The next challenge

The NIE report regarding the Iran nuclear situation published at the end of last year caused an international storm. The US president, the Israeli prime minister, European and Asian leaders, intelligence agencies and media centers - all attributed supreme importance to the document and proceeded to analyze its meaning.

This is not surprising in and of itself: the possibility that Iran is developing a nuclear program, the possibility that significant economic and political pressure will be applied on Iran; the possibility that the campaign to stop Iran's nuclear program will fail; the possibility that attacking Iran's nuclear sites will provoke a counter-attack; these are all scenarios that have intensely occupied the minds of decision-makers around the world in the Middle East and for world powers such as the US, China, the UK, France and Germany equally. The NIE report was bound to have an impact, direct or indirect, on the scenarios above - and has therefore generated such resonance.

Attempts to taint FADC war report will fail

The Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee's report on the Second Lebanon War numbers 151 pages. The committee worked hard to complete it for over a year; hundreds of hours of discussions, tours and meetings were invested into it; all military investigations of IDF operations and government and cabinet meeting protocols were analyzed in preparation; dozens of officers and reservists were invited to the discussions to detail their takes and experiences during the battles.

The final result is a thoroughly detailed document that strives to describe the war from a balanced perspective. Not everything is dark, not everything is superficial, clear-cut and sensational. There were failures and there were achievements. There were incorrect decisions made and there were courageous rulings.

Not in vain was the document signed by all the committee members, 17 in total from 9 different political factions from the Coalition and the Opposition. Granted, many of them had remarks and reservations about certain conclusions appearing in the report. Nevertheless, the lion's share of the findings, the conclusions and the recommendations were agreed to by complete consensus.

About this blog

Mr. Chairman Chairman of the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee provides his analyses of Israel's policies.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Oz, U.S.: The Cold War, US vs USSR - MAD: Mutual Assured Destruction. It was succesful in providng world peace. If possible, I urge utilizing the policy. Deploy suibs with nuclear launch capapbility. They move continually and preemptive strike on them is impossilbe. This wll deter Iran, probably even terrorists from using WMD. After all, their holy cities and shrine would be placed at risk of your wrath. The big black meteror rock in the Kaaba, pilgimmage site - unthinkable! Use the policy and et it be known you use it. Don't keep it a secret. For the rest: Buffer zones, reclaim land control.
Samuel Eichner L: There is not an easy way out of this problem, but a "combined" attack from the US and Israel (NOT NUCLEAR) will be the only way out.
Jeffrey- Jerusalem: If you think the unity of the current political leadership is the balm for the problem, then you are deluding yourself. The 1967 success was directly attributable to the miracles wrought by the Almighty for his people. How does one unify politicians caught up in their own secular ego trips? At least the late Menachem Begin was a shomer shabat. When politicians are not embarassed to admit publically that they flaunt the Torah and its laws, its little wonder that they do not have the wherewithal to bring about a lasting peace. There is no koach atsem byadi.