Sunday Oct 25, 2009

Guest Blog: The most noble prize

Posted by Ariella Bernstein
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

It's old news by now that President Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. Thomas Friedman of The New York Times suggested that the Nobel committee did the president no favors by awarding the prize prematurely, yet encouraged him to accept it on behalf of the American military, the world's peacekeepers. A day later, Ross Douthat argued in the Times that the president should turn down the honor. Ruth Marcus of The Washington Post, an admirer and supporter of the president, admits that the Nobel Peace Prize is about "doing and not being."

There is still time for the Nobel committee to redeem themselves next year:­ award the Nobel Peace Prize to me. Unlike the president, I am seeking it.

I make peace daily. I hold bipartisan negotiations all the time. In fact, I regularly have tripartite summits, not all that dissimilar from the 2009 beer summit with President Obama, Professor Gates and Officer Crowley.

Just yesterday, my son received some monetary compensation for folding the laundry and cleaning his room. His older sister was none too happy. She helps clean the house every Friday and gets no compensation. She sat on him, and he hit her. As with all conflicts in the Middle East, matters escalated rapidly. He touched her Ipod, she took his rock collection. All-out war loomed.

I did what all good negotiators do: I asked both parties to renounce violence as a precondition to final status negotiations on not only the Ipod and the rock collection, but appropriate compensation for what the children consider slave labor (and the adults call chores).

A couple of weeks ago, my daughter complained that she is tired of her brother's complaints about school. She has more school work, doesn't complain and is tired of the whining. She has a point, but alas, she is five years older and she should show some sympathy and tolerance for the difficulties her brother sometimes faces. This fruitful discussion took place during an ice cream summit.

I would have preferred a tripartite meeting, with the boy, the girl and the Mom, but my gut told me that an ice cream summit attended by only two of the parties would yield better results. Baby steps toward reconciliation are sometimes better than gigantic leaps.   

Every mother out there understands our role as peacemaker between and among our children, and sometimes between our children and their friends. And just like the Iraqi war, we have milestones to measure our success; if they don't actually kill each other, it's a good day (threats yes, but action no). This is a great accomplishment. In homes across the land mothers "do" peace every day.

In his New York Times piece, Tom Friedman aptly drafted an acceptance speech for President Obama. Here's an advance copy of my acceptance speech for when the Nobel committee does the noblest of deeds by awarding me the peace prize.

I accept this award on behalf of mothers everywhere who have ably deflected the time-honored complaints 'he started it,' 'she hit me,' or 'why does he always touch my stuff?'

I accept this award on behalf of mothers everywhere who have transformed the sibling relationship by finding common ground in the pizza dinner.

I accept this award on behalf of mothers everywhere who skillfully use the demilitarized zone (time outs) to de-escalate the rhetoric.

I accept this award on behalf of mothers everywhere who gracefully await the time when their children will recognize that they must emulate our peacemaking techniques to achieve a peace with one another on their own."

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Post your own comment
Be the first to comment to this post
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Guest Blog

Your turn to share your thoughts on the universe. This forum is open to all our readers and contributors. Have your say by sending your post to the Blogs Editor.


Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  2. Interfaith dialogue isn't naive
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman (nee Lande)
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  3. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. The Syrian illusion revisited
    Posted in Levant in Focus by Tony Badran
    Tuesday Nov 24, 2009
  5. The true desecrators of our Jewish tradition
    Posted in Masorti Matters by Rabbi Andrew Sacks
    Tuesday Nov 24, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

David W. Lincoln Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: It has been said that things equal to the same thing, are equal to each other. Muslims claim to be monotheists. Let them prove it in the light of the double standard (at the very least) they employ when it comes to the redressing of man's inhumanity to man. Now, Jew & Christian can agree on "The Abolition of man" by C.S. Lewis (at least, I think so), because a gauge can be used for each area of life. Given that each area of life is accountable to the same standard, they are equal. Which counters those who would put gov't, or church, or economy ahead of other areas.
Arthur G. Gilkes, Pittsburgh, PA: Inter-faith dialogue is a dream as long as the lslamists control West Bank and Gaza.
David USA: All this palavering is unnecessary. All that is need is eradicating the mutual vilifications in each religion's scriptures. That goes for New Testament, Talmud and Koran.