|
Sunday May 03, 2009
In the Trenches: Dear President Lula Posted by David Harris
Comments: 28
Dear President Lula, Why? Why would such a respected world leader welcome an international outcast like Iranian President Ahmadinejad to Brasilia on May 6? Why would you confer your considerable international legitimacy on such an individual - within weeks, no less, of a walkout by dozens of nations during Ahmadinejad's hate-filled speech in the halls of the UN in Geneva? Why would your nation, which has admirably forsworn nuclear weapons, seek at this moment expanded ties with Iran, which indisputably aspires to nuclear weapons capability - and the means to deliver them? Why would Brazil, an active and admired member of international organizations, conduct business as usual with Iran, which has ignored legally binding UN Security Council resolutions on its nuclear program and been criticized by the International Atomic Energy Agency for its failure to cooperate? Why would peace-loving Brazil embrace a regime which has been a leading force for conflict and instability in the Middle East and beyond? Why would Brazil host an Iranian leader who is establishing strategic beachheads in Latin America - from Venezuela to Nicaragua to Bolivia - that raise the specter of increased regional violence and terrorism? Why would your nation, the second Western Hemisphere country to abolish capital punishment, pursue ties with a regime that has used the death penalty widely, including for minors? Iran executes children despite the fact that it is a party to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention on the Rights of the Child, both of which proscribe death sentences for crimes committed by those under the age of eighteen. Apropos, crimes punishable by death in Iran include, believe it or not, adultery and homosexuality. Why would Brazil welcome the leader of a nation directly implicated in the murder of 85 people in the 1994 terrorist attack against neighboring Argentina, and which has steadfastly refused to turn over the five Iranian citizens wanted by Interpol for crimes against humanity? Why would Brazil, home to one of the world's largest and most vibrant Baha'i communities, estimated at 55,000 members and scattered across the country, receive the leader of a regime that has relentlessly persecuted its own Baha'i community? Why would Brazil, where many survivors of the Holocaust found a new start, open its doors to the world's leading Holocaust denier? Why would Brazil, which has enjoyed longstanding bilateral relations with Israel, receive an Iranian leader who repeatedly calls for a world without Israel? Why would Brazil, known the world over for its openness, pluralism, and spirit of mutual respect, and home to the second largest Jewish community in Latin America, find common cause with a regime that can only be described as the antithesis of these proud values? Why would Brazil, a full-throttled democracy, want to deepen links with a regime that jails dissidents, independent journalists, and women's rights activists? Why would you, President Lula, a former union leader in a country where trade unions are an integral part of the social fabric, sit down with the leader of a nation that hasn't been kind to those aspiring to your former job? As one who himself was imprisoned for union activities years ago, isn't your place alongside those in Iran seeking the same rights that you helped achieve in Brazil, and not with those who suppress their efforts? Mr. President, Brazil today is an influential voice on the international scene. In that spirit, your country speaks often of the need for a new global order, one that takes more fully into account the aspirations of countries which had been marginalized in international decision-making to date. Such a view is understandable. But shouldn't another and no-less-important factor also be taken into account? Iran wishes to have it both ways. It wants to be able to boast of its expanding ties with respected countries like Brazil and point to the welcome its leaders receive in key capitals. In doing so, it, too, claims to be building a new global order. But, at its root, the global order Iran envisions contradicts the foundational beliefs and values of countries like Brazil. Iran prizes despotism, not democracy; confrontation, not cooperation; repression, not rights; fundamentalism, not freedom; and medievalism, not modernity. So, while both you and Ahmadinejad may say that you seek a new world order, aren't your visions totally at odds? And aren't you unavoidably rewarding a regime and its leader whose behavior, in fact, merits ostracism? Truth be told, a warm reception for Ahmadinejad in Brasilia makes the work of those seeking to persuade Iran of the need to change its dangerous course still more difficult. For many friends of Brazil, then, May 6th is a painful date. To think of Brazil hosting the Iranian president - an individual guilty of incitement to genocide, human rights violations, denial of the Holocaust, and support for deadly terrorism - for friendly discussions on expanding ties is, frankly, beyond comprehension. What a sad day, President Lula!
1 |
vvurdsmyth - NYC,
Sunday May 03, 2009
Perhaps, President Lula would like to augment Prez Obamaman's initiative... damn it, man... give him a chance... we will see what shakes out - and then react.
2 |
CATIA,
Sunday May 03, 2009
May G-d forgive us and ours sinners governants. BRAZIL
3 |
Shalom U.S.A.,
Monday May 04, 2009
The traditional contradiction and hypocrisy within the marxist movement is the answer to your question.
4 |
Chris USA,
Monday May 04, 2009
Dear David Harris, to answer your question one need not go farther than Brazil's extra - heavy oil industry and how Iran presents itself as a possible inroad to OPEC, which brazil strongly desires to join. Next to such strategic interests very few countries are willing to uphold moral principals. Perhaps that is some thing which can be addressed?
5 |
J. Sepulveda,
Monday May 04, 2009
The global order Iran envisions contradicts the foundational beliefs and values of countries like Brazil. It´s true. But don´t contradicts the beliefs of President Lula and the PT (Partido dos Trabalhadores).
6 |
A. Aguiar Ferreira, Lisbon, Portugal,
Monday May 04, 2009
Dear David Harris, Thank you for your letter. We all DO support you.
G'd bless you!
7 |
John Q. Public,
Monday May 04, 2009
If President Lula can work effectively behind the scenes to try to win the release of American Journalist Saberi who was falsely imprisoned in Iran on trumped up spying charges, then we should give Lula a chance. That is one of the roles that Brazil can play when the United States has no diplomatic relations with this rogue state of Iran. Obviously, we should also send a loud message to Brazil that hosting the Iranian President, a known anti-Semite of the worst variety is a disgraceful slap in the face to all Jewish people, particularly Jewish Brazilians.
8 |
K. Ohana USA,
Monday May 04, 2009
Was this letter actually sent to President Lula or just published in the JP?
9 |
Carol and Sol,
Monday May 04, 2009
David Harris has written a compelling and accurate account of diplomacy gone wrong. Morality as well as political perversity are rampant today. This Alice in Wonderland behavior can only spell disaster for more than Jews; it threatens all people- their freedom, their safety and world peace. We have no choice but to be vigilant and vocal and active and strong.
10 |
Michael in Massachusetts,
Monday May 04, 2009
Isn't it amazing how Anti-Semitism can make bedfellows out of just about anybody?
11 |
claudia miriam romi,
Monday May 04, 2009
I am a Brazilian, lover/supporter of the State of Israel and the Jewish people. I abhor the visit of this man to my country. I have already signed a petition along wiht many others to president Lula and his Foreign Relations Office to deny such a visit and Not strenghten diplomatic ties with a terrorist, tyranical regime, denier of Historical facts, promoter of the destruction of the state of Israel. Brazil has an honorable historical record in Minister Oswaldo Aranha who gave the Minerva vote for the stablishment of the State of Israel in the UN in 1947. Now we must continue on his brave steps.
12 |
R. Diamant,
Monday May 04, 2009
Many thanks for your responses to Pres. Lula whom I considered a reasonable person. Many reasonable people, when they recognize they are up against a vicious and unbending adversary, think that kindness and rational behavior will win the day. They truly do not understand people who are missing aspects of their humanity, and who are incapable of being otherwise. I hope Pres. Lula will become able to see the reality of whom he is dealing with, and not accord Mr. Ahmedinejad the courtesy of this invitation.
13 |
Cjhaya Gilburt - Brasil,
Monday May 04, 2009
Even though most of us believe that President Lula is hosting Iran´s president as a favor to President Obama--a kind of back-door, third-party form of remedial diplomacy--Brazilians should get out into the streets tomorrow to protest. It is shameful that a clone of Hitler should be welcomed here.
14 |
Lucila - Brazil,
Monday May 04, 2009
The Brazilian government may be wrong about the way it carries out its diplomatic dealings with Palestinians and Iranians, but one thing is certain: the Brazilian PEOPLE still has a say in what goes on here. I strongly want to believe that international pressure, combined with the public protests by Brazilian Jews and Gays of the last few days conducted to the cancellation of Ahmadinejad´s trip to Latin America as a whole. He is not coming anymore. He cancelled. And we WON! Thank you very much for your support, Mr. Harris.
15 |
Kay Martin,
Monday May 04, 2009
We're bowing, acquiescing, acknowledging ALL of the US enemies, within and without, why can
it not be also in other lovely countries. This train is moving fast and threatening to ALL democracies. Welcome to One World.... all about takeover, using peoples, hatred.It's not too late to read all the prophets in the Old and New Testaments and round it off by Revelation. This world is racing to its final day. You made it very clear how stunned you are.How about the people in all these countries, in our America the Beautiful. Our own prez hates America, maybe Lulu has the same disdainment for his.
16 |
Susan, Weston, fl,
Monday May 04, 2009
It is happening be cause power abhors vacuum (read today's WSJ article). The world leaders are perceiving an ideological weak stance in the current USA administration as far as international relations concern. The Obama- Clinton therapeutical approach to dictators does not seem to work, the democratic leaders are fearful of USA withdrawal as a moral beacon , and as an enforcer of western values.
17 |
Mario - Sao Paulo,
Monday May 04, 2009
I´m brazilian and I agree 100% with you David. The good news is that this visit was just cancelled by the Iran president, explaining he´s got internal issues to resolve. No other date was fixed.
Lula is probably focusing commercial issues and the government said that they would express clearly to the president of Iran that Brazil desagrees 100% of his policy and ofenses against Israel.
The visit was calcelled and that's good enough!!
18 |
Jennne Wessell, Ohio, USA,
Monday May 04, 2009
Thanks for the bravery & truth of the post by David Harris
19 |
Liz, USA,
Tuesday May 05, 2009
Iran is working with Brazil, Bolivia and other South and Central American nations. Oil is one reason, uranium is another. With Iran providing money, weapons, logistics, etc. the U.S. will soon be facing a 21st century threat a la the Cuban Missile Crisis: an avowed enemy is installing the components of a major military threat just a few hundred miles away from the Continental U.S. We're screw..d, if people don't start dealing with this reality soon.
20 |
David Honaker, Phoenix, Arizona, USA,
Tuesday May 05, 2009
é uma tristeza. I am very familiar with the Brasilian people, and Brazil (o Brasil) in general. Brasil has a very large Jewish population as well as a large population of people who love the Jews (some non-Jews even feeling a kinship to the Jewish people). The president of Brasil does not represent the majority in this matter. When I was living in Brasil there was an expression, "So por ser Brasileiro eu sou feliz!" (Translated into English - "Just by being Brazilian I am happy.") I am sure the same holds true - in spite of this lapse of judgement.
21 |
Alyssa- Brasil,
Tuesday May 05, 2009
Mr. David Harris,
I would like to congratulate the words as direct and honest that you used for the president Mr. Lula, which the real president of my heart is in Eretz ...
Very admirable and brave. Congratulations ... it is exactly what I feel, but I hadn´t word to use it.
22 |
Jean Sherrell, Northern California,
Wednesday May 06, 2009
Why indeed. I would be interested in President Lula's response.
23 |
Jane Kasov, Scarsdale, NY,
Friday May 08, 2009
You need to get your views out in appearances on Brazilian television, whether you do it in person or recorded. It is worth it to buy time. Who, besides the "choir" are your fine, strong words reaching. I mean, thanks for the comfort, but I'd be really gratified to know your words were going into every Brazilian living room. That's how Lula got elected, for gosh sakes, through television speeches, not through the democratically constituted parties and electoral process of Brazil. It's a new day, with television trumping newspapers and, yes, Internet blogging, in its power to persuade.
24 |
Roddy Frankel,
Saturday May 09, 2009
To #14:
Brazilian protesters should be applauded for their successful efforts to cancel Ahmadinejad's visit. It is a shame that we Americans have so far been unable to block any of Ahmadinejad's visits to the US. The lecture at Columbia University was especially shameful. Equally shameful is the way American journalists give him so much unchallenged air time. It may me easier to criticize a foreign president than our domestic news media, but maybe we should reconsider this.
25 |
Uri Lam, Israeli/Brazilian, Jerusalem/Sao Paulo,
Sunday May 10, 2009
Dear David Harris,
I´m ashamed that our Brazilian president Lula and his minister Amorim wanted to receive with honour this dangerous man, Haman-dinejad.
And I´m proud of my Jewish Brazilian community, that made huge protests in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, together with other groups persecuted in Iran - women, homossexuals, Bahais, and all who defend freedom and respect to human beings.
Ahmadinejad eventually didn´t come - we don´t know why, but he didn´t come.
Thanks God, kol hakavod to the Brazilian Jewish Community.
26 |
Claudia A._ Brazil - Rio de Janeiro,
Sunday May 10, 2009
Congratulations for this letter. We are happy that he didin't come to Brazil. He had called the trip to Brazil, Equador and Venezuela.
27 |
Miriam Feldman Albuquerque,New Mexico,
Thursday May 14, 2009
Can this article be sent tothe N.Y. Times, President Barack, Rahm emanuel,David Axelrod, and anyone else that should read it?If not, why not? What is 101, and what dos it stand for?
Send it ot oped@NYTimes.com or oped editorial@NYTimes.com/opinions or both.
You soeak the truth. Thank you
28 |
mostafa- iran,
Tuesday Oct 13, 2009
shame on you david, how can you close your eyes and say such silly things?
Ahmadinejad is now the most popular president in the world and you can see this with your eyes (if not closed) when he is in Brazil and when people of Brazil welcomes him, YOU WILL SEE THIS.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |