Wednesday Mar 18, 2009

The Rabbi, The Pope and the Western Wall

Posted by Rabbi Andrew Sacks
Comments: 42
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

The Western Wall (Kotel in Hebrew) has been a symbol to the Jewish people since the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem which marked the end of the Jewish commonwealth in our land. Even when the State of Israel was reestablished in 1948, Jews could only look from afar toward this site, a retaining wall of the Temple Mount.
 
There are so many stories depicting efforts by Jews to pray there, or to smuggle in a Shofar on Rosh HaShana, during the British Mandate. During Jordanian rule we were barred completely.
 
Of course, once retaken during the course of  the Six Day War, it immediately became a pilgrimage site for Jews the world over. The plaza behind was cleared of homes to create a large space for visitors.
 
A modest Mechizah (dividing barrier) was nearly immediately erected. Even in the sixties, when a Masorti (Conservative) Minyan sought to pray in keeping with their custom, with men and women together - Mayor Teddy Kollek declared the time not yet ripe. We are now forty years later and the idea seems even more distant.
 
The Mechitzah was soon made permanent. Its height raised. Then raised again. Then the entire prayer area was enclosed. Then the prayer area was enlarged and the Mehitzah raised yet again, to its present height.
 
Of course all of this was done without government licenses. But maybe the Kotel Rabbi, responsible for these changes, "answers to a higher authority?" (It should be noted that the office of Kotel Rabbi [today Rav Rabinovitz] does not even exist under Israeli statute. There is a bureaucratic position called "the supervisor of Holy Sites." This has been filled by the Kotel Rabbi who serves a limited group of those who visit the site.)
 
Over the years, the rights of the secular Jews who visit have been diminished. A Bat Mitzvah ceremony would be unthinkable. Modesty demands have been rudely enforced. Women of the Wall have been violently attacked. Masorti Jews, seeking to pray in the very back corners of the plaza area, were subjected to violence on several occasions. The Israel army choir, which includes women,  is barred from singing at the Kotel on Israel Memorial Day for our fallen soldiers.
 
In short, the Kotel has, in effect, become a synagogue for the ultra-Orthodox, and for others willing to abide by their rules.
 
In the interest of peace, and without relinquishing a claim to equal access to the Kotel area, the Masorti Movement has been holding hundreds of Minyanim each year at the southern end of the Western Wall, know today as HaKotel HaMasorti (underneath Robinson's Arch). Indeed this has proved to be a wonderful arrangement, although complete and free access to even this area is not yet allowed.
 
But today we read of yet another insult hurled by those who feel that the Kotel is their own private purview. A headline in today's issue of The Jerusalem Post read, "Western Wall rabbi says pope should not wear cross at site."

Pope Benedict XVI plans a visit to the Kotel this spring. The pope always wears a cross.  He will not be the first pope to visit wearing one. Rav Rabinowitz likened this to "a Jew visiting a church with Tallit and Teffilin."

Of course the Rabinowitz comparison is silly at best, and insulting at worse. Tallit and Teffilin are part of Jewish prayer. The pope is not seeking to offer communion at the Kotel. And I know of no rabbi who has ever been asked to remove his Kippa when greeting the Pope.
Yes, much that is hurtful has been done to Jews in the name of Christianity. But this may not serve as an excuse for Jews to scorn Christian leaders. This is all the more so as we are today seeking to mend the tensions between the Jewish world and the Catholic church.

A learned colleague of mine reminded me of a story.  It seems that back in the 18th century, a Christian asked Rabbi Moses Mendelssohn "how can your religion be correct if my religion is correct?"  His response was that there is one pasture, but many gates. Or as your scripture puts it, "In my father's house there are many rooms."

Let the many "gates" to the Kotel, the "gates of righteousness," be open to all.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
1  |   Peter Newport Beach, CA, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 The Pope should not be told what to wear or not to wear. It is rude and disrespectful to the leader of 1 billion catholics. Christ told him to "carry his cross". This is a symbolic gesture of the Pope. You follow your religion, but please let someone else follow theirs. Do not enforce your preferences on someone else. If you are a peaceful person, you will live and let live.
2  |   Shema , Israel !, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 The Western Wall = Torah = Shema Israel , it is the wisdom
3  |   Nachman, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 I do not accept Rabbi Rabinowitz as the boss over the Western Wall which is part of our ancient Temple, and therefore belongs to all Jews equally. There should therefore be another process for determining all aspects of access and presence at the Wall for everyone who wishes to visit it, such as worship, decorum and respect, time-tables, security, access boundaries and such like. In any case much is necessary to be done to avoid the 'religious zealots' troublemakers, and in any case I do not see Rabbi Rabinowitz ever doing much to stop these people making trouble there.
4  |   Moish, Jerusalem, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 Mr. Sacks seems to think that the orthodox and traditional Israelis are the "limited group" implying minority while the conservative Jews and their sympathizers are the majority, however most Israelis including the secular ones only see Orthodoxy as a genuine expression of Judaism, and anything less as unauthentic Judaism. So it makes perfect sense that the Kottel serve the majority of Jews who make Judaism a priority in their lives, and not those who see Judaism as secondary to their American identity, as merely a cultural heritage that they express on occasion.
5  |   Jason Horn, New York, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 I think that there should be an opportunity at the Western Wall for Masorti or Conservative services to be held. I think there should be the option for a girl to have a Bat Mitzvah at the Western Wall. The Western Wall is an important place for all Jews to pray. I don't think that the Pope needs to wear his cross in plain view while at the Western Wall. This is a Jewish site primarily and this could be used as a way to influence conversion to Christianity. Does the Pope plan to wear his cross in plain view when visiting mosques?
6  |   Jack Kramer, Bound Brook, NJ, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 Part of the Pope's purpose in visiting the Kotel is to show respect for the Jewish people and our history. In a world where many do not believe in our historical ties to Eretz Yisrael, the Pope is affirming the truth of our history. In return, we owe him the proper respect due to the leader of more than one billion Catholics. Just as the Cohanim, in the time of the Temple, wore priestly vestments (ritual clothing), so does the Pope. We must follow Abraham's example, and be gracious hosts to the Pope, not insult him by telling him to remove part of his required vestments.
7  |   Patrick San Diego, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 With all due respect to my Jewish friends, with the negative PR disaster of Gaza you are picking the wrong fight at the wrong time with the wrong person. Israel needs as many friends as possible not more enemies.
8  |   Dan Wolpe, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 As usual, Rabbi Andy Sax makes a cogent, intelligent point that upholds both Torah values and basic derech eretz. The Pope is a guest. He should be treated with the respect and dignity that one is commanded by our tradition to show guests. Thank you, Rabbi Sax, for reminding us all of this basic Jewish value.
9  |   B. Chase, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 I would be very insulted and uncomfortable with him being there with a cross. If he needs to wear it, let it be inside. The Vatican had the gall a couple of years ago to claim the Kever David site as their own, and the further gall to offer to exchange it for the synagogue-turned-church they stole from us in Toledo, during the Inquisition. The Kotel rabbi is right to keep the area pure of symbols of other religions. And how about a little respect for your Orthodox co-religionists? Why don't you stereotype them all, go right ahead. Talk about open-minded....
10  |   MS, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 Mr. Why do you look at the Kotel as your spiritual property, to do with as you see fit? The Kotel belongs to ALL Jews, but you will never gain power there. Have a modicum of respect. There are solid reasons for the mechitza, and you can't just change them because you don't like them. Why not preach tolerance, instead of making the rabbi look like an idiot, just because you don't agree with him?
11  |   Padraig, usa, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 A sensible argument on Catholic-Jewish relations in the J-P? How can this happen? Where is the invective? This is a miracle!
12  |   Will, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 It would have been more wise to say it is ok for the pope to come dressed as is, but if he likes he could remove his cross. In the end, you can't ask a pope to remove his cross anymore than asking an orthodox to remove his little hat when going to church. Tolerance is they name of the game.
13  |   Will, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 It would have been more wise to say it is ok for the pope to come dressed as is, but if he likes he could remove his cross. In the end, you can't ask a pope to remove his cross anymore than asking an orthodox to remove his little hat when going to church. Tolerance is they name of the game.
14  |   GIla, Thursday Mar 19, 2009 Rabbi Sacks ommited to say that the Pope also demanded that the area of the Kotel should be closed during his visit and the Rabbi negated him that request stating that The Kotel belongs to everyone and he cannot close it for one person. The Pope is very welcomed at the Kotel but he must respect our traditiions and rules just like he would expect us to do while visiting the Vatican.
