|
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Koch's Comments: Universal medical insurance is absolutely essential Posted by Ed Koch
Comments: 50
Well, I'm back. I was admitted to New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center on June 14 and discharged on July 26. I spent most of that time in the ICU recovering from valve replacement and quadruple bypass surgery. Because my heart cavity filled with blood, a second surgery was performed to clean the area. Other complications included a pancreas that acted up and a gallbladder that had to be removed. I expect to return to the office sometime next week. That I am alive today is due to the extraordinary medical care I received in the hospital from brilliant doctors, marvelous nurses and dozens of technicians. I shall be forever grateful to each and every one of them. For those who will say that I, as a former mayor of New York City, received special treatment, they should know that those same physicians, nurses and technicians were simultaneously treating other patients recovering from similar surgery in the same ICU. I don't know what the total expense will be for my hospitalization, but most of it will be covered by Medicare and my private health insurance policy. Others are not so fortunate. Forty-seven million Americans, some holding jobs and others unemployed, are without medical insurance, and twenty-five million more are underinsured. I don't believe people without insurance who are treated in emergency rooms can receive the same adequate, ongoing care that insured individuals receive. My recent hospitalization has caused me to concentrate my energy now more than ever on the critical need for universal medical care. Politicians who oppose universal medical care by frightening the public with phrases like "socialized medicine" will pay a political price in loss of support when the public sorts out the facts between now and the time the congressional vote takes place on the issue. The United States is the only western industrial nation without a universal medical care plan. We should not have to reinvent the wheel to figure out how to institute such a plan. Let's look at how the French, Dutch, Germans, Swiss and others deal with the issues of cost and coverage, and select for ourselves the best parts of those plans, which have now been in existence for more than 50 years. Republican opposition to universal health care is not factually sound. It is merely an attempt to destroy President Obama's chance of reelection in 2012, and to hell with the country. What else could conservative political analyst and commentator William Kristol have meant when he said:
No Republican member of Congress I'm familiar with would dare urge the end of Medicare or Social Security, although that party came close to doing so when former president Bush and the Republican leadership urged the privatization of Social Security. I expect the Democratic majority will overcome Republican opposition to universal medical care and adopt a government vehicle like Medicare to provide insurance and compete with the voluntary and profit-making private carriers. The government should provide the exact same subsidies per capita to private and public insurers so none has an advantage over the other. I've been given a new lease on life due to the superb treatment by incredibly gifted doctors and staff members at a marvelous hospital - New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center. Now I can't wait to join the forces supporting universal medical insurance so that we all can have access to healthcare when we need it.
1 |
Ted, California,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Dear Mr. ex-Congressman and ex-Mayor: are you saying that, under the Democrat-proposed state-controlled health insurance, everybody in this country would receive AT YOUR AGE the same quality and the same extended health care as you did? Are you saying, as Mr. Obama did, that this health care would be available to all AND save money in the process? Are you saying that you can reduce Medicare payments while, at the same time, not doing anything about absurd jury awards in malpractice suits? Please don't insult our intelligence - American people aren't dumb.
2 |
Jack Kemp,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Ed Koch, if you think under the ObamaCare plan that a man of your age - without your political connections - would get such an operation as you just were fortunate enough to receive, then you are totally self-delusional.
You once said on your NY radio show that an old Jewish cabdriver admonished you for your saying that any cabdriver who racially profiles in order to insure his physical safety, was a racist. He told you he wasn't going to risk his old life on an altar of political correctness. At that time you had the sense to listen to someone living in the real world of non-privileges.
3 |
samyankee,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
As one who has been chairman of a hospital, I shudder to think of the administrative consequences of government controlled health care. It is one serious disaster waiting to happen, much in the manner that the "Cash for Clunkers" plan was mishandled. Also consider that our congressional representatives will continue to have their plan, and not be forced into the one they would like to impose upon the public. This alone should give cause for concern, and serve as notice for all of us to bang on the doors of our representatives and insist that there be true reform that will benefit us all.
4 |
Bobov,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Healthcare reform is doomed without tort reform. The Democrats are too drunk on trial lawyer money to sincerely make healthcare affordable by removing the watefulness of defensive medicine. Our drug prices are higher in this country because the cost of litigation has to be factored in. John Edwards never cured anyone...
