Thursday Oct 08, 2009

Window on Israel: Competing to establish Palestine? Or to kill it...

Posted by Ira Sharkansky
Comments: 8
BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Decrease text sizeDecrease text size
Increase text sizeIncrease text size

Recent expressions coming from the Palestinians reveal a chronic internal competition that does not auger well for their ability to get it together and reach statehood.
 
A week ago the Palestine National Authority, presumably under the direction of Mahmoud Abbas, withdrew its demand that the Goldstone Report move up from the United Nations Human Rights Commission in Geneva to the Security Council in New York.
 
Leading Palestinian voices accused Abbas of caving into Israeli demands, and say he did it to get Israeli permission to open a second Palestinian cell phone service, in which they claim his son had a financial interest.
 
Abbas responded with a "who, me?" He insisted that he was acting on the advice of the United States rather than pressure from Israel, and that his son was not involved with the cell phone initiative.
 
Egyptian opposition politicians are calling Abbas a traitor to Palestine, and demanding that the Palestinian ambassador leave Cairo.
 
Leading Palestinian figures accuse Israel of taking more and more land in Jerusalem, say that Arabs are not investing enough in their neighborhoods, and recall that it was Benyamin Netanyahu who opened a provocative site for tourists that threatened Muslim landmarks during his previous term as prime minister in 1996.
 
Abbas has joined the chorus, led by Hamas and its Islamic allies, that Israeli extremists are behind the recent incidents of violence in Jerusalem. Palestinians must defend the sanctity of al Aqsa.
 
This is not the first time Palestinians have accused one another of not being sufficiently shrill, and fiddling with sacred causes. Ranking office holders and their relatives have been involved with selling cement meant for Palestinian purposes to Israelis for building apartments in the West Bank, and even for the awful security barrier.
 
What is most worrying is the inclination of religious and political leaders to goad one another for not being sufficiently extreme on issues of national importance.
 
Prime Minister Netanyahu played a role in this current tussle among Palestinians. He has taken a strong position against the Goldstone Report, telling Palestinians, Americans and others that if Israel cannot defend itself without being dragged into a biased court of international censure, then Israel cannot afford to take any chances for peace. Read that as saying: Promote the Goldstone Report and Kill the Peace Process.
 
It appears that Americans urged Abbas to cool it with respect to Goldstone. This might be an appropriate way to keep the peace process alive, but it also led Palestinians to gang up on Abbas. That provoked him to respond by competing in the condemnation of Israel's imaginary attack on al Aqsa.
 
No matter what the Palestinians do, there are always other Muslims to add to the flames.
 
Against Abbas' decision to cool it on Goldstone comes an initiative from Libya to require the UN Security Council to deliberate on his Report.
 
Meanwhile, Israeli justice deliberates with care. The police arrested Sheikh Raed Salah on a charge of incitement to violence for calling on Muslims to become "martyrs" in defense of al Aqsa Mosque. For those unfamiliar with the language, that is code for violence. However, a local court would not agree to continue his arrest. The most it would give the police was banning him from Jerusalem for 30 days. His lawyer claimed that the source of problems was Jewish radicals who were urging Jews to pray on the Temple Mount.
 
Salah has opponents among religious Muslims as well as among secular Arabs. One of his competitors among religious leaders chided that he was leading a race to al Aqsa that would only lead to disaster. Yet an Arab academic who studies such things asserted that a prevailing view among Muslims is that Jews are intent on destroying al Aqsa. 
 
Cultural differences can get in the way of reasoned discussion, here and elsewhere.
 
If this sequence follows the well-established pattern, shouting, incitement, mass demonstrations and manageable violence will escalate in an ongoing competition. There will not only be increasingly extreme claims of what Jews are doing and what Muslims must do, but an increase in drive-by shootings, random stabbings, and suicide bombers seeking their place in Paradise. There will be Jewish funerals and a larger number of Palestinian funerals, rubble where there is now construction in the West Bank, the embarrassment of the Obama White House, and Israelis saying yet again that it is time to say Kadish (the prayer for the dead) for the idea of a Palestinian state.

