Wednesday Nov 28, 2007

Double Standard Watch: 'Free speech for me, but not for thee'

Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Sometimes it's hard to determine whether the academic hard left, which spends more time blasting Israeli imperfections than Arab genocides, is living in an Alice in Wonderland Topsy Turvy world or in an Orwellian Newspeak world.  In a recent example, a group of hard left radicals at Harvard claim they are being muzzled. At a recent Faculty meeting, Professor J. Lorand Matory, who teaches Anthropology and Afro-American studies, but who spends much of his time bashing Israel, (a country he has never visited) alleged that critics of Israel like him "tremble in fear" when they express their views at Harvard. He submitted a motion stating that "this Faculty commits itself to fostering civil dialogue in which people with a broad range of perspectives feel safe and are encouraged to express their reasoned and evidence-based ideas."

Matory's motion received support from other paragons of political correctness, who are well-known for their advocacy of censorship of the "offensive" speech of others, but who are now complaining that there's not enough free speech for them at Harvard.

At Columbia University, on the other hand, a group of professors - who are generally in sync with their extremist colleagues at Harvard - are complaining that Columbia’s President, Lee C. Bollinger, has too much freedom of speech when it comes to the Middle East. A campaign is underway to rebuke Bollinger for expressing his personal views about the Iranian dictator, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Led by well-known radicals such as Eric Foner - who complained that Bollinger's harsh description of Ahmadinejad was "completely inaccurate" - these politically correct censors want to muzzle Bollinger. They also want to muzzle students, alumni, and other "outsiders", who have legitimate complaints about the Middle East Studies Department, which has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of radical Islam.

It all seems so inconsistent unless you understand what the real agenda is, and then everything becomes completely clear and totally consistent. The agenda is Israel. If you're against Israel - as Matory, Foner, and their ilk are - then they want you to have complete freedom to speak against the Jewish state (as they certainly should and do). If, on the other hand, you're perceived as pro-Israel (or pro-American, for that matter), then suddenly you have no right to free speech. It is so transparently cynical that I'm amazed that any reasonable person actually falls for it.

The hypocrisy is rather easy to spot if you've been around long enough to remember when it was leaders of the radical left, led by MIT linguist Noam Chomsky, who were trying to intrude on the tenure process for political reasons. I recall vividly when Chomsky campaigned to prevent Columbia from granting a tenured position to Henry Kissinger. Chomsky spoke at a noisy rally against Kissinger's tenure. It was that same Chomsky who complained when I wrote a letter - in response to a request from the former chairman of the political science department - detailing misquotations, made-up facts, and other scholarly sins by anti-Israel extremist Norman Finkelstein and urging DePaul University to deny him tenure. I also remember when it was Professor Matory who tried to prevent former University President Lawrence H. Summers from exercising his freedom of speech with regard to Israel when he was president.

What I don't remember (because it didn't happen) are any complaints by these born-again freedom of speech phonies when Summers, as a mere professor, was prevented from making a speech to the University of California Board of Regents this September. Those political-correctniks who weren't actually demanding censorship of Summers were predictably silent because it wasn't one of theirs who was being censored. Nor do I remember (because it didn't happen) the hard left at Columbia protesting when the University provost defended an anti-Israel professor who was caught by a camera throwing a rock at an Israeli guardhouse. Nor do I remember (because it didn't happen) Professor Matory complaining when Israel’s former Prime Minister Ehud Barak was prevented from speaking at Concordia University by a hard-left anti-Israel crowd of violent censors. For that matter, where was Columbia's Eric Foner when the leader of the Minutemen was chased off the stage at Columbia by another group of freedom-suppressing hooligans?

I challenge Matory and his hard left political cronies to show a history of supporting the free speech rights of those they disagree with. Has Matory defended the right of Professor James D. Watson, whose despicable theories of racial inferiority resulted in the cancellation of his speech at Rockefeller University? I, and many other genuine civil libertarians, have long histories of defending the free speech rights of those we most despise. I supported the right of Nazis to march in Skokie, IL forty years ago. I opposed the cancellation of a speech by Tom Paulin, who advocated the murder of Israelis. I defended, pro bono, a virulently anti-Israel Stanford professor who was fired for inciting violence. I opposed Harvard's attempt to prevent students from flying the Palestinian flag to commemorate the death of mass-murderer Yasser Arafat.

Don't expect the defense of those with whom they disagree from the Israel-bashers at Columbia, Harvard, and MIT. For them, it is "free speech for me, but not for thee!"

Freedom of speech to criticize Israel and the US is alive and well at Harvard and most other universities. Matory need not "tremble in fear" of anything except his pernicious opinions being rebutted in the marketplace of ideas. 

Freedom of speech to criticize Palestinian extremism is however in short supply at many American and European universities.  Jewish students do actually "tremble in fear" of offending anti-Israel professors who have the power to downgrade and negatively recommend them.  This is an issue that deserves serious attention in the real world of academia, rather than in Matory's ersatz world of topsy-turvy newspeak.   

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |  zari namdar, Monday Jan 14, 2008
Mr.Dershowitz:We must put an end to antisemitism and Israel bashing.I had a big chance and privilege to grow under the wings of my pro Israely father{ambassador of royal Pahlavi Regime of Iran toAustria }.My first education and respect for Israel started at home.I see it as a must ,to add a simple history of Israel to the history deppartment,of all primery schools all around the globe.Israel today is the talk of our daily life! We must make a simple and cost effective effort to make Israel shine from each corner of the universe. Zari Namdar an x Iranian
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Double Standard Watch Analyses of burning topics by leading American attorney and stalwart defender of Israel Alan Dershowitz

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Most Commented Posts

  1. Campaigning for the Obama-Biden ticket
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Oct 02, 2008
  2. What IS it about religion?
    Posted in Generation Bubelah by Cynthia Blair Kane
    Thursday Oct 02, 2008
  3. Raising a cup
    Posted in Tales from the Towers by Lucca
    Thursday Oct 02, 2008
  4. News and features
    Posted in Behind BlogCentral by R.B.
    Sunday Oct 05, 2008
  5. The mental challenges
    Posted in Army Life by A.J.
    Sunday Oct 05, 2008

Recent Comments

Ya'akov ben Mika'el: The trouble with the Democratic Party is they do not learn from the mistakes of the past. McGovern is a case in point, why run a Presidential contender from the far left of the political spectrum, who does not appeal to that center of Public opinion? The truth is, even though a liberal Democrat may appeal to the center of public opinion, once elected, they will invaribly retreat back to their leftist position. Such was the case of Jimmy Carter. Perhaps the Democrats did not want to remind people of this, as I'm sure was a case in point.
Edward in New York: Thank you Alan Dershowitz for taking on Jimmy Carter! He is was the worst American president of the 20th century and continues to spew his anti-semitic ignorance and promote his dangerous diplomacy. I believe that his overtures to Hamas and Syria were part of Obama's trial balloons and signals of his intended foreign policy. A foreign policy tainted with a new outlook based upon John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt's effort to destroy the special relationship between the US and Israel. Obama is the next Jewish nightmare in waiting.
Odesa: Why president Carter is not friendly to Jews? Did he read the bible? His God is a Jew, bible is his guide. If I was a Christian, I would glorify all Jews.