On Hizbullah's deaf ears
President-elect Barack Obama's desire to engage some of America's political adversaries, such as Iran, in direct dialogue has been a source of acclaim and criticism. Those opposed to such talks charge that Obama's stance is detrimental to plans that seek to undermine the Iranian regime and inhibit its acquisition of nuclear weapons. Supporters of Obama's plan to have "tough, direct diplomacy without preconditions" believe that this is a chance to for America to persuade Iran to change its current course while avoiding further escalation. Former President Jimmy Carter has been the focus of much criticism after he met with Hamas' leader Khaled Mashaal in Damascus in April. After meeting with one group that his own government designates as a terrorist organization, this week Carter planned on meeting with another; Hizbullah. However, on December 10th a Carter spokesman reported that Hizbullah rejected the proposed meeting. Biden's worrying gaffe
The purpose of this entry is purely to reiterate what was pointed out by journalist Michael Totten after the Vice Presidential debate on Thursday. What he wrote in Commentary's blog should have made more headlines and caught the collective attention of the American audience. Both Sen. John McCain and Sen. Barack Obama claim to be allies of Israel, and I don't doubt either of their intentions on the matter. However, the Israeli government should probably be extremely worried if Sen. Joe Biden is to be the next American vice president after his fairly confident gaffe on Thursday. Many people lack a deep understanding of the Middle East. However, Sen. Biden's understanding of Lebanon, now one of the key players in the volatile region, is no where near realistic. In the debate he said "we kicked -- along with France, we kicked Hizbullah out of Lebanon," and that [he] "said and Barack said, "Move NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don't know -- if you don't, Hizbullah will control it."" |
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |