|
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
In the Trenches: Leaders and leadership: Is something missing? Posted by David Harris
Comments: 21
It's become an energizing habit of mine to attend the annual Summer University organized by the European Union of Jewish Students (EUJS). Hundreds of young people from across Europe gather in a picturesque spot for a week of studying and socializing. This year, I addressed the students on the subject of leadership. When I asked them to identify individuals currently in the public arena - elected officials, moral voices, persons of conscience - whom they admired, there was a moment's silence. Then came a torrent of names. But when put to a vote, only four people enjoyed any widespread support. Nelson Mandela and the Dalai Lama ranked at the top, followed by Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy. Strikingly absent from the list were current Israeli or Jewish leaders. When I pointed this out, a few names from the past were invoked, above all, Moses, who was regarded with near awe. Theodor Herzl, David Ben-Gurion, and Hannah Senesh were also among those who inspired admiration. But no one from the contemporary world of politicians, rabbis, and intellectuals made the cut, though, personally, I think some important names like Elie Wiesel were overlooked. Maybe the young people needed more advance notice to ponder a question that many said they'd never before been asked. Or maybe it takes time to determine whether some current leaders have staying power and star quality. Wasn't it Harry Truman, whose own stock has been steadily rising in the years since his presidency ended, who said that "a statesman is a politician who's been dead for 15 years"? Or maybe they were simply reflecting their view of contemporary reality. If so, that doesn't augur well for the Jewish future. Our discussion largely focused on Europe and Israel. My impression was that Israeli politics today - hmmm, said the students when the subject arose - doesn't enjoy the best of reputations. And few religious leaders are seen as inspiring beyond their pulpits, much less across denominational lines. Among intellectuals and cultural figures, it was noted, how many are ready to stand up and motivate Jews to be proud of their identity and heritage? It was a dispiriting, if revealing, conversation. To state the obvious, leaders remain an indispensable part of the equation in the Jewish world. Effective leadership provides inspiration and motivation. The total becomes greater than the sum of its parts. Seemingly, anything becomes possible. We need leaders to make the case for being Jewish in the twenty-first century, when religion increasingly has become a competitive marketplace and being Jewish has, in effect, become a choice, not an obligation. We need leaders knowledgeable in our faith and heritage, able to convey the beauty and range of Jewish tradition in ways that are open-minded, compelling, and meaningful. We need leaders who can give voice to the transcendent ties that unite us as a people. We need leaders to speak to the larger world about Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state and its yearning for peace with its neighbors. We need leaders to confront the very real threat to Israel's existence posed by the approaching marriage of radical Islam and weapons of mass destruction. We need leaders to address Israel's internal challenges of political sclerosis, religious-secular tensions, Jewish-Arab relations, and the rich-poor divide. We need leaders to protect the memory of the Shoah, above all when its survivors and eyewitnesses will no longer be with us, and to guard against the resurgence of anti-Semitism in any form. What are the qualities that best constitute a leader? There are many, I believe. It would be impossible, human frailties being what they are, to find leaders who possess them all. That said, apart from the specifics of Jewish passion, knowledge, and pride, my bottom-line choices are: courage, vision, principle, openness, responsibility, and humility. The lives of three public leaders - Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, and Harry Truman - illustrate the universal nature of these traits. To be sure, each had his shortcomings. Churchill and humility, for example, weren't exactly a perfect match. But all three rose to the ultimate tests of leadership in defining historical moments - Lincoln before and during the American Civil War; Churchill during the "gathering storm" and throughout World War II; and Truman in the struggle to define the postwar period, which included his recognition of the new State of Israel. Of courage, Winston Churchill famously said: "Courage is rightly esteemed the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all others." Of vision, Abraham Lincoln, stated in his Gettysburg Address: "It is for us, the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here, have, thus far, so nobly advanced ... that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain - that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom - and that, government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." Vision requires an outlook and the means to articulate it. But Churchill, himself a visionary and communicator extraordinaire, cautioned, "It's a mistake to look too far ahead. Only one link in the chain of destiny can be handled at a time." A leader's vision also needs a team that believes in it and works harmoniously to achieve it. Dean Acheson noted in Present at the Creation that Harry Truman had "the gift of vitality," "bounce and cheerfulness," and an inexhaustible capacity for work. "These are qualities of a leader who builds esprit de corps," Acheson wrote. "He expected, and received, the loyalty he gave." Of principle, Churchill said: "So long as I am acting from duty and conviction, I am indifferent to taunts and jeers." And Lincoln commented: "I desire to conduct the affairs of this administration that if, at the end ... I have lost every other friend on earth, I shall have at least one friend left, and that friend shall be down inside of me." And Dean Acheson noted, "President Truman's strength lay not only in knowing that he was the President and that the buck stopped with him, but that neither he nor the White House staff was the Secretary of State, or Defense, or Treasury, or any other... He made the ultimate decisions upon full and detailed knowledge, leaving to lieutenants the execution." Acheson also said of Truman: "He held his own ideas in abeyance until he had heard and weighed the ideas of others, alert and eager to gain additional knowledge and new insights." Of responsibility, the motto on Harry Truman's desk said it best: "The buck stops here." And it was a distinguishing quality of Lincoln's as well. Doris Kearns Goodwin, in Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln, wrote that "as always, the president refused to let a subordinate take the blame for his own decisions." Of humility, Acheson wrote of Truman: "Free of the greatest vice in a leader, his ego never came between him and his job. He saw his job and its needs without distortion from that astigmatism." And Kearns quoted Lincoln, who was to take a boat trip to visit General Ulysses S. Grant during the Civil War, telling the vessel's commander that "he wanted no luxuries but only plain, simple food and ordinary comfort...." During this Jewish holiday season of introspection, and year-round, there's a crying need to study and practice the essence of leadership. And there's an impressive generation of young Jews coming along that's watching and waiting. They're eager to absorb the example and one day pass it along in this remarkable narrative we call the Jewish journey.
