Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

Burning Issues: US military aid to Israel

Posted by JPost.com staff
Comments: 17
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

About 'The Road to the White House'

Question #7

Do you support President Bush's decision to increase the annual military aid to Israel from $2.4 billion to about $3b. for a period of 10 years, pending Congress approval? In principle, do you believe US aid to friendly Mideast and Gulf nations (whether Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia or Qatar) should be cut in return for greater domestic investment?

Contributors: (read it all or click on name to read post)

Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York (D)

Senator Barack Obama of Illinois (D)

Senator John McCain of Arizona (R)

Former Senator John Edwards of North Carolina (D)

 

 Hillary Clinton: I support the recently announced Memorandum of Understanding signed between the United States and Israel to increase US military aid to Israel. Now, more than ever, it important that we help Israel keep its qualitative and technological military edge in an increasingly dangerous region.

Decisions that impact the national security of the United States must be made based on our best interests. Therefore, it is a false choice to try to set a choice between national security and domestic investment. The United States must be able to do both.

However, I do have reservations about the Bush Administration's announcement of a substantial military aid package to countries in the Persian Gulf.
      
First, I want to be certain that Israel's qualitative edge is sustained no matter what the United States ultimately sells to Saudi Arabia and others.

Second, I have concerns about the sequencing. I think we needed to see evidence of genuine Saudi cooperation in pursing stability in Iraq and Lebanon and in supporting our efforts to foster peace between the Israelis and Palestinian, before we move ahead with such a significant arms sale. We also need Saudi cooperation in stopping the export of radical Islam from the Kingdom.

 Barack Obama: I support the recent agreement to increase military assistance, as part of the United States' unique defense relationship with Israel, which serves the security interests of both our countries. The current Administration's failed policies in Iraq, in a war that never should have been authorized, have strengthened Iran and emboldened Hamas and Hizbullah, heightening the threats to Israel.

That makes it more important than ever that the United States live up to its commitment to ensure Israel's qualitative military edge, which will help Israel deter and repel attacks from as far as Teheran and as close as Gaza. 
 
The current Administration's approach to the federal budget has resulted in massive deficits, with every dime they spend adding to our nation's debt. By getting back to sound budgeting practices, we can invest in our priorities at home and abroad without having to make our children pay for it. 

As president, I will double our annual investment in foreign assistance to $50 billion by 2012 and ensure that those new resources are directed toward worthwhile goals. 

Extremely poor societies and weak states provide optimal breeding grounds for disease, terrorism, and conflict, so the United States has a direct national security interest in dramatically reducing global poverty and joining with our allies in sharing more of our riches to help those most in need. 

We need to invest in building capable, democratic states that can establish healthy and educated communities, develop markets, and generate wealth. Such states would also have greater institutional capacities to fight terrorism, halt the spread of deadly weapons, and build health-care infrastructures to prevent, detect, and treat deadly diseases such as HIV/AIDS, malaria, and avian flu. 

Our rapidly growing international AIDS programs have demonstrated that increased foreign assistance can make a real difference. As part of this new funding, I will capitalize a $2 billion Global Education Fund that will bring the world together in eliminating the global education deficit, and counter the radical madrasas that have filled so many young minds with messages of hate.

But our assistance will not come as a blank check. I will couple our support with an insistent call for reform, to combat the corruption that rots societies and governments from within. I will also insist that any nation we provide assistance to refrain from actions that undermine important American national interests.

For example, Egypt is an important ally, and our aid to them since the Camp David Accords has served our interests. But I question promising billions more in arms ahead of help for creating a more just society in Egypt. And promising this aid without a commitment from Egypt for a serious effort to end the smuggling of arms to Gaza, which is a serious threat, makes little sense.
 
In the case of the Gulf states, we should insist on a demonstrated commitment to combat terror and extremism, in Iraq and beyond, before promising massive arms sales. We should also insist that the Saudis, especially, participate constructively in any effort to solve the Israeli-Palestinian situation. We should be rewarding people for stepping up to the plate after they do so, not in hopes of their doing so.

 John McCain: I strongly support increased US assistance, to include providing needed military equipment and technology, for our democratic ally Israel in order to maintain its qualitative military edge relative to its regional adversaries as they acquire and seek more potent military capabilities - often from outside suppliers, such as Russia in the case of Syria and Iran.

Israel's enemies are too numerous, its margin of error too small, and our shared interests and values too great for any other position. 

In the US Senate, I have supported efforts, for example, to rebalance US assistance to Egypt from large-scale military aid to greater support for governance, judicial, and educational reforms.  I also support greater US assistance for real judicial, governance, and educational reforms across the broader Middle East, including in Saudi Arabia. 

Expanding economic opportunity and promoting democratic institutions, grounded in, among other things, a functioning and impartial judiciary, a free press, a robust political opposition, and respect for women's and minority rights, are vital elements to an enduring peace in the region.   

 John Edwards: I strongly support the decision to increase aid to Israel — our ally and partner — to ensure its security, while doing everything in our power to achieve peace and stability in this vital part of the world. Israel and the US have a deep and fruitful friendship. 

The US must do everything it can, through diplomatic, economic, and military aid, to maintain Israel ’s qualitative edge and keep Israel strong and safe in a dangerous region.  America must always stand by our friend, the only democracy in the region.

