Closing the gap

There are several differences between Reut and other traditional think tanks. Most think tanks operate on the assumption that the central problem is connected to the collection and processing of information. So they deal with research. We say that the central problem lies with the cognitive, conceptual understanding of the problem. We don't provide answers, we ask questions.

People in think tanks are experts with knowledge and experience. Our team is young - the average age is 29 and there isn't one PhD among us. That means that we can ask questions, that we can apply ourselves to think about problems in a fresh way.

The Reut Policy Network

Jewish communities around the world represent a massive untapped intellectual potential for Israel. This potential is compounded by many Israelis who wish to make a substantive contribution to our wellbeing and security. The goal of the Reut Policy Network - RPN - is to provide an outlet for all of this energy and to allow the Government of Israel (GOI) to tap into this resource.

The Web 2.0 technologies have opened up new possibilities of connections and interaction. They allow for content and substance to be created through the inputs of many contributors who form virtual communities. Of the prominent examples for web 2.0 platforms are youtube, Myspace, Facebook, or LinkedIn.

The Jewish world has been impacted by these trends as well. A while back Amiram Barkat of Ha'aretz reported on the emergence of a new virtual culture centered around the internet. One such example, JewTube, is trying to create an online Jewish community based around videos of Jewish interest.

About this blog

A Link in the Chain Founder of the prestigious Reut Institute, Gidi Grinstein, blogs about his vision for Israel and 21st century Zionism.

Search this blog

Archives
Combined feed for all JPost.com blogs

Top Rated Posts

Recent Comments

Roddy Frankel: Perhaps a worthwhile application of your think-tank is optimizing the negotiation process with the PA. Some questions that need to be asked: 1) What principles will define the movement of Arabs and Jews across borders, in both directions? 2) What principles will define land ownership, and citizenship, on both sides, for all religious groups? 3) What principles will define the protection of and access to public holy sites? I think you get the idea. These questions have been largely ignored in any public debates. Isn't it better to resolve these issues before borders are drawn?
Yosef - Israel: Your shallow hubris is simply stunning. Whatever you don't explain is either not important or doesn't exist! After Oslo we expect some humility, not more of the same simplistic "instant fix" solutions! NO system will help if there are no real leaders and no real direction.
Scott, Leeds,Yorkshire UK: I really feel for the people of Israel just now. However as a distant observer ... based in the UK ... it is probably easy for me to make glib remarks when I do not have to suffer the indignities or experience the exigiencies of the Israelis. What I would say is this ... stay strong ... do not give in.