1 |
Norb,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
What do you expect when European Jews today bear the frontal brunt of outright verbal and physical anti-Semitism. Anti-Semitism fueled for example by the media there. Absence of Jewish leadership there under above circumstances is reason enough to explain the dispirited conversation.
The solution to my mind is when above Jews will choose to live in their own land free from anti-Semitism
2 |
Joel Pollak, Cambridge, MA,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
I agree with the opinions expressed in this article. However, I believe that the current set of American Jewish leaders has much to answer for. It was astonishing to see Jewish organizations capitulate to threats from the Democratic National Committee and dis-invite Gov. Sarah Palin from the anti-Ahmadinejad march last month. The Jewish community should not have to appease politicians from one party or another--especially in this case, where the cause was important enough to cast shame on any party choosing not to attend. The Democrats must appeal for Jewish support, not the other way around.
3 |
Ilan The Amazing,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
>>What do you expect when European Jews today bear the frontal brunt of outright verbal and physical anti-Semitism.<<
Norb, what about the ashkenazik jews in New York City who say these things about themselves? Are you aware of what's said on college campuses these days? Outside of the Arab world, the worst anti-semitism comes from within Judaism itself. I can get you articles after lunch. Look into groups like "Students for Justice In Palestine," there are MANY jews who are part of this (what I consider disasterous) organization.
Enjoy your lunch
4 |
Richard Wisconsin,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
We need Leaders and Leadership....how true. Why do so many Jews support Obama? He is no friend of Israel.. Are they not listening to his comments about Iran or the Palestinians?
5 |
rich the furrydoc delaware,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
I think there really are great leaders in the world who possess the qualities of Churchill or Lincoln, and who merit the admiration of people of all ideologies. Unfortunately the American political process does not place them in the political forum much, though Mayor Bloomberg certainly comes to mind as an individual of independence and accountability. More typically, the admired people are those who merge vision with competence, people such as the Nobel Laureates or major philanthropists.
6 |
Richard Lavin,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
David, this was a nice meditation on the fortitude of leaders, but I think the external qualities are sometimes even more important. Israel has not had a great spokesman to the west, such as Abba Eban, in many years. We are losing the American public, and certainly its youth, because the inspiring rhetoric all comes from the Arabs, whose spokesmen are wittier, wilier, and more passionate.
7 |
Ilan The Amazing,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
>>Of courage, Winston Churchill famously said: "Courage is rightly esteemed the first of human qualities because it is the quality which guarantees all others."<<
Yea, also "There's a fine line between courage and stupidity" - Unknown.
I think it's being smart and/or being strong that kept humans alive. Then again I missed that national geographic special about cromagnun's in our midst...i could take a few guesses where their genes are..
8 |
Andrei Iosef Schwartz, Romania,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
Mr Harris is going to be a politician on behalf of all Jews (in the US, in Israel and anywhere else from Moscow to Buenos Aires and from Capetown to Shanghai) for many years to come, and he's one good example of what a good Jewish leader is! Too bad Israel lacks someone of his moral, intellectual level, someone who could lead with this much passion! :|
Israel has many bright people - but those who can offer something, do other things, without trying to dry the Israeli political swamp.
In the hopes of a good year ahead for all, Gmar hatima tova!
