|
Sunday Jun 29, 2008
Living with Rockets: The truth is right there Posted by Anav Silverman
Comments: 8
I've just come back from England after spending a whirlwind of two weeks talking non-stop about Sderot and the rocket situation in southern Israel. I spoke at six different synagogues, covering basically all the different communities in London; Reform, Liberal, Conservative, Orthodox, and Charedi, as well as several schools and functions. There were two underlying themes that reoccurred during my first visit to London. The first was that the English don't do things last minute. The second went something like this, 'thank goodness for the ceasefire with Hamas.' Before I comment on the latter theme, I must point out that one of the most disturbing discoveries during my visit to London was the incredible lack of awareness that most Jewish communities had in regard to the rocket situation in southern Israel. This is not to say that the average Israeli is that much more informed, but Tel Avivim and Raananites are aware of the terms Kassam rockets and siren alerts. You can thank Ynet.news, Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, and other Israeli news outlets that consistently report when Kassam rockets hit Sderot and the western Negev. However, although the average Brit is well informed of the plight of Gaza residents and Israeli defense operations in the Gaza Strip, they know nothing of the fear and terror in which Israeli residents live under in Sderot and the western Negev. This should be surprising, considering that Britain is home to the largest broadcasting media company in the world, the BBC. The general picture that the BBC construes for its world wide audience is that Kassam rockets are homemade devices that are inaccurately aimed, children's toys in comparison to Israeli fighter jets. Comparisons are essential for the international media's coverage of the Israeli-Arab conflict, especially the British media. The number of Palestinians killed compared to the number of Israelis killed in the western Negev is a point frequently alluded to or made in BBC commentary of the conflict. Unfortunately, consistent emphasis on numbers and statistics, although they may be true in their own right, do not present an accurate portrayal of the wider picture. Although the Kassam rockets are unsophisticated and cheap to make, the truth is that they have caused wide-spread destruction and heavy psychological turmoil to Israelis living in southern Israel. Has the BBC ever made an investigative report on the number of mothers in Sderot who must take valium pills in order to function normally during the day, as sirens and rocket explosions for the past seven years have completely destroyed their sense of calm and security? What about Sderot children, of whom between 70-90 percent, now show signs of post traumatic stress disorder? Or the fact, that almost on a weekly basis, a Sderot family is made homeless because of a Kassam exploding on their home. And most importantly, why does the BBC choose not to present the fact that this rocket terror, which is slowly and cruelly wearing down on Sderot and western Negev residents, is financially fueled by Iran, Syria, and Hizbullah? I recall one visit that I had with a BBC journalist while in London, who spoke of her visit to Israel and how she could not understand why there was so much tension between Israelis and Palestinians. "There is so much misunderstanding and miscommunication between you," she told me. I answered her with one point. "You can freely travel to Ramallah, to Gaza, to basically any Arab country neighboring Israel and safely sightsee. I, as a Jewish girl, as an Israeli, would never have that kind of opportunity or right today." She never thought of the situation that way. The fact that Israel is surrounded by 22 Arab countries, most who do not recognize the Jewish state's right to exist and have closed their doors to Jews in general is a missing component in the international media's coverage of Israel. In light of this, Hamas's recent ceasefire with Israel, is a strategic decision made for the approval of the European and international community and media. Because in writing, Hamas's English website, still calls for the destruction of the "Zionist enemy," and does not mention the name of the Jewish state--Israel--even once. When someone in London asked me, if Sderot residents were now celebrating because of the ceasefire, I could only think to myself how uninformed this person was to the real agenda of Hamas. In the week since the ceasefire, four Kassam rockets have fired at Sderot and the western Negev, along with two mortar shells. Another Sderot home has been hit, another Israeli family displaced, and several Israelis experienced shock during the rocket explosions. The Kassam fire and mortar shellings against Israel continues today just as it did before the ceasefire began.
1 | Lowell Blackman, Ramat Ilan, Israel, Sunday Jun 29, 2008
I listen to the BBC about five or six times during the course of the day and nothing any of their correspondents have to say surprises me anymore. Their roguesÂ’ gallery of Israel bashers has long displayed a hostile attitude towards Israel and thinly veiled anti-Semitism has long permeated their stories along with their smugness and cynicism towards our side of the story. The media watchdog, Honest Reporting, has awarded the BBC with the dubious distinction of being the most consistently egregious anti-Israel media outlet four years in a row.
2 | Lowell Blackman, Ramat Ilan, Israel, Sunday Jun 29, 2008
However, the most troubling aspect is not what the BBC says, but that the BBC is an arm of the British Foreign Service and, as such, the BBC does not operate as an independent authority. Accordingly, BBC reportage regarding Israel and events surrounding Israel are, in actuality, reflective of UK foreign policy as formulated and directed by the British Foreign Ministry. With this in mind, we need to be very skeptical of what the UK government actually says when it feigns friendship. One can become quickly disabused of this myth with a regular dose of BBC Middle East reporting.
3 | Dr S McCosker, Monday Jun 30, 2008
Everyone: for more ammo on behalf of Sderot & Israel, go to Robert Spencer's jihadwatch website and google 'posted by Hugh' 'Israel' 'Fast Jihad' 'Slow Jihad' 'Treaty of Hudaybiyya'. You should find many fascinating articles packed with data - especially, data on the dirty tricks repertoire of Muslim warmaking. 'Hugh', Spencer's friend, is an agnostic and a passionate lover of Israel. He anatomises & castigates the relentless & vicious Arab/Muslim jihad against Israel, & the antics of the Western Useful Idiots & antisemites [as at the BBC] that enable it, with a white and lucid fury.
4 | abbed, denmark, Monday Jun 30, 2008
all we see in the media is not true. we only have to no what the world politic is and we will see ho the real troublemakers are.
us and the uk are one of the biggest troublemakers in the world
5 | Said, London, Monday Jun 30, 2008
To Lowell Blackman: at the very least the BBC is a good counterbalance to the blatantly biased American media that only show the suffering of Israelis, but explains away Palestinian suffering as though they're meant to suffer. When an Israeli soldier dies, the American media is immediately dispatched to the funeral, the parents suffering etc. When Palestinian children die as a result of Israeli fire, the America media's comment is along those lines: "Oh, and some Palestinian kids were killed from an Israeli tank shell... how's the weather George?" The BBC is far more balanced than the US media
6 | Hansscholl, USA, Monday Jun 30, 2008
How many civilians has Israel killed in Palestinian areas? Far more than the reverse. The US media is completely pro-Israel and you rarely if ever see any feature on Palestinians that is not AIPAC-approved. When non-ideologues who are not ruled by primitive tribalism come in to power in the area (if ever) I will believe there is a chance for solid agreements and perhaps even democracy will exist in Palestine-Israel.
7 | Ray Saperstein, Baltimore, USA, Tuesday Jul 01, 2008
Said, I don't know what American newspaper you are reading. Could you please name the sources you are talking about. As an American, I can tell you that I would like very much to read the newspapers you are talking about. Quite honestly, I don't think you will find any of the reporting you are talking about in any significant American paper. I challenge you to provide your sources.
8 | Jules Klapowitz, Friday Jul 04, 2008
A few ruffians in coonskin caps threw the mighty British out of America. It took the Brits about one hundred years to get over it. A few scrawny Jews pushed the British anti-Semites out of "Palestine" which started the collapse of their empire. They still haven't gotten over it, and probably never will.
|
All CategoriesTop Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |