Monday Mar 10, 2008
Posted by Martin Kramer
On Friday, the Columbia Spectator ran an article by its "news staff" under the headline: "Yiddish Prof Named Acting Director of Israel Institute After False Media Speculation." The Yiddish professor is Jeremy Dauber, and the institute is the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies. Mazel tov to Professor Dauber.
The article then adds the following: Last week, the New York Sun reported that sociology professor Yinon Cohen was appointed permanent director of the institute. The article quoted several professors upset by Columbia's decision to appoint Cohen, who signed a letter condemning Israel's policies concerning 2002 military operations in Gaza. The Sun also wrote that it found the information about Cohen on a blog named Sandbox, written by academic Martin Kramer who obtained his master's degree in history from Columbia in 1976.
[Columbia Vice President for Arts and Sciences Nicholas] Dirks said the Sun's article was completely false. "I don't know what the basis for the attack on Professor Cohen is," he said.
Cohen came to Columbia in fall 2007 as a visiting professor from Tel Aviv University. While Cohen was never appointed director of any institute at Columbia, he recently received the endowed position of Yosef Haim Yerushalmi professor of Israel and Jewish studies - a name similar to that of the institute, which may have been the source of confusion.
The report leaves the vague impression that I contributed to that confusion.
Tuesday Feb 26, 2008
Posted by Martin Kramer
On Friday, Amnon Rubinstein, the distinguished Israeli jurist and professor, published a column in the Israeli daily Maariv (in Hebrew) and an op-ed today in the Jerusalem Post, summarizing his stint as a visiting professor at Columbia University. A grim story it is: Ahmadinejad's visit to campus stirred all the muck back up again.
Rubinstein discovered that the only truly active friends of Israel on campus were orthodox Jewish students. For him, a self-avowed secular humanist, it came as crushing disappointment that like-minded Israelis weren't standing up. At the demonstration against Ahmadinejad, he could "count the Israelis on a hand that's missing fingers." At the faculty level, it was worse. He tells of being present in a meeting attended by two Israeli professors. One proposed the screening of the film Jenin, Jenin, a cinematic slander of Israel, and the other proposed inviting Israel-demonizing Norman Finkelstein to campus. Rubinstein doesn't name the two, but the sad thing about Columbia is that their identities aren't obvious. More than two Israeli professors there could have made these sorts of proposals.
|
 |
About this blog
Inside the Middle East
Shalem Center's Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies' scholar of Islam and the Arab world Martin Kramer on this turbulent region.
|
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs
Recent Comments
Donulvi Dolam - Australia: South America was once full of so called Freedom Fighters (called terrorists by some and comunists by others) This went on until a smart guy somewhere realised that it was the USA who was behind everything they did, planned or thought of, so they changed tactics and went legal. Today the Tupamaros are a political party in Uruguay (in power) also in Argentina, Chile, Bolivia, Venezuela etc. Quite frankly sir Terrorism doesn't work exept for those who keep promoting it or otherwise keep it alive by talking about it constantly. A terrorist is neither a moderate nor a radical, he is a fool
S McCosker Australia: See Quran Surah 9. See Robert Spencer, 'Onward Muslim Soldiers', 'The Truth About Muhammad' & 'The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam & the Crusades'; Bat Yeor, 'The Dhimmi'; & Bostom 'Legacy of Jihad'. Muslim texts + history show awful truth: Mohammed is a 'prophet' of war, Quran a book of war, Islam a religion of war.
Adina Kutnicki: One can always count on the so called intellectual, guilt ridden, Jewish progressives to take up every other cause, but that of their own people. It is as if they cannot contort themselves into enough knots in order to lend their full weight behind what the 'other' is claiming.
To call them useful idiots is underestimating the depth of the damage they have created. And that is precisely their intentions to harm their own people. Idiots they are not, selfhaters they are.
|
|