Thursday Nov 05, 2009

Window on Israel: On the value of realism

Posted by Ira Sharkansky
Comments: 4
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

What does the future hold?

Who knows? In Jewish tradition, Malachi was the last prophet, i.e., the last person to hear the word of God. He died  2,500 years ago. All else is speculation, whether colored by ideology, what the speculator would like to happen, or what is thought to be inevitable.

There are many who think that unless Israel shows more flexibility, its future will be nasty, brutal and short. It is likely that the Arabs will continue to multiply. Soon, if not already, they will be a majority between the Jordan and the Mediterranean. Their power will increase in international forums, not only because of numbers and oil, but because American and European governments will tire of Israel's stubbornness.

The settlements, in particular, are a problem. They must go, or at least be frozen, to satisfy the current demands of the Palestinians. Insofar as the Palestinian prime minister has said there will be state in two years, Israel must work hard to salvage what it can.

Dream on, those of you who forget, or who would not like to reckon with the element of power in international politics.

The Palestinians and their friends, including Americans and Europeans, have lost the Israeli Left. Meretz and Labor declined to their lowest polls ever in the previous election. Since then, the Labor leadership has coalesced with right-of-center Likud.

The Israeli government, and the dominant Jewish population, hold the keys to Israel's future. The country has a preponderance of military power in the area of conflict. It inflicted severe damage on Lebanon and Gaza in the most recent conflicts, and destroyed Syria's nuclear facility without a response. Greater powers have shown no signs of imposing their will.

Things do change, but no one knows the future. In the absence of certain knowledge, it is wise to assume that present realities will continue. Dreamers and ideologues may be right, but theirs is a risky bet.

While European and North American leftists, along with moderate allies, do not feel comfortable with what Israel has done, their governments have shown an understanding of the Israeli rationale.

No doubt the United Nations is firmly in the Palestinian camp. The most recent indication is the Secretary General's condemnation of Israel for its violation of Palestinian rights in east Jerusalem.

After an court ruled that a Jewish family was the owner of a disputed property, the police implemented the order, removed the Palestinian family, and allowed the Jewish family to move in. Palestinian neighbors scuffled with police while trying to block the transfer, and the UN Secretary General expressed his views.

When an Arab family moved into this building in French Hill, it did not require a court order, there was no demonstration by neighbors and the Secretary General of the UN did not take notice of the event.

And what if the Palestinians have, or acquire, a majority between the Jordan and the sea? Who will make Israel accept a one-state solution with majority rule? It is most likely that those who suffer from an increase in population and congestion in Palestine will be the Palestinians.

The security barrier being built between Israel and the West Bank may remain for fewer or more years than the Berlin Wall or the Great Wall of China.

It does not seem likely that the Israeli public will warm to the idea of removing settlements. The Palestinians have themselves to thank for that reluctance, due to all those rockets fired to Israel from Gaza, before and after the removal of settlements.

Nobody knows what God has in store for us. And nobody knows the future of international politics. That will depend on numerous events, some already seen but others to unfold tomorrow, next year and later, beyond anyone's capacity to predict.

Israel's advantages may not last forever. The British, French, Dutch, Portuguese, Belgian, German, Spanish, and Soviet empires are no longer with us. The United States is changing in its cultures and economy, and the greatness of its power is no more assured than that of all those empires.

We would all be wiser if we left the future out of the conversation, and concentrated on what is likely to make the present more tolerable.

Israeli leaders have made decent offers to Palestinians, in 2000 and 2008. Now it is time to hear from the Palestinians, other than their unchanging demands for "More."

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Manuel H. Lazerov USA, Thursday Nov 05, 2009
Your article expresses exhaustion and despondency because of Arab intransigence. You beg the Arabs to show reason. You even assume that they have the capacity or willingness to exhibit reason. After all of these years of disappointments, where on this G-d's earth did you ever acquire those notions? Nations were formed, built and sustained by the resolution of its people, by their successes and with their endurance . Waiting for the "other side" to aspire to your needs is futile---worse, delusional. When their failure is sufficiently painful, there will be peace. Until then, it'll be Israel's.
2  |   Vladimir, USA, Friday Nov 06, 2009
You want a suggestion? It is more than obvious: implement the decision of the League of Nations, create Jewish National Home in Mandatory Palestine. This is the international law that is still not implemented. Stop using political fraud term "palestinians", there are none. Treat the issue as it should be: Jewish vs. Arab conflict, only. Borders must be changed with respect to this conflict. All western Mandatory Palestine must be return to Jewish sovereignty, Arabs must be mandatory resettled to eastern part with compensations and new constructions there. Abdullah to Damascus, Asad out.
3  |   Shahab Mohd Altaf INDIA, Saturday Nov 07, 2009
Israel has military power, resilience, but what about providence?Read the history of Pharoah and Moses, the parting of the Red Sea ? Self-confidence is good, but Hubris and vanity are worse than death by a thousand cuts.No army can stop the force of an Idea whose time has come.Palestinian State is long overdue and Israel needs to accept reality.Power has its limits, reason has its limits but Fear GOD as He has no limits.Violence by Hamas is condemnable but the message of the Goldstone report speaks volumes of the situation in Jerusalem, Gaza, West bank and Israel itself.Fear GOD !.
4  |   Chris USA, Saturday Nov 07, 2009
If the UN is successful with the Goldstone report the muslims nations will begin erroding Israeli sovereignty by compromising the IDF command structure and nibbling away at Israel's assumed nuclear repertoire until eventually this nation becomes incapable of defending itself. Through a process of economic and financial leveraging eventually its jewish character will be assimulated into Islam as has happened some many times throughout the years to various individuals. How long will people like you be able to stick your head in the ground and pretend time is on your side? When you speak arabic?
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Window on Israel Hebrew University Political Science professor evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Al, USA: I agree with Ira. Gilo is part of Jerusalem and should remain so. Pres. Obama is naive and doesn't really understand the situation. However, if he does that is even worse, for he then is intentionally undermining Israel and the city of Jerusalem. Winners of wars and territories traditionally have not returned won territories unless they got something substantial in return. So far the PA has been unwilling to do so. We saw the consequences of leaving Gaza.
Pero, massachusetts: To shani: what about the sinai? israel returned to egypt 1981, and only agreed to do so in 1977, 4 years after the youm kippour war. what about when israel pulled out of lebanon? isnt that in the last 500 years. and anyway, just because something is won in war doesn't make it legitimate To neal: Britain's mandate was based on the fact that it conquered palestine. what right does britain have to give it away? is this your logic? things can only be won through. my friend, if that is your logic, arabs will be in a perpetual state of war with you, be cause you have no legitimacy.
Jay: yes possession counts! by your logic " EdB" the United States should give back all the land it stole from the Indians over the early years of the US's massive expansion. Israelis have more right to all of Jerusalem, Judea (hello?) & Samaria then do the americans to places like the state of Iillinois, Michigan, Ohio ect... because they all in fact had large native populations pre-dating the conquest of european/anglo-saxon's and would be the "palestinians" of today. with one big exception: the Jews pre-date the "palestinians" on this land by 2000 years.