|
Sunday Apr 06, 2008
The Sephardi Perspective: The ethnic cleansing of the Jews Posted by Ashley Perry (Perez)
Comments: 34
Today, more than ever, certain obscene canards are thrown at Israel in its war of words with those who seek to delegitimize the Jewish State. A cursory study at the many statements that derive from certain extremists sympathetic to the Palestinian cause would see the lie that Israel is "ethnically cleansing" the Palestinians is rife. Ethnic cleansing has been defined by many people as a variance of acts. Drazen Petrovic wrote, 'Ethnic Cleansing - An Attempt at Methodology' for the European Journal of International Law and defined it as "a well-defined policy of a particular group of persons to systematically eliminate another group from a given territory." I have chosen this particular person to quote as Petrovic is used by probably the best known academic who still clings to the absurdity of the 'ethnic cleansing' claim, Ilan Pappe. Pappe is quoted extensively by all those who seek to make use of this insidious claim. If this definition is reliable then Israel is perhaps the worst 'ethnic cleanser' in the history of man. Based on census figures and demographic trends, in 1947 there were most likely about 740,000 Palestinians living in the area formerly called Palestine. Today, the West bank, Gaza and the Arab citizens of Israel comprise a total of over five million Palestinians (including Israeli Arabs) and over nine million worldwide refer to themselves as Palestinian. To use the popular population growth rate equation, P = Poekt, would mean that the Palestinian growth rate is well above both the average, and even close to double, that of Asia and Africa for a comparable period of time. However, when compared with the demographic trends for the Jews of Asia and North Africa, there appears to be only one type of ethnic-cleansing in the Arab-Israeli conflict. Before 1948 there were nearly 900,000 Jews in 'Arab lands' and only 6,500 in 2001. This means that that there are more than 150 times less Jews in Arab nations than there was 60 years ago. When compared with the demographic trends for the Palestinians, there appears to be only one type of ethnic-cleansing in the Arab-Israeli conflict. In fact, according to a newly released study by former CIA and State Department Treasury official titled The Palestinian Refugee Issue: Rhetoric vs. Reality for the Jewish Political Studies Review, the value of assets lost by both refugee populations is incomparable. Zabludoff uses data from John Measham Berncastle, who undertook the task to calculate the assets of the Palestinian refugees in the early 1950s under the aegis of the newly formed United Nations Conciliation Commission for Palestine (UNCCP). In today's figures, Zabludoff uses the US Consumer Price Index to calculate that the assets are worth $3.9 billion. The Jewish refugees, being greater in number and more urban, had assets that total in today's prices almost double that of the Palestinian refugees. On top of this equation one must remember that Israel returned over 90% of blocked bank accounts, safe deposit boxes and other items belonging to Palestinian refugees during the 1950s. This diminishes the UNCCP calculations further. Whereas the proponent of Israeli ethnic cleansing can show no official command to back up their account, Jewish ethnic cleansing from Arab lands was an official state policy in many instances. Jews were officially expelled from areas in Tunisia and Morocco. The Arab League actually released a statement urging Arab governments to facilitate the exit of Jews from Arab countries, a resolution which was carried out with a series of punitive measures and discriminatory decrees making it untenable for the Jews to stay in the countries. According to The New York Times on May 16, 1948 a series of measures taken by the Arab League to marginalize and persecute the Jewish residents of Arab League member states. The Times article reported on a "text of a law drafted by the Political Committee of the Arab League which was intended to govern the legal status of Jewish residents of Arab League countries. It provides that beginning on an unspecified date all Jews except citizens of non-Arab states, would be considered 'members of the Jewish minority state of Palestine.' Their bank accounts would be frozen and used to finance resistance to 'Zionist ambitions in Palestine.' Jews believed to be active Zionists would be interned and their assets confiscated." In 1967, the Jews of Egypt were detained and tortured, and Jewish homes were confiscated. In Libya the government "urged the Jews to leave the country temporarily", permitting them each to take one suitcase and the equivalent of $50. Furthermore, in 1970 the Libyan government issued new laws which confiscated all the assets of Libya's Jews, issuing in their stead 15 year bonds. However, when the bonds matured no compensation was paid. Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi justified this on the grounds that "the alignment of the Jews with Israel, the Arab nations' enemy, has forfeited their right to compensation. Although these are just a few examples of what became common throughout the Arab world where Jews lived, these measures do not even refer to the pogroms and attacks on Jews and their institutions which caused major parts of the exodus. These facts are conveniently forgotten or not publicized for political expedience. The sad fact is that most Jews and pro-Zionists don't even know many of these facts. This leaves the way open for people like Pappe to spout their half-baked theories without any mention of the true facts of the Middle East's greatest ethnic-cleansing. However, a few recent events are changing people's perceptions of history to include these important events. On April, 1, the US Congress adopted Resolution 185, which grants for the first-time-ever recognition to Jewish refugees from Arab countries. The resolution text urges that the President and US officials participating in Middle East discussions to ensure that any reference to Palestinian refugees must "also include a similarly explicit reference to the resolution of the issue of Jewish refugees from Arab countries." This resolution and greater recognition of the refugee issue and the ethnic-cleansing of Jews from the wider Arab world brings a clearer definition of the history to a greater number of people. This means that many won't be so easily hoodwinked into buying empty and meaningless statements about the ethnic-cleansing of the Palestinian people. It is clear from any standard that one cannot possibly be 'ethnically-cleansing' a people from areas where they have seen growth double that of their neighboring areas. However, a people who have lost more than 150 times their number from an area over a few decades can clearly make a very strong case for being 'ethnically-cleansed'.
