Wednesday Jul 23, 2008

Koch's Comments: On gay adoption and race relations

Posted by Ed Koch
Comments: 1
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Republican presidential candidate John McCain opposes adoptions by gay parents. Last week in an interview with The New York Times he stated, "I think that we've proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don't believe in gay adoption." A few days later he clarified his comment, stating that the issue should be decided by individual states. 

I believe it is easier for a child to grow up in a home with two loving heterosexual parents, because it saves the child from the occasional unpleasant experience of having to explain why he or she has two mommies or two daddies. But surely that is small potatoes when compared with the alternative of keeping these children in orphanages where they have no loving parents to care for them. And, of course, having one loving parent is far better than two hateful parents, heterosexual or homosexual.

I've always been impressed that the adults I know who were raised by a single mother are well adjusted. They tell me they received all the parental love and attention any child could have wished for. 

There are certainly adoptions that should never have occurred. We recently learned of a woman in Florida who adopted 11 children from New York City's foster care system, apparently for the government subsidies that accompanied each adoption. She reportedly physically abused the children. A New York judge sentenced her to nearly 11 years in prison for abusing the children and for using false names and addresses to adopt them. 

That outrage is in part the fault of government in failing to engage in adequate oversight of her and the children. There are predators, both straight and gay, but I believe that overwhelming straight or gay adoptive parents love their children. 

John McCain, who is a very decent man and himself an adoptive parent, should reexamine his position, and not simply fall back on the defense that it is a state issue. While I agree that adoption is and should be regulated by states rather than the federal government, that is not the point. The point is that being adopted by a single gay or lesbian or gay couple is far better for a child than growing up in an orphanage.

According to The New York Times, "Currently only Florida has a broad ban on gay adoptions." South Beach residents should make this issue a priority in the next state election. 

* * *

Most people I know, blacks and whites (admittedly more whites), believe as I do that race relations have never been better. If we talk of conditions facing the traditional minorities - blacks, Hispanics, Jews and gays - I believe we are living in a Golden Age. A black man, Senator Barack Obama, is running for president and is considered to be the favorite.  A Jew, Senator Joe Lieberman, ran for vice president on Al Gore's presidential ticket and appeared to be more popular than Gore. Hispanics are currently being wooed by both parties as the most essential bloc of voters in the presidential election capable of determining its outcome. Recognition of gay rights is rising. Same-sex marriages are recognized in both California and Massachusetts and a number of other states accept "civil unions" for gays. 

However, a disturbing article appeared in The New York Times on July 16. It stated, "Nearly 60 percent of black respondents said race relations were generally bad, compared with 34 percent of whites. Four in 10 blacks say that there has been no progress in recent years in eliminating racial discrimination; fewer than 2 in 10 whites say the same thing."

Some whites and blacks believe that blacks are making a grave mistake when they constantly assert that they remain victims instead of recognizing the huge changes in America which now has a population that is 75 percent white. Two African Americans among many who epitomize the huge success of blacks today are Oprah Winfrey and Tiger Woods. They are now among the wealthiest and most respected people in the nation and abroad. Whites engaging in racist acts or racially discriminatory rhetoric do so at their peril, including loss of their jobs. Bizarrely, it was Jesse Jackson who recently used the "N" word and ended criticism of himself with a simply apology. No white could ever have managed that. 

Some whites point out that Senator Obama will probably receive more than 90 percent of the black vote in November. To be fair, when Jack Kennedy ran for president in 1960, he received 80 percent of the Catholic vote. On the other hand, Jews in New York voted predominately for Hugh Carey, a Catholic, in the Democratic primary against Howard Samuels, a Jew, in the 1974 gubernatorial race. 

That same Times article reported, "Black and white Americans agree that America is ready to elect a black president," yet a majority of blacks in the same poll believe race relations are bad.

Every one of us, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, sex or sexual orientation, should get down on our knees every day and thank the Lord that we live in this country and receive His or Her bounty. Surely, there is room for improvement in the way racial and ethnic minorities are treated, but there is no denying that significant progress has been made. 

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  Donulvi Dolam, Thursday Aug 14, 2008
To say that adoption by gay couples is ok is quite frankly wrong. Gay couples have absolutely no right when it comes to adoption. After all it is the child who must come first at all times and therefore it is the child who has the right to a real mother and father. As long as there are mother/father couples anywhere in the world willing to adopt orphan children then gay couples should never under any circumstances be allowed to adopt anything higher than a monkey or a dog for a pet. What a shame you wrote this crap Mr Kosh.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Koch's Comments New York's legendary Jewish former mayor Ed Koch scopes out the scene in the US.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. Separating fact from fiction
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Tuesday Sep 02, 2008
  2. Germany, the Jews, and business with Iran
    Posted in A Point of View by Abraham Foxman
    Wednesday Sep 03, 2008
  3. Why they love Livni
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Sunday Sep 07, 2008
  4. The public wants to know
    Posted in A-vital Blog by MK Colette Avital
    Tuesday Sep 02, 2008
  5. Commanders are just regular guys too
    Posted in Army Life by A.J.
    Sunday Sep 07, 2008

Recent Comments

Steve Teicher - Florida: I think you have a good point. Note that Mayor Palin also tried to restrict what was in the public library. Also, I have a close friend who worked with pregnant women. Sometimes an abortion of one or more fetuses in a multiple birth situation did preserve life, but could not be proposed in a "Right to Life" state.
james hazan U.K: I would not be too concerned about Palin and abortion.Before choosing her, McCain MUST have spoken to her about the subject,he is a consumate politician and knows the disaster befalling the U.S.,if the subject is wrongly tampered with.At the very most make use of the English system. 1The patient is counselled.2.One Dr or psychiatrist agree. 3.The patient can see one of them without the parents,in short ,choose the one you need...capishe? Mr Koch should worry more about Obama."Jerusalem the undivided capital of Israel" he flipped plopped 24 hours later and "Always loved Jews."
Joel, Virginia: I was appalled at another's suggestion that income is the determinant used to judge which lives are worth protecting. How meager does one's income have to become before other family members look a little less viable? Are bubbie and zeyda safe if Dad gets a cut in salary? I hate playing the Nazi card, but the idea that a special needs child is expendable if keeping it means foregoing the new car reminds me that the Nazis found cause to kill the Jews, then gypsies, homosexuals and the handicapped. When one life is devalued it decreases the value of all lives. How sad when wealth becomes our G-d