The next challenge

The NIE report regarding the Iran nuclear situation published at the end of last year caused an international storm. The US president, the Israeli prime minister, European and Asian leaders, intelligence agencies and media centers - all attributed supreme importance to the document and proceeded to analyze its meaning.

This is not surprising in and of itself: the possibility that Iran is developing a nuclear program, the possibility that significant economic and political pressure will be applied on Iran; the possibility that the campaign to stop Iran's nuclear program will fail; the possibility that attacking Iran's nuclear sites will provoke a counter-attack; these are all scenarios that have intensely occupied the minds of decision-makers around the world in the Middle East and for world powers such as the US, China, the UK, France and Germany equally. The NIE report was bound to have an impact, direct or indirect, on the scenarios above - and has therefore generated such resonance.

Objective: Topple Hamas

During the past few weeks, there have been numerous active public discussions about the steps that need to be undertaken to stop the Kassam rockets from falling on residents in the Gaza periphery.

One of the ministers proposes to "wipe out a designated neighborhood" to make an example of. Another minister proposes to permanently halt electricity and gas supplies to Gaza. Yet another minister sides with going for a large-scale military operation in Gaza - a move that would see Israel in complete control of Gaza by the end.

Knesset members are encouraging a renewed Israeli grasp on the border between Egypt and Gaza in order to minimize the smuggling of weapons and ammunition into Palestinian territory. An opposite view is held by MKs who prefer direct talks with Hamas to fulfill the need for a long-term ceasefire. Another proposal suggests the use of international assistance of bodies such as NATO and the UN whose presence in the region would 'separate' between the sides.

Attempts to taint FADC war report will fail

The Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee's report on the Second Lebanon War numbers 151 pages. The committee worked hard to complete it for over a year; hundreds of hours of discussions, tours and meetings were invested into it; all military investigations of IDF operations and government and cabinet meeting protocols were analyzed in preparation; dozens of officers and reservists were invited to the discussions to detail their takes and experiences during the battles.

The final result is a thoroughly detailed document that strives to describe the war from a balanced perspective. Not everything is dark, not everything is superficial, clear-cut and sensational. There were failures and there were achievements. There were incorrect decisions made and there were courageous rulings.

Not in vain was the document signed by all the committee members, 17 in total from 9 different political factions from the Coalition and the Opposition. Granted, many of them had remarks and reservations about certain conclusions appearing in the report. Nevertheless, the lion's share of the findings, the conclusions and the recommendations were agreed to by complete consensus.

The moment of truth is approaching

In November 2006, when I held a ministerial position in Ariel Sharon's government and was responsible, among other things, for strategic dialogue with the US, I stood at the head of the Israeli delegation preparing for a meeting in Washington.

As is customary, prior to our departure to the US, the delegation was called in for a final briefing with Prime Minister Sharon. We presented to him a list of topics that were on our agenda to be discussed in the US.

We described in detail the Israeli positions as consolidated in discussions by our team, composed of senior officials from the Foreign Ministry, the Prime Minister's Office, the Defense Ministry, the IDF and the Mossad.

About this blog

Mr. Chairman Chairman of the Knesset's Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee provides his analyses of Israel's policies.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Most Popular Posts

  1. The 'clash of civilizations'
    Posted in The Warped Mirror by Petra Marquardt-Bigman
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  2. An impossible dream?
    Posted in In the Trenches by David Harris
    Tuesday Jul 22, 2008
  3. Life and death on King David street
    Posted in Reform Reflections by Rabbi Michael Marmur
    Thursday Jul 24, 2008
  4. Good news from American campuses
    Posted in Classroom Battlegrounds by Dr. Mitchell Bard
    Wednesday Jul 23, 2008
  5. Miss Sheitel 2008
    Posted in Modesty Blasé by Modesty Blasé
    Sunday Jul 20, 2008

Recent Comments

Gary Sutton, Toronto: The noise that Europeans and American make regarding milutary action against Iran - are just that, talk. Some of it is more agressive than other - but still talk. No matter how long it takes for the Ayatollahs to attain a nuclear device, the world (including Israel) are not going to embark on a military option. The main reason is the fear of disruption of the oil flow. They will all learn at the end to live with an Iranian bomb.
Anybody Home: When will you wake up and understand finally that you are all alone from your friend when replying to life and death threat You are told to pull back after all your self-defense wars from your friend. You are told to place hostile state right between your eyes by your friend. You are told that you aren't ijndependent but need ok by your friend. You are not free to act from your friend. You act dependently and not independently. Why, could it be your friend how about commenting to the public who think you're a bunch of cooney lemels.
Gene Germany: Sanctions will fail as they failed in the Oil for Food Program. The greed of the companies to make the hugh profits will continue. China will have a rude awakening along with the EU countires on the higher energy prices after Iran takes over the ME totally with their Nuclear Weapons. Prepare for WWIII all over energy supplies.