1 | Avram, Sunday Apr 06, 2008
it's a fact most of the world want to forget - had the Arabs been remotely 'hospitable' to their brothers like Israel was to hers (we won't go into their racism etc), the 'Arab-Israeli' conflict wouldn't even be around today ...
2 | Reut R. Cohen, USA, Sunday Apr 06, 2008
This is such an important issue that has received so little recognition. It's troubling when we realize just how little attention it has received. Great article!
3 | peggy cidor, jerusalem, Monday Apr 07, 2008
sir
i was born in tunisia, and made alyah to israel in 1962, with my parents . i want to emphasize, that we never heard of any jew expelled from tunisia. tunisian jews had good relationship with their moslem neighbors, and if the conditions for those who decided to leave were harsh - we were not allowed to take with us more than one suitcase per person - it was true for all tunisians citizens, jews and arabs alike.
sincerely
peggy cisor
jerusalem
4 | suzanne pomeranz, jerusalem, israel, Monday Apr 07, 2008
Peggy - you should talk with Gina Waldman about her experience being thrown out of Libya and many, many others! Just because your experience wasn't so bad (only one suitcase? what about your homes, your possessions, etc., even the rest of your clothes?) doesn't mean everyone's was like yours.
5 | Raymond from DC, Monday Apr 07, 2008
I can't see how anyone could suggest the losses between these two refugee populations were even close. While many were craftsmen or minor traders, the Jews included a professional class, owners of factories, land, hotels and department stores. It included bankers and international traders. People forget that Iraqi Jews (Sasoons) helped build up Hong Kong. The refugees from Mandate Palestine had no such economic base.
6 | Eli B. - Brooklyn, NY, Monday Apr 07, 2008
Ethnic cleansing, please...everybody wants it both ways. Does life suck for the Palestinians? Indubitably. Are the refugee camps horrible and inhospitable, the very breeding ground of the extremists who oppose us today? Sure.
But this sort of intellectually dishonest conflation of refugee camps and humiliating searches with the sort of death squads that still roam Africa (Arab ones too, I might add!) or with the Nazis, Stalin, Mao, and their ilk is deplorable. Boggles the mind.
7 | Eli B. - Brooklyn, NY, Monday Apr 07, 2008
Missing for this article: how the Turks and Iranians - non-Arab Muslims - treated Jews after the establishment of the state; I'd be very interested in hearing about that.
I know that many people left, but feel like the situation may have been at least a little bit better for them.
8 | Mark, Monday Apr 07, 2008
Comment #4 - Suzanne: Tunisia was explicitly cited in the post by Ashley. Peggy referred to her FIRST HAND observations in 1962. What does Gina Waldman's experience in Libya have to do with Peggy's experience in Tunisia? This is an interesting and powerful topic, but lumping all countries together and ignoring facts is not helpful. I, as a Jew of Iraqi descent, am well aware of some of the abuses, but that does not justify overstating or ignoring facts.
9 | Rob Barnett, Minneapolis USA, Monday Apr 07, 2008
So this is what Sephardi moral thinking consists of in 2008: Zionist Jews mistreat, uproot and dispossess hundreds of thousands of people because they're different, and it's retroactively justified by subsequent Arab mistreatment of Jews in Arab lands. Others did these bad deeds, so I, the Zionist Jew, had entitlement to do them as well. Pure Zionist moral bankruptcy.
10 | Joe Feld, London, Monday Apr 07, 2008
Well written Ashley. I always enjoy reading your columns. This is an important issue that is conveniently overlooked. Jews had lived in countries like Bavel/ Iraq and Egypt since about 586 BCE. The Arab Muslims only began to arrive from the 7th Century CE, a thousand years later!
11 | Andrew Australia, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
It just shows that the truth seems to be blinded by the nations against the Jews. Twenty years ago in the media in Australia, the Arab-israeli conflict was rarely mentioned. Now it seems to be a one-sided debate favouring the arabs.
Now "safe" countries like Australia, seem to be not such a safe place anymore. Even though I have lived here for 150 years, I was told by a government agency to visit a new immigration centre. I speak great English, I was an english teacher in Israel & 1 million people don't speak english in this country & this has happened...it makes me concerned...
12 | David, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
Everything that Ms. Perry says here is fine, but what about those Palestinian Jews who have lived in their homes for generations, and have been made refugees since the first bloody Arab riots in 1920 and up to and including the War of Independence? Doesn't anyone even care about this bit of history at all?
By the way, if an Arab 'refugee' from 1948 is today, living comfortably in a mansion in Malibu, is he still considered a refugee?
13 | Tarrell Martin, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
We all know that we can't allow anyone to do serious damage to Isreal. So the longer this issue with Iran goes on the more people that will get hurt. Support a Isreal strike to destory Iran's nuke abilities to stop/slowdown this threat. Remember that have alreaay said they are going to wipe Ireal off the face of the Earth.
14 | RaminFromBerlin, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
So when Israel gives 10000 USD to every Iranian Jewish family that leaves Iran and migrates to Israel, then it is the Iranians that are kicking the Israelis out??!?!?!??!
15 | h ny, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
as one whose family had to leave egypt in 1948 ...it is incredible to think how we pervert history. we ontinue on this path with the likes of peace now who pervert it further..they will lead the next disaster to befall our people..the idiotic mentality of one sided peace has never worked and never will. problem is they are the ashkenzic jews who incorproate a failed philosophy that has already cost us more than 6 million. failure to understand your enemy and his philosphy will doom us once again. .the muslim radicals are yelling what they will do and we had better llisten this time.
16 | Aryeh, Brooklyn, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
Regarding Persian Jews, my great grandmother fled Persia in the 1920's and by the time she arrived in Palestine had all but one of her children killed by the Turks. She used her substantial wealth to purchase land but after the foundation of the State of Israel forfeited 100% of it to the Arabs on the West Bank. Her story is not unique, thousands of families who purchased land from the Arabs were not entitled to compensation by anyone. Even Hebron, for example, is full of Jewish homes occupied by owners who acquired the property by force of pogrom.
17 | Mark, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
To #9 Rob Barnett and #12 David - Except for the few "true believers" most Jews, Sephardic or otherwise, do not deny that SOME of the emigration from 1948 Israel was due to abuses of Arabs living there. How much is oft disputed. Rob assumes, however, that all of the emigration was due directly to acts of Jews, when there is ample evidence (radio broadcasts and speeches) that the Arab states encouraged much of it. Regardless, the fact is that somehow the plight of the Jews living in Arab lands has been ignored.
18 | Mark, Tuesday Apr 08, 2008
ContÂ’d from previous post - Aside from raising the ethnic card to explain this lack of attention, there is another obvious explanation raised indirectly by David. The Jewish refugees were not (at least by policy) kept living like refugees 60 years later, but the Arab refugees have been. The fact that the Jewish refugees picked themselves up (with much help from their brethren) from the mess they were placed in should not provide an excuse to those who abused them.
19 | Eli B. - Brooklyn, NY, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
...Rob 9: Ashley's article is pointing out historical facts that are often overlooked and doesn't even address the refugee situation stemming from 1948. Neither I nor Ashley made the claim that the 'uprooting' of Arabs from their homes is retroactively OK, it is you who imposed this view on us.
It is worth mentioning that while the Jews took care of their own when forced to flee, the Arabs chose to let their kin rot in the camps, in part creating today's refugee problem. Cheap way of scoring brownie points on the Arab street without solving the people's real problems.
20 | Levani , Suva Fiji, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
Bravo to you Sir. for this article now we know how one -sided are some of the UN policies towards israel. Nobody can change God's plan for Israel , not he UN,Arab League or anyone whatsoever.
21 | kemal pasha, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
If jews think they can live in an arabic country that has depotic rulers and fundamentalist they are kidding themselves. Israel is the only salvation. For now America is safe however under Obama sharia law will come here - hence massive jewish aliyah to Israel.
22 | Rob Barnett, Minneapolis USA, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
#17/Mark, A significant minority of the Palestinian refugees were forcibly expelled. That is historic fact. The others fled for a variety of reasons, not least of which were warfare, threats, and violence. To attribute all of the flight to radio broadcasts is disingenuous and just a classic, staple Zionist tactic. While only some of the refugees were expelled, ALL who sought to return were barred because they weren't Jews, and Israel has behaved unjustly and bears responsibiity for ALL of them.
23 | Rob Barnett, Minneapolis USA, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
#19/Eli, The article addresses the topic of Palestinian refugees in the first several paragraphs with an emphatic tone toward demeaning, denying, and dismissing the injustices Zionism has meted out to the Palestinains as the fantasies of extremists and idiotic academics. It goes on to make use of injustices committed toward Jews in Arab lands to in effect dismiss the notion that any kind of ethnic cleansing against Palestinian Arabs has occurred. The fact that one group of refugees does not seek to return does not mean another group of refugees doesn't have a legitimate grievance.
24 | sol ny, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
As usual, the Arabs start something and then blame the Jews when they lose.
The Jews bought mostly publically owned land during the mandate. Had the Arabs not attacked there would be no refugees.
If Israel truely wanted to kick all of the Arabs out there would not be 1.2 million in pre-1967 borders today.
Pls check the following website which shows another example of the Arabs starting something and crying about their losses later:
http://yije.org/israel/6%20day%20war.pdf
25 | Jack, Toronto Canada, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
As a second generation Sephardic Jew living in Canada, we are blessed to be in a country that has provided economic opportunity and religious freedoms. For those who don't think that Sephardi culture and tradition is on the brink of extinction - you are completely wrong. The entire Jewish population should do all we can to safeguard a culture that we should all treat as our very own. If we don't; we're as guilty as those who collaborated or stood idly by while Jewish communities were "wiped off the map" 60 years ago. Doesn't everyone hear the echo these days resonating from Tehran?
26 | Joseph Abdel Wahed, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
. In 1948, the Arab Leagues announced: "This will be a war of extermination that will be likened to the Mongolian massacre and Crusades." In 1936, Haj Amin El Husseini, Mufti fo Jerusalem called on Palestinain Jews to "rise up as one and kill the Jews, (of Palestine)." They lost and are now whining that they are the victims. Give me a break!
Today, the Arab world is Judernrein.
We lost everything. No trial. No Jury. No Justice.
The Palestinians and Arabs continue their culture of violence while my children continue to work, study and teach tolerance and understanding.
Joe
27 | muslim, Wednesday Apr 09, 2008
THE MEMORY OF THE JEWISH PEOPLE IS LIVING IN A GHETTO...THE WORLD HAS ADOPTED THE ARAB NARRATIVE ...AND THE MEDIA ,THE WORLD PUBLIC OPINION DON'T EVEN GIVE A CHANCE TO THIS PAINFULL MEMORY TO LEAVE THE GHETTO...I DON'T THINK THAT ARABS CAN MANIPULATE SO EASELY WESTERN PUBLIC OPINION...THE ISRAELIS ARE DECENT PEOPLE -THEY TOOK CARE OF THEIR BROTHERS AND SISTERS EXPELLED FROM ARAB COUNTRIES.THE ARABS ARE ANIMALS-THEY LET THEIR BROTHERS AND SISTERS SUFFER IN REFUGEE CAMPS AND USE THEIR BLOOD FOR PROPAGANDA AGAINST ISRAEL...IF ONLY FAISAL AND WEIZMANN...
28 | Laurence Morrell-Maitland, Florida, Thursday Apr 10, 2008
It's time for this type of information to be publicized extensively. I learned years ago in London while at Hyde Park, if you are going to discuss the Mid-East with an Arab, you should know your facts. This includes documented and verifiable information to counter thier fabricated and revisionist retheroic. Let the truth be known. As a Palestinian refugee ( my great grandfather was born in Jerusalem ) I too want to go back home ( to Israel ).
Laurence Morrell
Maitland, florida
29 | I, New Jersey, Thursday Apr 10, 2008
H from NY - you are 150% correct! Problem with today's world is the media - they sway the majority of the population away from news such as this. The world is CLEARLY not listening to Iran and the potentially futile peace talks with Israel. There is no such thing as peace with these people, because they not only want all of the land of Israel, but they want all Jews exhiled. Question is - how do we make the world listen??
30 | Mark, Friday Apr 11, 2008
Rob Barnett - #22: I encourage you to read my comments again. Your indignancy is blinding your objectivity.
31 | gzuckier USA, Friday Apr 11, 2008
Not only Palestinian Arabs and an equal number of Jews from Arabic countries were displaced; at the same time, the number of Hindus and Arabs displaced by the creation of Pakistan dwarfs the Middle Eastern population redistributions. That's the way it was done after WWII, for everyone.
Of all the displaced populations, the only one not quickly assimilated remains the Palestinian Arabs, because they are too useful as a thorn in the side of Israel for their welcoming "brethren" to give them anything more to live for, except hatred-fueled dreams of revenge.
32 | gzuckier USA, Friday Apr 11, 2008
#23, the oppression of Jews by the Arab governments in no way mitigates mistreatment of Palestinian Arabs at the hands of Israel; but to focus on the mistreatment of only one party in the Middle East raises an obvious question of bias, counter to any protestations of simple interest in justice.
So, why don't all those with an interest in justice for the Palestinians regarding their lost wealth, demand that those Arab governments turn all that wealth, confiscated supposedly because of the suffering the Jews caused to the Palestinians, over to the Palestinians?
|