5 |
samyankee, New Jersey USA,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
As one who has been chairman of a hospital, I shudder to think of the administrative burdens of a government-controlled health care system. It is a serious disaster waiting to happen much in the manner of many government programs. Also consider that our congressional representatives are so enamored with the proposal they have exempted themselves. This alone should be cause for concern, and serve as notice for Americans to bang on the doors of their representatives and insist there be true reform for all of us, with no exclusions for privileged classes.
6 |
Morton Friedman Lanham, MD,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
How much are you, and I worth? The Warsaw ConvOn Air Travel said $44K. The aftermath of 911 gave millions to victims families to allay lawsuits. A key word, lawsuits. Look at your bill, how much for defensive procedures, both direct and indirect. We are both over 70, medical science can maintain us to 100, are we ENTITLED to a damn the cost attitude, funded by the govt? Or will some beaurocrat decide when to pull the plug. There is a supply and demand aspect, and not every procedure requires a 'rocket scientist'. Remember when your local drugist would remove a splinter, and do it free.
7 |
Heshy, Flushing, NY,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Do you realize that under Obamacare, Doctors will be forced or G-d forebid encouraged to "pull the plug" on many ICU ventilator dependant patients because they are elderly and resources may be used for youger patients or those with what appears to be a more reversible like condition? Implicit in Obamacare, we should't even treat people once they have reached 80 years of age (the age Moses took the Jewish people out of Egypt and then led them for 40 years in the desert), because of that awful notion put forth by that Colorado politician who stated that " the elderly have a duty to die."
8 |
Heshy, Flushing, NY,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Do you realize that under Obamacare, Doctors will be forced or G-d forebid encouraged to "pull the plug" on many ICU ventilator dependant patients because they are elderly and resources may be used for youger patients or those with what appears to be a more reversible like condition? Implicit in Obamacare, we should't even treat people once they have reached 80 years of age (the age Moses took the Jewish people out of Egypt and then led them for 40 years in the desert), because of that awful notion put forth by that Colorado politician who stated that " the elderly have a duty to die."
9 |
david - Kansas,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Ed, go away and study Torah with Jimmy Carter. You have become absolutely NON-essential.
10 |
Anton from New York City,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
You are lucky that you are not under Obama's healthy care since you would not be around to wright this letter. I think you are one of the greatest leaders of New York and I want you around longer. So I am against Obama's health care program. Wishing you a long and healthy life.
11 |
bannister , USA,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Malpractice awards less than 1% of the US health care economy.
If Malpractice went away and the defensive medicine also went away we still have 99% of the costs and 48 million uninsured.
We cannot compete globally when a GM car has a $2000.00 premium in employee health car attached to the price tag and the Japanese Government and system has eliminated that cost on their products.
Opponents of universal care have ifinancial interests int he current system which delivers half the care at twice the cost.
12 |
Elise westchester county,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
I am tired of this liberal democratic government thinking that it can usurp my hard earned dollars for an undefined, malthoughout healthcare plan that does not end up providing health care. I am tired of the puppet like manifestations of the democratic pundits in support of this nonsense. Because of this democratic sophistry we now demonize everything that made this country great: hard work, innovative thought and unparalled ingenuity. "1984" is becoming too much of a democratic reality..
13 |
joe smith,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Mr Mayor may you live until 120 years old, I think you are going a little alzheimers you are not living in the real world now
14 |
MES,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
You try it first and then maybe we'll talk, Ed. You don't have to worry, you have the gold plan for life. Otherwise, anyone else your age would be dead in a year.
15 |
Jo Ellen Davey Cohen Chicago, Illinois,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Obamacare initiatives will be justifiably scuttled, if for no other reason than the time required to openly debate the merits of socialized healthcare. Mr. Obama is accustomed to the use of forcefed political techniques that are advocated by his handlers. What is best for the American consumer is the 'transparency' in government that Barack H. Obama promised in his administration. The 'audacity of hype' for a continuation of ''The Great Society' will bankrupt the American system of free enterprise. Will Obama offer a Bud Lite garden party conversation regarding a Republican response?
16 |
David Miami Beach,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
Hi Ed. Welcome back to the action. Well done on your healthy recovery. Proof you are tough enough to lead many smart American Jews to a better life in Israel, where they have excellent universal healthcare coverage for everyone. Until 120 to you Ed.
17 |
Streetcar, Jersey City USA,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
I agree with Ed Koch and President Obama. Mr. Koch and my mother benefit primarily from Medicare, America's socialized health insurance system for the elderly. Would that Medicare be extended to all Americans of all age groups!
