Peace efforts: admirable or foolish?

A Palestinian official has complained that Israel is currently offering less than was offered in the last serious efforts at reaching an accord, in 2000-2001.
 
This seems like a ploy to get the sympathy of the world, and put some pressure on Israeli negotiators.
 
Not from me. If this is true, (and truth is a problem with one-sided reports about ongoing negotiations) then I applaud the Israeli posture. In response to the Palestinians, I ask if they expect a reward from the Israelis for seven and one half years of violence under the heading of intafada.

Ceasefire? What ceasefire?

"Wow!" is the only response possible to a headline from news.walla.co.il. "Fatah Threatens: We Will End the Cease Fire with Israel."
 
I had not noticed that there was a cease fire.
 
It did not seem like a cease fire when a gang of Palestinians, members of one of the several security forces supposedly directed by Fatah President Mahmoud Abbas, killed two Israeli hikers three weeks ago. Nor is it a cease fire that brings the IDF into cities of the West Bank, presumably controlled by Fatah, to deal with people wanted for violence against Israeli civilians.
 
Further down in the same article was the news that Abbas was threatening to resign as President of the Palestine National Authority, and end the peace process if Israel did not stop attacking fellow Palestinians in Gaza.
 
Does this mean that Israel should accept more than 50 missiles per day fired at its civilians, and not take any action?
 
Yesterday there was a report that Abbas complained to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and said that President Bush's dream of peace in the Middle East was in danger because of Israeli attacks. The report, from Palestinian sources, said that the Secretary of State would pressure the Israelis to stop the attacks.

About this blog

Window on Israel Hebrew University Political Science professor evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Search this blog

Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. Ceasefire? What ceasefire?
    EEEE MMM dd, yyyy
  2. Ceasefire? What ceasefire?
    EEEE MMM dd, yyyy
  3. Ceasefire? What ceasefire?
    EEEE MMM dd, yyyy
  4. Peres's vision: succint and memorable
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Sunday May 11, 2008
  5. Peres's vision: succint and memorable
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Sunday May 11, 2008

Recent Comments

gad jer is: all life is sacred. thats whats missing here
Chris: What about Daniel 9:24-26a? The time span from Artaxerxes’ decree to rebuild the city in March 444 b.c. until Christ’s crucifixion in April a.d. 33 covered 483 prophetical years (173,880 days). This calculation agrees perfectly with our own solar calendar. Thus, Daniel predicted that 483 prophetic years would lapse from Artaxerxes’ decree until the death of the Messiah. There is no one else that fits this prophecy.
Chris: Interesting that Hashem wrote in Zechariah 12.2-3 : "Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem. And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it." Man will never solve mankind's problems despite the best efforts and intentions of people. It will take divine intervention.