Thursday Aug 09, 2007

A European View: Europe, Turkey, Jews and Israel

Posted by Jonathan Joseph
Comments: 16
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Many Jews – as well as Europeans, Americans and Israelis – dreaded what might follow when Turkey’s Justice and Development Party (AKP) first took power in late 2002.  

Sceptics pointed out that AKP leader Recep Tayyib Erdogan was, during the 1970s, a disciple of the Islamist National Salvation Party under the hardliner Necmettin Erbakan. And while Erdogan’s then two-year-old successor party seemed decidedly more moderate and less confrontational, was this not all just a ruse?

Might AKP not abolish Turkey’s long established secular mores, and replace parliamentary governance with the rule of the mullah? History has certainly proven otherwise. AKP kept to its word to respect the constitution. More than that, it liberalised draconian laws and boosted the economy significantly.

But what of religious tolerance? No problem there, certainly not for Jews, it seems. Within the machinations of internal Turkish politics, the headscarf issue loomed large.

The constitution forbids officials or wives of officials from wearing the offending cloth. So when Abdullah Gül was put forward as presidential candidate earlier this year, and his wife Hayrunnisa was spotted wearing a headscarf, the military stepped in and blocked his candidacy.
 
Hence AKP’s decision to force the issue by calling early parliamentary elections. The gamble more than paid off. To quote the Washington Post on Election Day: “If it weren’t for a metre-square piece of fabric… Turkey’s 42 million voters wouldn’t be going to the polls today”.
 
Of course, Turkish Jews are not profoundly affected one way or the other by the scarf issue. But as a community of just 20,000 out of some 70 million, naturally they have concerns about whether a new burst of Muslim religiosity might impede their own freedoms.
 
The AKP victory seemed to mark the death knell for Turkey’s hopes of ever joining the EU. But here again the sceptics were wrong-footed. For AKP has accelerated Turkey’s path towards joining the EU, a move that Jews in Europe should really support.

When some European xenophobes argue against “alien” Muslims joining the EU’s “Christian club”, what does this signal to Europe’s own non-Christian minorities? Jews harbour some painful memories of subordination to the church’s edict: are we seeing Christian identity once again defining “true” citizenship?

If so, that would be truly regressive. With Turkey onboard, and notwithstanding the economic challenges this may initially introduce, EU could shine as an example of pluralism within the rule of law.
 
Istanbul has for centuries formed a pivotal location along timeworn Jewish trade routes. In fact, the Jewish/Turkish relationship exhibits a long history of harmony and mutual respect. Think of the year 1492, when Catholic Spain expelled Jews who had lived in Iberia for centuries.

Almost immediately the Ottoman Muslim Caliphate offered a large proportion of the 150,000 refugees succour and new homes in the Balkans, in Greece and the Aegean islands, and on the Anatolian mainland itself.
 
True, the Sultan’s motive was probably not entirely, or solely, humanitarian in origin. The Turks knew that Sephardi Jews were preternaturally talented and economically dynamic. Constantinople had fallen to the Ottomans just forty years earlier. Who better, then, to raise its status as a financial entrepot than these entrepreneurs, with their myriad contacts across the Mediterranean, Northern Europe and Middle East?
 
Following the theme of Turkish “enlightened self-interest”, even when the Ottoman Empire fell in 1918, and Attaturk’s Turkey arose from its ashes, there was a safe place for Jews. Turkey has since proven to be one of Israel’s most steady allies in a troubled Middle East. Indeed, it was the first Muslim country to recognise the Jewish state, in March 1949.

Despite fears to the contrary – as alluded to already – Turkey’s essential strategic ties with Israel remained intact after Erdogan took power in 2002. Not only did he uphold the epochal free trade agreement signed between Ankara and Jerusalem in 2000, he even built on it. Erdogan has visited Israel, and particularly Yad Vashem.

Yes, there was admittedly a minor rumpus over his decision not to don a yarmulke at the site. But surely that pales beside the realisation of the significance of an elected Islamist leader paying homage to the six million victims of Nazi hatred.
 
Not everything in the garden is entirely rosy There was, for instance, the recent hullabaloo about prominent novelists, including Turkey’s Nobel Prize winning author Orhan Pamuk, being hauled before the courts on charges of “defaming the republic”.

Kurds, for their part, feel disappointed that Erdogan has not smoothed the path towards recognition of their language and minority status. Sadly, bigotry – whether anti-Semitic, anti-Kurdish or anti-anyone else – is endemic everywhere. And Turkey is no exception. The point is, we should be wary of rushing to judge “the usual suspects”.

When al-Qaida minions bombed Istanbul’s largest synagogue, Neve Shalom, in November 2003, Erdogan personally visited the wrecked buildings, and then prayed with the relatives of the six Jews murdered that day. Most significantly, Erdogan and other leaders announced that an attack on Turkish Jews was an attack on all Turks.

Such comments immensely reassured the small community .The AKP government was clear: those who attacked the synagogue might claim to act in the name of Islam, but as terrorists they had made themselves the enemy of all Turks, Muslim, Christian or Jewish. If ever there was a reminder that “Islamism” comes in different varieties, that was it.

Claudia Roth for Germany’s Greens feels the time for Turkey in the EU has come. The window of opportunity is still open. “Turkey’s democracy isn’t perfect”, she was quoted on German radio and in the Turkish daily Cumhurriyet, “but despite everything, it works. Turkey isn’t a Muslim country, it’s secular. But most Turkish people are Muslim.”
 
And if the window closes, what then? A Turkey adrift on its own; or seeking friends only to the east? From our perspective at the EJCJ, two things seem clear: Turkey is part of Europe, and if Turkey wants to elect an Islamist government, that doesn’t spell Armageddon. This is a great opportunity for Israel, for Europe and the Jews. 