The Republicans today exist only to protect vested commercial interests, in this instance the pharmceutical and private insurance industries. They are not only trying to sabotage Obama. They are trying to sabotage the American national state by undermining its legitimacy and competence to solve problems.
18 |
julie CA,
Sunday Aug 02, 2009
It is hard to know what the truth is on this debate. I believe in coverage for all Americans who cannot afford it. And yet I am wondering if increasing medicare benefits to those truly in need, mandating coverage for all to buy beyond a certain income, mandating a partial payment for those who fall on the line, letting your children be part of your insurance policy until 26, taxing soda and junk food, and keeping all cost of preventive care easily affordable or free would sound less threatening than government coverage which too many believe will undermine their own benefits in the long run.
19 |
Shalom,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Mr. Mayor. The first President who tried to privatize the SS was Bill Clkinton. Just for the record.
20 |
Shalom,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
# 11 Bannister U.S.A. You're talking about malpractice awards instead of the cost of it - the cost of malpractice insurance! How about the millions of illegal alliens living in this country, paying no taxes and taking advantege of emergency room sevices. Let's have an honest debate! Please.
21 |
Morton Friedman Lanham, MD,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Bannister, don't just count the 'awards', although I doubt your numbers. I hope you stay healthy, but every procedure, no matter how minor, will trigger a battery of expensive tests $$. Will a doctor traet you in his office, perhaps. But he will most likely send you to a hospital. Lance a boil? Sorry, I don't do surgery $$. Need a time-critical , but minor, blood test? Sorry, go to the Emergency room. $$ Outside the US, I have received adequate treatment by para-medical personnel, the costs were minimal. But they did not work in fear of the US legal system.
22 |
AZDude,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Mr. Koch,
You are woefully ignorant of the proposals to federalize healthcare in America. That ignarance is dangerous to the health of millions of Americans. Many Americans, including myself, are not buying the democrat party sales pitch. The goal of the Obama-Pelosi-Reid plan is the ability of the federal government to micromanage our lives. Please stop insulting our intelligence by telling us otherwise. We know lies when we hear them. That is all.
AZDude
Informed American
23 |
John; Lynchburg, VA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Dear Mr. Koch:
As a physician in full time practice, it is next to impossible to deal with Medicare. The mountains of paperwork constantly increase our cost of doing business. Reimbursements have not been increased or kept in line with inflation for over 10 years. Instead, Medicare constantly threatens to reduce them. Only Congressional delays have kept them from going down. Payment of cliams are dependent on unseen people reviewing medical information and making decisions that may incur tremendous cost for the provider when claims are denied; often for spurious reasons.
NO-BAMA CARE !!
24 |
bannister , USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Its a crime to be wiithout Car insurance.
You might damage someone and not be able to pay for it.
However it is not a crime to spread TB or Typhus or any number of other diseases which Plague the Uninsured.
How many Swine flu victims can one sick person infect?
I cant imagine anyone other than Americans opposing this since people in civilized nations have a public health care system. (America is not civilized in this way)
25 |
Chris USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
I believe Senator levin's assessment is correct. The level of disinformation is simply to high to address this issue in DC. This issue requires attention away from the lime light and away from prognostications intended to bury it.
26 |
Marsha - USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Sorry, Mr. Koch, you and I will always be treated differently. You, having been a US govt. employee set for life, tenured to be covered along with your spouse. (pg.16 states Congress is exempt from this care) I have no insurance since I am self employed If I get sick I see a doctor and pay out of my pocket. Insurance should be for major emergencies like when I had breast cancer. I appealed to the hospital and was allowed to make monthly payments; my doctor forgave his bill. And if you are literate; not like Congress, READ the bill !! Know your subject and then we can talk.
27 |
Marsha -USA,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
And furthermore..stop blaming Republicans. I am independent; just a US citizen, who knows a scam when I see it. There are enough Democrats in Congress to pass this bill without the Republican vote yet some of them see a scam, too. Not only has the Congress not read the bill but admittedly neither has Hussein Obama.
28 |
Peggy - Calif.,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
I'm with David of Kansas, #9 above!!
29 |
DB Stonington ,CT,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
I can't understand how someone as intelligent as you can become so blind to truth. You expect us to believe that we can add millions of new subscribers to some kind of government health care program AND control costs so that they go down. What other government plan ever achieved this miracle?You don't believe that your celebrity status had something to do with the health care you received?How can someone with your experience sign on to such "pie-in-the-sky" nonsense and lead people down this road which will end in disaster?
