|
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
A Point of View: World leaders need to act on Gaza Posted by Abraham H. Foxman
Comments: 28
It is almost as if the world is begging Israel to go into Gaza with a full scale invasion. How else can one interpret the international silence and inaction in the face of Hamas and Islamic Jihad's escalating rocket assault on Sderot, the production of more long-range and sophisticated rockets by Hamas, and the continued smuggling in the huge quantities of weapons and materials to the terrorist regime. The international community has been surprisingly good, overall, in refusing to deal with the Hamas leadership until it recognizes Israel and halts terror. It has been far less good in helping Israel address the daily rocket barrage on Sderot and environs. Where are the public statements of condemnation by world leaders? Where are the UN resolutions condemning Hamas for attacking the Jewish state from Gaza long after Israel pulled out? Where are proposals for international forces -- UN, NATO, the Quartet -- to intervene and place themselves in Gaza to prevent the rocket attacks and make it unnecessary for Israel to have to consider reentering Gaza as the only way to change the dynamic and protect its citizens. One can think of all the reasons Israel should not go into Gaza. There will undoubtedly be many IDF casualties, as well as Palestinian civilian casualties. Israel will surely get bogged down there and will have to take over running the place again, which is not a situation that anyone wants. One can almost guarantee the televisions images, newspaper headlines and statements by leaders around the world that will paint Israel once again in a highly unflattering light. And yet, what alternatives in the long run does Israel have? Not only is the government accused of not protecting the residents of Sderot, but with longer-range rockets in the works, it soon will be accused of not protecting the residents of Kiryat Gat, Ashdod and other cities further north. Where will it end? No government will be able to resist the public pressure to act, once and for all. Is the world going to sit back and let events unfold with a certain inevitability and then complain about Israel's "disproportionate" response? Or should it ask itself the obvious question: shouldn't we be doing everything in our power to make sure that rocket attacks on Israel from Gaza and weapons smuggling into Gaza are halted, not so much because we worry about what is happening to Israelis, but because it is the only way to make sure that Israel doesn't invade Gaza? In this sense the Gaza issue resembles the Iran nuclear issue. Those who are most against military action should be those who should most support every kind of measure short of military steps as the best way to avoid reaching the moment when the only option left is the military option. There still may be time for the world to wake up. The Israeli government worries about a lot of things -- the impact on the Annapolis process, the safety of Gilad Schalit, the need to organize for the day after -- but the dam will burst sooner or later if the current situation continues. The Bush Administration together with the other members of the Quartet who are pushing the Annapolis process should make it a priority to bring the rocket assault to a stop. Because an Israeli invasion of Gaza, however much it might help Mahmoud Abbas in the long run, will surely bring a suspension of the peace talks, for Abbas would have to show Palestinian solidarity in the face of Israeli reoccupation of Gaza and attacks on Palestinians. Is this going to be a tragedy in which every party plays its appointed role, or will leaders wake up now and do what's right?
1 |
harry flicker Mebourne autralia,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
I suggest that Israel should announce to the world and Hamas in Gaza,that as soon as a rocket is launched from Gaza in 15minutes time,a preaviously nominated public building in Gaza,will be destroied,the 15 minutes is the time in which the civilians in this building must
2 |
David Katcoff, Jericho, Vt,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
Look at the bright side : The inevitable blowup in Gaza may save Israel from making long term, strategically suicidal concessions stemmong from the Annapolis process.
3 |
Steve Fla.,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
This is a very sad column to read, written by a Jew who wholeheartedly supported the expulsion of many wonderful Jewish families from Gush Katif, Gaza only because they are Jews. By any standard of measure, this is anti-Semitism at its worst. Mr. Foxman seems overly pre-occupied with world opinion. Perhaps this is why he supports negotiating the land of Israel away to our jihadist enemies, dedicated to our destruction. Favorable world opinion. Very sad.
4 |
Aaron from NYC,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
Security in Sderot is primarily the responsibility of the Isreali government. They, unfortunately, are the ones abandoning the wonderful people of Sderot.
5 |
paul david swinford Christian truck driver,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
David #2 is right. If this stops Annapolis from destroying Israel, then it is a good thing.
6 |
hyman peskin, montreal canada,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
Foxman and many others do not realize that the intention of the rocket attacks is to provoke Israel to invade Gaza in force, with the hope of scuttling the peace process. Additionally, it might force Israel to become responsible for the day to day administration of an ungovernable territory. For too many this rationale is probably to subtle to fathom.
7 |
Len from Boca Raton, FL,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
It is profoundly sad, but very clear, that when your neighoring territory is ruled by a regime that only believes that "a good Jew is a dead Jew", you have to do whatever needs to be done to neutralize them. They are never going to become peaceful neighbors in the long run, so Israel might as well control the situation, rather than the terrorists.
8 |
J.M.Jordan, Germany,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
No way UN troops will go in as long as Hamas considers whomsoever is in the Gaza Strip as occupier. In no way comparable to what ended Lebanon War II.
9 |
Yari,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
HAMAS is a fanatic organization supported by Mullah's of Iran. They must be driven out of Gaza. They have their Mullah's in iran. Let them go there. When the regime change of Mullah's come, they will be dealt with also. The civilized world can no longer tolerate fanatic organizations.
10 |
R.O'Neil, USA,
Sunday Dec 23, 2007
A seperate gov't in Gaza can not be sustained. It would be a parasite on the world needing constant money from the very western world it scorns while attacking Israel and supporting terror worldwide. Israel must rule up to the Egyptian border to guarentee security both for itself, the world and the 'palestinians' living there.
11 |
Paul Velasquez,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
Many times I can't help, but wonder, what's wrong with the Jewish psyque.
12 |
abe in philadelphia,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
Abe Foxman is one of those Jews who wants Israel to win without killing the enemy. He wants to attend the liberal parties on the Upper West Side without people asking him why those Israelis kill those nice Palestinian children. He wants to collect money from Reform Jews without having to explain Israel to them. Foxman might be OK with an invasion of Gaza but only if enough IDF are killed in the process to balance things out. G-d save us from liberal Jews.
13 |
Said, London,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
The land of Canaan was given to Abraham and his seed. No less than four times in your own Torah, is Ishmael described as Abraham's son. Why is it then that Jews think that the land belongs to them exclusively?
14 |
dagoberto mensch,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
Sorry, but maybe you mean from the Nile till the Euphrates river. That´s what the Arabs are trying to take and let nothing to Israel. The Arabs have more than 50 countries, some 100 times bigger than Israel (like Iran and Saudi Arabia). Israel has 70% of desert. So, if you want more territory, I mean, seriously...
15 |
Yehuda ben Meir,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
Israel should NOT give up 1 inch of land to Arabs who seek its destruction.
16 |
Joel Sprayregen,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
Generalissimo Foxman was a chief cheerleader for the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza, which proximately--and forseeably-- caused the rocket barrage he now decries. This gave him the photo ops he craves; view if you can his earlier smiling photos with Arafat. Before granting Foxman's strategic pretensions any shred of credibility, shouldn't he acknowledge he was dead wrong about Oslo and dead wrong about Gaza? Joel J. Sprayregen, Chicago (former ADL National Vice-Chair)
17 |
Phil US,
Monday Dec 24, 2007
Those who argue for restraint ( like Mr. Peskin) do not have a solution to the ceaseless rocket bombardment of Sderot. There are innocent civilians being killed, injured and terrorized and the Israeli govt. considers them to be expendable. Do the advocates of negotiating with Abbas really think he has the power or the will to stop the rockets?
18 |
Steve, Florida,
Tuesday Dec 25, 2007
Joel #16 wrote: "Before granting Foxman's strategic pretensions any shred of credibility, shouldn't he acknowledge he was dead wrong about Oslo and dead wrong about Gaza?" Yes.
19 |
micki schloss, los angeles,
Tuesday Dec 25, 2007
Talk, talk, talk. It's so simple! If they send two unsophisticated rockets into Israel, Israel should send two sophisticated rockets back. What country could complain about tit for tat? The residents of Gaza will themselves stop the rocket fire when their actions bring reactions of much greater consequence. Israel cannot invade Gaza. Who needs that headache? And as far as international forces acting as a buffer zone, that can go on forever. One for one . . . two for two, etc.
20 |
Herckle,
Tuesday Dec 25, 2007
I just say Google "Iraq, PNAC, Where Do All Roads Lead?"
21 |
Steve, Florida,
Tuesday Dec 25, 2007
Joel #16 wrote: "Before granting Foxman's strategic pretensions any shred of credibility, shouldn't he acknowledge he was dead wrong about Oslo and dead wrong about Gaza?" Yes.
22 |
Velvel silver spring,
Wednesday Dec 26, 2007
Once again, Foxman NOT speaking in the interest of Jews, especially those in Israel. You really want a UN or Nato force in Gaza to disrupt society like they did in the Balkans? They will serve as the new excuse as to why Israel is "not allowed" by the international community to fight back and respond to terror attacks. "you might hurt the UN troops that are on the ground." "They are working diligently to solve the problem"... Right. They provoked Bosnian Muslim Terrorist acts against the Serbs and they'll provoke more terror on Israel. Foxman, you are out of your league.
23 |
tt jones, london,
Friday Jan 04, 2008
Yehuda ben Mei - put yourself in the arab's shoes, would you not fight if someone took away your land. give the land back to palestine then you will not get rocketed. FREE PALESTINE
24 |
David - Texas,
Friday Jan 04, 2008
I am so tired of the typical American Jewish Leaders, they still are living in 1970. Wake up, the self righteous and self appointed leaders so concerned over a christmas tree or a book in school that they are miss the big picture of survival. The EU that they so want to please will never back Israel or the Jewish people. We need a leader that will lead in peace and war. We did not get to Israel from Egypt by passing out candy and gifts, not should we today.
25 |
Dennis Cast-Oklahoma,
Sunday Jan 06, 2008
To no. 21
26 |
fred,
Tuesday Jan 08, 2008
why does the world standby silently while Israel has nuclear wepons,why does it standby and tolerate apartheid in Israel, why are we so quiet when Palestinians are treated like animals and kids are denied medical treatment?????
27 |
Robert Rabinowitz,
Friday Jan 11, 2008
The united states needs to stop backing the aprtheid regime of Israel. As Ron Paul mentioned last night in the debates, Israel is being treated like the stepchild of the US. Mr. Foxman is so evidently concerned about influencing the debate in this country -- and opinion by policymakers generally -- that he fails to acknowledge that, even though Israel is a so-called "democracy" -- it engages in actions that run counter to U.S. security and our national interest.
28 |
Moshe Samuelson,
Friday Jan 11, 2008
a seperatist government in Gaza would be a "parasite" on the world? Funny you use the word parasite: considering that Israel sucks 1/6 of all US Foreign Aid and is the 29th largest economy, I'd attach that label to the country that harbors 300 illegal nuclear weapons and has always been the force of destabalization in the region. |
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |