The cooperation of neighbors

Barack Obama and John McCain are trapped by recent events to express themselves on Iraq and Afghanistan.

We should not expect complete honesty from candidates. Humility can add to their stature among those who will read history years later. It may not help with the voters in November.

An unpleasant Israeli episode is relevant.

Envy the Norwegians

Ehud Olmert's problems have deepened, with accusations that he doubled-, tripled-, and quadrupled-billed for his overseas trips while Mayor of Jerusalem and Minister of Trade and Commerce. His lawyers and supporters assert that the violations are technical, the fault of bureaucrats, and trivial. Countering this are claims that Olmert's profits exceed US $100,000, that he managed the techniques employed, and used the money for family travel.
 
We hear competing reports of a government that is not functioning alongside claims of business as usual. Some prophets predict that the prime minister will resign this month. Others say he will dig in, and take advantage of legal and political realities that make it difficult to carry him off against his will.

Newest Judeo-Christian discovery

Another discovery may shed light on the period prior to the birth of Jesus, and add to discussions about Judaism and Christianity. 
 
What is called "Gabriel's revelation" is a stone tablet with 87 lines of Hebrew writing. It describes a prominent national leader who died and came to life after three days.
 
A day after an article about the stone appeared in the New York Times, a Hebrew translation of the Times article began on the front page of the Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz. That evening two professors from the Hebrew University appeared on a major television news program to discuss its significance.

A change of tune for Peres?

There are signs of a political earthquake in Israel.
 
They have nothing to do with charges of corruption against the prime minister, or the maneuvering of aspirants to seek advantage in the expected collapse of Olmert's government, or the election that will follow it.
 
The shock appears in comments of the national peacemaker, President Shimon Peres. He said that there is no chance of peace with the Palestinians.

Israeli vs American approaches to war

Things are not going well for the United States in Afghanistan. The Washington Post headlines an increase in US deaths. Somewhere down in the article, we read that a ranking American official says, " . . . There has to be better governance, less corruption, more economic development and more vigilance paid to counternarcotics in order to ultimately bring peace and stability to Afghanistan."
 
That is spoken by someone who did not ask advice from the British or Russians, both of whom blunted their swords without much effect in Afghanistan.

What about Gilad Schalit?

The government has completed one decision with high emotional costs, and it is coming up to another that will be even more difficult.
 
It has decided to accept a deal with Hizbullah. Israel will release a terrorist responsible for the deaths in 1979 of two young children, their father and another adult, as well as some Hizbullah fighters captured during the fighting in 2006, several dead bodies and an unknown number of Palestinians. In exchange, Israel will receive what is likely to be the bodies of two Israeli soldiers captured in 2006, and some information about an airman who parachuted into Lebanon in 1986, and subsequently disappeared.

Loyalty in politics

A prime minister must view his colleagues as potential competitors, and keep them in line. The country as a whole faces tough antagonists on the international front, who are looking after their own interests. There are also intense enemies intent on doing great harm to Israel.

The Jewish Wars

Religious politicians may start proclaiming against the Conservative Movement's advertisements, and open a new front in the wars among the Jews. Or Orthodox politicians may feel secure enough in their capacity to keep non-Orthodox wedding ceremonies non-legal and off the public agenda.

From one crisis to another

One definition of a good agreement is that no partner really likes it. That pretty much sums up how Israel and Hamas are viewing the terms of a cease fire for Gaza.

Cost-Benefit analysis of Gaza invasion

For all major decisions, including perhaps an invasion of Gaza, Olmert is waiting on the cross-examination of the witness who testified to some activities that look like deception, violation of duties, and perhaps money laundering, tax evasion, and acceptance of bribes. That witness seems flakey, and sometimes worse. He may fall apart in a cross examination.
 
If that happens, the electoral calculations of Kadima, Labor, and Likud may go back to where they were some time ago.
 
There is no reliable way of concluding what is the importance of each of the elements causing a delay with respect to a major operation in Gaza. Virtually everyone is saying that it is inevitable. Virtually no one is saying what form it will take, or that it will happen soon.

About this blog

Window on Israel Hebrew University Political Science professor evaluates the latest happenings in Israel.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. The 'clash of civilizations'
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  2. An impossible dream?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  3. Life and death on King David street
    Posted in Reform Reflections by Rabbi Michael Marmur
    Thursday Jul 24, 2008
  4. Good news from American campuses
    Posted in Classroom Battlegrounds by Dr. Mitchell Bard
    Wednesday Jul 23, 2008
  5. Miss Sheitel 2008
    Posted in Modesty Blasé by Modesty Blasé
    Sunday Jul 20, 2008

Recent Comments

Ed M. United States: I am an American, the way we have to fight a war today disgusts me!! we have to be politically correct when we fight wars today, we have to advise lawyers today, PATHETIC!! war is hell, during WWII and to some extent vietnam, because vietnam was a political war run by beurocrats in Washington. My point is if you have to go to war, you fight to win, no matter the cost to mosques, collateral damage, civilians, etc. the war in the pacific was ended with 2 bombs, and the Japanese were begging to end the war, in Europe we bombed everything into oblivian, no political correctness, just VICTORY!!
ben hillel: Sharkansky says that Israel's potential next leaders have greater experience than the U.S. presidential candidates. That's right, but it fails to note what kind of experience that constitutes. Bibi was a failure as PM, and as finance minister had great success in simultaneously making the rich richer and the poor poorer. Barak was completely ineffective. Then let's take -- well you take, please -- Mofaz, who has done nothing at Transport and whose major accomplishment as chief of staff and at Defense was failing to prepare the army for what it faced in 2006.
Mike Germany: Don't envy the Norwegians, let the European nations serve as a warning. It took the compeat destruction of the continent bafore Europeans stopped waging war and settled down to building themselves a future. The Mideast is now n a position Europe was in a century ago - Will it take the compleat destruction of the region to achieve lasting peace?