30 |
Jon_Boy, UK,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
The principle of universal medicare is a good idea. Howvere in the UK it is achieved by capping the wages and earnings of health care professionals and allowing others such as bankers and lawyers to earn and charge whatever they like. This way the very poor get free health care and the very rich avoid being charged the equivalent rates they charge for their own services. The government then monitors and maintains this system of control on doctors and nurses wages and makes sure they continue to work very long hours fo very little money. So how about we have medi finance and medi law too?
31 |
Sally - U.S.A.,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Because of cost-risk assessment, you would not have received the treatment that you received. You would be deemed to old for the cost & it would be assessed that you will die soon anyway, even if you could pay for it yourself. This terminoloy was used not to give Natasha Robinson a catscan when she bumped her head skiing in the universal health care system of Canada and which you are advocating for the U.S. The cost of performing the catscan was too high given the probability assessment that she was not bleeding internally. Oops they were wrong. Would you want the U.S. to play G-d with you?
32 |
Sally - U.S.A.,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Natasha Robinson, a movie star, had the money to pay out of pocket for the catscan but they would not do it because in universal health care systems a cost-risk assessment means the hospital decides if a procedure/treatment can be done at all. Her family flew her to the U.S. but it was too late. Her brain had swelled. A catscan & simple drilling a hole in her skull would have relieved the pressure & she would be alive today. With universal health care, even if you could afford it out of pocket, you could not receive the treatment because the gov't decides the value of your life.
33 |
Sally - U.S.A.,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Oh, sorry. Natasha Richardson.
34 |
Paul Boca`Raton, FL,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
As a former New`Yorker, I always repsected your opinion, though not always in agreement. We are of the same generation and WWII vets fortunately I still think clearly and you are`probably "losing it", as evidenced by this article.
35 |
Aaron - Denver, Colorado,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Hey, Ed, if you want Canadian-style socialized medicine, then all the power to you. However, you would be quite dead, most likely, under the proposed Obamacare.
The 47 million uninsured citizens is an outright misstatement. You are bright man, and I assume that you know the numbers behind our government's numbers. 12-15 million are, perhaps, illegal immigrants. Another large number of millions are younger citizens that consider themselves invincible and opt not to spend money on health insurance.
Move to Canada, Ed.
36 |
Adler Lawrence, NY>,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
If and when all congressmen and senators including their immediate families will go on the plan they are formulating I'am in. Also if the liberals like Kennedy give up 60% of their existing wealth I don't mind being taxed at that rate either.
I can visualize Wachsman and Kennedy sitting in an Obama Health clinic, on hard plastc chairs in a gov. green painted waiting room waiting to be called their next after eighty aliens and infants are treated first.
37 |
Joel Florida,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Insurance companies should bid to underwrite part of a pool of all residents of each State, not individuals or smaller groups. This obviates exclusions for pre-existing conditions and eliminates insurance company provider empanelment. Care needs be assessed by State level agents independent of both government and insurance companies. The deplorable absence of health insurance for some Americans, detrimental to their full participation as citizens as is the absence of the rule of law, cannot be allowed to become the tragedy, of a problem that has a solution, but which remains unsolved.
38 |
Avner, Omer,
Monday Aug 03, 2009
Why is Ed Koch so much in love with ObamaCare? After all should that calamaty become law it will destroy Medicare and poeple at Koch age group(Koch and all Dem appratchicks will get the best care regardless) with only 3-4 QALY will be offered pain killers and "end of life counseling" instead of quad CABG surgery! I am sure its the same kind of reasoning that Koch uses when he is trying to sell us what is by now well to any Jew in Isreal and in the US a big lie: that Obama is good for Israel.
Koch should promise, in wrting, that he join the government health plan.
39 |
David Katcoff Jericho Vt,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
When you say we need universal medical insurance, just make sure you mean insurance, which is defined as the financial protection against unlikely and catatrophic events. If the plan is to "insure" everyone against anything and everything from teeth cleaning to checkups to visits for the flu, then that's a subsidy and willl only lead to higher costs, higher taxes and bigger deficits, which is what I'm afraid the Dems want.