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments:
1  |  Oldtimer, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
Tourists to Turkey are one of its greatest blessings. I'm surprised that people from the west aren't coming in droves to walk in the footsteps of Paul & John. Maybe they don't know that the 7 churches of Revelation are in Turkey or that Tarsus is in southeast Turkey. When Paul left for the "Yeshiva" of Gamaliel in Jeru., communities back home were 20 percent Jewish! Turkey is beginning to dam up the Euphrates in order to improve the livelihood of its citizens BUT who's taking pictures of important archeological sites before they will be "drowned"? Nat'l Geographic or SOMEONE - pls go there before it's too late. Turkey is as important as Egypt, Iraq, Iran, etc not only because PEOPLE are important, but because of the importance of ancient/Biblical history - "the origin of mankind!" Ephesus & Pergamos one shouldn't miss, together with a knowledge of mythology. You'd understand the "Diana" passage in Acts like never before. History repeats itself...
2  |  Concerned, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
I don't think the Christians in Turkey would share your benign comments. Have you not heard of the Armenians? The three Christians who were tortured and killed in the spring of 2007? The Catholic priest that was murdered?
3  |  Doron Katz, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
Im a Jew and Cypriot, and Turkey will not be an EU member, because of its tyrannic attrocities. My father a Cypriot, my mum an Israeli, I am in Europe, and I cannot see Turkey in the EU. Turkey may be moderate in Istanbul, but in Ankira, where islamism is ever-present, joining the millions of other Muslims in Eurabia would allow the fridge muslims in Turkey to become more radical. Turkey are occupiers of Cyprus, and thus Cyprus will torpedo any move for Turkey to join. Dream on Jonathan!
4  |  B.Abraham, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
Under Suleiman-the-Great (Turkish Salomon} the Jews in his land prospered, nay even held important positions at his court and Jerusalem was rebuild. Before, in the Byzantine land, Jews were persecuted by Christians, read Flavius Josephus, so who has butter on his head...?
5  |  David Patterson, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
Cypriot Christians seem to have missed the boat. The last thing the Turks want to see - is the Island being ruled by a person who represented a religious icon such as Macarious.
6  |  Concerned, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
I don't think the Christians in Turkey would share your benign comments. Have you not heard of the Armenians? The three Christians who were tortured and killed in the spring of 2007? The Catholic priest that was murdered?
7  |  massaraksh, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
This is wishful thinking of the worst kind. The Turkish relationship with Israel is basically a one-way street: it enormously benefits Turkey politically, militarily, & economically while Israel gets very little in return: the Turkish leaders pay only lip service to it while the Turkish people are just as anti-Israel as let's say the Egyptians are. It got to the point, that the American-Jewish groups like AIPAC have been busily promoting Turkish interests in the USA in order to please the "friends" in Istanbul. At the same time, the vast majority of Turks harbor deep anti-Semitic feelings. Sooner or later, the Israeli-Turkish Utopia will come to an abrupt end, just like it happened in 1979 in Iran. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to predict that one day, Turkey may be just as hostile towards Israel as Iran is and Israel had better be ready for it. To be honest, I suspect that the shtetl dreamers of the Shimon Peres kind won't learn their lesson even after the Islamists in Istanbul take the Israeli diplomats hostage a al Tehran circa 1979
8  |  topanga, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
turkey as part of europe is great for residents of turkey and muslims in general, I don't see the connection suggested by author that its good for jews. There are too few jews in europe to make this claim. (As seen in france, jews are leaving for israel,& we know why) BTW, What does 'effect turkish jews profoundly'? Does it connect to european issues? As 4 erdogan, just b/c he is a moderate either for show or for real, is no indicator of how relations with EU will play out over several decades if turkey becomes a member
9  |  massaraksh, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
The author is (to be charitable) clearly unaware about the Turkish history in general and the treatment of the Jews in particular. There's no question that the Ottomans eagerly accepted the Sephardi Jews fleeing from the Iberian peninsula; it was a rather profitable thing for them to do, and a standard Ottoman policy towards refugees in general, but there was no humanitarianism involved here. In fact, the Ottomans eagerly accepted refugees from other countries (Russian Old Believers, Circassians, Ukranian Cossacks, & others) and settled them among peoples hostile to the Ottomans. The Ottomans perfected the "divide & conquer" policies. In the modern Turkey, founded by Ataturk, the Jews were treated no better than other minorities; the Jews (and Christians) were subjected to discriminatory taxation Muslims were exempted from. During the WWII, The Turkish government refused to grant refuge to the Jews fleeing from the Nazi oppression despite the heavy lobbying by Dr. Weizmann and other Zionists. Hundreds of Jewish children drowned in the Black Sea after Turks forced the broken ship (Strumila) out of the Turkish waters and then did nothing after it was torpedoed by a Russian sub. The capacity for self-deception and delusion by the Jewish elite is truly awe-inspiring. Unfortunately, the Jewish people have to pay for it, just like the Jewish Israelis paid a heavy price in blood for the Oslo delusion. Turkey will remain a secular country with good relations with Israel only if the Turkish generals maintain their control of the Turkish politics. Once, the generals lose their political power, Turkey will revert to its historical role as the "sword & shield" of Islam.