15  |   John N Ireland, Friday Mar 20, 2009 Thank you, Rabbi Sacks for writing this article. I would hope that Rabbi Rabinowitz would reconsider and withdraw his request. The Pope is a holy man and and to ask him to take off his cross is not helpful. He is a guest of Israel and a Rabbi who visits the Vatican or a Catholic Church event, does not take off their kippa for example. I would hope that other Rabbi's would ask him to reconsider. The Cross is part of his vestments and he wears it everywhere in public, including mosques to my recollection. The late Holy Father, Pope John Paul wore his to the Kotel. Shalom aleichem.
16  |   Tzvi/amerikkka, Friday Mar 20, 2009 In the end you cant ask the pope to remove his cross any more than you can ask the pope not to reinstate a holocaust denier
17  |   Joseph London, Friday Mar 20, 2009 As the pope is also a head of state his visit should have been guided by Pres. Peres, who surely would have had the sense not to tell the pope what to wear. In the iconic pictures of John Paul praying at the Kotel he is clearly wearing a cross and the world didn't end.
18  |   michael london, Friday Mar 20, 2009 by all means quote moses medelssohn but do not refer to him as a rabbi which he most certainly was not.All his decendants including the composer felix mendelssohn converted to christianity!
19  |   Moshe Y from NY, Friday Mar 20, 2009 The Conservative rabbi shows his ignorance by declaring that talit and tefillin are prayer items while a cross is a religious item. This is not correct. The custom has arisen to only wear them during prayer, but biblically these are simply religious items just like a kippah and tzitzit. That aside, the cross is a symbol of idolatry according to many, so the comparison isn't even necessary, R. Rabinowitz was only trying to be politically correct with the comparison. The kotel has not "become" an Orthodox site, it always has been. when you go to a place you need to respect the way they pray.
20  |   salomon arya, San Diego, Calif., Friday Mar 20, 2009 Your efforts to change Halacha only make the Orthodox build bigger defenses to assimilation. In the U.S. the intermarriage rate of non-orthodox is about the same as that of secular Jews. We need all to follow the rules that produce continuity (Shabbath, Kashruth, Holidays,etc) and call ourselves LESS observant or MORE observant. NO OTHER LABELS! As to the Pope's good efforts, the Catholic hyerarchy wishes to remove the Jews as the obstacle for the 2nd. coming they invented. We are a bone stuck in their throat. They might make nice, but they hope the Iranians and the Arabs erase us off the map.
21  |   Gil Israel, Friday Mar 20, 2009 Mr Sacks point is well taken. I have never heard of a Jew being required to take off his Magen David in any church. Rabbi Rabinowitz's remarks border on the side of racism, and that is not appropriate or acceptable in the State of Israel.
22  |   Mahesh Lavannis, Friday Mar 20, 2009 Christianity, as run by Pope, is not a normal religion. Just like Islam, as run by Saudi, is not a normal religion. Power hungry people in religious guise - do not a religion make - even when they hide behind prophets.
23  |   John Preller, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, Saturday Mar 21, 2009 You are right, for too long we have been concentrating on the wrong difference of view, as a Christian I will always Love, Support and Pray for the Jews and the Nation of Israel. I believe my faith is built on your foundation. The qoute from the article says it well, " one pasture, but many gates. Or as our scripture puts it, "In my father's house there are many rooms." Israel will always be in my Prayers. John Preller
24  |   Dos, Saturday Mar 21, 2009 #22 - Mahesh Lavannis, your name sound Hindu. Do you worship a god with 8 arms, now me guess its name, Shiva, shivalingam?
25  |   jd, new jersey soviet socialist republic, Sunday Mar 22, 2009 as a conservative protestant i take issue with mahesh: the pope is not the heard of all christendom, but only a part of it; i share rabbi rabinowitz's aversion to the pope's crucifix for similar reasons. the kotel as an orthodox jewish posession was a moot point prior to the establishment of the state of israel; also, the pope needn't wear his crucifix at the wall simply out of respect to his hosts, as such does not imply any renunciation of his faith and such respect is iaw the precepts and principles in the new testament - after the sspx debacle, he could try to be a mensch
26  |   elliot usa, Sunday Mar 22, 2009 just because the pope can wear his cross visiting kotel does not mean jews who are not 'visitors' should abandon their own traditions there or anywhere in israel
27  |   freakshow, Sunday Mar 22, 2009 #22 Christianity not normal religion run by Pope and Islam not a normal religion run by Saudi? You must be totally nuts. Both religions were the originals of Christianity and Islam. Buffoon!
28  |   Borya K, California, Sunday Mar 22, 2009 Does the Kotel Rabbi have a Halakhic obligation to keep crosses and idols out of the Kotel area? I think it would be a really difficult situation to be in if he does. I'm sure he wants to be a good guest and welcome a visit from the leader of so many people, and I'm sure he knows it's politically not the best idea to publicly tell a pope what to wear, but I wonder if he has an obligation behind his actions. Seems like talking in private, away from the media, might have made more sense, but, like just about everyone else, I'm sure I don't know the full story.
29  |   a voice, Sunday Mar 22, 2009 cleric Saks should understand that living in Israel has great responsibilities for Jews regardless of their belief systems. If you can't agree with this, you are not even a cleric. Cleric Saks should realize that the state of Con-Judaism flies in the face of traditional Judaism and all the new, reformed policy changes make them less con and more reform- seen when you so eloquently describe the inability to do your USA shtick at the Kotel. You are a failing business- not a religion that raises the bar for your flock. It began with driving a car on Shabat - today- no control!
30  |   Truth Kansas City, Sunday Mar 22, 2009 Being that the cross is of pagan origen and not of the Bible, I see no reason why the pope should be wearing the cross to one of the most holiest site in the world. For even Abraham was told to remove his sandal s for he is walking on holy ground. The one billion followers that the pope has his grasp on, need to actually read the Bible and they will see that most of the traditions held by the church goes against the word of God. The catholic church itself admits that their authority is not from the Bible. Google this information, it is there for all to see.