BOOKMARK or SHARE: technorati digg del.icio.us reddit newsvine facebook What's this?
Print  |  
Comments: Post your own comment
1  |   Bloodyscot Dallas, Texas, Thursday Oct 08, 2009
Two main problems: 1) The Palestian leaders are either greedy or choose to use violence and both care more for their own agenda than helping their people for a better life. 2) Israel's leaders are now following the Zionist/Settlers agenda for a greater Israel which will lead to Apartheid first and later a push to remove all non-Jews from west of Jordan. Both sides are using hate to push their policies and views but some in Israel believe that forcing the Muslims to violence is the best way to stop the peace talks and push Zionist agenda. Where are the videos, Iran had them everywhere.
2  |   Michael, Friday Oct 09, 2009
The Palestinians have been day for day learnt by their leaders there are no compromisses they have to make to the Israelis. Furthermore is the peace process for the Palestinians exactly what the word covers: a process to be followed by new wars from a better position. What do you expect to make about a leader allowing even the slightest compromise? They will run after the political leader, who rejects the compromise. By the time being, there doesn´t make sense talking about peace talks, since no Palestinian leader has the mandate for any concessions neither from their people nor Egypt.
3  |   Albert Reingewirtz PA, USA, Friday Oct 09, 2009
Arab fantazia: Jews destroying Al Aksa. Fact: Arabs blow up mosques daily everywhere they have a conflict between them. The only one's who could destroy Al Aksa are Arabs to be able to claim Jews did it. Al Aksa is only a pretext, a rallying cry against Israel.
4  |   The other Bob - USA, Friday Oct 09, 2009
Check out the 'Blame' vidio. The imam starts off with the absurd assertion that Bibi had promised Jewish radicals that they could 'have' all Aksa and these groups were planning to storm it. He then goes on to aver their right to defend their mosque. But, while doing so, refers to a stroming of Aksa AS IF HAD HAPPENED. He went from ridiculous allegation done deed in a matter of seconds! These people make the sleeziest of ambulance chasers seem like choir boys in comparison.
5  |   Dolly Langley Tel Avv Israel, Saturday Oct 10, 2009
The arrogant and delusionary Arabs now have the impudence of accusing Israel the Jewish State 'of taking more and more land in Jerusalem!' From which Authority had they ever learned that Jerusalem 'The City of David' belonged to anyone other than the Jews? That it was their Defence Minister Moshe Dayan who gave over the Temple Mount to the Arabs as a goodwill gesture after Israel's Victory of the' 6 Day War'? Is it feasible for Jews to live side-by-side with these ignorant and hostile Arabs whose only knowledge is that which they have been brainwashed with? NO! Never
6  |   Dagma Langley Tel Aviv Israel, Saturday Oct 10, 2009
Kill it. To establish 'Palestine' is an endorsement of the Palestinian Charter which obliges the Palestinians to destroy the State of Israel and to create an Islamic one in its place. Arabs have meanwhile been attempting to obliterate Jewish connection when the Jewish presence in Jerusalem in 636 CE anteceded the Muslim arrival by a millenia! with on-going Wars between Arab and Jew and Arabs defeated every time, the last one 'Cast Lead' in 2088/89. Enter now a Judge himself a Jew Goldstone and if he be nota Partisan/Arab himself. Kill it I say No Palestine not ever.
7  |   flower, USA, Sunday Oct 11, 2009
sorry for the repeat but as was said before - the PA Arabs never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity...they silmply do not want peace and they go through hoops and loops to prove it . OK already.We are convinced.
8  |   sal california USA, Sunday Oct 11, 2009
JUST KILL ITwhy play with scorpions
Add your comment remaining characters
Name and Location *

NOTE: Comments are moderated and will not appear on this blog, until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting.

For more information, please see our
Readers' Submission Policy.

E-mail * (will NOT be published)
Your Blog/Website
--------------------------------
* All fields are required

About this blog

Window on Israel Hebrew University Political Science professor evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular

  1. World opinion: who cares?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Glen A. Fritz
    Tuesday Nov 17, 2009
  2. Mr. President, bring the troops home
    Posted in Koch's Comments by Ed Koch
    Thursday Nov 19, 2009
  3. Interfaith dialogue - naïve or necessary?
    Posted in Guest Blog by Ruth Wasserman
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  4. Who will take care of my fruit trees?
    Posted in Making Aliyah by Jonathan Feldstein
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009
  5. Our base is broader
    Posted in Green-Lined by Yisrael Medad
    Sunday Nov 22, 2009

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Laine Frajberg Montreal: Response to John R #10, Why not set an example John and return the southwest to Mexico which Pres. Polk STOLE fron Mexico in 1847?You Americans called it "manifest destiny".The rest of the world called it THEFT. Till then you have no right to criticize Israel for taking-and keeping- land in a DEFENSIVE WAR.Now go away!
Laine Frajberg Montreal: Response to EdB #1, Hey Ed,didn't your country steal northern Georgia from the Cherokee in 1838?You did this even though the Cherokee were at peace with you and your own Supreme Court declared that the Cherokee had a right to retain their land.Didn't make any difference.General Winfield Scott expelled them anyway-and over a quarter died on the way to their new homes.Contrast this with Israel,which took east Jerusalem after being attacked by Jordan on June 5,1967-so indeed Israel's Jews have every right to build anywhere they want in Jerusalem.
David USA: Just when did Gilo become part of Jerusalem? Surely not at the time of David hamelech. When and by whose idea was Gilo "Jerusalemized "? Pretty soon Maale Adumin will also be Jerusalem. And why not Ariel ?? The sky is the limit when it comes to gerrymandering. (For instance, Montreal could become New York just at some poltician's say-so, even if Canada objects).