10  |  Albert Bello, Sunday Aug 12, 2007
If Turkey is divided in continental regions (European, Asian, and Middle Eastern) we can expect various cultures but its constitution prevails to remain united. Should Turkey be admitted to the EU, its European region will widen more than expected. If most of EU members have significant Muslim population, why should Turkey be discriminated if Turkish laws are amended identical to the European ones?. The several thousand Jews of Turkey are considered most responsible citizens who always positively contributed to the Turkish society and their government in every aspect of life for more than five hundred years, Turkish intelligentsia always honored the precious Jewish community. Therefore, Turkey has the upper most confidence to trust the Jewish State for undivided friendship justifiably. Turks/Jews should celebrate the harmony for many years to come.
11  |  Lenard King of Israel, Monday Aug 13, 2007
In so far as Israel and Jews have a good relationship with Turkey, that's fine. But advocating EU membership for Turkey would flood Europe with moslem Turks, a disaster for Europe, which already has plenty of problems in that regard. Stick to the Israel-Turkey relationship if it works, but don't push it for Europe, any more than you would want Europe to push for more moslems in Israel.
12  |  oz, Monday Aug 13, 2007
Reply to #7 Calling Turks anti-semitic is a historical siege mentality where any non-jew is considered a potential enemy to destroy jewish nation. If jews keep on portraying themselves as members of an exclusive club where race and religion are only entry requirements, then they will definitely manage to see potential enemies everywhere they look at. What a nonsense to call Turkish israeli relations as a one way street. What about israel defence companies selling their lower spec products at grossly inflated prices to Turkish army.
13  |  massaraksh, Monday Aug 13, 2007
Reply to #12: My posts weren't directed against Turkey, frankly, I do believe that Israel and Turkey should maintain a good relationship. After all, from a geopolitical point of view, the countries don't have any unresolved issues, and if Turkey's secular elite keeps maintaining its control of the country's politics, then Israeli-Turkish relations will be good. This is, of course, a big if, and Israeli leaders should be well aware of the reality instead of feeding their people feel-good tales. My posts were directed at the Jewish elites who think they're so smart and everybody else is so stupid that it almost makes reasonable people cry. I don't know how you personally feel about the Jews, but the success of the "Valley of the Wolves", a Turkish made blockbuster with undisguised anti-Semitic motives, demonstratively attended by Mrs. Erdogan and profusely praised by her speaks for itself. So do the sales of "Mein Kampf" in Turkey. If there's a "silver" lining there, then one has to also mention that the movie was anti-American as well. Imagine the brouhaha if Mrs. Laura Bush attended a movie sympathetic towards the Turkish Kurds fighting for independence!
14  |  oz, Monday Aug 13, 2007
Reply to 13# Since you have inquired, my personal views about jews are very clear: Humanity has a lot to owe to jewish intellectuals, scientists and artists. Israel has a right to exist without the fear of being wiped out of the map. I also happen to have a few good jewish friends here in Turkey. Valley of the volves was no more different than a bad Slyvester Stallone movie where all bad guys were russians, arabs, turks or vietnamese . But no one here made such a fuss about those movies. Look at the situation in Iraq and consider all the lies that were fabricated to justify the war. Consider instability at our borders and every day one or two Turkish soldiers are killed by mines of PKK kurdish seperatists. If Turkey had adopted the style of Israel in Lebanon, we would have occupied whole Northern Iraq by now. No surprise that Turks are getting less pro-American just like many other nations.
15  |  Norman, Wednesday Sep 26, 2007
Turkey in the EU? Surely not. What next after that - Iraq, Iran, Israel?
16  |  Renny, Thursday Nov 15, 2007
As long as Turkey doesn't go islamic in general I don't see why they should't join Europe seein that part of the country is in Europe. I am sure something can be included in the signing that would throw them out of Europe if they change laws and let religion take over the running of the country.

About this blog

A European View President of the ECJC, Jonathan Joseph, expounds on the challenges facing European Jewry.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. A moral army
    Posted in Army Life by A.J.
    Monday Nov 17, 2008
  2. Ben Hur loves Zion
    Posted in Ten Tribes Challenge - India by Amir Mizroch
    Wednesday Nov 19, 2008
  3. How did a small tribe from Samaria get all the way out here?
    Posted in Ten Tribes Challenge - India by Amir Mizroch
    Tuesday Nov 18, 2008
  4. Indian airports spell chaos
    Posted in Ten Tribes Challenge - India by Amir Mizroch
    Tuesday Nov 18, 2008
  5. Yes we can (stop talking about Obama)
    Posted in Majoring in Aliyah by Lahav Harkov
    Wednesday Nov 19, 2008

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Sherlock Holmes, London: If the protestant minister was of Jewish origin, the 'Rabbi' didn't marry out! How could he be appointed a 'Rabbi' without any reasonable checks on the curriculum vitae?
kayanja julius mawejje.Uganda:

i wonder whether lena has authored her thoughts for posterity?
Julius

James:

Ha, you editor must also be a dog lover?