Arab parties - had the majority in government, with 70 Mks. The Likud, with Binyamin Netanyahu at its head leading a hawkish, right-wing stance, was crushed and won only 12 mandates, while Lieberman followed closely with 11 mandates. Based on the results of the votes, Israel Beitenu's (Israel Our Home) entry into the government was, in fact, a slap in the face for the average voter who expressed, again unambiguously, deep mistrust for the politics of the Right-wing extremists. From the first day of his entry into the government, Avigdor Lieberman behaved as if it was his party that won the vote and as if the 'fundamentals of government' was but an unworthy, decorative document, not to be given any meaning whatsoever. Instead of accepting the general population's decision and taking his place on the opposition's bench, Lieberman decided to act from within by joining the government in an effort to torpedo any political progress. The government became paralyzed. Instead of acting to evacuate to outposts and delineating the country's borders, the government did not dare evacuate not even one illegal caravan. Lieberman even succeeded in affecting the Annapolis conference, and after a series of threats and intimidations, the PM surrendered to the pressure and emptied the conference of any significant content. Lieberman's highly-covered visits to Har Homa and illegal outposts only added to international embarrassment and to the government's feeling of helplessness in the face of Lieberman's very public opposition. The Minister of Strategic Affairs himself became a strategic threat to every development toward any compromise and dialogue with the moderates in the Middle East. Leiberman's method succeeded, even partly, in bringing about this situation and grinding the whole government to a halt. Even the subject of the 'core issues' became an excuse to threaten the coalition. As far as Leiberman was concerned, we can talk with the Palestinians no more than we can talk about the weather. His resignation from the government is the PM's only chance to survive politically and to fully take advantage of this window of opportunity for peace. Israel Beitenu's exit will allow this coalition to really start acting according to its basic and fundamental premises. Without Lieberman, the government can now seriously address the outposts issue, freeze settlement expansion and use every opportunity to advance the peace process in a significant way. Leiberman, who represented the central threat to a political process with the Palestinians, will go back to his roots and join the right-wing extremist opposition lead by Netanyahu. The Olmert-Barak government, on the other hand, will receive its last chance to lead Israel to a peace agreement with the Palestinians; a commitment it promised to undertake on the eve of the elections.
1 | Daniel, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
I know it is politically corect to talk about outposts and exchanging land for an air(peace talks). On the serious note, Leiberman is absolutely right about arab MKs and Israeli arabs, they are the enemies from within, dilligently working on deligitemizing Israel and trying to make it as one more arab state.
2 | Tal Solal Cohen, Nairobi, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
I was so pleased to read your article while fully supporting your views, consideration and analysis of Israeli politics and hope that many more in all side of the conflicts including our Palestinian brothers will share it with us. This positive outlook is giving me and other moderate hope for the future & help further marginalise these extremists such as the Lieberman & Netanyahu as well as the Mashaals & Nasrallah of the world!
I want peace and prosperity. Like a marriage, it will only work if both parties compromise & use religion as a mean to unite rather than divide.
3 | Hershel Barg, USA, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
I noticed that Mr. Oppenheimer counted the Arab Parties in his center-left coalition. I didn't know they were "left wing", or does "left wing" stand for the dismemberment of the Jewish State? I suspect Mr. Oppenheimer's answer to that is yes.
Mr. Olmert brought in Israel Beitenu because he needed them for the survival of his coalition. Now that they are gone we can only pray that his coalition comes to a speedy dissolution.
4 | Esther, Israel, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
The Olmert-led government is carving a path of physical destruction for the state of Israel. Our state is not up for grabs by those who decide to terrorize us. You do not react to intimidation by concessions. Lieberman leaving the coalition is beneficial if it helps bring about Olmerts political downfall.
5 | Yuval Zimerman, Israel, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
To all who speak of giving away the west bank and of giving it to the Palestinians: leave your own homes and move elsewhere; give your own property to the Palestinians. For, in the sense of the term "Palestinian," they lived in Tel Aviv as well as the rest of Israel, and we kicked them out. Those in the West Bank are Jordanians which tried to kill us and kick us to the sea, but failed. So if the "center-left" gather enough courage, let them leave their homes and hand them over personally to the Palestinians. And leave the rest of the Jews alone to build a Jewish homeland.
6 | Gil, Eli, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
I love funny math. The right won 50 seats. The left won 34 seats, even if you include the Arab parties who some believe may not all be fully committed to the security and success of the Jewish state. The Jewish left which numbered 56 seats before Oslo now has just 24. The center-right is far stronger than the center-left, even including the Arab parties. Pretending that the Israeli public supports Labor-Meretz-Arab parties more than it supports the Israeli right is ludicrous. Lieberman represents the Israeli public more than Barak and his colleagues do.
7 | Salomon L Vaz Dias, New York, Wednesday Jan 16, 2008
I 100% disagree with Mr. Oppenheimer. I sincerely believe in the aims of Zionism: The ingathering of the Jewish people in its historic homeland Eretz Israel through Aliyah from all countries; The strengthening of the State of Israel which is based on the prophetic vision of justice and peace; And the protection of Jewish rights everywhere. I favor a comprehensive peace but not at the expense of our people, and our country. Lieberman did the right thing, and the Shas folks continue to be the extremist traitors they always were. Long live democracy!
8 | Marsha - Stamford, CT, USA, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Funny, (tragic, actually) that every time you use the phrase right wing you feel the need to add the word "Extremist". Because of your left-wing government, the people of Sderot and the Negev (and Tel Aviv, soon. Just watch) are enduring unimaginable horror EVERY DAY. Because of the LEFT WING EXTREMISTS, the unity of Jerusalem is in danger too. The sooner the present government is ousted, the better. A right wing government is sure to restore some sanity. It certainly can't get any worse.
9 | S. Singal- Jacksonville, FL USA, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Such a fragile coalition supporting such an unpopular government cannot long endure except for the situation where the coalition members think more of their current jobs than the security of the people and the country. Bring down the government and schedule elections and half of these coalition members would have to find real jobs.
10 | Julie, Jerusalem, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Really Mr. Oppenheimer, you give Liebermann too much credit
11 | Eitan Levy - Bat Ayin, Israel, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
The terms 'extreme' and 'extremist' are used here as ad-homonym attacks on anyone who disagrees with the authors un-realistic perception of the political 'center.' In fact the left represents both a minority of the country, and a minority of seats in the Knesset. If the term 'extremist' is used for Lieberman, it should equally be used for anti-Zionist, supposedly 'left' parties, such as the Arab parties. To the contrary, Oppenheimer includes them in the consensus and labels their Zionist counterparts on the other side of the spectrum 'extremists.' How sad.
---
B'ahavat Yisrael
12 | YM, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Yariv, Please don't count the Arab parties when you are counting whether "Israel" is trending one way or another. If a decision on a major national security issue has a majority only when you include Arab parties, and cannot muster the support of a majority of Jews, this is a recepie for civil war.
Additionally, if you count Kadima as 1/2 left and 1/2 right, the results of the last election trended the way the previous election did. You can reshuffle Israeli political parties, but the left-right spectrum always comes out the same.
13 | Owen, London, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
As a UK-based supporter of Israel I am v pleased that Leiberman has left the coalition. He has discredited the Israeli government by the incluson of someone widely perceived as being a racist, and someone who has repeatedly thrown spanners in the works of the peace process. With him gone the international community can begin to restore confidence that the government of Israel is committed to working towards a fair and just peace with the Palastinians.
14 | Jack B., Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Why is a peace process the most important thing? The Hard Left's peace process has completely and totally failed. Signing pieces of paper with Abbas will not solve anything.
15 | Shmuel, Jerusalem, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Lieberman forgot to include "Peace Now" in his list of strategic threats to the Jewish State.
16 | Ephraim Rubinger , Miami USA, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Oppenheimer as usual bandies about the word "extremists" with total abandon. Might not the extremistrs be those who support using the IDF to arrest teenage girls on Judean hill tops rather than have the IDF take action - REAL action - against Hamas in Gaza? Might not the extremists be those who are convinced that Fatah is a peace partner? Might not the extremistsbe those who do not take the Arab threat WITHIN Israel.
The State of Israel and the Jewish People are entering a defining moment, let us choose our "extremists" very carefully
17 | John Simpson, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Oppenheimer the best man the US and the EU has in Israel.
18 | Gili, Canada, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Peace Now has done more to harm Israel than any amount of settlements or demographic problem could ever have.
What demographics are rumored to produce 50 years from now you managed to produce in less than a decade. Congratulations for destroying the very country you claim to want to protect.