31  |   D A Levit, Tuesday Mar 24, 2009 I think Pope Benedict's point in visiting the wall is to express his respect. Was there a big deal when Pope John Paul visited years ago? I think when the security for the pope tried to demand that the area be cleared for his visit, it set up this situation about the cross. In this case, it only represents something to him, not to those around him. In that case, it is two sticks, crossed and tied at the middle and nothing more. I doubt anyone would object to Tallit and Tefillen at the Vatican if it was on the most important Jewish representative in the world's first visit.
32  |   DJStahl, Wednesday Mar 25, 2009 Mishlei and R' Chaim Vital z"l would both say let the Pope wear his cross. Mishlei says the best way to treat an enemy is with graciousness. This even assuming the Pope is an enemy. The best way to show up antisemitism is not to behave with bigotry oneself. Narcissistic picking at scabs repulsive. Vatican II 40+ years ago and its pro-Jewish message reaffirmed by Benedict. Charedim actually praise themselves for their ignorance of the world, which endangers the Jews. That the Pope is coming at all is a great benefit to the Jews. It is idiotic for R' Rabinowitz to jeopardize this. Fire him now.
33  |   DACON9 aka DAVID, Sunday Mar 29, 2009 if this man sachs knew torah, specifically the 2ND commandment he would NOT WRITE THIS ARTICLE.iT IS FORBIDDEN TO HAVE OTHER gods AND ORNAMENTS OF OTHER gods BEFORE 'HIM'.On of the requirments to have a share in the NEXT WORLD or a share IN 'THE LAND' when MASHIACH (MESSIAH) ARRIVES IS THE SAME NO ornements of other gods. This article only shows the ignorance of reform and conservatives when it comes to TORAH.The GD of Israel judges all Jews on their abilities to observe,not on their abiblity to rewrite "HIs" words DACON9
34  |   MG. USA, Sunday Mar 29, 2009 I don't think you can compare efforts to smuggle in a shofar during the British Mandate, and a group of Conservative Jews trying to form a "prayer group" at the Kotel. Conservative Judaism is an American invention that is seriously failing in America. Israel certainly doesn't need it, and the conservative thought that it should be imparted to Israeli Jews, over the Torah that has served us well for generations, is just chutzpa. Even the Conservative movement admits it's having a crises. Of course it is. It's "adherents" for the most part practice nothing, many have turned to Modern Orthodoxy.
35  |   Giggio, Wednesday Apr 01, 2009 Leave the Pope alone. He is NOT a Jew.
36  |   Joel, Wednesday Apr 01, 2009 Sachs has a perverse dislike of observance it seems. "In short, the Kotel has, in effect, become a synagogue for the ultra-Orthodox, and for others willing to abide by their rules." Note when he says "THEIR RULES". That let's us all know that he takes no pride in the basic fact that the "rules" the observant (he would say orthodox) follow are his as well (whether or not he follows them). The mitzvot are for ALL Jews, whether or not you observe them doesn't make you more or less of a Jew. We should be thankful for and admire Jews who recognize the importance of being observant.
37  |   OLd City of Jerusalem Milcah Naveh, Wednesday Apr 01, 2009 you are right the kotel is a prayer site the jews yearn for The Temple Mount. Till we will have The Temple the kotel is a synagogue an orthodox synagoge the pope should get advice from his advicers not to show his cross thats ethics( in rome behave as the romans) we the residents of the Old City who pray daily at synagogue "Kotel" should be taken into consideration.Thank you for reading a proud Jews lines. Milcah
38  |   Raj, Chicago, Thursday Apr 02, 2009 I am from India. now live in US. islamic terrorism is threatening to destroy the entire world - first the jews, then hindus, then christians and last but not the least muslims themselves. i pray the israelis build friendships with India and with Christians. let us unite my friends. we have a common enemy. Rabbi Andrew Sacks, I salute you Sir. What well balanced, good article. no sentimental jargons, but pure, cold logic. Thank you Sir. I hope the nation of israel listens to your wise words. you and i have wife and children and i will not blow ourselves up or shed innocent blood. let us unite.
39  |   DACON9 aka DAVID, Wednesday Apr 08, 2009 As long as xtians continue to proselytize JEWS, to want to ''perfect JEWS, to put in their versions of assorted versions of their ''bibles, there will never be a ''peace''. This started in the spanish inquisitions and remains today. The xtians will never leave a JEW have it HIS WAY< THE WAY OF THE 'ONE G'D OF ISRAEL'' And the war will continue as has been since esauv, and will never end until the LAST WAR THEM AS IS WRITTEN BY OUR HEBREW PROPHETS. If JEWS are the LIGHT UNTO THE NATIONS AS THE XTIANS RECOGNIZE AS TRUTH..THEN LEAVE US LEARN HOW TO IMPROVE THE LIGHT
40  |   Cember, Friday Apr 17, 2009 aka David, #39 While I'm not sure how it relates to R. Sacks article, isn't it about time to replace the "war" simile? Proselytiztion as it is now practiced is a non-violent attempt at convincing others of the truth/reality of a particular religious canon. If we believe our version is true/real, then we need have no fear of listening to the theological arguments of others. Christian evangilism in the modern age is advertising, just like the Lubovicher bumper-stickers that say "We Want Moshiach Now!" Don't like the product, don't buy. Just don't try to close the marketplace of ideas.
41  |   David South Carolina, Saturday May 02, 2009 Simply put it is Jerusalem not the Vatican. We know the cross is a symbol of Christianity but have we not made enough concessions to other peoples?
42  |   David Ben-Ariel, Friday May 08, 2009 I've taken out two full page ads protesting the pope's new crusade, his political campaign, in The Jewish Voice and Opinion - [ Link to page ] " rel="nofollow">Christian radical theology?
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Masorti Matters
Director of the Masorti [Conservative] Movement's Rabbinical Assembly in Israel (the organization of Masorti/Conservative rabbis), Rabbi Andrew Sacks on Conservative Judaism, Israel, religious pluralism and much more. The views expressed are his own and do not necessarily reflect those of Masorti organizations.