40 |
Jen USA,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
On the one hand, the pharma-insurance industrial complex is screaming that they could never compete or survive if the government offers a plan. On the other hand, they claim that a government plan will be inefficient. BS. A government plan will force the players to tighten their game, cut the golden parachutes and actually provide service. Requiring everyone to have coverage will bring down the costs for all of us. Streamlining isn't a bad thing. Competition isn't bad either.
41 |
moron galut,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
ed koch was right to endorse george w bush twice and wrong to argue as he does here for any healthcare reform as long as its government dominated--he does not even argue for single-payer which is the only government plan with any redeeming merit---the republican health reforms proposed by president bush and blocked by democrats for not being socialist enough solved 80 per cent of the problem for 20 per cent of the cost but left americans free--intolerable for left!
42 |
Fred - Israel,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
Though Mr. Koch is thankful of the healthcare he has received he is misguided, as are democrats, as to the solution. To make health insurance better for all Americans, the government should simply make providers unable to charge more than the medicare allowable rate. To lower the price on drugs, it's simply to allow reimports, & shorten time for exclusivity. Lower the rate of increases for health insurance companies and you've fixed healthcare without turning into socialized medicine. The real agenda is an end-a-round tactic to ration care for the elderly and help social security stay solvent.
43 |
walter,
Tuesday Aug 04, 2009
Unless you're a millionaire and can afford to pay out of poclet medical costs, you're limited in your
medical treatment choices.
You must have an Insurance carrier, and a bureaucrat at the company decides what treatment
the carrier will pay for. So what's the difference if a government bureaucrat decides what
wiill be paid for. at least the government doesn't take in consideration corporate profits.
Most people in the U.S. are satisfied with their plans until they really need them and then they
have a rude awakening when teratments are limited or judged "experimental."
44 |
Samuel H. Cohen,
Wednesday Aug 05, 2009
Dear Mayor Koch,
With a comparatively fixed population of medical personnel, they will find it impossible to give proper care to an added 50,000,000 people. Even G-D couldn't solve the problem of the poor; how can you believe the president will?
45 |
Emilio,
Wednesday Aug 05, 2009
No one cares Koch. You are a second rate journalist now and no one cares about New York. Talk about your little stories to you family not to us. By the way, I didn't read your article I just can't stand them popping out all the time. Enough! Your readership is meager too.
46 |
Daniel New York,
Wednesday Aug 05, 2009
The 47 million uninsured number is decite. According to the 2006 Census Bureau (uninsured outside Medicare): 10m were not US citizens. 17m lived in housefolds making more then $50k and could purchase it. 18m were between the age of 18-34, in good health, and could purchase. The real problem is how to pay for it. Look at Medicare - $34 trillion in unfunded liabilities.Ed wants to mirror Canada? Do you think their systems produced Retrovir or any of the other 14 drugs in an HIV cocktail? The public option does not develop drugs, MRI machines, technological breakthroughs.
47 |
Avishai, Yokne'am,
Wednesday Aug 05, 2009
Mr. Koch, I remember when you were a political force to be reckoned with. Now the only audience you can find for your thoughts on US domestic issues is here, across the world, in Israel? I hate to break it to you but you're going to have a hard time influencing Americans by posting your blog here. Have you thought about bringing a soap box to Speakers Corner, in London? You may be more relevant there. Good luck! I hope you get your way over there in the USA, whatever it is!
48 |
Barbara Garner,
Saturday Aug 08, 2009
I just wanted to know the name of the surgeon ....starting to have mitral valve issues
God Bless You and Keep You for a very long time
49 |
Raymond Waliany MD. Los Angeles, USA,
Monday Aug 10, 2009
Why can't we treat health care the same way as we take care of other commodities in life?
Why do we need insurance companies and their redtape to deal with medical issues?
We in USA, will eliminate lots of middle men and women if each health care consumer considers health care as a privilege and not a right, and has to pay for it, and if there is no money to obtain healthcare than they should be allowed to talke a loan.
If a consumer is expected to pay for the care than there would be a reasonable expectation from the system and would control the cost.
50 |
joseph Lessard,
Friday Aug 14, 2009
Universal health care is just one aspect of our lives government is trying to take over. I have seen, as many have, how insurance companies can coldly drop people's coverage when they become ill. Or even deny it for pre-existing conditions. However, government control is not the answer; they control enough already. Tort reform should be a priority to bring down costs. If you can corral some of the lawyers you'll have more money. Also, allowing more competition between comapanies nation wide, and some limited regulations on insurance to keep corporations honest. Let's discuss it, not name call.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |