Wednesday May 27, 2009

A Point of View: Seeing the glass half full - for now

Posted by Abe Foxman
Comments: 6
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Perspective is everything.  The glass can be half full or half empty.

These unoriginal thoughts came to mind after two significant events in the life of the state of Israel and the Jewish people - the visit of Pope Benedict XVI to Israel and the meeting between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.

The tendency in the Israeli press was to focus on the negative. The Pope was widely criticized for the things he failed to say or said in an infelicitous way. And the Washington summit meeting was picked apart for the alleged lack of warmth between the leaders and for the pressure points and disagreements.

Pope Benedict XVI at Yad Vashem

In each case, the specific criticisms were not misplaced. At Yad Vashem the Pope failed to speak in appropriately emotional terms about the Holocaust, referred to the "killing" rather than "murder" of the Jews, and never mentioned the German or Nazi perpetrators by name. And the unresolved issues between the US and Israel - settlements and the concept of a two-state solution - leave much uncertainty.
    
Having said this, we must not lose sight of the forest for the trees. Both events, in my view, at bottom are important positive developments for the Jewish people.
    
In the case of Benedict XVI, it is exactly because he is not as adept as his predecessor in finding the right thing to say at the right time, that his visit was so important. The challenge in Catholic-Jewish relations is to make sure that the remarkable progress in those relations achieved during the papacy of John Paul II are not merely the reflection of an extraordinary individual but of the institution. The fact that Benedict XVI came to Israel, visited the Western Wall, Yad Vashem, and met with Israeli leaders in Jerusalem, and it was not seen as a major breakthrough is what is truly significant. It is part of the process of the Church internalizing change, just as the Pope's visit to a New York synagogue reinforced the historic visit of John Paul II to the Rome synagogue.

As time moves on, this kind of reinforcement together with the filtering down of the new teachings of the Church will be the most important elements of the relationship. Yes, it would have been satisfying had Benedict said the right things in the right way, but let's not lose sight of how the visit reflects and reinforces how far we have come.

Similarly with regard to the Obama-Netanyahu meeting, amid the question marks, the fundamentals were upheld. The great threat to Israel's security comes from Iran and its nuclear program. The President acknowledged that threat to Israel, importantly made clear that it is not merely a threat to the Jewish state, indicated that US engagement with Iran was not open-ended, would be revaluated by the end of the year, and said that, if dialogue did not produce results, all options would be on the table. I'm not sure that Israel could have asked for much more on this issue from the new President.

PHOTO: AP

Moreover, the fear of some that the White House would insist on a "sequencing" of events in which Israel would have to make significant concessions to the Palestinians before the US would commit to action against Iran - on the grounds that only that way could the US win over the Arabs to support steps against Iran - was not realized. It is true that Israel may not have achieved its own version of "sequencing" - first Iran, then the Palestinian issue - but that was never truly in the cards. What seems to have emerged are parallel and simultaneous tracks for the two issues, with neither one being held hostage to the other.

Here is where the glass is half empty; where a half full perspective fully comes into play. Undoubtedly, there will be tensions between the US and Israel on certain Palestinian-related issues, particularly settlements. The truth is Obama is hardly the first president to push an Israeli prime minister on this issue. If, however, the Administration lives up to its commitment on the priority challenge facing Israel from Iran, then whatever unpleasantries may emerge regarding settlements will be seen as a price worth paying.

I am hardly a Pollyanna. Differences with the Church and the Administration will likely emerge. However, let's keep our eye on the ball. Catholic-Jewish and US-Israel relations were further advanced by the two major events of May.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Tzvi/amerikkka, Thursday May 28, 2009
True Jewish/catholic relations and Israel/amerikkka relations were advanced during the trips...AND abe foxman had NOTHING t do with either
2  |   Jan, Australia, Friday May 29, 2009
Amazing! Who is the Vatican? Who is the US? The question is who has the power really in the long term? A long time ago Egypt was a great empire. Israel was told not to lean on Egypt as they were a bruised reed that would pierce them. Who were they told they could lean on? Despite appearances God rules and both the Vatican and the US are sunset empires. One last bright show and then the sun sets. Just hold on Israel. Hold onto faith.
3  |   Roddy Frankel, Friday May 29, 2009
By postponing any military decision against Iran until the end of the year, Obama has ensured that Iran will get the bomb. A military leader should never show his hand by setting an absolute timetable for action. Now that Iran has a deadline, they can either accelerate their efforts at refining uranium, or, more simply, they can place an order with North Korea and have a bomb delivered within a week. It seems the glass is now 99% empty.
4  |   Isaac Moddel, Saturday May 30, 2009
I have read Foxman's books, and I have read many of his articles, and this article seems like it is in a completely different tone. Usually Foxman looks at the reality and confronts it and tries to find answers, in this article he is look at the reality and trying to find a fantasy solution why we should be happy with what happened. I am disappointed, and I hope that he has not changed his way of understanding the world, for it would be a shame to have lost a great advocate on reality.
5  |   Jo Ellen Davey Cohen, Chicago, Illinois, Saturday May 30, 2009
Abe... the glass half full is a perfect metaphor for the Obama Administration's half measure response to the war on terrorism, and the axis of evil. The American President's rhetorical abdication and his lapse in analysis of the North Korean and Iranian objectives has enabled the world Mullahs to rapidly advance their nuclear capabilities.
6  |   Roland Solomon, Tuesday Jun 02, 2009
A glass is half full when you are filling it, and half empty when you drinking it.
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

A Point of View Anti-Defamation League (ADL) National Director Abraham Foxman on fighting anti-Semitism, bigotry and extremism.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Time to be put out to pasture?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David A. Harris
    Sunday Nov 01, 2009
  2. Hillary's Middle East saga
    Posted in A Point of View by Abraham Foxman
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  3. The end of anti-Semitism?
    Posted in Guest Blog by David Turner
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  4. 'The Jewish Terrorist'
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  5. The downfall of a cynic
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Lande
    Tuesday Nov 03, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

B. Cohen USA: More of Abe's liberal bloviations. "Relax, it's only a shower." Sorry, Abe, Israel better not buy that this time around.
khalid-Morocco: it s clear enough that it is the so-called, illegal satate of Israel who is the party who hinders the negotiations with so many obstacles.Netanyahu and those who were before him never had a sincere will to engage in serious negotiations.They are simply afraid! they have nothing to give! they believe that the land is theirs, the promised land as they claim! But,wait! what negotiations are you talking about!? Abbass is an illegitiamte president of the Palestinians.He does not have the right to represent them! He is a mere weak lamb facing the Israeli wolf! Mrs. Clinton is a real hypocrite, but no wonder!
Chris USA: This is all very interesting, however, I would like to know what Israel will do to prevent international opinion against Israel from progressing from merely disapproving to truly substantive measures? Granted it appears a long way off now but eventually it will arrive if its progress is not halted and redirected.