Monday Dec 10, 2007

Window on Israel: 'We know better'

Posted by Ira Sharkansky
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Is Iran pursuing the development of nuclear weapons or not?
 
Someone outside of the Iranian loop is not likely to find a clear answer .
 
Israeli officials are close to wetting their pants due to the change in United States intelligence estimates. Now it looks like the United States will not be attacking Iranian nuclear sites, and may not even be able to obtain any multi-national agreement to increase the weight of sanctions.
 
Mohammad El Baradei, the director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, is crowing that "we told you so," and has reaffirmed Iran's certificate of kashrut.
 
One suspects that more than a few Europeans, as well as Russians and Chinese, are happy to see a bit of egg on George W. Bush's face. The president who invaded Iraq on the basis of flawed intelligence is left with a sea change in his own intelligence on Iran. Reports are that the intelligence on Iraq was not simply flawed, but the product of an Iraqi who successfully pursued a scam on American operatives. As a result, there are several portions of egg on the face of the unpopular president.
 
Controversy about these changes in estimates may be academic for Americans, Europeans and others who are not on Iran's publicly announced list for annihilation. If the Americans got it wrong in 2003, and/or 2007, it is not too important. They have survived nuclear weapons in the hands of the Soviet Union/Russia, China, North Korea, India, Pakistan, and almost Libya. They will find a way to live with nuclear weapons in Iranian hands, if or when it comes to that.
 
What about Israel? Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is noted for denying the Holocaust, saying that if it did occur European countries must provide room for Israelis, because it is necessary to wipe Israel off the map.
 
I do not know for sure that Israeli policymakers are wetting their pants, but several of them have expressed something in the range of dismay, frustration, and indecision on account of the latest American intelligence estimate. Jewish activists are more forceful. One item that found its way to my mailbox this morning, from an American who calls herself the Founder and President of the Israeli Project:

New press reports today about the recently released National Intelligence Estimate report on Iran lead readers and viewers to believe that the Islamic Republic has ended its nuclear weapons program. We know better.

"We know better" consigns this message to my fat file labeled "Jewish junk." It is the kind of mindless panic that feeds skepticism about the Israeli enterprise.

Which does not mean that there is no cause for Israeli concern.

Shimon Peres is more cogent, prestigious, and persuasive than the Founder and President of the Israeli Project. He comes to this issue as President of Israel, holder of a Nobel Peace Prize, and several decades of being to the left of the Israeli center, an optimistic, tireless and often tiring worker for peace. He is less than impressed with the latest American intelligence estimate. If it is true, he asks, then why has Iran invested so heavily in developing long range missiles that can carry nuclear warheads?

In this and other intelligence estimates, there is nothing approaching certainty. The latest American estimate has provoked a number of inquiries far more profound than "We know better." I do not think we will see an American attack on Iran during the coming days, or a heavier set of economic sanctions against Iran. We can expect further inquiries about this intelligence estimate.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print
Post your own comment
Be the first to comment to this post
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Window on Israel Hebrew University Political Science professor evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. The 'clash of civilizations'
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  2. An impossible dream?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  3. Life and death on King David street
    Posted in Reform Reflections by Rabbi Michael Marmur
    Thursday Jul 24, 2008
  4. Good news from American campuses
    Posted in Classroom Battlegrounds by Dr. Mitchell Bard
    Wednesday Jul 23, 2008
  5. Miss Sheitel 2008
    Posted in Modesty Blasé by Modesty Blasé
    Sunday Jul 20, 2008

Recent Comments

Ed M. United States: I am an American, the way we have to fight a war today disgusts me!! we have to be politically correct when we fight wars today, we have to advise lawyers today, PATHETIC!! war is hell, during WWII and to some extent vietnam, because vietnam was a political war run by beurocrats in Washington. My point is if you have to go to war, you fight to win, no matter the cost to mosques, collateral damage, civilians, etc. the war in the pacific was ended with 2 bombs, and the Japanese were begging to end the war, in Europe we bombed everything into oblivian, no political correctness, just VICTORY!!
ben hillel: Sharkansky says that Israel's potential next leaders have greater experience than the U.S. presidential candidates. That's right, but it fails to note what kind of experience that constitutes. Bibi was a failure as PM, and as finance minister had great success in simultaneously making the rich richer and the poor poorer. Barak was completely ineffective. Then let's take -- well you take, please -- Mofaz, who has done nothing at Transport and whose major accomplishment as chief of staff and at Defense was failing to prepare the army for what it faced in 2006.
Mike Germany: Don't envy the Norwegians, let the European nations serve as a warning. It took the compeat destruction of the continent bafore Europeans stopped waging war and settled down to building themselves a future. The Mideast is now n a position Europe was in a century ago - Will it take the compleat destruction of the region to achieve lasting peace?