9 |
Steve Roisman , lLos Angeles,Ca,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
Liberal Jewish kids from 18 to22 or so are a little too young and inexperienced to really know much about the real world and all the social problems, local and international,they are of course very intelligent high minded idealistic humanitarians who find it hard to believe that many people believe the lies that many people in high places tell the world....cordially,
10 |
Bruria Florida,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
I totally agree with Joel of Cambridge, and Richard Wisconsin. Leadership has become synonym of sharing an ill understood "Liberal" ideology--that of the actual Democratic candidates.-- that is considered the "traditional" Jewish view of the world. It will be also useful if the Jewish institutions open their doors to young--and old- Jewish men and women whose merits are not uniquely based in the range of their monetary contributions.
11 |
Saul Levine, MD,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
When Mr. Harris cites Truman and Churchill as leaders embodying all his listed virtues (principled, visionary, open, courageous, etc), he leaves himself open to disagreement from those of us who know of their faults, frailties and foibles. Other revered leaders come to mind (eg, JFK, Golda Meir, Jawaral Nehru), whom many idolize, and yet many others revile. Quality of leadership is a subjective pronouncement, in the eye of the beholder. Sadly, there are those who idolize egregious depots, and would even attribute to them these same laudable characteristics.
12 |
Stuart Kaufman,
Tuesday Oct 07, 2008
With regard to Israel, it is my considered opinion that the basic political system is so flawed that first class people stay as far away from politics as possible, and only the second-rate and the corrupt enter the public arena.
As to America, American Jews have become so accustomed to voting for the left that the American Jewish community and its leaders have rotted from within.
13 |
Leslie Tatz Vieland USA,
Wednesday Oct 08, 2008
Because my son is a junior executive at AJC, I read David Harris' blog on leadership intently. If, Dorothy-like, the young men and women in Mr. Harris' audience are looking for a modern leader who conveys dedication, the wisdom of remembrance and the courage of modern reasonableness, they should look directly at the man behind the podium.
14 |
Jon, Cambridge, Massachusetts,
Thursday Oct 09, 2008
As a young Jew, I appreciate David Harris's effort, both in this blog and a previous one, "A cri de couer", to bridge the gap between generations of Jews. On the other hand, I'm shocked by the shrillness and shallowness of some of the comments, as if everything should fit into a left-right or Republican-Democratic framework. This is a huge turn-off for me, and I'm sure I'm not alone. To attract young Jews to the community, my advice is to tone down the rhetoric and tone up the reason. Meanwhile, thanks, Mr. Harris, for your thoughtfulness.
15 |
Chaim (Israel),
Friday Oct 10, 2008
Israel desperately needs a Churchill. We've had a long series of worse than Chamberlains. I say, worse than Chamberlains, because while Chamberlain offered another country to appease England's mortal enemies; Israel's Chamberlains offer Israel to appease our enemies. We must end the perversion of appeasement and retreat. It has caused us nothing but suffering and never will. We need a leader who doesn't pretend genocidal terrorsts are "peace partners". A leader who would never consider freeing and arming terrorists. A leader who inspires our people rather than dissipates our national will.
16 |
Vinegar Hill, Madrid, Spain.,
Friday Oct 10, 2008
Chaim you are using historical references out of context. The appeasement policy followed by Chamberlain was the only real alternative at that time. To then relate his policy to the present day distorts the existing situation which demands conciliation and a sympathetic ear to the plight of the Palestinians.
17 |
Jean Sherrell, Sebastopol, Califorrnia,
Monday Oct 13, 2008
Though Ariel Sharon is not with us, I nevertheless suggest that his presence, flexibility in pursuing security for Israel and shrewd vision qualify him as a leader of whom to be proud. (When my son-in-law went to Iraq, I sent him off with a Hamsa hand necklace and a copy of Sharon's autobiography "Warrior".) Another leader of Israel is Amos Oz, whose ability to love his people and his country yet seek some form of peace with the Palestinians is exemplary. Also heroic are the men who have led Mossad.
18 |
Benjamin Zagzag, Paris, France,
Monday Oct 13, 2008
Mr. Harris perfectly understood us at Summer U !
19 |
Frank Lornitzo Bradford, Vermont USA,
Monday Jan 12, 2009
What is needed immediately right now is strong intervention to separate what is like like a brawl among brats who have too many teeth, for the sake of humanity and staving off a nuclear mess among the
middle East Semitic population as a whole
20 |
Hans Levi, St. louis, MO USA,
Monday Jan 12, 2009
An excellent summation of the predicament that Israel faces in its struggle with Hamas.
21 |
Robert Willard, Los Angeles,
Tuesday Jan 13, 2009
Israel has the right and duty to protect its citizens and defend itself. If the IDF does not conclusively win the current Israel-Hamas war, it will be the greatest failure in Israel's military history. The way the war, win or lose, is being fought now by the Israelis only fuels Hamas's propoganda machine. The most important need is for the Israeli establishment to make a sincere effort at peace, for example, not bowing down to those particular leaders of the West Bank settlers who work the government and IDF like the mafia did in the U.S.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |