|
Wednesday May 27, 2009
A Point of View: Seeing the glass half full - for now Posted by Abe Foxman
Comments: 6
Perspective is everything. The glass can be half full or half empty. These unoriginal thoughts came to mind after two significant events in the life of the state of Israel and the Jewish people - the visit of Pope Benedict XVI to Israel and the meeting between President Barack Obama and Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. The tendency in the Israeli press was to focus on the negative. The Pope was widely criticized for the things he failed to say or said in an infelicitous way. And the Washington summit meeting was picked apart for the alleged lack of warmth between the leaders and for the pressure points and disagreements. ![]() Pope Benedict XVI at Yad Vashem In each case, the specific criticisms were not misplaced. At Yad Vashem the Pope failed to speak in appropriately emotional terms about the Holocaust, referred to the "killing" rather than "murder" of the Jews, and never mentioned the German or Nazi perpetrators by name. And the unresolved issues between the US and Israel - settlements and the concept of a two-state solution - leave much uncertainty. As time moves on, this kind of reinforcement together with the filtering down of the new teachings of the Church will be the most important elements of the relationship. Yes, it would have been satisfying had Benedict said the right things in the right way, but let's not lose sight of how the visit reflects and reinforces how far we have come. Similarly with regard to the Obama-Netanyahu meeting, amid the question marks, the fundamentals were upheld. The great threat to Israel's security comes from Iran and its nuclear program. The President acknowledged that threat to Israel, importantly made clear that it is not merely a threat to the Jewish state, indicated that US engagement with Iran was not open-ended, would be revaluated by the end of the year, and said that, if dialogue did not produce results, all options would be on the table. I'm not sure that Israel could have asked for much more on this issue from the new President. ![]() PHOTO: AP Moreover, the fear of some that the White House would insist on a "sequencing" of events in which Israel would have to make significant concessions to the Palestinians before the US would commit to action against Iran - on the grounds that only that way could the US win over the Arabs to support steps against Iran - was not realized. It is true that Israel may not have achieved its own version of "sequencing" - first Iran, then the Palestinian issue - but that was never truly in the cards. What seems to have emerged are parallel and simultaneous tracks for the two issues, with neither one being held hostage to the other. Here is where the glass is half empty; where a half full perspective fully comes into play. Undoubtedly, there will be tensions between the US and Israel on certain Palestinian-related issues, particularly settlements. The truth is Obama is hardly the first president to push an Israeli prime minister on this issue. If, however, the Administration lives up to its commitment on the priority challenge facing Israel from Iran, then whatever unpleasantries may emerge regarding settlements will be seen as a price worth paying. I am hardly a Pollyanna. Differences with the Church and the Administration will likely emerge. However, let's keep our eye on the ball. Catholic-Jewish and US-Israel relations were further advanced by the two major events of May.
1 |
Tzvi/amerikkka,
Thursday May 28, 2009
True Jewish/catholic relations and Israel/amerikkka relations were advanced during the trips...AND abe foxman had NOTHING t do with either
2 |
Jan, Australia,
Friday May 29, 2009
Amazing! Who is the Vatican? Who is the US? The question is who has the power really in the long term? A long time ago Egypt was a great empire. Israel was told not to lean on Egypt as they were a bruised reed that would pierce them. Who were they told they could lean on? Despite appearances God rules and both the Vatican and the US are sunset empires. One last bright show and then the sun sets. Just hold on Israel. Hold onto faith.
3 |
Roddy Frankel,
Friday May 29, 2009
By postponing any military decision against Iran until the end of the year, Obama has ensured that Iran will get the bomb. A military leader should never show his hand by setting an absolute timetable for action. Now that Iran has a deadline, they can either accelerate their efforts at refining uranium, or, more simply, they can place an order with North Korea and have a bomb delivered within a week. It seems the glass is now 99% empty.
4 |
Isaac Moddel,
Saturday May 30, 2009
I have read Foxman's books, and I have read many of his articles, and this article seems like it is in a completely different tone. Usually Foxman looks at the reality and confronts it and tries to find answers, in this article he is look at the reality and trying to find a fantasy solution why we should be happy with what happened. I am disappointed, and I hope that he has not changed his way of understanding the world, for it would be a shame to have lost a great advocate on reality.
5 |
Jo Ellen Davey Cohen, Chicago, Illinois,
Saturday May 30, 2009
Abe... the glass half full is a perfect metaphor for the Obama Administration's half measure response to the war on terrorism, and the axis of evil. The American President's rhetorical abdication and his lapse in analysis of the North Korean and Iranian objectives has enabled the world Mullahs to rapidly advance their nuclear capabilities.
6 |
Roland Solomon,
Tuesday Jun 02, 2009
A glass is half full when you are filling it, and half empty when you drinking it.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |