|
Monday Sep 03, 2007
My Truth: There is no such thing as an illegal outpost Posted by Avigdor Lieberman
Comments: 16
Ariel Sharon instructed our youth to “charge the hilltops”. The State allowed water and electricity link-ups, provided infrastructure and roads, encouraged the settlement of the outposts with grants and financial incentives. There is no such thing as an illegal outpost. Some were erected with the State turning a blind eye, some were authorized behind closed doors with a wink or a handshake. But there is no such thing as an illegal outpost. It is true that Ariel Sharon, as Prime Minister, adopted President Bush’s Road Map, and that one of the clauses in the agreement (out of 38 clauses) is that the government of Israel will dismantle settlement outposts erected since March 2001. It is also true that the Road Map is “Performance Based”. The very first clause of the Road Map, to be carried out at the outset of Phase I, has yet to be met. It reads: “Palestinian leadership issues unequivocal statement reiterating Israel’s right to exist in peace and security and calling for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire to end armed activity and all acts of violence against Israelis anywhere. All official Palestinian institutions end incitement against Israel.” Nor have the clauses requiring “confiscation of illegal weapons and consolidation of security authority, free of association with terror and corruption” and “Arab states cut off public and private funding and all other forms of support for groups supporting and engaging in violence and terror”. What happened to these clauses? Why is the left wing so zealous about pursuing clause number 24 (dismantling of settlements), yet so apathetic when it comes to the remainder 37 clauses? Why jump straight to clause number 24, when the previous 23 clauses are left unfulfilled? Those who claim it’s a law-and-order issue are also tainted by duplicity and political agenda. Why is there no Ministerial Committee on the dismantling of illegal Palestinian building prevalent throughout Israeli controlled Area C of Judea and Samaria (such as the one on Jewish outposts)? Why is there no Ministerial Committee on the dismantling of illegal Bedouin building rampant throughout the Negev, or illegal Arab building consuming the Galilee? There are over 70,000 illegal Bedouin buildings in the Negev (only 1,600 in the outposts) and over 260,000 dunam of land unlawfully seized, equivalent to the combined area of Jerusalem + Tel Aviv + Haifa + Hod Hasharon + Yahud. I have demanded of the Prime Minister to set up these committees, while fighting the double-standard from within the committee. It was not so long ago that Israel had evicted its Jewish citizens from Gush Katif and Northern Samaria. This is still an open wound, a continuing rift in Israeli society. We do not need a repeat of Gush Katif or Amona. Especially when the government has yet to find those evicted families suitable rehabilitation.
1 | Jason, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Thank goodness for a clear head...
2 | Y. Kreminsky, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Mr. Lieberman is correct. But why is he still in the government? By remaining in the government, he keeps it going -- Instead of dismantling outposts, it is this government that should be dismantled! AVIGDOR LIEBERMAN -- DISMANTLE THIS GOVERNMENT!
3 | jez, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Lieberman get's it right: the Israeli state encouraged the building of settlements and the colonisation of arab land.The Israeli state is a colonial power.
4 | Dr Mat Gelman, Monday Sep 03, 2007
The Olmert government is incompetent weak benighted corrupt treacherous antiJews antiZionist antiTorah, more of a strategic threat to Eretz Israel than Iran.Mr Lieberman in the New Year we need a new and Jewish government .
5 | Steven, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Mr. Lieberman is a patient man. But there comes a time when too much patience is cowardice. Mr. Lieberman will have to decide if and when that time has arrived as to whether he in good conscience can stay in the government or must withdraw from the government and help to bring the government down. Granted that will be a difficult decision for him. The question he should ask himself in making that decision is simple: "What will do the most good for the people of Israel in accordance to my deeply held beliefs." What he must not do is compromise his beliefs by staying in the government, since his beliefs are fundamentally wise and correct in the short term and in the long term.
6 | Hanoch, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Judea and Samaria, or what outsiders like Jez from Europe call West Bank, is at the very least disputed land. By no means it is occupied land. What counts is that we, the Jews NEED this land. We WANT this land. WE believe this is OUR land. And we have the means to take this land.
We should take it. Let Jez from Europe and the likes recall HOW they got their lands and shut up. In any case they should be ignored.
7 | Jeremy, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Outposts tolerated by Israeli Policies during all those decades can't be what Lieberman is talking about. Indeed, we should assume Lieberman is talking the real issue out of this world. Same try as usual and it's obvious Lieberman is one of those DESPERATE Right Wing Jews who don't want peace. Well, we have to tell this Lieberman that that approach to the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict is one of the things that went WRONG (all those decades "Occupation" has existed)
8 | Rabbi Brad Rosen, Monday Sep 03, 2007
And isn't it so true what Mr. Lieberman is referring to. If you look around Nok Dim, where surrounding Arab villiages are building and continue to build, you can wonder exactly how prevalent this is across Eretz Yisrael. My cousins live in Nok Dim and can tell you that they are surrounded by hostile arabs. The real heroes are the people like Mr. Lieberman who live in these areas, protect our land and prevent the terrorists from destroying our land and people. I commend Mr. Lieberman for telling the truth, its about time he replaced this corrupt joke for a prime minister. At least we'll be much closer to expelling our enemy and making our state a Jewish state.
9 | Enzo, Monday Sep 03, 2007
What you say Mr Lieberman is very true and I commend your logic. Then why, for heaven sakes, you help Olmert and his gang rule and make grevious damage to Israel? Are you happy of Olmert's rule? Don't you know that if you leave this horrible government it will probably collapse and a new government can replace it? Use your brain, your logic and ethical values and make this terrible government disappear,please!
10 | Jon, Monday Sep 03, 2007
Israel deserves all of it's land and to be given peace.
11 | Rafi, Tuesday Sep 04, 2007
Why is this man still in the coalition? This makes no sense other then his nonsensical excuse that he is monitoring Iran. While he states some things correctly in this article, his primary concern is to preserve his party and power. He is dangerous and should be shown the door along with Olmert. I deeply regret having voted for him, and I know many others who feel the same way.
12 | Zalmi, Tuesday Sep 04, 2007
Worthy thoughts indeed, but hard;y credible from a man who betrayed his voters to support a prime minister who clearly espouses the exact opposite view which he intends to give effect to in capitulation of those hilltops to Arabs whose sole aim is to plant them with more rockets to wipe out our people. Yvette: it is still not too late to walk out with some honor.
13 | A.Chinovich, Tuesday Sep 04, 2007
I doubt that Mr.Lieberman's removal from the coalition, with Shas remaining in it, will bring the government to collapse. He can be easily substituted by his friend Mr.Beilin.
Also, I doubt if Mr.Lieberman's voice in the government sounds strong and has any significant weight.
But I do not doubt that the government, in terms of preparation to the ME conference, is ready to make new humiliating consessions to our enemies.
14 | Jeremy, Tuesday Sep 04, 2007
A theoretical Cabinet of Mr. Lieberman is likely to be the sort of Cabinet we have seen our PM having: 4 Cabinets in about 5 years..hahaha..here we used to call that "Italian Political Chaos" as nowadays our country too seems to have a quite averagely scoring PM, who says he himself doesn't like average people while he himself is LESS than average, if you consider that never before this country had had 4 Cabinets in 5 years!
Yet, due to lack of a good alternative to this average PM, we still have him, as PM, after he wasn't capable to hold the 3 first ones together..haha..well, I really think Israel will be having a series of Cabinets Lieberman, until so many politicians men have had him that they want to try something else as well
15 | Uri, Tuesday Sep 04, 2007
His alleged "selling-out" his constituency being beside the point here, Mr. Lieberman is exactly right from a legal and common sense points of view. The Palestinians have not fulfilled their obligations AT ALL, so for others (be they American, Arab, or Israeli) to dictate to Israel that they must dismantle settlements is obviated by lack of Palestinian performance. The West Bank settlements' status as disputed territory as per international law is well known (if often denied by its own proponents).
Whether or not Mr. Lieberman has a duty to leave the government, this is definitely arguable. As someone who had bigger hopes for such a self-described hardliner, I find his participation in Olmert's farce sadly pathetic. Let's hope the new year will bring a stronger, Zionist government.
16 | Shuli, Monday Nov 26, 2007
Talk is really cheap.........If you meant what you say...you would stand with that thing we call a prime minister.
Be a man , stand up and say what you man and DO IT.
|
All Categories
Tags:Blogroll |