With respect to other countries in the region - including Saudi Arabia - I believe we must use both carrots and sticks to manage our relationships to ensure that they invest in policies that benefit regional stability and the security of America and our allies. 

That is why I have opposed, for example, a proposed $20 billion arms deal that isn't in the long-term interests of our country or the region. This deal has serious shortcomings—it doesn't force Saudi Arabia to stop terrorists from going into Iraq , make a real effort to help stabilize Iraq , lead regional security talks or assure the arms will not be used for offensive purposes. Congress should do the right thing and block the deal. 

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Mark, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

Stop aid to Israel and all other nations now!!! Resume the aid only when we have no homeless people, no people on welfare or with no health insurance.

2  |   Sam, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

Mark, why don't you visit some other countries and see how their poor live. Then get back to us about the welfare system in the US.

3  |   T. Stephenson, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

Mark from Texas,

You know not what you ask! How goes Israel, is how goes the world. When we stop giving aid to Israel, the U.S. will fall. Quit promoting it!

4  |   Tom, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

It is Important for the US to support its allies. There will always be poor wether it be Canada or The US, better policys and programs and allocation of resources will help the poor rise above their current conditions.

5  |   Dov, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

Mark, You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. I will contnue to thank g-d that librals like you are not the ones running this great country. Do you understand how much the USA relies on Israel for security?? i suggest you read up on it! America has its own reasons for giving security money to israel, it the long and short run its keeps us safe too!

become educated before commenting!

6  |   Markenson jeanny, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

I strongly agree with the memorandum with the United States and Israel, To help preserve what is good in this world so one day we can all see eye to eye

7  |   Eric, Wednesday Aug 22, 2007

I HIGHLY belive we MUST support Israel! In fact, I would like to see American Troops in Israel with the Israeli Troops to liberate them from the terrourist group called the Palistians. I hope that we will be blessed with another Concervative Leader here, to support them there! God (Jesus) Bless Israel!

8  |   Linda 2, Thursday Aug 23, 2007

Mark, you are talking about a big project. No homeless, no people on welfare, I don't really think I will live to see that. But as I read the Bible, it is full of G-d exhorting us (me, you) to help the poor, feed them, and to treat them w/ great respect. Your idea starts with me, you and everyone who has and can share. Our problem is not that we 'give' too much to other nations, it is that we give too little of ourselves to our neighbors.

9  |   Martha, Thursday Aug 23, 2007

Mark! are you nuts. G-d blesses those who help Israel and judges harshly those who do not. We must always do everything possible to assist Israel even if it means putting our troops there to help defend it.

10  |   Robin, Thursday Aug 23, 2007

Pray for the Peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee. Psalm 122:6

11  |   Bruce, Thursday Aug 30, 2007

To all persons wearing blinders - like Mark: We must support the ONLY democracy in the Middle East if we are to retain a voice in what happens over there.

12  |   Harry O, Tuesday Sep 25, 2007

I agree with support to Israel, Genesis 12:3, I will bless those who bless Israel and curse those who don't. I do not agree on support to any country that is a supporter of terrorism. I love Israel and love to visit the country.

13  |   chris, Thursday Sep 27, 2007

Mark...Continue increase support to Isreal, the problems mark names in our country is not caused by lack of funds, these problems exist due to MISUSE of funds.

14  |   Andrew Prieditis, Friday Oct 26, 2007

I am a firm supporter of Israel, and any increase in aid is definitely a good investment to peace and stability to the middle east region.

15  |   Noah, Monday Nov 12, 2007

To Mark: I am an Orthodox Jew in the US Navy, and you know what? to hear something like that from you is ridiculous, this country is the greatest and most powerful country in the world, and unfortunatly we are facing an enemy who wants us all dead, even the poor people. So we must continue not only giving aid to other countries in the same fight, but continue fighting until this threat is destroyed, then we canworry about all that liberal garbage.

16  |   David Kimble, Saturday Nov 24, 2007

Who writes these people's material. Did anyone notice the exact phrase,' Qualitative military edge', in each candidates answer except Edwards. He only said,'...military aid, and Israel's qualitative edge'. Who talks like this and why are they using each others exact words? Talking points don't tell us a thing about what they think or will do. If they are too afraid to give us the truth about their positions then we should be too afraid to have them in power!

17  |   Mike USA, Friday Sep 12, 2008
What ever happened with the IAEA investigation into the Syria installation booming
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Burning Issues JPost's best opinion-writers respond to questions on today's hottest new topics.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  2. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  3. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. The shawl and the hood
    Posted in Reform Reflections by Rabbi Michael Marmur
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Dean Arnold Helena, Montana USA: Thats the best answer I have seen. that seems logical to me, Mr.Amotz Asa-El
beau walsh: Ah.. what to do with the conflict in Gaza? Isreal will always be misunderstood and the palastinians too! (...the muslems,fundamentalist,moderates....) Here is a EXTREAM IDEA for a extream problem ! Are you all ready??? Move the UNTIED NATIONS HEADQUARTERS to GAZA!!!! Then the UN will be in the "thick" of the middle east problems and Isreal after all is a geographical cross roads to all the worlds hotspots also! The economics would be great for all and Isreal would have a secured border! And if the UN refuses to move they show that they have out lived thier usefulness anywhere in the world!
Mike USA: What ever happened with the IAEA investigation into the Syria installation booming