|
Monday Mar 16, 2009
Majoring in Aliyah: Israel is not the problem Posted by Lahav Harkov
Comments: 10
A few days ago, Pulitzer-Prize winning author and activist Alice Walker visited Gaza with Code Pink, a group that describes itself as "a grassroots peace and social justice movement." Sitting with a group of hijab-wearing women, she called upon the Obama administration to change the narrative the USA follows when it comes to Israel. "We were indoctrinated to the song in that film Exodus, you know, 'this land belongs to us, this land is our land,' meaning the Israelis, the Jews," she said. Walker believes that most Americans do not know about the "plight" of the Arabs. "I think all of us have an opportunity here to just say what we believe, which is... we think stealing land is wrong," she explained (while sitting on land Israel gave to the Arabs three and a half years ago, in exchange for a daily barrage of rocket attacks). Let's say that I buy into Walker's post-modern rhetoric, that different narratives reveal different truths. Why don't we look beyond the story of "stolen land" that Arab PR feeds us? Walker is active in promoting human rights and feminist causes. Why didn't she look at the narrative of the women in Gaza? Granted, when Hamas came to power in 2006, they announced that they would not force women to wear the veil, and many Gazan women do get an education. However, there are methods other than legislation for a totalitarian terrorist regime to get what it wants. It is not rare to see a woman in a niqab, a full veil with only a slit for her eyes, in photographs from Gaza. Some even tie green Hamas headbands over the black robes. In "Hamastan," as the Israeli press often calls Gaza, women are respected mainly as mothers sacrificing their sons in the name of jihad. The Hamas PR machine tried to show the world how well they treat their women: "Look! We have policewomen!" they exclaimed in a 2008 New York Times article. However, even a newspaper that is often accused of sympathizing with Arabs could not cover up the clear subtext of the story. Most of the policewomen interviewed refused to give their full names and kept their faces covered to preserve their anonymity, because they were afraid. It is still considered unacceptable for a woman in Gaza to hold such a job. When the United States began the war on terror in late 2001, even the most peace-loving liberals agreed that the Taliban was bad. Of course, they couldn't really admit that while calling George W. Bush a "cowboy" who could only see things as black and white and didn't recognize the "nuances" of Islam. Instead, they focused on the women of Afghanistan. The American media was full of descriptions of Afghan women covered from head to toe by stifling burkas and forbidden to go to school. A Thousand Splendid Suns, which told of the plight of women under the Taliban, became a best-seller, as did Reading Lolita in Teheran, a book about Iran after the revolution. Afghan women became a cause célèbre in America. Why haven't the women of Gaza been treated in the same way? Let's look at another popular cause in America: homosexuals' rights. Proposition 8, an amendment to the State of California's constitution allowing gay marriages, was voted down in November. This led to a chain of protests across the country, as did President Obama's inviting Reverend Rick Warren, a pastor that has spoken out against homosexuality, to his inauguration. When Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed, in front of an audience of Columbia University students, that there were no gays in Iran, Americans scoffed, mocking his primitiveness. Earlier this year, the blog "Gay Persons of Color" wrote the following about Gazan homosexuals: "For gay Palestinians, much of their lives are spent deciding when, where, how and if they should hide. They are caught somewhere in between choosing to be quiet about who they love, [and] undergoing harsh maltreatment at home, which includes physical abuse, death, disowning, or imprisonment."
American conservative pundit Ann Coulter defines a liberal as someone with "the absolute conviction that there is one set of rules for you and another, completely different set of rules for everyone else." This description has, once again, proved itself to be true. Would Alice Walker and her ilk stand for such discrimination in the United States? I think not. However, when the "underdog" discriminates, the whole liberal card castle comes tumbling down. When it turns out that the left's favorite "freedom fighters" take their cues from the Ayatollah, their reaction is something like "does not compute." They prefer to ignore the injustices of Hamas's regime, rather than admit that "the occupier" is actually the only true democracy in the Middle East, the only country that grants its citizens full human rights in the whole region. I recommend that the next time Alice Walker and Code Pink visit Gaza, they take a detour and go to Tel Aviv. There, they will clearly be able to see the rights that people of every gender, sexual orientation, religion or race enjoy. A visit to the financial district will show them women at the head of Israel's biggest banks; a visit to Chof Hilton (Hilton beach) will show them that no one is afraid to come out of the closet in Israel. Alternatively, they can look at Israel's history: Israel was amongst the first countries to have a female prime minister, and despite the protests of the ultra-Orthodox, a gay-pride parade was held in Jerusalem, Israel's holiest city. Actually, if you ask me, Israel is too liberal. When Alice Walker and the rest of the extreme left complain about the inhumane conditions in Gaza, and say we should stop listening to the Israeli narrative, I say they need to open their eyes. This isn't a matter of narratives. This is the truth. Israel is not the problem; Hamas is. They are oppressing their own people. Whether you're modern or post-modern, liberal or conservative, it's obvious which side cares more about human rights in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Just ask the homosexuals and women of Gaza.
1 |
Jen USA,
Wednesday Mar 18, 2009
Lahav Harkov, Are you really using Ann Coulter to bolster your arguments? Ann Coulter is a joke, even in conservative circles. I might also add that many muslim women wear the veil as a symbol of cultural and/or religious and/or political identity. When you use this personal expression as "evidence" of Hamas' oppression, your argument falls apart. There has been (and still is) oppression of women and homosexuals by Western societies. Isreal is no "safe haven". You should get to know Gazans- invite them to your beaches. I am sure that they will tell you that peace is a 2 way street.
2 |
Ande-Modiin, Israel,
Wednesday Mar 18, 2009
Jen, your comment is inane. We invited Gazans to our beaches for 60 years. They used them to murder our children. Coulter is no more of a joke then Al Franken. His best joke is that he may be the senator from Minnesota even though he can't spell it! What the author is pointing out is the hypocrisy of lefties like yourself and Walker. They have no problem defending societies that execute homosexuals and deprive women of an education. The question is why? Because Jen, Walker, and ISM have thier priorities. Hatred of Jews is number one. Human rights for gays and women-they're not interested.
3 |
Jen USA,
Thursday Mar 19, 2009
Ande-Modin, The difference between Coulter and Franken is simple. Franken makes us laugh, while actually engaging in political thought. Coulter is laughable while attempting to spew her hateful diatribes. As a moderate and a woman, I find Coulter's lack of substance (mental, moral and political) offensive. I was explaining that Lahav's arguments are flawed. Lahav showed a cultural bigotry and hypocrisy that undermined the article. I have read Walker, have you? Never found a bit of anti-semitism in her writing. There is a huge difference between critisism of Israel and hatred of Jews.
4 |
Aviv wherever you'd like,
Thursday Mar 19, 2009
Jen, you're ridiculous! The difference between Coulter and Franken is simple Franken makes us laugh, who lacks depth now? I just want to point out that Coulter is hysterically funny. When facing a liberal or stupidity one has two choices to laugh or to cry 'Annie' picks a little bit of both. In Israel were a little ting called rights actually exists plenty of Arab women abandon their lovely as you called is symbol of cultural and/or religious and/or political identity for something called real clothing. As for inviting the Palestinians to our beaches we have its called freaking Gush Katif.
5 |
Aviv from wherever you'd like,
Thursday Mar 19, 2009
May I recommend you remove your own veil and recognize the facts in front of you? You call peace a two way street. Israel has paved this street, put up clear road signs, we even give the poor Lexus driving Arabs money so that they can afford proper weapons. We've done everything we can but what you are asking is that we all lay on the street WE BUILT AND CONTINUE TO BUILD and yell "pretty please run us over." The Arabs are not interested in peace they werent even intrested in it when the British were here or the Ottomans and all of Israel was 'thiers.'
6 |
Aviv from wherever you'd like,
Thursday Mar 19, 2009
' How do you explain them attacking us then? Were we 'oppressing' them from our few poor kibbutzim and moshavim filled with confused immigrants? Someone here definitely is a joke and it ain't Annie.
7 |
Marc, USA,
Friday Mar 20, 2009
Jen, while I agree that referencing Ann Coulter is a pretty bad idea, Harkov is right. Israel and "Hamastan" are polar opposites when it comes to civil rights. While some women do wear the veil proudly, it is clear that many in Gaza are coerced into wearing it. Sure, there is still discrimination in the west, no one has got it quite right, but it is incomparable to the scale that it is occurring in Gaza. And indeed, peace is a two-way street, its getting frustrating to watch Israel give land to Palestinians and free security prisoners as good will measures and in exchange getting terrorism
8 |
Valerie-Philadelphia Pa.,
Saturday Mar 21, 2009
Yes, Jen, do get a life. As an American woman, I find it hard to believe you could possibly compare any of "our" difficulties with those women who truly are oppressed. It's not only an insult to our way of life, it mocks the suffering and degradation of many muslim women.
9 |
Jen USA,
Friday Mar 27, 2009
Marc and Valerie... I suppose that actually knowing Muslim women who embrace the veil, as both a sign of faith and cultural identity, is the difference. I see it as no different from wearing a cross or a star of david. It has become a political symbol in Gaza. Would you limit their voices? I absolutely do not support coersion! However, this blog posting was ridiculous in it's lack of comprehension of both the culture she wrote about and our western culture. Lahav shows a hypocricy and a disdain that is not conducive to bringing peace or understanding. Bigotry begets bigotry.
10 |
Jen USA,
Friday Mar 27, 2009
Aviv... Did you see Coulter on the View? She accused Barbara Walters of reading from Coulter's new book as if it were Mein Kampf, which just showed again how nuts she is. Coulter doesn't engage in political discourse, she yells her points (which frequently have no basis in fact) and never answers challenges to said points. Re: Peace... The Palestinians need to get their you know what together. But, Israel really has the power in this game and hasn't played fair. Why should the Palestinians? I expect that the day Israel is ready to make a real deal (which may be never), peace will follow.
|
Top Rated Posts
Tags:Blogroll |