Wednesday Jan 21, 2009

Window on Israel: Considering the aftermath

Posted by Ira Sharkansky
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Gaza did not fix everything. Our part of the world is still upside down.
 
Hamas fighters are strutting on the main streets with their weapons, while their leaders proclaim victory from underground shelters.
 
Like Hassan Nasrallah, their counterpart in Lebanon, they may stay underground for the indefinite future. Perhaps they fear Israel if they peek out to the sunlight, or dare hold a victory rally in the open. Or they may fear the people of Gaza, faced with the rubble of wild promises.
 
Ban Ki-Moon, the United Nations Secretary General, is visiting Gaza and Sderot. He laments violence against civilians in both places, but only in Gaza does he call it totally unacceptable, requiring international investigations and charges of war crimes against those responsible.
 
Israel survived Kofi Anan's tantrums. It will still be here when Ban Ki-Moon is collecting his pension.
 
One should not expect much better. With a third of the world Muslim, and much of that off the rails of rationality, one must expect persistent claims of victory from the likes of Hamas, Hizbollah, and Iran, as well as condemnation from United Nations personnel beholden to the votes they can muster.
 
The noise does not make for gaiety in the Promised Land, even though we are doing better than those claiming victory in Lebanon and Gaza.
 
The latest sign of Israeli caution, also against the grain of what is happening elsewhere, appears in the responses to a query on a popular web site: 

  • 21 percent  of 6,000 respondents answered that "Obama's swearing-in fills me with hope for a better future"
  • 43 percent answered that "Obama's swearing-in fills me with dread for the future of Israel and the world"
  • 36 percent answered that "I don't have expectations and therefore will not be disappointed." 

Saudi Arabia pledged $1 billion to rebuild Gaza, Kuwait a quarter of that, Dubai a bit less than Kuwait, and Bangladesh $20,000. If there is a repeat of past financial pledges to Palestine, substantially less than those amounts will leave the pockets of the donors, and an impressive portion of that which leaves their pockets will end up in the pockets of well placed Palestinians.
 
Oil is back into the $30s. Along with recent events, that might limit Iran's inclination to make another sizable investment.
 
European governments are talking about aid, not to Hamas but to the "official" government of Mahmoud Abbas. Should we remind them that his term has expired?
 
For some time to come, Gaza is likely to be an organizational as well as a physical mess.
 
Palestinian suffering does not make me happy, except that keeping busy with scrounging money, and rebuilding, may keep them away from rocket launchers.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Post your own comment
Be the first to comment to this post
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Window on Israel Hebrew University Political Science professor evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. World opinion: who cares?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Glen A. Fritz
    Tuesday Nov 17, 2009
  2. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  3. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Laine Frajberg Montreal: Response to John R #10, Why not set an example John and return the southwest to Mexico which Pres. Polk STOLE fron Mexico in 1847?You Americans called it "manifest destiny".The rest of the world called it THEFT. Till then you have no right to criticize Israel for taking-and keeping- land in a DEFENSIVE WAR.Now go away!
Laine Frajberg Montreal: Response to EdB #1, Hey Ed,didn't your country steal northern Georgia from the Cherokee in 1838?You did this even though the Cherokee were at peace with you and your own Supreme Court declared that the Cherokee had a right to retain their land.Didn't make any difference.General Winfield Scott expelled them anyway-and over a quarter died on the way to their new homes.Contrast this with Israel,which took east Jerusalem after being attacked by Jordan on June 5,1967-so indeed Israel's Jews have every right to build anywhere they want in Jerusalem.
David USA: Just when did Gilo become part of Jerusalem? Surely not at the time of David hamelech. When and by whose idea was Gilo "Jerusalemized "? Pretty soon Maale Adumin will also be Jerusalem. And why not Ariel ?? The sky is the limit when it comes to gerrymandering. (For instance, Montreal could become New York just at some poltician's say-so, even if Canada objects).