If you look back at what you have actually *accomplished* in the past two decades you will realize I am right. Not a single withdrawal of any kind has improved Israel's security, no matter how many excuses you come up with.
19 | Howie, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Name calling and sloganisms from BOTH sides has long been leaving me cold. I have yet to hear any coherhent suggestions? "Land for Peace" "Transfer" "Kill them all", well what to do folks suggest? Personally, I think it starts with the Palestinians...not with us. They have not done much of anything on their end.
20 | Nehemia Levin Ph.D., Thursday Jan 17, 2008
Mr. Oppenheimer fixation on Avigdor Lieberman is like a psycho-stalker who is unhappy to see Avigdor Lieberman getting world attention with his calssical analysis of Israeli Arabs incedious plan for the destruction of Israel, from within. Mr. Oppenheimer is purely jealous of Lieberman's success.
21 | Yaakov K/, Jerusalem, Israel, Thursday Jan 17, 2008
UTTER NONSENSE! "Kadimah," a Leftist (NOT Centrist!)
party, got in only because of the personality of Sharon.
Bib was defeated because a lot of people hate his guts personally from his past tenure as Prime Minister.
Olmert has no mandate to do anything.
22 | Dan Friedman, Friday Jan 18, 2008
Lieberman is certainly a "strategic threat" - to Peace Now and the rest of the obsessive Left in Israel and their comrades in the USA and Europe. Unfortunately for them, and fortunately for normal Jews, "strategic threats" always emerge just as Israel seems on the threshold of signing a suicide pact with Peace Now's Arab clients, as we see today with another imploding "process." As long as there are more Israelis who choose to live - and live in the real world - than Israelis with a death wish, the Arab's hostility to Jews in their midst will keep Israel alive.
23 | leisha langer, Friday Jan 18, 2008
You are a dreamer. You also have not learned from history and to quote a great historian and philosopher "Those who do not learn from history destined to repeat it."
Start reading-It is about time
24 | Terry Eilat, Israel, Friday Jan 18, 2008
No publication could actually print what most people think of "Peace Now" as the language would be confined to four-letter words & combinations thereof. You & your loony-left collegues are as marginalized among Jews as the Neturei Karta. Basically, you are only a media-phenomenon written about to make a cheap headline. The truth of the matter is that you are the extremist. Lieberman's ideas represent the thinking of a large percentage of Israelis & the percentage grows daily.
25 | Beth Landau, Tel Aviv, Israel, Friday Jan 18, 2008
Yariv's got a very selective memory. He conveniently forgets that Olmert was voted in BEFORE our soldiers were kidnapped, a war in Lebanon broke out and Kassam missles began falling on Sderot and the Negev. But this of course is of little concern to Mr. Peace Now. He could care less about all of the above...for his biggest concern is Avigdor Lieberman.
Yariv's is the European Union's man in Israel. I would take everything he says with a grain of salt.
26 | Beth Landau, Tel Aviv, Israel, Friday Jan 18, 2008
( Part 2)
Peace Now gets their funding from the E.U.. Their main goal is to demonize Israeli patriots and of course to spy on fellow Israelis using special satellite cameras to see if they are heaven forbid, building new homes in our homeland. I wonder if there's an Arab organization which goes against its own by aligning themselves with their nation's enemy, the same way Peace Now aligns itself with our enemies - highly unlikely
27 | Beth Landau, Tel Aviv, Israel, Friday Jan 18, 2008
It's unfortunate that every forum & platform he receives is used for trashing Israeli patriots, including residents of Northern Israel...for those who do not know, he appeared on Israeli TV several nights ago, & along with several Arab guests proceeded to attack Jewish residents of the North as being "racist" for insisting on populating the Galilee with further Jewish settlements..We aren't even speaking about the West Bank, but Israel proper!
Yariv, why must you use each forum and platform you receive to trash your own, while aligning yourself with our foes?
28 | sandra schmidt, Saturday Jan 19, 2008
i have not heard anything so crazy as what this oppenheimer says. what is there to understand. the arabs say they hate you and want to wipe you off the map. what is so hard to understand about that. go ahead and believe these people and see how long you have a country left.
29 | Chuck Howell U.S.A., Saturday Jan 19, 2008
Do the words "Peace in our time" ring a bell?
Neville Chamberlin and company threw Czechoslovakia to the wolves. One year later the world was at war! Today,the peace at any price movement is willing to use Jerusalem in the same manner. Land for peace?, never!
|