British intelligence smarter than US' - and than Gary Hart

Anyone who doubts that Iran is determined to develop deliverable nuclear weapons should not be in position of decision making or influence.  The evidence is as clear as can be, despite the "fog of peace" artificially constructed by the recent National Intelligence Estimate issued by our government's collective intelligence agencies. It may be true, as the estimate concludes, that in 2003 the Iranian shifted from a single track approach to a duel track approach - from taking direct steps toward building the bomb to taking indirect steps that have both civilian and military applications. But it does not follow that either the goal of the program, or even its schedule, has changed significantly. 

As I demonstrated in a previous blog, nothing has really changed with regard to the Iranian nuclear threat since 2003 except that Iran is closer today than it was then to developing a nuclear bomb. 

Yet our intelligence community seems to have fallen for Iran’s version of two-card monte. Either that, or they are deliberately trying to pull the wool over the eyes of the American public in order to discourage what they believed was a drum-beat for a preemptive attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.

One prominent public figure who seems entirely willing to pull the wool over his own eyes, and those of his readers, is former senator and former presidential hopeful Gary Hart. 

Stupid Intelligence

The recent national intelligence estimate that concluded that Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003 is just about the most stupid intelligence assessment I have ever read. It falls hook, line and sinker for a transparent bait-and-switch tactic employed not only by Iran, but by several other nuclear powers in the past.

The tactic is obvious and well-known to all intelligence officials with an IQ above room temperature. It goes like this: There are two tracks to making nuclear weapons: One is to conduct research and develop technology directly related to military use. That is what the United States did when it developed the atomic bomb during the Manhattan Project. The second track is to develop nuclear technology for civilian use and then to use the civilian technology for military purposes.

About this blog

Double Standard Watch Analyses of burning topics by leading American attorney and stalwart defender of Israel Alan Dershowitz

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Recent Comments

Daniel in TX: Dershowitz criticizing Finkelstein's scholarship is like the hunchback of Notre Dame criticizing someone's posture.
Dan, TEXAS: Finkelstein is to be ignored. On the odd occation when it is actually published in a periodical or article that is actually read, it needs to be put in its place. What a schmuk. Indeed, I totally agree with Mr. Leaf who suggests that you sue him for defamation - that will bankrupt it completely.
Martin Leaf F.Hills: Alan, just sue him for defamation. That will bankrupt him financially. He is already bankrupt morally. I will volunteer to help. Otherwise you are giving him more attention than he is worth and it makes you look petty. We have bigger fish to fry. Like Ahmedinijad. The Fink is just a typical sociopath, begging for attention, that criminal defense attorneys see all the time.