Rabbi Avi Novis Deutsch, faculty member of the Schechter Rabbinical Seminary and Rabbis for Human Rights exegete, previously wrote for this blog. BlogCentral thanks him for his contributions.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Time to be put out to pasture?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David A. Harris
    Sunday Nov 01, 2009
  2. Hillary's Middle East saga
    Posted in A Point of View by Abraham Foxman
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  3. The end of anti-Semitism?
    Posted in Guest Blog by David Turner
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  4. 'The Jewish Terrorist'
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Thursday Nov 05, 2009
  5. The downfall of a cynic
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Lande
    Tuesday Nov 03, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Hadassah: Women who are disabled or elderly, find it impossible to board the bus from the back. They have the right to have accessibility and I believe the elderly or disabled take much more precedence than men who can't see a woman. Why not put the men in the back, a huge curtain up (terrorists will love that heter) and that way these men won't have to see a single female, until they marry and scream each time they see their wife. Accessibility is the right of all in our democratic society.
David: To #33. It is clear that Rabbi Sacks does not accept Rav Feinstein as his posek. But Haredim see him as Gadol HaDor. If he said that separate seating was not required, it diminishes their claim for its need. In addition, he is writing from Israel where the Masorti Movement does NOT sanction driving on Shabbat and does not (although I hope this changes) ordain Gay rabbis
Jen USA: Sharona Israel, Only Israelis can change this. Israelis should boycott the bus! Tell your political leaders that public funding for discrimination is unacceptable. Hit them where it hurts-the pocketbook and the polls. Never let a group of thugs ("religious" or not) push any woman to the back of a bus or from one side of the street to another. You say that I should come to Israel to make my opinions heard. Hmm... do you think I could get a gross of tazers past customs? Perhaps, these men would finally have a reason to be afraid of women.